F1 Winter Break
2017
Monaco GP playing out amid moves on long term Ferrari F1 driver line up
Scuderia Ferrari
Sebastian Vettel
Posted By: James Allen  |  28 May 2017   |  7:55 am GMT  |  97 comments

Starting with a front row lock out for the Monaco Grand Prix is a nice place for an F1 team to be, even if it does come with some pitfalls and nothing is a given at this track.

Ferrari threw away a front row lock out in Russia, so will not want to repeat the error here.

Meanwhile behind the scenes the two drivers involved are in the middle of discussions on whether they will remain with the team and what happens on track plays into those discussions.

Let’s start with Sebastian Vettel. His contract expires at the end of this 2017 season and his state of mind at this point with regards to the Maranello team is quite different to how it was at the end of last, when there was clear disaffection and some words were spoken. Rumours circulated that he had signed some sort of pre-agreement with Mercedes for 2018, but there has been (and won’t be) any confirmation on either side of this.

Sebastian Vettel

Vettel is likely to stay at Ferrari. Some say it’s done, other influential voices say it’s still being done. Ferrari chairman Sergio Marchionne has said recently, “If he likes our car then Vettel can stay with us a long as he wants,” while former Ferrari champion driver now Mercedes F1 team chairman Niki Lauda said this weekend, ” No driver who can win the title in a Ferrari thinks of walking away.”

The other side of the garage is more interesting.

Kimi Raikkonen will be 38 years old in October and has managed to survive each of the last few seasons at Ferrari, after some indifferent performances, through a combination of being well liked by the team, causing no friction with his team mate and the fact that Ferrari’s decision makers couldn’t see any viable alternatives with the right mix of speed, experience, consistency and personal fit.

Kimi Raikkonen

This season he has been driving well – clearly the 2017 high downforce cars suit his style – and has been close to a pole position a couple of times. He finally got one in Monaco, ending a 128 race streak with no pole, the longest in F1 history. That said, he still has around half the points that his team mate has scored in the championship, but he’s contributing more than in the last few years and he’s a presence at the front.

Going into this Monaco weekend the word was that the team was lining up Sergio Perez to come in for 2018.

The Mexican, who has been consistently impressive this season, did a deal with Force India last season to stay, after coming close to doing something with Renault. But he kept his options open knowing that there could be either a Ferrari or a Renault up for grabs later this year. He has Ayrton Senna’s former manager, Julian Jakobi, in his corner but also great support from Mexican telecoms billionaire Carlos Slim Jr, who is fighting his corner.

Asked this weekend by Gazzetta dello Sport about possibly replacing Raikkonen at Ferrari, Perez made a rather enigmatic response, “I’m very happy at Force India, but all drivers want a better opportunity. Ferrari has made impressive progress. In the event that they want to change drivers – and maybe they do, who knows..But I don’t know anything about that at the moment.”

Sergio Perez

Carlos Sainz is the other driver in the mix, young, fast and consistent, who Ferrari have evaluated and who also came close to doing something with Renault, but was blocked by Red Bull. He is more likely to end up alongside Hulkenberg at Renault, as things stand.

Has Raikkonen’s Monaco pole position reaffirmed Ferrari’s confidence in the Finn, that he can keep on performing into his 39th year? A two year deal would take him to 40.

Raikkonen remains hugely popular with his fanbase and is still a huge name for the sport as a former world champion.

What do you think? Leave your comments below

Featured Video
Behind the Scenes at the track
Behind the Scenes at the track
Featured News in ferrari
MORE FROM Ferrari
LATEST FROM THE SCUDERIA FERRARI COMMUNITY
Previous
Next
Share This:
Posted by:
Category:

Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment.

97 comments

by Oldest
by Best by Newest by Oldest
1

I said two years ago that Kimi might as well retire, but now I'm getting ready to watch him start the Monaco GP from pole position, so what do I know?! Perez would be a good choice for them, I can't see Red Bull releasing Sainz until his contract runs out. As I'm so good at predictions, here's my line up for next year. Merc, Red Bull, McLaren, Haas and Torro Rosso, no change. Williams, Stroll + Nasr. Force India , Occon + Wehrlein. Renault, Hulkenberg+Ghasly.

2

After today's Monaco race, Kimi might be thinking of retiring irrespective of what Ferarri might want...

3

I see either Bottas or Max V will take Kimi seat.

Lets see

4

I don't see Max going there just yet, Valterri would seem a logical choice to replace Kimi, but maybe he would like to stay at Mercedes? Perez is the paddock rumour, and I think it makes sense.

5

How cool would it be: "Rosberg makes a comeback with Ferrari!"

That would be soo nice i would love to see him back racing!

6

Bbernie. Nico is saying that he doesn't want to come back, but people do change their minds. I can't help thinking that if he does come back, it will be to McLaren....

7
Kenny Carwash

When was Rosberg initially contracted until? I think Mercedes would need to grant permission for him to race for someone else before the deal he retired from has expired. Can't see it happening, though - I think his reasons for retiring were entirely genuine and I doubt he'll look back.

8

While pole at Monaco for Kimi is impressive, I don't think it will be enough for him to be re-signed. Considering how good the Ferrari is this year, they should be leading the WCC at the moment. The reason they aren't, is all down to Kimi's results with that car.

9

KRB, I predicted that last year would be Kimi's last in F1, and the year before that, and the year before that.....

10

I think it's more likely that Ricciardo will move to Ferrari and Sainz move up to Red Bull.

11
Kenny Carwash

I could see Ricciardo going to Ferrari eventually. I think Verstappen & Gasly are the driver pairing Red Bull are aiming for.

12

Ricciardo to Ferrari hmm.. I think then Vettel would leave to Merc.

13

Isn't Ricciardo on contract till the end of 2018?

14

@ John H...I neglected to mention that both Marko and Horner have stated that there are no 'break' clauses in either driver's contract. However if a driver doesn't want to drive then most times a divorce is arranged. Interesting to note that there seems to be some dissension brewing in the team. Ricciardo was well miffed about the quali strategy and he said so openly. Horner has tried to deflect that with some superficial 'flim flam' and Ricciardo is having none of it. Newey doesn't seem to be a very happy chap ATM either after it's now coming up for four years since a WCC and Renault are no nearer to solving any sort of parity with either Ferrari or Mercedes. Red Bull are now, IMO, becoming prone to internals as they struggle to catch up. The solution to the Red Bull's engine supply could well be, we'll let you have Ricciardo for a supply of factory parity engines. That would be a good move for both teams and it would also allow Sainz to move up and partner Verstappen.

15

Ricciardo will not be released from his Red Bull contract says both marko and Horner.

16

I believe both Rdd Bill drivers are firmly under contract for next year, but there are break clauses. Apparently these are, if the team finishes lower than third in the WCC, if the car fails to win a race and if the driver is lower than fifth in the WDC. If two out of three of these conditions are not met, then the driver can walk. The problem is they wouldn't be triggered until after the last race of the season, which would be too late to do a deal for next year.

17

I don't see kimi taking on any other roles in f1 like commentator, ambassador etc. He's a character so I think ferrari should keep him as long as they can. he's well liked no matter which driver you support. he's already retired and come back like Schumacher who was forced out after his return at age 43 I think so kimi still has a good couple of years

18

congrats in monaco. kimi is still the best choice for ferrari long term. whether seb stays or not. should be an exciting race!

19

I like Kimi,but maybe with family and time...he might wish to leave F1,
I think Perez would be good choice to take his seat.
Sainz to Renault as sadly Parmer seems to not have worked out.
Red Bull can not stop/hold back Sainz as they not have room in main team.

20

I think Grosjean has missed the boat when it comes to landing a big team drive. He didn't handle the pressure of having a competitive car in 2012/13 particularly well (nor was his performance vs Raikkonen particularly impressive) and these last two seasons at Haas he has done nothing but complain very publicly which goes completely against the total loyalty Ferrari demand from their drivers.... even Vettel got slapped down for criticising the team at one point last year. Plus at age 31 he is no longer a young talent as teams are already looking at the next generation... Ocon, Sainz, Verstappen, etc.

If Ferrari are going to run this clear no.1 & no.2 set-up it is hard to see a better driver line up than they have now, assuming Raikkonen wants to stop around in that kind of role.

21

What about Grosjean? Deserves a chance, and thought his move to HAAS was a stepping stone to Ferrari

22

+1. Romain Grosjean's name has got to be in the mix. Just down the road at Haas and doing a great job this season. Has worked very hard on his weak points wheel-to-wheel and he's always been a quick driver. He's not perfect but then again, as we saw yesterday, neither is Perez.

23

This thought occurred to me too. Grosjean must have thought about it, too...

24
Torchwood Mobile

@SteveB

Although with apparent good reason, Grosjean complains about the car too often, and that tends to be anathema to the Ferarri tradition.

25

Spot on. Ferrari drivers are not allowed (?) to complain about the Ferrari they are driving in, public. I think he is also somewhat erratic in his overall performance - good on good days, poor on others, and a top team, whoever they are, would not be happy with that. Think that there must be days that Haas wonder what they have got.

26

Will be surprised if Kimi does stay beyond this year. But never say never right!

I think Seb will resign given that things are falling in place and it will checo on the second Ferrari; he deserves it after such consistent performance for FI.

27

Difficult decision for Vettel. Despite being shot down for saying this before, I still believe James Allison had a significant influence on the design of the 2017 Ferrari and they may yet start to struggle without him, especially when the concept for a new car has to be laid down.

28

Ale. Are you really watching F. I mean 2017

Ferrari may struggling? You have great sense of humor indeed
j.Allison worked 3 yrs on Ferrar where he did nothing. Thanks God Sergio Marchionne shelved him

Fir Ferrar 2017 Design. FYI. J Allison has nothing to do with it. As design was copied from old time winner car. Read Giorgio Piola tech analysis to understand how 2017 car was designed

Cheers

29

The 2017 Ferrari was the first year Allison could do a clean sheet design. Previous 2015 & 2016 car designs were already fixed so it was limited what he could do with the car. The 2017 is definitely an Allison car.

30

I think Kimi is exactly the type of driver ferrari needs. Someone who couldn't be in contention for the driver championship all season long but good enough to support the constructor's championship and happy to be the number two driver.

31

Did Kimi look happy to be number two yesterday? I think this is his last season in F1.

32

He just has to accept. After 5 races he is 40-50 pts behind his teammate, I think he has to answer that first. Last season or not, he is past his best as from what we can see since his return to F1.

33

Yep, I agree with you there mate.

34

Well after Monaco Kimi was more angry than I have ever seen. I think it was too early for team oder. Kimi still had better mathematical possibility to WC than for example 2007 when there was 3 race left...

Sadly I see this making Mercedes to do same with Bottas.

And now we could have very good season with 4 drivers running for title. Its maybe time to cut paytelevision contract. Sad.

35

Not too early in my opinion as this season's WDS should be very tight, every point matters. I believe the 40-50 points gap between Seb and Kimi give Ferrari good enough reason to favour Vettel as there are not a lot of tracks that Ferrari is outright faster than Mercedes, which is why they have to give the driver who is leading his teammate by 40-50 pts every chance to get the win in Monaco.

Everyone can see that Kimi is number two compared to Vettel in the past 2-3 seasons. What else is there to let them race to prove who number one and who is number two?

36

Last year he won Seb in Q. WDC is Always WDC but Im not onlyone who thinks clearly deserved is better. Like MS in 2000 for example. Eaven second Seb would have gain to Hamilton. Now I fear there might be clear 1-2 in both topteam and I dont like it.

37

Ferrari are very conservative, they will not not consider Sainz at the moment. He is good but young and still misjudges low-pressure situations just a bit too often: collision with Stroll (30% responsible, Stroll 70), several half spins, getting away with launching himself into the barrier, wrong tyre choice in the wet.
Perez is more mature, he is consistent and delivers in a midfield team. Would not call him 'consistently impressive' though. He is an option but I still feel Ferrari may choose to hang on to Raikkonen a bit longer. He still is a great driver. Problem is, he is so laid back that he does not seem to care how long it takes his engineers to set up his car Kimi-way - and he is rather particular about the setup he prefers. I feel it's been mostly this which brought about the indifferent performances we've seen. He's got to address that and win the occasional race. If Bottas can then so can Kimi, the car is great. In addition, he's got to get himself in the strategic mix. Ferrari want to make Vettel WDC, Raikkonen must prove himself a factor by delaying Mercs and taking away their points. As soon as he nails that I don't see him leaving in 2018.

38

If I were Ferrari, I'd go for Hamilton long term. The best is the best, wht compromise?

Short time Sainz looks electric at times and seems to have the kahunas to deal with being a Scuderia driver. He could develop nicely.

Perez is clearly quick and has done an excellent job in a good midfield team, but I don't think he has the spark to make him stand out as a future great.

39

@ Fiona...Interesting that you say that. I cannot see Hamilton at Ferrari. IMO he just would not fit besides he is not necessarily the best. Yes, i know his history but there are other drivers who could win as easily as he has done given perhaps the most dominant car to grace the F1 world in performance. Perez is good but not exceptional besides he is too prone to mercurial performances. IMO he will follow in the 'hulkenberg' mode being a nearly man. Given the choices you have made i would suggest that Sainz needs another year at TR and then he would be a fit into Ferrari. Just my opinion.

40

Ferrari typically don't go for two No1 drivers.
They try to buy the best driver they can and support him by having a team mate who is adequate but nit a threat to the lead driver.
Which means Dan or Max or Ham won't be in a Ferrari while Vettel is there.
Perez or Sainz both seems suitable candidates.

41

Agreed! Seb to Merc and Lewis to Ferrari.

No team can afford Seb and Lewis in the same time, even Ferrari.

Alonso either quit F1 or stick with McLaren, I think he will stick for another 1 or 2 years.

42

Alo will be gone. Honda cancelled engine upgrade. They are finished. He will do Indy500 and Lemans.

43

I think Carlos Sainz would give them consistency, development and results and also he would push Sebastian to the limit.

What about Lewis James? Lewis Hamilton is such a dominant racer considering not only results on the track but the social media, fashion, tv... It'd b great mix of brands: Lewis Hamilton and Ferrari.

What about Fernando Alonso? He is about to move to IndyCar? His return to Scuderia would give them experience. I remember Grosjean and Perez were considered to b Ferrari's drivers back in 2016 and 2012 but they wouldn't give them consistency in my view. I follow F1 since 1998.

I would like to see Jenson Button or Robert Kubica at Scuderia however it's highly unlikely.

44

Don't think that either of them would agree with you on that!

45

I still think that it's possible that they, Ferrari, will retain Raikonnen for another year if he keeps on driving as well as he has lately. Age, as a pure number, doesn't enter the equation just so long as he fulfills all the ferrari requirements and performs across all aspects. ferrari will keep him on. They do have time on their side and besides that, '18 will throw up further alternatives for them to consider. They have made it clear that they would like to have ricciardo but red Bull have again come out and said 'no way Jose'. Sainz is one name that keeps coming up and i'm pretty sure that he would do well at Ferrari. He is noth fast and he has 'spirit'. he would also be a good fit. Vettel won't leave just so long as he has a car that is competitive. Ideally i'd like to see both he and Ricciardo teamed up as that would be a formidable duo. Unfortunately it won't happen. Perez is for me an unknown quantity. he seems to have good races and so so races. Would he fit in to Ferrari? I don't really know the answer. I don't think so but that means zippedy doo dah really. I guess that all will be revealed sooner rather than later. As for mwercedes, i would be pretty sure that given the maintenance of the status quo Bottas will get another contract. He is proving to be better than i expected and i was somewhat off course when assessing his potential.

46

I like the Button idea, that would be geat.

47

Kimi's seat is the no. 2 at Ferrari. Much as it pains me to say it, that one fits Pérez more than Sainz. Sergio's low key and fuzz free, much in the tradition of no. 2 drivers at the Scuderia.

48

Sainz and Perez are both good choices. I might pick Perez first, though. If I were Ferrari I would pass on Raikkonen for a new contract. I think they can do better.

Would love to see Alonso back in a top team but really don't think it will be with Ferrari.

I also have a feeling that Ferrari would say no to a Hamilton switch. Would love to hear what insiders have to say about that one.

49

I think Kimi will stay another year for his stability and ability. Hopefully Ferrari will let Kimi and Vettel race over the rest of the year, but ultimately I feel Vettel will continue to be the "number 1" driver in the team (from the teams perspective) because of his consistency.

Monaco should be interesting...if the ultra soft does last the whole race as was suggested during practice, I guess we won't see any pit stops until a safety car period. Is it still possible to do a Schumacher-style pitstop on the final lap (1998 Silverstone for 10 sec penalty) and change to the alternate tire? (i.e Keep Kimi out the whole race, enjoy the blue flags and avoid a slow outlap...) The start/finish line isn't until the pit exit... I'm all for controversial wins 😉
But seriously - fingers crossed it's not a procession.

50

That sounds reasonable. I wonder if Perez has been around too long without doing anything spectacular. Sainz has more development potential perhaps.

Both would be good #2 drivers to Vettel. Hamilton and Alonso are both old and problematic. Vettel is good enough to deliver the championship, so no need for 2 #1 drivers I'd say

51

I guess we wont know what Kimi is doing till the Vettel side is locked down.
Great day for Kimi yesterday and was slightly spoilt at the end by some geezer we never saw before conducting interviews over a poor skype connection as we watched in super ultra HD

52

Ooh Tough Call.. I would love to see Sergio Perez in Red next year no doubt about it. But since Kimi is performing better at times this year, he could make it easier if he makes a grace full exit on his own this year when in top form, rather than risking an exit in those 2014 kind of years when things don't suit his driving style.

It could be a fairy tail ending if he could retire this year winning his last race at abu dhabi to boot and then next year reboot with Perez!

53

My money says Daniel Ricciardo, not only he got talent with the balls, though an a Oz born and bread but Italian a pedigree, and since the arrival of Marchionne the moto is Italian made, and they have proved the point with this year car !

54

I'd wait until Sunday late afternoon to see how things go.

55

On Kimi: Leave the man alone, he knows what he's doing :p Experienced and pressure-proof.
On Vettel: only going to Merc if Ham leaves. Merc has no need for a second Ham/Ros scenario
On Perez: viable option, fast, clean and reliable, easy on equipement.
On Grosjean: Cracks under pressure, fast but prone to stupid mistakes, hard on equipement.
On Sainz: viable option: fast (could match VERST), low profile and calm, and young
On Alonso: I guess bridges burnt, very fast but way too much trouble, doesn't understand "team" and his age doesn't help. OTOH, has probably a pact with the devil to be that fast 🙂

56

Too close to call.
So far, while Vettel has been at Ferrari, he has clearly got the better of Kimi.
But when we consider alternatives, we will only find drivers who will 'stir the mud' at Ferrari, and they need to avoid that while they have (finally) established competitiveness.
Clearly, Vettel has the speed to win the championship(s) (depending on whether Mercedes are gaming the entire sport with loads of ready-to-go stuff in the bag, but it is looking as if they may NOT have it; yet, as many of the usual suspects feel ,I won't believe it until Ferrari have won the championship!)
Perez is personally aggressive, so is Sainz. I see them bringing much greater risk of instability due to team mate friction.

Still, will Kimi want to stay?

I think, on balance, Ferrari may want to keep him for team stability.

57
Aaron Noronha

As long as Vettel is ahead of Hamilton, Kimi needs to be ahead of Bottas in the championship by the next 6 or 7 races for him to have any realistic change of keeping his seat. It's still possible they might retain Kimi, although in my humble opinion they should give Sainz or Perez or Grosgean an opportunity instead of relying on a driver that's fairly inconsistent. Don't get me wrong even Vettel has off days but they very few. Hamilton has had 2 off races this year and he is still 2nd in the WDC. Kimi needs to carry his improved qualification form into the race. As for now he is a destined no2 driver.

58

Typical Ferrari, they decided the race before it began and everybody had to endure the charade known as the Monaco grand prix. What an ugly race. Fixed.

59

nonsense.....The strategies only came into play as the race unfolded.

60

Why would you bring in your leading driver knowing he's going to come out into traffic on a track nobody can pass on? That strategy only made sense knowing Kimi is regarded as number 2 by Ferrari. They swapped positions, no question.

61

Ferrari knew exactly what they were doing. Kimi lost 3 sec. to Vettel on his outlap. Race was lost there and Ferrari knew it would happen.

62
Tornillo Amarillo

Sainz is better than Perez.
Perez is easier to hire than Sainz, but Perez personality I don't know if it is perfect for Ferrari.
No need no keep Kimi with such a good alternatives.
But...
If RB releases Sainz, he will be the Ferrari driver in 2018 IMO.

63

To be honest, it hurts to say he must quit. I love him since Michel era but he must consider that he is making unforced error which hurts a lot. He should walked away with dignity.

64

Ferrari has a front row lock out and all of a sudden everybody knows were Vettel is going and Räikkönen is replaced with...
Its way too early for that and as Lauda is saying, Vettel isn't going anywhere soon.
I wish, at this stage, we could talk about other things than rumours on driver line ups for next season.

65

Hans. Not going to happen. Most of fella here like to gossip rather than being technical

66

Sad but true I guess....
Leave them alone, they know what they are doing... 😉

67

Bring back Alesi or Berger. Can't stand half the grid anymore.

68

To me lt looked like Vettel had the speed and made it work and I dont like the way Brundle is trying to make out that it was preplanned. Ricciardo did the same thing to Max and Bottas and no one is claiming that it was intentional. Mercedes did the same with Bottas because on paper pitting first looked the best option. Martin is again showing his cynicism which is why he is my least favourite commentator. Kimi was unlucky with traffic and the last time I looked Ferrari dont control that.

69

Taking to other engineers in airport lounge they feel Vettel was faster

That was proven when he had the extra laps once RAI pitted

Kimi had traffic on our lap and slowish stop - I'm analysing closely for Tuesday's strategy report which will give definitive answers

70
Ashish Sharma

Waiting eagerly for this.

I agree that Vettel was faster, but what i would like to know is if there were there radio messages to Kimi to ask him to speed up knowing Vettel was a threat when he stopped. Even if one believes that Ric and Vettel did luck into the better strategy, Ferrari didn't seem too keen to ensure a Kimi win.

71

All of us could see Vettel was so much quicker than Raikkonen this race. So basicly what we are discussing here is:
Was it possible for Ferrari to plan a strategy were the (much) faster driver is not going to win...
Kinda weird

72
Ashish Sharma

Not just possible, very easily. This is Monaco where track position, not speed, is everything. With an optimal, even equal, strategy Kimi would have won.
What we are discussing is this - Did Ferrari, despite saying in the press that it didn't, actually give Vettel the superior strategy for the win.

73

Ferrari just protected a "One Two". Decisive was that Räikkönen was too slow around the pitstops thus putting Vettel in danger of an overcut by Bottas and Verstappen.
I'll explain why so you understand....
If Vettel would be called in first he only had a margin of a few seconds on Bottas and Verstappen. This because Räikkönen was not allowing him to go faster.
So a slight error in the pit would cost him places unnecessary.
Furthermore even Mercedes reacted on Verstappen trying the undercut and almost made it stick. So it is not that the undercut or overcut strategy was better or worse, decisive was that Vettel had so much speed left in the US. Read James' article on that.

74

Ferrari had no need to react to Max and Bottas. They ended up behind Sainz and were anyway getting held up. Kimi was always going to come out ahead of Sainz. So it is clear what they did.
Kimi needs to up his game and beat Vettel if he can. Otherwise Ferrari are always going to favor Vettel. Even in earlier races they compromised Kimi's strategy whenever they felt there was a chance to benefit Vettel against Hamilton.

75

James, you don’t need much brain to calculate where the car will join the traffic after the pit stop. Ferrari knew that KR will get stuck behind backmarkers. Of course, the Ferrari engineers will tell you that SV was faster. What else do you expect them to say. The truth is that KR could keep a safe distance from SV since the start of the race, except for the backmarkers. Ferrari say that they tried to cover DR, but that is rubbish, of course. I am looking forward to your Tuesday's strategy report, which I am sure will correctly report what exactly happened.

76

Read the Sky F1 analysis. Kimi lost 3 sec on his outlap getting stuck behind backmarkers. That's where the race was lost. Their lap times were very similar before and after the pit stops. Let's just be honest about it. Ferrari gave it to Vettel.

77
Aaron Noronha

Dude kindly look at the laptimes he kept Kimi within range until Kimi pitted and in clean air just blew Kimi away. Like I said before even if Vettel was pitted first he would have beaten Kimi because of how fast he switched on the harder tyres and how fast he was on his outlap. I am pretty sure Kimi fan boys would have been crying claiming Kimi as lead driver should have got first priority if the y had pitted Vettel first and he came out ahead of Kimi.

78

You don't know what your talking about. Go read the Sky F1 race analysis. Their lap times were very close before and after the pit stops, but Kimi lost 3 secs on his outlap getting stuck behind backmarkers, that's where the race was lost, and Ferrari knew it. There was no reason to pit Kimi so early.

79

I think you will find it is the timesheets saying Vettel is faster, and not just Ferrari engineers

80

Being faster when you cannot overtake is largely irrelevant. Ever followed a slow vehicle down a country lane?

So switch positions in the pits to favour your WDC contender.

81

Kimi was asking for a stop....

82

I he wasn't.

83

Is Perez WDC material? I am not sure. I don't expect SV to move to Merc unless Hamilton also departs, which is not going to happen. Could Seb go back to Red Bull, maybe... at some point either DR or MV are going to leave and I think that creates an opening. I think Max V in the Ferrari would be an utterly dominant combo. Now, if the Renault engine becomes eq to the Ferrari/Merc package, RB could very well be THE car again.

84

Equally...if DR gets to one day drive this ferrari he would be a match for any other driver on the grid.

85

Ricciardo isn't going to Ferrari as long as Vettel is there & delivering the points.

86

Look, Kimi will always be a respected F1 great. He's done some amazing things. But

87

Look, Kimi will always be a respected F1 great. But surely it's time now. Perez and Sainz - either way you're going to get a fast, experienced and hungry driver ready to compete at the front. Obviously the main concern is that their hunger for glory could bring tension into the Ferrari camp (and we know how crazy Seb can get when things start getting punchy) but if Ferrari hang on to Raikkonen for much longer they're only going to allow fresh talent to end up in a competitor's seat. I'd love to see Perez get a proper go in tier one team. He was dumped very unfairly by McLaren as far as I see it. Sainz will get his chance eventually. He's too good not to.

88

Perez is too flaky. He drove like a madman in Monaco and ruined more than one driver's race as a result. He doesn't deserve a top tier drive, Sainz is a far better option IMO.

89

Perez wasn't too impressive today.

90

Half expected to wake up to headlines saying Kimi had walked away from Ferrari and F1.
I wouldn't blame if he did.
I know all about Ferrari drivers and their status blah blah, but what they apparently did to Kimi yesterday was shabby this early in the season.

91

Great Monaco pole position but Kimi has been around for too long now - his best F1 days were before he went rallying. He's made a lot of money and should make way for some younger blood, somebody with some fire in their belly who will keep pushing even when his team mate jumps him in the pit stops!

92

Niki Lauda said this weekend, ” No driver who can win the title in a Ferrari thinks of walking away.”

Er.... Didn't Lauda do exactly that? Or have I misunderstood something all these years? I mean, I understand why he did (or I thought I did), maybe the quote is a bit out-of-context or something.

93

The impression I get from both the article and all posts is that even big teams like Ferrari reason and act only in terms of short-term driver availability. That is, Formula1 signing practice is purely short term/pragmatic/opportunist and most of all, reactive. Well, Merc was totally reactive when Rosberg retired, they had no clue.
I just wonder... James, are the big teams at all capable of longer term strategic and proactive acquirement of not just A good driver, but the best? Are they interested to begin with? If they're not, is the reason that most of the time one team or very seldomly two dominate, so you can get away with not having the future top driver?
Sorry to disappoint everyone here, but at the latest in 1 or 2 years Verstappen over the course of a season will beat everybody except possibly VET and HAM, provided he's in a car no more than 15% slower than the best on the grid. Perez and Sainz are fine drivers but no exceptional talents. Same goes for Ricciardo. So, can MB and Ferrari afford not to take Max into the equation?
Point is, the wish to hire VER should probably zoom in on 2019 and hiring the likes of Sainz earlier is at odds with that. Why? Because they will wait for Vettel to leave and then feel entitled for nr 1 spot. Which they will not be. Holding on to Kimi for 2-3 years is actually the best strategy if you want to swap Vettel for Verstappen.
(Fine if you don't believe in Verstappen's potential, then make this a hypothetical exercise how to hire your preferred top driver in 2 year's time.)

94

I also believe Verstappen will be the REAL Key to all up coming silly seasons. I firmly believe Ferrari and mercedes are prepared to be playing the waiting game in favorite of Verstappen. He is the guy you want as a future driver. His godgiven talent has far more to offer than what Perez or Sainz will bring to the table. They are both good drivers but not exceptional. Alot of pundits and People who know what's going on in the backrooms of Ferrari and Mercedes will tell you excactly the same. Verstappen will be the dominating driver within a few years time. Talentwise he is miles ahead of Perez, Sainz or Grosjean. I do believe these 2 topteams will wait for the best driver they can get to replace either Vettel or Lewis.

95
Kenny Carwash

I think Perez would be an excellent choice. I'm still not sure just how good Carlos Sainz might be. He's been consistently strong, but he's never impressed me to the extent Perez had at the same point in his career. I still think there's a fair chance Kimi will stay on, though. Ferrari look like winning both championships this year. They are always conservative when it comes to the second seat and the only reason I can see them replacing Kimi is if they feel they're missing out on someone better. Unless Kimi takes umbridge at being used as a guinea pig for the super softs on Sunday, I think they'll stick with him. Perez isn't going anywhere, and if he was there's still Sainz and Grosjean out there. Ocon looks good, too, and Hulkenberg might be obtainable in a year or two. They've got time on their side.

96

Ferrari should stick with Seb and Kimi. There is no better pairing on the grid.

97
Roberto Sattin

Kimi is a great driver and a man with few words, which is good, no time for bullshit . I think he still has a few years of excellent driving, and he is friends with Sebastian which makes it a bonus in a racing team, share some setups and help each other.

Top Tags
SEARCH Scuderia Ferrari
JA ON F1 In association with...
Multi award winning Formula One photographer
Multi award winning Formula One photographer

Sign up to receive the latest F1 News & Updates direct to your inbox

You have Successfully Subscribed!