Crowd power
Silverstone 2018
British Grand Prix
Renault go for experience in super sub Nick Heidfeld
News
Renault go for experience in super sub Nick Heidfeld
Posted By: James Allen  |  16 Feb 2011   |  10:34 pm GMT  |  126 comments

The Renault F1 team has been extensively restyled this season already with the arrival of Lotus and today it announced a forced change with Nick Heidfeld replacing his former team mate Robert Kubica. Although there had been speculation about the team looking at other options, it always looked likely that they would go for Heidfeld.


Heidfeld, a veteran of 172 Grands Prix without a victory, was out of work after opting to give up his secure testing contracts with Mercedes and Pirelli for a five races deal with Sauber at the end of last season. But the injuries incurred by Kubica in a rallying accident ten days ago mean that the Pole is likely to miss most if not all of the season. He had a third operation today to repair his broken elbow. Although no official time for his recovery has been given, specialists in hand surgery suggest the nerves and tendons in his right hand will require a year to heal.

“I would have liked to come back to Formula One in different circumstances, but I’m proud to have been given this chance,” said Heidfeld.

Meanwhile the team boss Eric Boullier has said that the decision needed to be taken quickly to avoid derailing what was looking like a promising season for the team. Experience was the watchword for him and his engineers with an aggressive new car to sort out and new Pirelli tyres to be understood. They might have opted for hunger in the form of Nico Hulkenberg, but have decided to play it safe with Heidfeld. He ran Kubica close in their days together at BMW Sauber and if the tyres suit his style of driving can be a very potent performer.

“The team has been through a very difficult couple of weeks and we had to react quickly,” said Boullier. “We gave Nick a chance in Jerez last week and he really impressed us. He’s quick, experienced and is very strong technically with his feedback and understanding of the car. We always said the priority was to have an experienced driver in the car and we feel he is the ideal man for the job.”

Featured News
Editor's Picks
Share This:
Posted by:
Category:

Add comment

E-mail is already registered on the site. Please use the Login form or enter another.

You entered an incorrect username or password

Sorry that something went wrong, repeat again!
1

I still resent the way you refer to Heidfeld as ‘solid’ or ‘a safe choice’ James, if you check out my response to Dale in post 34 I’m sure you will agree you are doing him a disservice.

He has been team-mates with Alesi, Kubica, Massa, Raikkonen, Villeneuve and Webber and beaten them all.

I know that Alesi and Raikkonen are two of your favourite drivers ever and that you have a soft spot for Kubica and Webber but I’m sure you’d concede that they were beaten fair and square by Quick Nick and that he deserves far more credit than you and many others in F1 give him.

Perception it seems, is everything, sadly.

2

This post is hilarious. It is really simple, and we don’t need a post on a website to figure this out. If Nick was better than all the drivers you listed, he would be driving an F1 car already, instead of being without a drive. It is just common sense. He’s been through so many teams that one would have picked him up. Instead, he did not have a drive. All the drivers that you list have had long, long F1 careers (infact all of them have won at least 1 race if I am not mistaken) so lets bring some common sense to this…if he was that good he’d be driving in a top team. The guys you have listed have all driven for top teams.

3

Your so called ‘common sense’ assumption that formula one is somewhat meritocratic is laughable im afraid. ‘If Nick was better than all the drivers you listed, he would be driving an F1 car already, instead of being without a drive.’

Do you not think his lack of sponsorship was to blame? Do you think MSC would have got his break with Jordan if he hadnt got the money (Eddie Jordan admitted so much). f1, like life, is made up of breaks for drivers on a varying amount of merit, money and good fortune.

4

Spot on Andrew – both in your analysis of Heidfeld’s F1 season and your response to John – the world doesn’t work that way, where the best drivers get the best seats, it is as much about money as it is about luck and most certainly perception – ie there is a belief that Nick is nothing more than solid or a safe pair of hands and thus has never got a big break whereas lesser drivers such as Kovalainen, Massa and Ralf had higher stocks and thus ended up in great cars

5

I don’t know where to start in correcting the errors and wrong assumptions in this post

6

Hi

I thought I would have an attempt at this

and don’t think ‘Quick Nick Rules’ is too far wrong.

2001- out qualifies and races inexperienced Raikkonen.

2002 – beats inexperienced massa.

2003 – lacklustre beaten by Frentzen

2004 – not comparing pay drivers, but showed great grit and determination with jordan.

2005 – beaten webber on points before his injury. Please correct me if i’m wrong; but I am not. How many podiums did each have? 3-1 to heidfeld i recall.

2006 – beats revitalised JV and inexperienced Kubica

2007 – beats RK

2008 – beaten by RK

2009 – close by minor victory for Nick.

7

A real shame that Kubica is out for the season, but I guess Renault didn’t have much choice but to sign Heidfeld as his replacement. He’s a safe pair of hands and is bound to score plenty of points. He’ll probably blow Petrov away, anyhow…

8

James,

Not sure where to leave comments unrelated to the post at hand, so here it is.

Are you able to describe the relationship between an engine supplier like Cosworth and the teams they are working with? Specifically, how integrated are they into the overall design/development of the car?

Looking at the packaging of Renault’s exhaust, for example. How would a team like Williams adapt that type of system to their car working with Cosworth? How would the workload breakdown, and if Cosworth is gaining knowledge working with Williams, how do they isolate that knowledge if asked to work on the same type of effort with Virgin?

9

I think this shows how tight the experienced driver market really is…I think if Petrov’s performance in 2010 had been stronger, they would have opted for Senna…

I’m neither pro or against Heidfeld he’s no doubt a nice guy but he comes across as lacking the personality and killer instinct in a driver that fans or sponsors want. Remember he was being groomed as the heir to Schumi…roll fwd 10yrs later, most of his ex-teammates have since won races and done better (Kimi, Massa, Webber, Kubica, etc.)

10

Renault have made the best decision available to them. With the car as quick as it is in testing they could not afford to stick in Senna and hope for the best. Heidfeld while not having set the world on fire has been picking up results by stealth for years.

I do think that Heidfeld needs to fend for himself abit more as he is placed in the DC and Rubens category of being a team player ie someone who will move over if asked. Kubica would never do that so Heidfeld needs to do much the same.

Petrov will be looking over his shoulder as well as if Heidfeld racks up the points (as he has done in his BMW days) and Kubica is able to return later in the year he could be one for the chop. Renault have made it clear they want 4th place in the championship and cannot afford to play nice with the driver line up.

11

Look I’ve never been a big fan of Heidfeld but Renault had no other option. Would love to see Renault have a successful year but I just can’t see this driver lineup delivering any real success,I hope I’m wrong.

12

I struggle to get excited about Nick Heidfeld racing again. However I completely understand why.

It’s sad that a more exciting prospect isn’t available as a ‘quantifiable’ risk. Think of the amounts of KMs Jacques Villeneuve was given with Williams coming from a vastly different series, and got pole at his first race, and nearly won his first race. More recently Hamilton performed well from debut.

What gives a team the confidence that these two examples were worth the risk… probably Damon Hill and Fernando Alonso… the teams both had qualified winners as team ‘leaders’ mates.

Reno doesn’t have this, but its still sad that a driver such as Bruno Senna who has tested for Honda, got a full season of F1 behind him, has talent and name to justify a decent drive (I agree I was somewhat disappointed by him at HRT especially vs. Klien), can’t be risked, and F1’s ultimate journeyman bar de Cessaris, gets a chance again that I don’t believe personally he deserves, he has good cars and never proved better than average.

I personally want to see new talent coming in… but I equally have to say I don’t want to see great junior formula drivers like Grosjean used and abused and tossed out of F1 without a fair opportunity.

So to sum it up, I don’t Love the idea, but I do understand the unfortunate scenario of experience vs. risk.

13

Im happy to see Nick get the drive. As a follower of his since he drove the Prost im pulling for him, I hope he makes the most of the opportunity.

14

I am interested to see how this pans out. I think Heidfeld has been seen in the past as an intelligent but undemanding team player, able to feed back to engineers enabling them to develop the car without the hindernce of a driver who is overbearing or one who blows hot and cold. I’m not saying that Kubica is a ‘primadonna’ but I think his teams affection for him has gathered through his raw talent to pull something from nothing on the track rather than his dedication and ability to develop the car during tests or back at the factory.

What if Nick really gels with the team, facilitates a strong season long development of the car and outperforms Petrov to the bargain?

Will Renault have a difficult decision to make when Kubica is ready to return?

The choice may be between a truly strong and proven driver pairing (Heidfeld, Kubica) or one with a single exceptional driver, on track at least, (Kubica) and one who brings money, (Petrov) but both lacking in technical depth to develop the car.

15

I’m not a Kubica expert, but I’ve seen/read nothing that suggests he is poor at giving technical feedback.

James described his rally driving as a way of working on his skills.

Kubica is generally known as someone who lives for racing – sleeping in kart training as a teenage, shuns the glamour side of the sport, the dedication to weight loss.

It will be interesting in the sense that this is the first time that Nick has started a season in a team with high expectations and a strong expected edge over his team mate. Expectations are high.

16

Kubica lacking in technical depth to develop the car? thats funny because judging Renault’s development last year i have impression hes actually very good at giving feedback to engineers and knows what he wants from the car precisely.

17

Much has been said about the recovery of enough manipulative dexterity to enable Robert to operate the multiple buttons on the wheel, quite a pessimistic outlook, mostly. However, what’s to say that he can’t fiddle with the buttons with his left hand? He’ll almost certainly recover enough strength to hold the wheel with his right hand and he will obviously compensate by using his left. I agree with a previous poster, he’ll be at the Italian GP!

18

I’m actually really disappointed they made this decision. Don’t get me wrong, I might be biased in wanting to see a Senna in a Lotus again…but Nick Heidfeld has had a lot of opportunity in F1…Senna has not. Senna’s overall experience is actually much less than most new drivers as he got back into racing much later.

They went with the safe option (Heidfeld) instead of the exciting one, and thats why i find it to be a lame decision. They already had a generally terrible driver in Petrov…why not risk a little with Senna? They would have garnered an immediate fanbase just because of the name…and I actually think given a chance Senna could be better than Nick, whom we’ve all seen. Just sounds dull to me…I’ll be supporting the other Lotus team 🙂

19

I hope to see Bruno Senna in the car for the second half of the season after Renault have further developed the car.

20

James,

You better change that F150 in your front page image before Ford comes after you.

21

On that topic, if I were Ferrari I would have renamed the car “F-150” instead of what they chose; what a mouthful.

22

Heidfeld is in the same league as Rosberg, Webber, Massa and Button. He so much deserves his first win in F1!

23

James,

What do you think will happen if the car is fast and Heidfeld destroys Petrov? If the points differential between Petrov and Heidfeld is the same as it was between Kubica and Petrov last year, surely Renault would lose face by keeping Vitaly on board and doing away with Heidfeld once Kubica returns.

Mind you, planning for and predicting when Kubica will return makes no sense until it’s clear that full functionality has returned.

24

Good point. Petrov has to improve, I think he and the team recognise that and believe he will. He had some great days last year, he needs them a lot more often in 2011

25

And he just needs to finish and keep the thing on the track.

26

Many things are uncertain in the Renault team and I bet their sponsors are very unhappy about this situation. The team needs to get an answer about when Kubica will race again. My bet is that Nick’s time with Renault will not be long term. Let’s believe some posts here saying Nick was quicker than Kimi or Kubica in some stages of his career, his inability to land a significant seat other than the BMW stint must have a reason.

27

Whilst it is a terrible thing that has happened to Robert Kubica and that I really hope he recovers well and is back behind the wheel of his Lotus Renault GP car as soon as he’s ready, congratulations must be given to Nick Heidfeld for getting this drive.

Lotus Renault have made the right choice and I hope that Nick can do a good job for them in, what looks like, a good car this year.

28

Rob will be back second half of the season, no doubt, he is the most stubborn driver in F1 and he is already out of the op phase. Think some people will be really surprised by how quick he will bounce back.

29

i agree with you pal. we will see kubica back sooner than people think. the great valentino rossi was back on his m1 yamaha last year in a month when people said was closer to 3 months before he would be back. i think kubica will drive again this year no doubt about it. he is a class act no doubt about it.

30

Heidfeld was without a drive because every team (including Renault) had not considered him despite all his experience. However, in the unfortunate circumstances Renault needed an experienced driver to partner Petrov who has only one season behind him.

31

To be fair, Petrov seat comes with his money. Not to mention other seats in the lesser teams…

32

I’m glad Nick Heidfeld got the Lotus-Renault seat. He was really the only option for them. Raikkonen is a rally driver now, pure and simple. The same way as American single seater fans want Montoya to go back to Indycar and leave NASCAR behind, of course, we as Formula 1 fans want to see Raikkonen – one of the most naturally gifted racing drivers of the last decade – back in an F1 car, but he doesn’t want to come back. My heart would have loved to have seen a Senna in a Lotus-Renault, but he is not experienced enough at this stage to take up this role. I have no doubt that we will see him back in F1 in the future, possibly in the Lotus-Renault. As for the others, Liuzzi would have been a bizarre choice as he was the most frustratingly inconsistent driver of 2010 and Hulkenberg basically fits into the Senna box.

However, in my mind Heidfeld is by no means getting the drive by exclusion. He is IMHO one of the most underrated drivers in F1. He has consistently outperformed his team-mates including against respected opposition. He scored more than Raikkonen and Massa at Sauber in 2001 and 2002 respectively and Kubica in two out of their 3 years together at BMW. He is fast, maybe not lightening quick, but he does seem to be good at developing a fundamentally good car viz-a-vis the Sauber Petronas cars and the BMWs. If people have question marks about his racing abilities, please remember the 2008 British Grand Prix where on route to 2nd place in the wet, he passed both Raikkonen and Kovalainen in one corner around the outside at Luffield!! He is not to date been a scintillating driver, but bar one season at BMW when they had a car that was occasionally capable of winning, he has never been in a car that was especially great. He is a driver comparable to Button or Webber IMHO, not quite at the very pinnacle – only Alonso and Hamilton of the drivers since the mid-90’s to mid-00’s-mark Schumacher and Mika Hakkinen are really at that level. However, he is quite capable of winning in the right car. Look what happened to those two the first time they were in cars capable of victory – Button won the world championship and Webber came painfully close! I’m not saying that Nick Heidfeld will win the WDC this year, but given the right equipment I have no doubt that he could win races.

——

On Kubica’s injuries, I have thought a fair bit about whether I should or should not post on these because I am actually an Orthopaedic surgical trainee, so I have fair bit of experience of these kind of injuries through the work we do in Trauma Surgery. I think I should probably say a few things, not to be graphic or sensationalist, but to put a bit of realism in his injuries and their potential prognosis

Obviously, I cannot be too specific because I don’t have xrays to look at and a patient to examine. However from the photographs of Kubica at the time of the injury, what has been released to the media and what I have pieced together from the medical reports from the Orthopaedic surgeons in Italy, it seems he had an injuries to his right wrist and forearm, his right elbow and his right leg.

The right leg has not really been mentioned too much, which means either it was not serious enough to need an operation or it was dealt with at the 7-hour operation on the day of the accident and is now no longer the main issue standing in his way of his rehabilitation. The exact injury has not been mentioned as far as I know and only one photo I have been shown gives any suggestion of what it may have been so I don’t think it is right for me to speculate on this injury from that.

With regards to his right elbow/forearm/wrist/hand injury, I think you can probably deal with this as a one-r even though the injuries may be quite separate. From what the Italian doctors have said, he has bony, tendinous and nerve injuries. The bony injuries appear to be fractures of both the radius and ulna (forearm bones) which probably includes the fracture around his wrist, probably the end of the radius +/- ulna bone(s). The elbow injury maybe an injury to his ulna +/- radius bone at the upper end or to the end of the humerus bone or any combination of the above. With regards to fractures, provided the normal alignment of the bone can be restored and the bones held with the correct stability, provided infection is prevented and an appropriate rehabilitation programme is instituted, Kubica stands an excellent chance of good bony union. This will take between 3-6 months until the bone is approaching its pre-injury strength. Complications and delayed or even non-healing (we call it union) of the fractures can occur, but the Italian Orthopods seem pretty happy at this stage.

What I am most worried about is his tendon and more particularly his nerve injuries.

The main press statement from the surgeon stated he had both flexor and extensor tendon injuries in his right arm. These are tendons in the forearm which control wrist and finger movement. Flexor tendons bend the wrist and fingers towards the palm side and make a fist – they are obviously important with grip. Extensor generally do the opposite function. Tendon repairs have to be very accurate and the ability to repair them depends largely on what you start off with. They don’t have the same excellent reparative abilities as bone does to deal with missing fragments and still heal well. The majority of the time of the 7-hour operation would have been in tendon repair. Ideally, following on from this you need a aggressive, but protected rehabilitation using complicated hand and wrist splint to rehabilitate this kind of injury. This is not quick, especially in multiple tendon injuries and stiffness in the fingers and loss of range of movement is a real risk. You are looking at up to a year until you know what the end result is here.

Kubica cut the median and ulna nerves according to the doctors in Italy. These are the two nerves that supply the hand. The ulna nerve especially is involved in a lot of the fine movements of the fingers, ones you would for example need for controlling an F1 steering wheel’s dials. Again, the end result is some-what dependent on what you start with. If they were fully cut, the nerve needs to fully regenerate along their WHOLE length and here is the rate limiting factor for him, no matter how well motivated he is – nerves heal at a maximum rate of 1mm/day. Each nerve is probably 100cm to 120cm long. Before you can start rehabilitating his hand in terms of fine control and dexterity the nerve has to regenerate and function has to return. Nerves are fickle things and partial function can return more quickly or it can take much much longer. As someone wrote above, even after stretching, not cutting, nerves when they dislocated their shoulder, they had numbness in their hand for 2 years! It may be a year or more before he knows just how well these injuries will recover.

I wish Robert Kubica the very best of luck and my heart really goes out to him. He is one of the most exciting F1 drivers with an abundance of raw talent that is truly impressive. When I saw how well the new Lotus-Renault was going in his hands in the first test, I was really excited that he may be able to compete on a level playing field with the likes of Alonso, Vettel, Webber, Button and Hamilton at the front for race wins this season. I guess we will never know now, though Heidfeld’s pace will be a good marker I feel. I hope that come the start of the 2012 season he will be back in the black and gold of Lotus-Renault on the grid at the first race of the year. If he is there, it will be a testament to the skills of not only the surgeons and his team, but to a phenomenally talented individual and his will to succeed!

Keep up the excellent site, James, sorry about the rather long post!

33

Thanks so much for your frank and honest opinions from an informed point of view. As a layman, this is exactly how I have looked at the situation.

Driving a modern F1 car takes an enormous amount of digital dexterity. I think of it as “playing a piccolo with your thumbs”, while displaying the fantastic car control that the best drivers have. There are many knobs and buttons that must be manipulated and with the addition of KERS and rear wing controls it has become even more complicated this year.

34

Longest post I remember!

35

Excellent post, thank you for sharing your expertise!

36

It may be a long post but it was very interesting, thanks for your input. Maybe if Heidfeld does a good job this year and Petrov continues to not cut it Renault will have the two old BMW teammates together again for 2012!

37

Well done Simon, you expressed all I wanted to say about Quick NIck by comparing him to Jenson and Mark. Your analysis is spot on and the medical part quite interesting too!

38

Indeed; Regaining fine motor skills will take the most time. Fortunately I suppose Robert has a good baseline for his reaction times and abilities prior to his accident.

That is not to speak negatively about the prospects of his recovery, I hope and pray he returns soon and has a long and successful career.

39

When a driver receives massive injuries like RK has suffered, they seldom get back to where they were before. For example, his broken elbow may never straighten again, the nerves that have been damaged may not respond as quickly.

When Robert recovers from his injuries, he’s going to have to prove to himself and his team that he’s up to driving an F1 car at the top level. Rushing back isn’t going to be enough.

40

Doesn’t this prove that Renault aren’t really first division?

I mean is that all they can come up with, what’s the guy ever done? Answer NOTHING.

41

Ok Dale lets look at Nick Heidfeld’s F1 career a bit more in-depth than simply writing him off as you have done.

2000: Despite being a rookie Outqualifies vastly more experienced team-mate Jean Alesi 9-8 and racks up better finishing position than the mercurial Frenchman – Prost are pointless but under today’s scoring system outscores Alesi 10-3

2001: Not only Outqualifies highly rated team-mate Kimi Raikkonen 10-7 but outscores him 12-9, grabbing a brilliant podium in Brazil whilst the Finnish rookie spins off in the rain

2002: Destroys highly rated team-mate Felipe Massa 12-4 in qualifying , outscores him 7-4

2003: Outqualifies highly experienced

team-mate Heinz-Harald Frentzen 9-7, HHF outscores Heidfeld 13-6

2004: Obliterates massively rated team-mate Giorgio Pantano by outqualifying him 13-1 and getting a couple of points at Monaco in a truly awful car. Replacement Timo Glock is a far better match for Quick Nick yet he still outqualifies his fellow German 4-0 and outscores him 3-2

2005: In the 13 races Heidfeld competes in, he may get outqualified 8-5 during this period but he outscores highly rated team-mate Mark Webber 28-24, bagging 3 podiums – all in races where his team-mate drives very poorly in comparison. In Malaysia, Nick takes an excellent 3rd whilst Webber collides with Fisichella in a suicidal move, at Monaco Heidfeld takes a brilliant 2nd place including a beautiful pass on Alonso at the harbour chicane whilst Webber makes a hash of it, scrappily passing the spaniard only by skipping the chicane and at the nurburgring, Nick takes a fine pole and mature 2nd place whilst the aussie has a poor start and rashly takes out Montoya at the first corner in a rookie-like error.

2006: Outscores former world champion Jacques Villeneuve 13-7, qualifying is 6-6.

2006 – 2009: Outqualifies and outscores highly rated team-mate Robert Kubica 30-28 in qualifying and 150-137 in the races. During this period they take 8 podiums each with Kubica getting the sole win between them in Canada thanks to Heidfeld letting him through.

2010: Does 5 races at the end of the season alongside highly rated team-mate Kamui Kobayashi. He is outqualified 4-1 by the Japanese but scores 6 points over the 5 races, the same amount Pedro De La Rosa did over the previous 14.

So I have analysed Nick Heidfeld’s F1 career in a bit more detail than you did Dale, and I think it’s fair to say he has done a bit more than ‘nothing’ as you claimed. He has been team mates to Alesi, Raikkonen, Massa, Webber, Villeneuve and Kubica – all top class F1 drivers, and he beat all of them.

His only dud year in the sport was 2008, and even then he took some brilliant podiums – who could forget his glorious run to 2nd at Silverstone where he TWICE overtook 2 cars at once as he passed Alonso, Glock, Kovalainen and Raikkonen and was the only man not lapped by Hamilton.

Likewise at Spa that year when he took a terrific 2nd after overtaking Alonso, Bourdais, Kubica and Vettel in the last half a lap.

He might not have the charisma of Alonso or the swashbuckling style of Hamilton, but he’s right up there with them in terms of talent. To write him off as having achieved ‘NOTHING’ is very lazy and cliched and shows a very poor knowledge of the sport and a tabloid style of writing.

Hang your head in shame, Dale.

42

Sir,

You write: ”To write him off as having achieved ‘NOTHING’ is very lazy and cliched and shows a very poor knowledge of the sport and a tabloid style of writing”.

————————

For info I have been an avid follower and supporter of F1 since the late 60’s and pride myself on having an in depth knowledge of F1 since that time.

F1 to me is all about the special people who come every now and again, we currently have a few exceptional drivers competing at the same time and (in my opinion) Nick Heidfield is simply not one of them.

I can’t recall (and I’ve seen them all) a single race he’s been involved in which has stirred the blood, the same cannot be said of the likes of Hamiliton (to my eyes by far the most exciting and racy current driver), Alonso, Schumacher and Kubica to name a few of the current crop of drivers.

My opinion remains as I stated on the start of this thread, Heidfield is not top draw and never will be.

43

That’s enough of that thanks. Let’s move on.

44

Who would you have gone for?

Villeneuve?

45

James, as you’ll know NOTHING in F1 is impossible and if Renault were really serious about being seen as one of the big boys they should have shown a little imagination, – for example why not go for Webber? If they really believe in their car this would have been possible as it may have suited both Webber, Redbull and Renault and not forgetting Ecclestone!

What they have done instead is show us that they are not one and are never likely to be (with the current setup) one of the real players in today’s F1

46

I completely agree with you.

47

He beat Kubica for 2 seasons at BMW, Kimi in 2001 and Massa in 2002.

48

“He ran Kubica close in their days together at BMW Sauber” – He more than ran him close, James. He scored more points and outqualified him over the 3 and a half years. The only area Kubica beat him was in race wins, and that’s because Nick played the team game in Montreal ’08. A more selfish driver would have taken the win – maybe that’s what stopped the very good Heidfeld ever becoming great?

49

Well said

50

This. Again, well said.

Hopefully, Nick will rack up wins this year and prove that nice guys can finish first.

51

Thanks guys, we should start a campaign against all the lazy journos who write off Quick Nick as being nothing more than ‘solid’ or a ‘journeyman’, it really is incredibly lazy journalism to resort to such cliches. Andrew Benson and Joe Saward are at the top of the list! Fair play to Andrew Davies though, this article is spot on :

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/3261/6756565/Signing-Came-In-The-Nick-Of-Time

Best line has to be “Like Kubica, Vitaly has shown a desire to go off rallying, the only difference being that Vitaly likes to do it exclusively in F1 machinery” Quality!

52

Would they really kick Heifeld out of the seat late in the season, if Kubica recovers by then, and assuming Nick is performing well ?

I’m a RK fan, but surely they will leave NH for the entire season if he does 60% of it or so? Would be interesting to see his contract.

Hope NH thrashes MS. Go son!

53

I think if Nick is still a contender for the WDC by Italy, you would maybe see Robert coming back to play a similar supporting role that Michael did for Eddie Irvine in late 1999. But I think Robert should not rush back and wait until he is fully recovered before leaping back into an F1 car.

I hope Nick does well, as I just put a fiver on him to finish in the Top 3 in the WDC this year! (28-1 has got to be worth a flutter)

If he does perform well, I then hope Mercedes make amends and come back for him for 2012.

54

I can’t understand that anybody, not being the medical in charge of Kubica, can give verdict of time of recovery. Who thought that, just after his last accident, that he would be back again at all??

Good luck Nick, eventhough I would have loved seeing Kimi back at the wheel

55

I really hope LRGP delivers the goods and we will see Heidfeld get his first win. All the knockers love to point out he has never won, but honestly, how many races do you think Schumacher, Alonso or Vettel (insert favourite driver here) would get in those woeful cars? 0.

Top Tags
SEARCH News