How the West was F1
Austin 2014
US Grand Prix
Webber beats Vettel to take maiden pole for Japanese Grand Prix
News
XPB.cc
Posted By: James Allen  |  12 Oct 2013   |  7:11 am GMT  |  320 comments

Mark Webber took his first pole position at Suzuka, the 12th of his career, the first since Korea last year, beating his team mate Sebastian Vettel into second place, with Lewis Hamilton third.

It ended Vettel’s run of pole positions in 2013 and his sequence in Japan – he had been looking for his fifth Suzuka pole in a row.

However Vettel was told at the start of the Q3 session that he had no KERS. Red Bull’s Christian Horner estimated that KERS is worth 4/10ths of a second. The team had changed the KERS system on Vettel’s car after FP3, but the problem remained intermittent. He had no KERS in Q1, had it in Q2, but lost it again for Q3.

It is the first time this season that Webber has outqualified his team mate. Webber was in a new chassis this weekend, after his fire and accident damage in Korea.

“It’s a great track. It was pretty good Sebastian had a problem, so it’s a bit of a hollow pole position because he still did a phenomenal lap, but you have to take your opportunities when you can,” said Webber. “It’s a very nice farewell for me to have pole on my last time at Suzuka. I’ll never forget sector one today.”

Vettel played down his issues, “Congratulations to Mark, he did a very good lap. We did have an issue in qualifying, but I’m not a big fan of saying, ‘If we’d had this or that.’ We were P2 today.”

It was Renault’s 209th pole position as an engine supplier, a new record in F1.

The pace was fast, the change of wind direction was significant. There was a tail wind on the straights, which was a headwind through the esses in the first part of the lap, which made the lap times much quicker than on Friday.

Romain Grosjean and Nico Hulkenberg maintained their strong run of form with fourth and seventh places respectively.

In Q1, Webber set the pace, with Hamilton and Alonso also looking quick on the harder tyres. The Lotus drivers were obliged to take a set of mediums, as were the McLarens, Saubers and Force Indias.

Jean Eric Vergne brought out a red flag three minutes from the end of the session, due to a bizarre brake fire at the rear. A change of wind direction meant that teams weren’t clear on what the cut off time would be. After the red flag, Rosberg felt he needed to use a set of mediums to be sure, lying 11th as he was after his hard tyre run.

In the ensuing last minute dash, Grosjean went fastest with a very impressive lap on hard tyres ahead of Massa, on mediums, while Sutil was eliminated. After accident damage in FP3 and a gearbox change he will move back a further five places from the 17th place he qualified in.

Both Williams cars made it into Q2, meanwhile Marussia’s Max Chilton did well to outqualify his team mate and both Caterhams. “Since the August break my performance has really improved,” said Chilton.

Both Red Bulls, Hamilton and Alonso got through without using a set of medium tyres.

In Q2 Alonso continued to find good pace from the Ferrari, to edge out Hamilton, while the Lotus pair looked very quick on the hard tyres in the initial runs.

Vettel left it late and did a stunning lap 1m 31.2s, over half a second faster than Alonso’s Ferrari, while Webber was 2/10ths slower than his team mate. Grosjean got very close, just 4/100ths off Webber’s time.

Perez, Di Resta, Bottas, Gutierrez, Maldonado, Ricciardo we all eliminated in Q2.

In Q3, Vettel had no KERS and also made a mistake in Spoon Curve. Webber managed to beat his first run time by 4/10ths. Alonso was in third almost a second off Webber’s pace.

Raikkonen, Massa, Rosberg and Grosjean did only one run in Q3, also Button and Hulkenberg.

In the final runs Vettel wasn’t able to beat Webber’s time, while Hamilton managed to edge out Grosjean. Felipe Massa had only one run in Q3, compared to two runs for Alonso, but the Brazilian came out on top once again. Alonso starts 8th, as Rosberg and Hulkenberg both got ahead of him.

This could prove a significant development for Massa, who is on the look out for a new team after being dropped by Ferrari.

Meanwhile the man who replaces him, Kimi Raikkonen, again wasn’t able to peak in qualifying, ending up 9th, three tenths of a second behind team mate Grosjean.

Charles Pic, already subject to a 10 place grid penalty before the event, became the first driver in F1 history to have a drive thru penalty imposed on him before the race. Stewards were angered that he had ignored a red light in the pit lane for the second time and imposed the penalty, which means that he will have to drive through the pits in the first five laps of the race.

JAPANESE GRAND PRIX, Qualifying
1. Mark Webber Red Bull 1m30.915s
2. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1m31.089s +0.174s
3. Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1m31.253s +0.338s
4. Romain Grosjean Lotus 1m31.365s +0.450s
5. Felipe Massa Ferrari 1m31.378s +0.463s
6. Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1m31.397s +0.482s
7. Nico Hulkenberg Sauber 1m31.644s +0.729s
8. Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1m31.665s +0.750s
9. Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1m31.684s +0.769s
10. Jenson Button McLaren 1m31.827s +0.912s

11. Sergio Perez McLaren 1m31.989s +0.699s
12. Paul di Resta Force India 1m31.992s +0.702s
13. Valtteri Bottas Williams 1m32.013s +0.723s
14. Esteban Gutierrez Sauber 1m32.063s +0.773s
15. Pastor Maldonado Williams 1m32.093s +0.803s
16. Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1m32.485s +1.195s

17. Adrian Sutil Force India 1m32.890s +1.066s * 5 place penalty to take
18. Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1m33.357s +1.533s
19. Max Chilton Marussia 1m34.320s +2.496s
20. Charles Pic Caterham 1m34.556s +2.732s * 10 place penalty to take
21. Giedo van der Garde Caterham 1m34.879s +3.055s
22. Jules Bianchi Marussia 1m34.958s +3.134s * 10 place penalty to take

Featured News
MORE FROM JA ON F1...
Share This:
Posted by:
Category:
320 Comments
  1. TGS says:

    Well done Mark, great chance for a win tomorrow. A bit unsure why they didn’t keep a set of mediums and just did one timed lap. Hard tire better for the race?

    1. Leah O'Dwyer says:

      Yes but, Marks comments on the weight bridge which I’ve just heard now on Sky, sum it all up. To paraphrase he inferred to Hamilton that Vettel had no KERs in Q3 and thats how pole was acheived. To be fair he said the same in the post qualifying press conference and in my opinion it gives an insight to the mind set of Webber and the other drivers as to how fast Vettel really is.

      Nonetheless it was a great lap from Webber and he was very honest about the performance he gained over his teammate.

      Great laps too from Felipe Massa, Hulkenburg and Grojean. Hall of shame for the 2014 Ferrari drivers, though I am sure both wil race well.

      Should be an exciting race.

    2. michael grig says:

      mark’s start history it might not repeat itself; yet i wonder.

    3. Dany says:

      Grosgean actually made two runs in q 3 but aborted his first run due to a mistake

  2. Kuda says:

    I hope Webber gets a few more wins before his exit.

  3. Brad Withyman says:

    Lots of happy faces around the world after Q3. That wing is working……hope the tyres match. Mark deserves some good luck. Hope he wins.

    1. Brad Withyman says:

      Correction….Vettel had KERS on his last run. No excuses.

      1. Mike_M says:

        Incorrect.
        Christian Horner confirmed that Vettel had no KERS throughout Q3.

      2. Miha Bevc says:

        He said KERS failed in Q1, it worked in Q2, and then in Q3 it failed completely. Both timed laps were without KERS.

      3. Ryan says:

        He sounded pretty vague to me. He said intermittent use of kers i think. I’m pretty sure he did have it for that final run where he couldn’t beat Webber though…. And then Webbber went ahead and put in another fastest lap -0.060 from his previous.

      4. Tealeaf says:

        Erm no he didn’t and woyh no setups in the morning FP3 and a KERSless Q3 that was a phenomenal effort to put Seb 0.15 behind Mark, dare I say without that lockup and running slightly deep Seb would have been on pole on these circumstances but then its just 1 of those things, at least it gives all the Vettel haters some hope for tomorrow especially with Hamilton with his usual engine to the max trick to qualify for 3rd, Kimi and Alonso? Lol

      5. Tim says:

        I have a question that I hope you can answer. On several occasions you have claimed SV is worth somewhere around half a second per lap. If that is the case, and KERS is worth 0.4 seconds/lap (according to CH) how is it that SV couldn’t get the pole? Something doesn’t add up :-)
        Btw, are you the same tealeaf that used to post on the BBC?

      6. Tealeaf says:

        Actuallt I’m glad you asked that, its a easy 1 to answer, due to not having time to hone the quali setup in FP3 Seb was already on the backfoot for quali but then as you said the KERS cost 0.3 at least, the other time was lost at the hairpin with the slight lock up and subsequently running deep costing at least 0.3 alone, Webber was 0.4 quicker in that sector and just say 0.1 was the KERS the 0.3 that was missing was in that middle sector, but even with that mistake if he had KERS he would have beaten the ‘qualifying expert’ Webber to pole, hope thats more clear.

      7. Spinodontosaurus says:

        I’m quite sure that running your engine at maximum power during Q3 is not a ‘trick’, nor reserved for Hamilton…

        ____

        At the end of Q2 there was something like half a second between 2nd and 14th… crazy.

      8. KRB says:

        [mod]

        I also saw the stories that said Vettel had KERS for his second run in Q3, so it’s not as though you made it up. You didn’t deserve to get jumped on b/c of it. It’s since been clarified (from Horner) that Vettel didn’t have KERS throughout Q3, so there you go.

        Webber will feel absolutely no shame in taking pole, considering all the times he’s gone into battle KERS-less.

      9. baddow_oracle says:

        It is exceptional that Seb can put in that lap without KERS, but we seem to forget Webbers car gives away a tenth or more in ballast setup. So really any time in the past where Webber was within 2 tenths of Seb, you would have to admit they were pretty much equal!

      10. Andrew M says:

        Lewis is such a cheat! How dare he turn his engine revs up! Disgraceful!

      11. simon says:

        Brad, Let me remind you Webber’s pole is not hollow because not only Vettel had KERS at delivering full power, he had the best car designed by Newey and the whole RBR behind him; yet he could not get pole? How do you explain that Brad? And another thing Brad, Mark will win Suzuka with or without your good luck. Happy viewing, Brad!

      12. Brad Withyman says:

        Your telling the wrong guy Simon. …..I’m with you.

      13. Racyboy says:

        Sky commentary said Vettel did have KERS for his final run.
        So did he or didn’t he?

      14. Tealeaf says:

        Horner and Webber both clarified Seb had no KERS, then Simon at the end made a note of that half heartedly, now imagine if its Webber without KERS and had problens in FP3, there would be cries of foul play and the result would have been Webber 6th to 8th.

      15. Alec Tronnach says:

        Maybe Seb’s mum got confused about which car she was supposed to UN-plug the KERS from… After all they’re both the same colour.

      16. Craig D says:

        It’s great Webber is on pole but face it, if Vettel had had KERS (and he didn’t) he’d have got pole by at least 0.2s I expect. Vettel still did his usual top quali performance.

      17. Aaron Noronha says:

        Correction Vettel had no KERS IN Q3, Confirmed by Honer

      18. James Allen says:

        As it says in the piece…

      19. David C says:

        Hi James the poster brad Whityman claimed seb did not have KERS and Aaron is correcting him not yourself who correctly stated that seb did not have KERS

      20. Brad Withyman says:

        Yes. My post was incorrect. …….thanks Brundell!

      21. bearforce says:

        Ummmm no Vettel did not have KERS on his either of the two Q3 laps.

        The Hulk is seriously really really good.

        Happy for Massa cause I think he needs a little positive outcomes to get him back into being competitive.

      22. Tyemz says:

        2 seconds a lap-Vettel doesn’t need KERS anyway. What really happened? Mark got Seb’s car toadey eh? Not too bad for a number 2 driver

      23. Tyemz says:

        *today*

      24. anon says:

        Yup no excuses. Vettel’s been out qualified by Webber once all season.

        Alonso bottled qualifying again. 5th time Massa has beaten him, Hulkenberg beat him again with the same engine and inferior chassis. Kimi lost to Grosjean for the 6th time in 8 qualifying sessions.

      25. Anil says:

        He himself admitted he hasn’t been in form this weekend and he clearly is upset about Maria’s passing. Also Massa almost won a WDC and dominated KImi in qualifying, why shouldn’t he be able to out-do Alonso every now and then?

      26. Tim says:

        Trust me, I am not a fan of Nando (I respect his ability, but I am no fan). But, if this is the 5th time he has been out qualified by Massa then doesn’t that mean, somewhere along the way, Nando has out qualified Massa on 10 other occasions – not exactly a close run contest, wouldn’t you say?

      27. Olive says:

        You can see Vettel had no kers in Q3 from the fact he lost all in sector 3, where they use the kers.

    2. Gazza says:

      Vettel for the win tomorrow though.

      Has Sebs Kers is malfunctioning can they swap it with Marks?

  4. Bryce says:

    Good to see him on pole. Fingers crossed that there are no gremlins on board for the start.

    1. jakobusvdl says:

      +1, let’s hope this is the day Webber gets a good start, and can race to the finish.
      Vettel is going to make it soo hard for him to win.

    2. tank says:

      by gremlin do you mean Webber himself?

  5. Miha Bevc says:

    Well, sooner or later, it had to happen to Seb, I guess …
    Still got quite close to pole.

    Tomorrow could be interesting. If Webber starts more or less cleanly, Vettel on the dirty side, Hamilton on P3 …

    1. KRB says:

      Talking ’bout dirty sides, just saw this:

      http://deadsp.in/1eh6KzF

      I didn’t even see this as it happened. Don’t think there’s really anything in this, I’m sure he was just doing a quick adjustment over the clothes, etc.

      Just stirrin’ the pot …

  6. Bryce says:

    TV coverage said that VET had KERS on his last run.

    Have not heard much from the Bianchi fan club lately, could it have something to do with being outpaced by his pay teammate?

    1. nandon says:

      Well Horner said that Seb had no KERS on any of his Q3 runs.

    2. Random 79 says:

      The vultures are circling…

    3. AlexD says:

      Not a fan of neither, but clearly Bianchi is a better driver. One or two races is nothing…you need to see a bigger picture. Maybe some problems with the car…who knows

      1. Bryce says:

        I think “the bigger picture” shows a gradual closing of the gap for some time, then basically level for a few meetings.

    4. Sid says:

      Do you believe his team principal or TV coverage, do they have any evidence to prove their claims?

      1. Bryce says:

        My TV coverage finished just after Webber weighed in, so no idea what Horner said.

        But if I had choose, I would probably believe the commentators before a team principal in most cases.

  7. goferet says:

    OMG!!! Who would have thought

    Webber on pole >>> Wow!!!

    Great effort by Aussiegrit, he has finally got the monkey off his back and yes it’s seems the B spec chassis is more kind to him the other blasted one.

    Having said that, it was a stellar job from Vettel to still manage P2 despite KERS issues though the mistake in the first Q3 run indicates Vettel is human and pressure gets to him at championship deciding races e.g. Brazil qualifying 2013.

    Good effort by Lewis to steal away P3 from Grosjean but seeing as Grosjean did only one run, I would say Grosjean did a better job.

    Oh yeah Hulkenburg gets stronger each weekend and also Massa & Jenson deserve a pat on the back. I think the latter two like the Suzuka track >>> Special mention to Chilton for producing unexpected magic at the back.

    Last but not least, disappointing performance from the A list drivers Kimi and Alonso, for just like in 2005, they find themselves out of position but hey, good news for the racing fans as we’re guaranteed plenty of action.

    Alright see you on the tarmac, we have a very good mixed grid for tomorrow’s race.

    1. Brad Withyman says:

      Im not so surprised. There are other quick drivers besides SV. Mark has been quick for years. Didn’t he win the prize for most fastest laps in a season…….twice?

      1. Random 79 says:

        I believe you might be right :)

      2. goferet says:

        @ Brad Withyman

        Oh, didn’t know Webber has a fastest lap trophy somewhere in his cabinet.

        For sure as shown in 2010, Webber can give Sebi a run for his money in qualifying but the problem is when his head drops, it’s very difficult to get performance out of him and that’s why I was surprised.

      3. KRB says:

        That was Kimi … 10 in a season, twice. Schumi did it once too (10 FL’s, that is).

    2. Sebee says:

      Couldn’t this be the race where Webber gets 10th win and Vettel allo2s the WDC to b3 stretched out?

      I don’t know. I’m out of the predictions business. ;-)

      1. goferet says:

        @ Sebee

        Uh-Oh!!

        I think you have just jinxed Webber.

  8. Joshua says:

    Place your bets for a trademark Mark Webber start issue!

    Great lap from vettel without kers. Also Grosjean Hamilton and massa did really well.

    Looking forward to tomorrow

    James. …great pod cast and I caught the tv interview with Murray. What a legend Murray is.

    1. James Allen says:

      Thanks! Spread the word

    2. David C says:

      Your right man mark needs to get his act together, he has so many bad starts that it’s probably all in his head at this stage. I would love to see one last MW win

  9. johnH says:

    Great to see MW get a pole, now for the race :)

  10. dufus says:

    Great work Webber. Tv said Horner told vettel he had kers for his flying lap. Vettel locked up a front. Webbers lap was better and hes been on it all weekend.

    1. Brad Withyman says:

      Notice how nobody wants to accept that. I heard Brundel say it. Anyway, now we might have a fight for the lead. Have the jus jus masters hopped on vettels back? Its his turn ;-)

      1. Juzh says:

        Accept what? Webber and Horner both confirmed he had no kers throughout Q3. Sky was full of non-sense and false information today, not to mention they missed a ton of stuff.

      2. Juzh says:

        Also the only time vettel’s kers worked was in Q2 and guess who was on top by quite some margin in that session.

      3. dufus says:

        Accept that Webber has been outstanding this weekend. Can you do that ?

      4. Tim says:

        I think that’s a bit harsh on Sky. Crofty quoted SV’s engineer, Rocky, during the commentary. He even mentioned the re-set method, joking that it wasn’t ctrl alt delete. They must have got that information from somewhere – maybe the radio messages?

      5. Sid says:

        Horner referred to the first sector time being right up there, but KERS isn’t used in S1 and not much in S3, Vettel was fastest in both. KERS is used in S2 where he lost 0.3s to webber but clawed back 0.2s on the rest of hte lap

      6. Equin0x says:

        Yeah it is funny some don’t want to accept Seb had a terrible day starting from FP3. If its Webber with all those issue god knows what he and these Vettel haters would be saying, actually that was a great effort from Seb it shows what he can do from a car that wasn’t tuned in and also was underpowered, if everyone is jumping up and down thinking this was an achievement from Webber should maybe look at themselves and wonder if Seb could actually win the title next year with a underpowered car, scary thought.

      7. Tim says:

        Please may I make a polite request? Would you please refrain from referring to anyone that isn’t a fan of Vettel as a hater. I am not a fan of Vettel (I respect his abilities, but I am not a fan) but I certainly don’t hate him.
        We are all fans of F1 (I think/hope) and it must be possible to debate without being so aggressive.
        Thank you :-)

      8. James Allen says:

        The word “hater” is not allowed on this site. We always try to spot it and mod it out, but your request here is reasonable and mirrors our own view

  11. Random 79 says:

    Well done Mark, bring it through for tomorrow :)

  12. Rach says:

    I can’t believe how many times things go wrong for Vettel. What with his Kers problems in Germany and Hungary. A DNF in Silverstone, now this. How much bad luck can one guy have………

    I joke of course. Good luck to Webber tomorrow I hope he wins as it would be great for him to go out with a final win.

    1. Random 79 says:

      Yes I too weep for the amount of bad luck Vettel has had during his three and a bit world championships. Honestly, how does he cope? :)

    2. Tealeaf says:

      Lol but you have a point, Vettel has had just as much car technical issues if not more than Webber yet its conviniently not acknowledged by the english speaking media and Hamilton fans, but the thing is Vettel can handle these issues and negate them and still win races and championships.

      1. Gazza says:

        @Tealeaf

        I have to say you are very balanced.

        You have the “English speaking media” chip on one shoulder and the “Hamilton fans” chip on the other.

        Absolutely brilliant!!

      2. Tim says:

        + 1 Lol :-)

      3. Drew says:

        Gold!!!

  13. MelB says:

    Typo: “… meanwhile the man who replaces him, Kimi Raikkonen, again wasn’t able to peak in qualifying, ending up 9th, six tenths of a second behind team mate Grosjean.”

    4. Grosjean 1m31.365s
    9. Raikkonen 1m31.684s

    1. Phil Glass says:

      Both ALO and Kimi probably finish ahead of the rest, excepting Vettel. Old habits die hard: poor quali stellar race.

      Now if that kers in the RB is a naughty little kers, maybe just maybe the order will change
      1 ALO
      2 RAI
      3 HAM

      Drinks!

    2. MelB says:

      James, the difference is 0.319, not 6 tenths.

    3. jee1 says:

      Yes..The difference is 3 tengths.They are making it look more worse for Kimi

    4. Chir says:

      Kimi is making Grosjean look like a valid F1 driver.

      1. jjpm says:

        You’re absolutely right!
        Grosjean is just a GP2 champ… as the others GP2 champs, you know the like of Hamilton, Hulkenberg, Rosberg… your run-of-the-mill F1′s drivers! :P

  14. AlexD says:

    All it takes is the usual start from webber and things will get back to normal:-) this pole is just a data point for statistics….tomorrow ispt will mean nothing:-)

    1. Phil Glass says:

      Webbo will start well, but Massa will spin again [trying too hard] and will claim just one victim. Hope it isnt Webbs

      1. AlexD says:

        Sorry….what is your definition of usual?

      2. Phil Glass says:

        Real bad start for WEB, followed by kers issues… but just thought he might be in for a bit of luck, unusually.

  15. Harshad says:

    are both the Lotuses starting on the hard tyres?
    Will be interesting to know as to how was Kimi down 3tenths on Grosjean? They been very close to each other all through the weekend, within a tenth or too really, so difference on 3tenths in Q3 is a surprise.

    However, if they both are starting on hard tyres we are in for some strategic action tomorrow :)
    Alonso and Kimi, will have a lot to do, that makes in interesting is well.
    All set for a good race.

    1. James Allen says:

      No, both are starting on the medium tyre. They look very fast on the hards, though.

  16. Luke says:

    Congratulations to Mark, but I’m sure he would have preferred to take pole when his teammate wasn’t disadvantaged. Stellar performance from VET, considering that he had no KERS. No KERS means – 0.4s.
    Alonso and Kimi bad performances once again. Lewis – great as usual.

    1. dufus says:

      Stellar from Webber FYI…

  17. yes, i am of the exact same opinion. vettel maybe didnt have KERS on his first Q3 laps but i distictly heard it said that he had KERS on his final runs. if so then webbers win certainly wasn’t hollow.

    what is the bet that the team mess up with his start?

    1. Rene says:

      ‘the team’ mess up his start. lol

    2. Juzh says:

      Horner and webber confirmed he had no kers in Q3 for both laps. Don’t believe everything sky says.

      1. James Allen says:

        Webber called its hollow pollen- he wouldn’t do that if Vettel’s KERS was working, would he?

      2. Juzh says:

        Surely not =)

      3. Stephen Taylor says:

        I didn’t know flowers could do a fast lap time.

    3. DaveF1 says:

      Webber doesn’t need any external help to mess up his own start.

  18. spactus says:

    Are we that gulable?its quite clear that now that Vettel has the championship practically sown up,Webber is now allowed to compete and dare I say win one or two races.This accomplish couple things,the main one is dealing with Vettel unpopularity, the boings.Vettels unpopularity is because fans think he wins too easy,so giving a win to a sympathic figure like Webber,will please fans and make it look that Vettel is really that much better most of the time and just not a favoured number one,driving a Newy car.This is all PR,since after Singarpore and the suspicions,REDbULL has been toning down there pace within 3 to 4ths to make it look close and competive.

    1. bearforce says:

      Pure fantasy

    2. tara_185 says:

      I think your right. There seems to be a subtle change there.
      Obviously Vettel won’t stop winning or give positions to webber but I think someone has been briefed on the more pc/pr way to handle things

    3. Torchwood Five says:

      Yep, Red Bull tried the audacious experiment – how will the viewing public react to Vettel pulling a 20-30sec lead on the pack.

      Okay, not well, as it happens; let’s go back to the status quo where Sebastian maintains a lead that doesn’t look too out of this world.

      I grew up with the FIA for several years, changing the rules to clearly inconvenience Schumacher’s dominance, and seeing, probably three seasons in a row, Michael overcome the obstacles.

      While I shouldn’t advocate such behaviour, if a car ever does find itself in front of Sebastian’s vehicle, I think the FIA should temporarily suspend the ‘one blocking manouevre’ rule, simply because once his RB is past, it’s all over.

    4. deancassady says:

      Stranger things have happened in F1.
      The ‘B’ spec car/replacement.
      Horner quotes earlier in the week, ‘we’re in no hurry to sow up the championship’.
      But Vettel has shown that he is pathologically incapable of not trying to beat Webber.
      Maybe Bernie made a deal with them to preserve the mathematical possibility of continued competition to a time which they mutually agreed would be overall more suitable than this point, so early on.

      We can see what happens, tomorrow.

      I still like Grosjean to win.

      1. Ronnie says:

        “pathologically incapable of not trying to beat Webber.”
        +1

    5. SteveS says:

      The biggest problem with F1? The fans are mad as hatters. Why do you watch a “sport” where you’re convinced the results are all staged?

      1. Tim says:

        I don’t think the results are all staged but, surely, you must admit there is a certain degree of flexibility in the way the rules are administered. This is where conspiracy theories start ;-)

      2. Phil Glass says:

        Steve, this is a How forum, not a Why forum.

      3. Nedder says:

        Quite!

  19. The Spanish Inquisitor says:

    Alonso failed again. He is under pressure because he doesn’t know what to do in the next season. Out of Ferrari already. Ferrari is your sport tomb.

    1. anon says:

      Alonso’s not on the level of Vettel. He basically has one dry pole since 2007. He had a pole in 2008 but it was set with minimal fuel.

      Next year Ferrari will consistently qualify on the third row with two of the worst qualifiers driving their cars.

      1. Anil says:

        Not on the same level as the driver who in very fast cars made loads of mistakes in 2009 and scraped over the line in 2010 and 2012 despite a performance advantage.

        Seb is incredible in dominant cars but if you think he’s leagues above Alonso you’re mistaken. They are clearly better than the rest of the pack with Alonso much fewer mistakes when the pack is tighter and Seb being a better qualifier.

      2. Stephen Taylor says:

        He had no poles in 2008 but 1 in 2009 in Hungary.

  20. Sanky says:

    I fail to understand Kimi’s lack of qualifying pace .has he really lost his one lap pace or is it to do with the tyres and the lotus car? ..his race pace is awesome, in sharp contrast to his qualifying one

    Hoping for the Iceman to storm through the field tomorrow..
    BTW still cant forget Suzuka 2005, one of the most exciting races ever..

    1. James Allen says:

      Don’t know but Ferrari might be concerned looking at recent quali for of their 2014 drivers

      1. C Lin says:

        I think its the “new” tyres.
        Both Alonso & Raikkonen have this problem.

        James, do you know if Pirelli is using the same tyres next year? If yes, then worrying for Ferrari. But if the car is quick, these 2 champions will be up there on race days even if quali is not ideal.

      2. James Clayton says:

        Pirelli have said that they couldn’t use this years tyres because the loads of the 2014 cars would cause them to explode.

        Yea… I know, right!

      3. Abraham says:

        James, I have a question for you re the fast starting Ferrari. It is very scary for other team had they qualify 3rd, 4th on the grid as it put them 1st, 2nd by the end of the first corner.
        James can you do some analysis re how Ferrari got such a good start as it is worth a couple of position. I think Ferrari needs only to qualify in the second row.
        Thank you James

      4. James Allen says:

        We already did that at the time of Monaco GP this year, with Mark Gillan.

      5. justafan says:

        Not only Ferrari. As a fan I am concerned too. Why didn’t Ferrari take Hülkenberg? Not only is he in qualifying better than Alonso (see Suzuka), but in the race as well (see Yeongam). Despite driving a slower car, that is.

      6. Torchwood Five says:

        Why didn’t Ferarri take Hulkenberg?

        Ferarri policy. “Always have a Champion in the car.”

        If Alonso had not started to make his dis-satisfaction clear, then Nico may have been a shoe-in for the Massa seat, but once they start to worry that their current champion driver might be thinking of leaving, or getting himself sacked, they had to cover themselves by getting another champion, Kimi.

      7. hero_was_senna says:

        @ Torchwood.”Ferarri policy. “Always have a Champion in the car.”

        1) I’m assuming you meant Ferrari not Ferarri

        2) Let’s go on a journey back to 1983. I figure THIRTY years gives enough leeway.

        The only time Ferrari has had a World Champion in the car is
        1990/91 – Alain Prost
        1995/06 – Michael Schumacher
        2008/09 – Kimi Raikkonen
        2010/13 – Fernando Alonso

        Over the same period, Mclaren have had;
        83/93 – Lauda, Prost and Senna.
        98/01 – Hakkinen
        2007 – Alonso
        2009 – 2013 Hamilton and Button

        Prost was a champion already, MSC too and won a further 5 WDC there. Kimi wasn’t until Ferrari and Alonso obviously was.

        Ferrari is a successful enough institution that they can hire the best drivers in the world, it’s not because their philosophy demands it.

        They didn’t take Hulkenburg because this is a longer term game. They are seriously annoyed with Alonso. His nickname within Ferrari is “shit layer”.
        Hiring Kimi was done on purpose and was sealed before Hungary, when Alonso’s manager went to see RBR about a vacancy.
        LdM even said last winter to Alonso, when he wins a WDC then he can ask for specific team-mate. I think that says it all.

        If as people suspect, Alonso runs before 2014, Hulkenburg will be taken on then. But even so, Ferrari’s goal is Vettel and he is good friends with Kimi.

      8. justafan says:

        senna, Schumi was driving a Benetton in 1995.

      9. Vin S says:

        Why would Ferrari be nervous?
        How can any driver be the fastest in the Race… For 55 continuos lap after lap… & not be fast over 1 Lap? Physics doesn’t make any sense.

        Ferrari 2014 drivers have already lost the WDC this year after having thrown some mesmerising drives to catch Vettel. Now they are going through the motions and waiting for this season to get over already with some fun & frolic. Grosjean & Massa are fighting for their seats… they have no choice but to get in there already.

        Why Rogro & Massa were so slow for the first 12 races is the real problem. Kimi & Alonso are fighting for WDC, while Massa & Grosjean are huffing & puffing for a few bones when the season is already over. They’ll do exactly the same next year, while Ferrari drivers will be long gone in the first 10 races of 2014. Fact.

      10. C Lin says:

        Funny, it used to be you’re as good as your last race. Now its you’re as good as your last quali!

      11. deancassady says:

        reads like a wet Red dream, to me.
        I think Grosjean is finishing his curing stage, and is ready to be a proper F1 racer.
        Massa, one can only empathize with him, having been relegated to a supporting role for most of his prime, only with the rude machinations of MS in the Ferrari camp, working on proactively revising history to maximize his legacy and Kimi’s apolitical nature, did Massa ever get a real shot.
        I believe Lotus will keep Grosjean, and take the Hulk, if the Hulk doesn’t replace Alonso at Ferrari

      12. Phil Glass says:

        James, Kimi has been on the podium several times since the Ferrari announcement. It’s not as if either driver has a bad quali and then follows with a worse race.

      13. James Allen says:

        No I think it has nothing to do with the Ferrari announcement

        The new spec tyres seem to have knocked him off his best in single lap pace

    2. AlexD says:

      I watched Suzuka 2005 yesterday, great race. I really have no clue what is happening with Kimi and Alonso, but they are really doing a poor job on Saturdays and therefore can only recover some places instead of fighting for wins. Just imagine them starting a bit higher up the grid and do the same magic they typically do on Sundays. Concern for Ferrari….especially because Ferrari cannot produce a car that is fast on Saturday for many years already.

      1. justafan says:

        Wrong. Schumacher put the Ferrari on pole many times. It’s just Alonso who cannot deliver on a saturday. This is not Ferrari’s fault. Excluding the factor that Ferrari signed the wrong drivers, that is.

      2. Anil says:

        Schumacher was given cars that were fastest on a Saturday multiple times in his career.

        Alonso has never been given a car capable of regular pole position since 2008. On top of that he’s older than most drivers and we all know that younger drivers tend to be faster over 1 lap.

        I know you hate Alonso but chill out man.

      3. hero_was_senna says:

        He did, but most of those times coincided with a Ferrari that won at least 8 races a year and in 2002 and 2004 won 15 out of 18. I’m guessing that car was a little special?

    3. Antti says:

      Looking at the stats, one explanation stems to mind. Facts are as follows:

      Up to (and including) the German GP, Kimi beat Romain 8-1 in qualis, since then Romain has beaten Kimi 5-1. Pirelli developed the new tire specification for Hungarian GP after the German GP

      Obvious conclusion is that Kimi doesn’t get the present tire to work for qualification, the previous tire suited him much better. I assume the issue is that his gentle driving style does not generate heat into the tires fast enough so he doesn’t get the most out on one lap.

      1. James Allen says:

        Kimi has said that himself several times, including this weekend

      2. Rob Newman says:

        Who is to be blamed for that? Both Kimi and Alonso didn’t qualify properly today. Do they still want to blame the new Pirelli for that?

        In July they had the Young Driver’s Test in Silverstone. Vettel was working hard evaluating the tyres while certain drivers were hanging their family jewels in the pool. Who’s laughing now? Says a lot, doesn’t it?

      3. Antti says:

        It is of course up to Kimi (And Alonso) to get on top of the new tires, I was merely pointing out the reason why Kimi has been struggling in qualis lately (as far as I see it) to the poster I responded to (Sanky).

      4. jjpm says:

        Maybe Grosjean has learned some trick on how to use tires during his stay as Pirelli test driver, tricks he didn’t share with his older teammate…

      5. jjpm says:

        Maybe Grosjean has learned some trick on how to get the best out of his tires during his stay as Pirelli’s test driver, tricks he didn’t share with his older teammate…

  21. Harshad says:

    For all those who undermine/Criticize Vettel, today was an example of his talent & Speed!
    P2 without KERS, goodness me!

    Put any of your favorite drivers in that car without KERS, I don’t think any of them would have managed P2.

    1. Anil says:

      Surely that shows how much further ahead the red bull is relative to the other cars? Without KERS and a RB driver finished ahead of the everyone but his team mate…that’s bloody impressive, it also shows webber didn’t extract the maximum from the car.

    2. Sid says:

      Even with James clearly mentioning Vet has no KERS and team principal Christian Horner clearly stating the same, look at comment #2, they’re saying he had it and lost it with that lock up. Astonishing fans!

    3. AlexD says:

      In which car…..I would say that many drivers from the current grid would do the same today in Vettel’s Red Bull. I am absolutely certain about it.

      1. Harshad says:

        Would you name a few? remember Alonso/Kimi both lost to their teammates by 3 tenths.

      2. Anil says:

        Interesting how you point to one race as an example…

        Younger drivers tend to have better 1 lap pace imo. I reckon rIcciardo would have taken poles in this years RB without a doubt. Let’s see what he does next year.

      3. Sid says:

        Many drivers would do same as Vettel in Redbull, the @AussieGrit outqualified Vettel in RB9 for the first time in 15 races… FYI

    4. Fada says:

      If Anything, It was the might of the RB9 that was displayed today. No KERS and its still a RB 1-2 up front.

      Looking at the sector times, It seems to me that Vettel lost 0.3 secs to Webber. Now whether that was due to lack of KERS or not, I can’t say. But for sure, RB were easily 0.4 secs ahead of their nearest rivals.

      1. peruvian says:

        In fact it is the might of the RB9 with Traccion control that is….
        TC is banned, yet the RB car has it…. I also believe Alonso has it, this of course is pure expeculation, but Alonso can’t qualify well, and race well… if alonso give his all during qualifying then everybody will notice his TC… I also believe the renaul power cars has it, Kimi is a very good driver but does not Qualify well and race well, same as Alonso.

        i know I will get flamed for this, but it is my opinion, and I am entitle too.

    5. pratz says:

      Webber is using a low downforce wing. So obviously he will lose some time to Vettel in sectors 1 & 2. So overall i think Webber performed better today.

      1. pratz says:

        sorry sector 1 & 3.

  22. Juzh says:

    Raikkonen and alonso binned the quali as usual.

    1. Rob Newman says:

      I think Kimi made a few mistakes. But in Alonso’s case, it is the car. For the past four years he has been telling the team to improve the car but they haven’t done anything. He is giving 200% (whatever that means) but with all the experts in the team, they are unable to give me a race winning car but he has managed to drag this car to race wins.

      1. Antti says:

        I’m not quite sure I follow your logic. Both Kimi and Fernando ended up 0.3s behind their team mates. You claim in Kimi’s case this was because he made a few mistakes, but in Fernando’s case the issue is that the car can’t go any faster? Which car did Massa drive then?

        All in all, way too much is made of this “Kimi and Fernando can’t qualify”-thing. They both have out-qualified their team mates this season 9-6 (and both team mates are known to be very quick on one lap), With Kimi, it’s easy to see that the new Pirelli spec does not suit him during Saturday’s, with the old spec he was trouncing Romain. Felipe has always been very strong on Saturdays, his problem for the past couple of season has been Sunday’s.

      2. Rob Newman says:

        Oh, actally it was the wind this time around which screwed up Alonso’s qualyfing laps. In India it will be somehting else – probably smog.

      3. Martin says:

        Rob feels Alonso is highly over rated and generally highlights his negatives. For this qualifying session Rob is reasonably accurate – Alonso said the car wasn’t quick enough, but based on Massa’s time, it is likely that in theory, 4th could have been squeezed out.

        That doesn’t mean that Massa didn’t do a better lap than Rosberg and Raikkonen and that the Ferrari isn’t the fourth fastest car. Looking at the speed trap, there’s no obvious set up bias for the race for Alonso versus Massa, unlikely 2011.

      4. hero_was_senna says:

        Unlike you Rob, you sound as though you’re defending Alonso.
        Normally you quite rightly observe that he is amongst the worst F1 drivers, he is solely responsible for Ferrari not qualifying any higher and that his father Dick Dastardly has one over the F1 paddock.

        Or is this a different Rob?

      5. Rob Newman says:

        Apologies. I got carried away; I was being sarcastic.

    2. justafan says:

      Ferrari will have two drivers next year that cannot qualify. It hurts being a Ferrari fan. Luca, get Vettel, Hamilton, Rosberg or Hülkenberg. Qualifying is too important nowadays.

      1. Bryce says:

        And a lot of people were surprised by the Bulls decision to sign RIC for his quali and testing speed, a no brainer IMO.

      2. hero_was_senna says:

        Rosberg…. hahahahahahaha stop it, it hurts!!!

      3. Martin says:

        I could be wrong, but I reckon passing will be pretty easy next year – fuel saving will be more significant and with the electric motor power boost being twice what it was, there will be more opportunities for passing – none of it related to traditional driver talents.

    3. Vin S says:

      It doesn’t matter to them anymore… WDC fight got over in Spa. Top Drivers only bother to rise when there is a Prize available for their efforts. Fighting with their teammates over some minor qualifying bragging rights doesn’t interest World Champions this late in the season when the Championship is already done & dusted.

      They used up all their energy trying to beat Vettel… Now they are chilling out, taking it easy and recharging for a brand new WDC fight in 2014.

      Meanwhile, Massa & Grosjean are making the most of this lowering of guard by their champin teammates. Kimi & Alonso are wise enough to know when to peak, and when to chill.

      1. C Lin says:

        Also I believe for Lotus case, they are concentrating to giving all their support to Grosjean since Raikkonen is leaving. This will help to boost Grosjean’s confidence next year to lead the team.

        Let’s not count the chicken before they are hatched, Alonso & Raikkonen may still be a good pairing for Ferrari next year.

      2. deancassady says:

        I am more in agreement with you on this comment.

      3. fan says:

        If that is the case then ALO and RAI have already lost the 2014 season in addition to 2013. Real top drivers leave nothing on the track whether they fighting for 1st place or 20th place. Can you imagine Senna taking the rest of the season off? A true champion would never just go through the motions. Face it they are performing poorly or they have lost their heart.

  23. yst_01 says:

    FYI
    Vettel does not need a bad starting Webber…

    He will get him as he got Hamilton in Germany, Spa, Barcelona or Alonso in Bahrain. Get your tissues ready or stop whining.

    1. Random 79 says:

      Tissues ready: Check.

      Let me know when you need them :)

    2. KRB says:

      Germany was a horrible start for Hamilton, who got swamped by BOTH Red Bulls. Spa was better traction out of La Source for Vettel, and the RB9′s ability to better carry speed through Eau Rouge than the Merc. No chance for Lewis to hold off Vettel on the straight there.

      Barcelona I’ll give ya, though Lewis wasn’t helped at all by his teammate at the start there, helping to box him in, heading into turn 1. Lewis should’ve kept moving over as Nico moved over, as it would’ve forced Vettel to the inside and would’ve kept him in P3. As it was, Vettel wasn’t able to get by Rosberg for 12 laps, which seems to negate your premise. And this at Spain, which was a nightmare race for Mercedes.

      As for Bahrain, the difference in car performance in those early laps was stark. The RB9 was so nimble, whereas Alonso’s Ferrari was lumbering. At the time, I likened it to a MiG fighter getting past a Lancaster bomber.

      1. yst_01 says:

        I see, the usual excuses: Vettel overtakes, it is the car, Hamilton or Alonso overtakes, it is the driver…

        Vettel and Hamilton shared five times a row in 2013. Vettel won four of them. It seems, Marko manipulates not just Webber’s starts…

        “Vettel wasn’t able to get by Rosberg for 12 laps, which seems to negate your premise. And this at Spain, which was a nightmare race for Mercedes.”

        Well, Alonso didn’t pass Rosberg until the first pit stop too and Vettel passed Rosberg and finished ahead of him in the end. BTW it was only a nightmare for Hamilton who got lapped by a couple of drivers..

        “As for Bahrain, the difference in car performance in those early laps was stark.”

        yeah.. we all saw what Webber did in the opening laps in Bahrain. Vettel was P3 after the first corner and P1 after the third lap, while Webber couldn’t overtake Massa and his broken frontwing on the track and pitted in lap 9. Stark? LOL!

      2. KRB says:

        I see, so every pass Vettel has ever completed is all down to him, and nothing to do with the great car underneath him? In fact, it was b/c of the car that he couldn’t pass in Hungary, right? The car holds Vettel back … yeah, that’s the ticket!

        Spain was a nightmare for Rosberg too … unless of course you think P1 to P6 is a good day’s work. For the pole-sitter to drop 5 places in a race w/o any incident to explain such a drop, is very bad indeed. I would say the worst ever ‘clean race’ for a pole-sitter in the history of F1, but hey, there’s Rosberg’s P1 to P9 in Bahrain this year!

  24. AJ says:

    Word is that because the spare RB was set up in case Seb would need it, it’s missing a few little special tweaks that Helmut had done to Mark’s previous car back at the start of the season.
    Don’t believe me? just watch Mark off the line tomorrow. This car won’t bog down and Mark will have a ripper get away.

    jk, but then again…..?

    1. James Allen says:

      Nice theory, but they don’t have spare cars any more.. Only spare monocoques that can be built up

      1. AlexD says:

        I will need to google: “Helmut + Marco + Voodoo”….see if Google returns pictures of Webber:-)

      2. dufus says:

        Wow ! let’s see. Most of us Webber fans expect a crap start. Why, well of course because Vet is better than Web. Give me and any reasonable fan some respect !!!!!

      3. Simmo says:

        It’s all too confusing :S

      4. KRB says:

        JA, what was this talk about team orders from RBR?! I hope that’s a joke. If this was the final few races, and Seb was in a close fight with another rival, that would be one thing. But Vettel’s up by 77 pts with only 5 races to go! Alonso could podium the remaining races (3rd every time), and Vettel DNF each race, and still he could lose.

        I will be disgusted if RBR employ team orders for the race.

      5. justafan says:

        Webs wouldn’t follow them anyway.

      6. Tim says:

        I will be disgusted if RBR employ team orders for the race…

        They wouldn’t dare, would they?

      7. SteveS says:

        Webber has never followed team orders in the past, what makes you think he would start now?

      8. KRB says:

        SteveS, you believe that Webber hasn’t followed more than a few Multi 12′s in the past 4 seasons?

      9. hero_was_senna says:

        Vettel will be racing hard despite the points advantage. Why?

        Hasn’t anyone realised he will equal most wins in a season if he wins every race now?

        MSC is the holder on 13 wins.

    2. Sid says:

      Squashed silly conspiracy!!!

    3. Brad Withyman says:

      Helmut is the only spare mono-cock at Red Bull.

      1. Nedder says:

        Hahaha! There is some funny stuff on here tonight…

    4. Glennb says:

      It’s true! If you look reeeeeal close you can see where they had to sand off the #1 and replace it with a #2. Also, on the dashboard, there is a tiny plaque that reads “Ravenous Rhonda”. Definitely Seb’s spare car ;)

  25. Ibrahim Sher says:

    Raikkonen is 3 tenths behind Grosjean not 6!

  26. Kaartik says:

    Being Raikkonen fan it’s always disappointing Saturdays of late. He is struggling very badly to generate heat compare to Grojeon with the new pirelli even though his race pace is very good. Raikkonen should sacrifice some race pace for quali just because he can have good grid position.

  27. according to one report the chassis webber now has is the one used in hungary and it is heavier than the one demolished in korea….and he still managed pole.

    1. Sid says:

      link please

      1. Rob Newman says:

        This was reported by Sky TV.

    2. CYeo says:

      Having a heavier chassis just means he has less ballast weight to move around.

      All cars are racing at the same minimum weight, which is the car + driver.

      1. Anil says:

        Yeah but less ballast means far worse balance.

  28. Erik says:

    Um, the Sky boys on the commentary today were informed and said on-air that KERS was back for Vettel’s car for his final Q3 run, got reset in the pits before he went out for it, which explains Vettel’s quick sector one time. The difference in laptime was Vettel locking up, running wide in the middle sector as shown in the replay no? Sorry James, but I don’t think that if Brundle and his informants are indeed correct (just watched it all back as I have it recorded) that it would be fair on Mark, he seems to have beaten the Vet fair and square today so he should take all the glory.

    Anyway well done to Webber, though I have a sneaking suspicion Mark’s car will bog down at the start as usual and the KERS issue will magically move to his car overnight!

    1. Sid says:

      On same Sky coverage, team principal Christian Horner confirmed that Vettel didn’t have KERS. You think Brundle has more info than a team principal. Seb’s S1 time on both his quick laps was pretty identical, by the way KERS is not used in S1, it’s used in S2 when exiting slow corners.

      1. Brad Withyman says:

        You think Horner is more believable than Brundle?? Its a question of credibility not who says what.

    2. Sue says:

      As has been confirmed many times Brundle was wrong. The BBC knew he didn’t have KERS from the graphics which suggests the Sky commentary team just weren’t paying attention to all the information at hand.

      1. James Allen says:

        The graphics did not show KERS on that lap.

        Vettel himself, Horner and Webber all said in their post quali interviews that Vettel did not have KERS in the laps that counted in Q3. Simple as that

      2. Jay says:

        How would Mark know that Vettel did not have KERS??

      3. James Allen says:

        He told him as they got out of the cars. But his engineer may have told him before that via radio.He would know that

  29. kevsuths says:

    Hopefully the problem with Vettel’s car will keep the people who say there is a conspiracy against Webber will keep them quiet!

    Hope Webber pulls’s off the win tomorrow!

  30. SbengaF1 says:

    “Fernando, Felipe is much faster than you. Can you confirm you understand that message, Samurai?” Hehehe!

    Seriously though, I’m really happy for Felipe. Hope he gets a competitive drive next year. Really deserved the title in ’08. A real shame about that accident in ’09.

    1. hero_was_senna says:

      I hope he leaves F1, cannot stand him.

  31. graham says:

    Can’t you guys give credit where it’s due?. Why are so many of you so one eyed!
    Being an Aussie, I am a massive Webber fan, having followed his career since his Formula days.
    But even I concede that Vettel is, on average, 3 tenths quicker over a quali lap.
    What is wrong with that? I’s okay to admit that someone is better at something than someone else.
    So, let’s give credit where it’s due. Like him or hate, Vettel has some serious talent.

      1. Nedder says:

        Seconded.

    1. jjpm says:

      and the same can be said of Grosjean, he is, on average 2 tenth quicker in quali lap than Kimi as demonstrated since Hungary!

      1. Elie says:

        & where had that got him on Sunday..? Do people appreciate that setting a car up for Sat does not ideally give you the best Sund car or vice versa..

      2. jjpm says:

        Vettel won and Grosjean lead 26 of the 53 laps
        Grosjean third 9.9s
        Raikkonen fifth 47.3s

        what’s your point?

      3. Elie says:

        Many point is why is it Kimi always manages to pass Grosjean no matter where he starts.Suzuka being the exception for quite some time. Kimi manages to set his car up and manage his tyres better through the race. I’m sure this is allowed for over the course if the weekend. That said he still needs to be a bit better quali and Suzuka was the perfect eg.. But unlike most others he made clear he made 2 small mistakes on his quali lap and the gaps were very tight on Sat..

    2. Nate says:

      Exactly. I’m a big Webber fan, but Vettel is faster. That’s just the way it is. Mark has lost a bit of pace over the last few years, it happens to all of them over time. Let’s not fool ourselves, doesn’t matter if your a fan if Vettel or not, he’s one of the best, no question. Claiming otherwise is just plain silly.

  32. Luke says:

    http://www.wired.com/autopia/2013/10/red-bull-f1-traction-control/

    James,

    can you give us an opinion on the article?

    Thanks

    1. James Allen says:

      I saw it. There’s no way of doing something funny with ECU.

      I’ll ask Mark Gillan’s view

    2. Vivek says:

      James,

      I hope there is nothing to this really. But, one must accept that Vettel’s car made a different sound to the rest of the cars that came around.

      The different sound while not exactly identical to the sound on the Honda, does seem like a muted/inhibited version of the same.

      I hope RB are not doing something funny. RB & Vettel really do not need to be doing any of this. Please tell me this is not true and put all the conspiracy theories to rest.

      Regards
      Vivek

      1. James Allen says:

        I’ve said it many times. It’s not possible with an FIA spec ECU to have traction control. All you can play with is engine mapping

      2. SteveS says:

        The reason people love their conspiracy theories is that by definition they can never be put to rest. They can always say “But it COULD be true if …”

      3. Nedder says:

        The way the car seems to work is EXTREMELY clever, but highly unlikely to be illegal. The FIA (who know far more about it than us) have probably been checking this allegation out in some detail,and as we’ve had no rule clarifications, I suspect everything is in order. I believe the teams submit anything ‘questionable’ to the FIA before it’s raced (generally speaking). It’s a quick car, with a couple of quick drivers in it. It may well be right on the edge of being legal, but ultimately, Red Bull are just doing the job. I’m not a huge RB fan but (if I had a hat) I’d doff it to them. They have destroyed EVERYONE for almost four years now, and to be fair, that’s against some quality opposition. Fair play to them.

    3. hung says:

      Anyone noticed that Vettel’s car seemed losing a bit traction at corners in Q3 after his KERS was down?

      1. Hansb says:

        Well I really didnt see that. The only thing I noticed today was the RB didn’t produce this strange noise anymore.
        Not even in the slow chicane before the main straight.

      2. Jay says:

        The word is because his Traction Control is some how linked to KERS!

  33. oddz says:

    James, I have a question for you if you don’t mind plz?
    on this tract how fast is the redbull machinery compared to it s closest rival both race pace nd qualy pace given that even without kers vettel was dat fast?

    I know SV is fast but I get the impression that car really gives him a big advantage

  34. CRP says:

    Minor correction, I believe… but anyway:
    “Meanwhile the man who replaces him, Kimi Raikkonen, again wasn’t able to peak in qualifying, ending up 9th, six tenths of a second behind team mate Grosjean.”

    I believe that’s closer to three tenths to be fair to Kimi.

  35. Elie says:

    James,would you kindly clarify to everyone that Sebastian did in fact have KERS for his final run. He lost it at the start of Q3, but got it back just before his final run.. I do realise it means he has to rebalance the brake set up and get back his rythym but fairs fair.. Or was it wrong what was announced by Martin &DC?.. Either way it was a great effort by Mark- well done mate !

    1. AlexD says:

      How do you know he had KERS for his final run?

      1. Elie says:

        I will say it again !- It was announced by Brundle and Coulthard during live commentary

      2. bearforce1 says:

        The sky team got it wrong on this occasion.

      3. Elie says:

        Yep they got it wrong Apparently !

    2. bearforce says:

      Clarified. Vettel had no KERS in Q3. It was all Vettel’s mad skils.

    3. Tim says:

      Or was it wrong what was announced by Martin &DC?

      Crofty definitely said that SV had KERS in commentary (for the final run in Q3). He even quoted the method of resetting it from Rocky. I assume SKY have someone monitoring the teams radio messages and that is where the info’ came from. It was after the race that Horner confirmed when KERS was and wasn’t working.

  36. fox says:

    Or Alonso and Raikkonen saved tyres for the race? Every single lap does matter. Those two are old foxes. It might be not so simple as failed quali. With few more laps in the pocket they are stronger with strategy and tactics.
    Anyway, this season is booooo’ed.

    Another confirmation that RB uses KERS for the magic in the corners?

    1. deancassady says:

      could be…
      we’ll see.

  37. David C says:

    Hi James/ anyone can RBR work on sebs car to fix the KERS or is he in parc fermé

    1. KRB says:

      They can fix the KERS, for sure. Might be limited in what they can play with, take off, etc., but they can definitely fix it.

    2. Gazza says:

      They’ll just take take the Kers off Marks car and give it to Seb.

      Simple.

  38. Glennb says:

    Well done Mark and RBR. KERS or no KERS Seb still did a sensational 2nd lap too. I’ll be holding my breath at the start tomorrow hoping Mark can get away cleanly. He hasn’t been too shabby recently so I hope that holds for tomorrow. Not sure if there will be any team orders but it doesn’t often come down to that with these 2 drivers. The team should be happy with a 1-2 either way. Mark should not feel this is a hollow ‘victory’. Some days are lucky, some are not. At least he can be satisfied that Seb didnt go down without a fight. Maybe they should jettison Sebs KERS and replace it with some strategically placed ballast ;)
    Nice run from Lewis in the dying moments too. Seems Fernando & Kimi like to challenge themselves on race day. They do make it hard on themselves sometimes. Happy for Felipe and Romain. This is a real interesting grid. I hope it doesn’t disappoint.
    Good luck to all your fav drivers/teams tomorrow :)

  39. paddy says:

    Im just a bit miffed by massa?! Im as a ferrari man through and through, but i am properly glad we have got rid, honestly, as nice a bloke as he is what use is a driver that only turns up the wick once his mind is settled towards the end of a season? None? Id love to have seen him do this well earlier in the season but he never has, nor did he do so last year, until his mind was settled. Few good qualys enough to make me sad hes going?? -no. Just remember, not only 6 days ago, was he going backwards into the hairpin at the start in korea. Does raikkonen do that kind of stuff often? Sad to see him go having SEVERELY under achieved all season, not sad that he will be replaced by a quality professional. Although…. Having wanted the man drowned after spa last year., would grosjean have been the better choice as a package for us…….. You decide, because i cant!

    1. Bryce says:

      I think your pair of drivers for next year are too similar, great if the car is capable of good quali pace and the tyres need nursing, but a little past their prime.

    2. Martin says:

      On Grosjean vs Raikkonen, in qualifying the characteristics of tyres next year could be a big factor – probably more how good Raikkonen will be. Raikkonen being shorter like Alonso might have a packaging benefit too.

  40. Vinoo says:

    im curious ..i remember kimi as being super fast over one lap in his younger days! but since he s been back…no great qualifying performances. !

    1. Vin S says:

      China P2 on the grid.

      Anyways, Kimi isn’t in a happy place with Lotus at the moment. He was 9-2 ahead before the Ferrari rumour got strong. Since then, the team themselves aren’t rooting for Kimi to perform coz of his Bonus Payments above Grosjean.

      No excuses, but having a enviornment where people want you to succeed is very important for any driver. Permane said he was annoyed with Singapore Podium, and called Korea lucky.

      Kimi has nothing more to achieve this season… And Lotus ins’t exactly giving him reason to turn up. They are ever so eager to crisize their top performer since Ferrari announcement non-stop, 3 weeks in a row. Any employee would be affected. Kimi still gets podiums when things are not exactly rosy with his team. Same in 2009 Ferrari, Monaco podium & 2nd half.

      Ferrari would be happy to see Kimi getting things done for his team, during this weird time of the season for him with Lotus. 2014 will be great, again critics are expecting Kimi to fail… But history states that Kimi always proves them wrong, every single time.

      1. Bryce says:

        The bonus payments would be covered by the monies from constructors points, so no problem there.

        With Kimi leaving, they would be silly not to give Romain priority. I also think that the change of tyres has affected their relative performance.

  41. Alexander Supertramp says:

    Dear Mark,

    First of all, congratulations with your first pole of the year, you deserved it.

    Secondly,for the sake of the race, have a good start. If you can’t, promise me you’ll hunt that German down as if he had just stolen your winning lottery ticket.

    Sincerely,

    Alex

  42. Michael S says:

    I rate Alonso and Kimi the best in F1 when it comes to race craft. However, they are no where near the top any longer in flat out qualy pace. They sure make life harder on themselves for Sunday.

    Great to see Webber get one last pole, but with no KERS for Seb, Mark must know he is coming in the race.

    1. justafan says:

      Alo’s and Rai’s times as good qualifiers are over. This is age taking it’s tall. Only Ferrari can’t see this.

      1. Vin S says:

        Wow, your ‘age’ having a toll doesn’t even make any sense logically.

        Older drivers should be having trouble in the Race Distance of 307 Km…. But you are saying that they are getting fatigued over 5 km lol.

        If age was a factor, It should be reverse don’t you think?

      2. Bryce says:

        I assume that you are young, else you would know the answer.

      3. Sri says:

        Not sure you follow cricket. In 5-day tests, older and experienced cricketers do very well in short T20 format (4 hours if you are not aware), it is young who shine. In quali, all you need is one good lap always on the edge with total dedication: young usually are more risk-taking and hence it pays off very well when it works: recall how many times Grosjean cut the chicane in practice sessions, but when he nailed it, he was always good. In race it is more of skill to look after the tires, overtaking and pushing only when needed – all that comes with experience. Of course Kimi already admitted that he made a couple of mistakes besides the tires introduced after Germany by Pirelli are not suited to his driving. Before that he was trouncing Grosjean.

      4. Martin says:

        Webber has said this year that the absolute last tenth of pace is the first thing to go with age. he didn’t go into details as to how he knows or how it manifests itself – for example the time to make small corrections mid corner, and therefore the corrections become bigger.

      5. dimitris says:

        Surely @justafan, do you seriously believe that either Alonso or Kimi could have done better in qualifying this year, against the one lap pace of Red Bull and Mercedes? Prior to the tyre change they were the best of the rest, securing, on the average, fifth and sixth position, behind the Red Bull and Mercedes drivers, being noticeably faster than their team mates. Both have said that the tyre change hurt them, and, in the case of Kimi the team is obviously not helping him to solve the issues brought by the tyre change. In the case of Ferrari, they stopped developing the car some time ago.

    2. fox says:

      My hypo is that they saved tyres for the race. Suzuka has plenty of turns. They need flexibility for the pitstop timing.

    3. alanf1 says:

      Dream on mate, by far Seb is the best.

      Stirling Moss has said recently Vettel is like Fangio. A few days ago Murray Walker considered the best ever three drivers Vettel, Schumacher and Fangio.

      Enjoy witnessing one of the best F1 periods.

    4. anon says:

      How can Alonso be considered best for race craft when he was stuck behind a Sauber for 50 laps last week? Hulkenberg out smarted him.

      Alonso and Kimi aren’t good qualifiers, haven’t been for years (Alonso has effectively one dry pole since 2007), they consistently under-perform on Saturday, then people gush when they get their cars to at least where they should be over the course of 1.5 hours on Sunday.

  43. Simmo says:

    It seems that Vettel has finally got some Webber luck now! It would be great to see Webber win this race :)

  44. Doug says:

    Software boffins at RBR work into the night…

    $car2_bog_start = TRUE;

    1. Nate says:

      Too funny!

  45. Kenneth M'Boy says:

    Multi 21, Seb. Multi 21!!!!

  46. Rob Newman says:

    Kersus! I find this strange; very strange. Vettel has KERS problem and Webber gets pole. Is this something like the strange gear box problem Vettel had in Brazil 2011 where Webber won his one and only race of the year but Vettel still managed to hold on to second place?

    Is there an element of WWE in F1 now? Newey is not in Japan which means definetely they are not expecting Vettel to win the championship in Suzuka. May be Bernie had a word with Horner to postpone the championship in the interest of sport, to increase viewing figures?

    Also, let’s not forget, Alonso still has hopes of winning the championship!!

    1. AJ says:

      I really can’t see Seb playing along with that one at all.

    2. deancassady says:

      thanx for this perspective, it does clarify, especially the Newey not in Japan.

    3. Brad Withyman says:

      Yep, definately room for suspicions with RB shenanigans. the kers is the Helmet control box.

    4. hero_was_senna says:

      I can’t see it Rob. If Vettel wins the remaining races this year, he equals Schumi’s 13 wins in a season.

  47. Freeman says:

    Great to see webber on pole, no KERS on vettles car and suddenly we see power oversteer? Don’t see that often? Maybe there’s some truth in the KERS TC rumours?

    1. Martin says:

      And so every team on the grid is running traction control by your logic?

  48. AJ says:

    Good stuff Mark. Did anyone notice at the weigh-in it seemed that many of the other drivers were really chuffed for Webber, coming up to him and giving what look to be very sincere congrats.
    Let’s hope he can follow through tomorrow.

    1. Bryce says:

      Probably fair to say that the only people that don’t like and respect him would be members of the blinkered finger boy fan club.

    2. yes AJ, i certainly noticed the open ‘bonhomie’ extended to webber from all the other drivers. it was great to see and just goes to show that the other drivers recognise webbers talent…at the top.

  49. Rob says:

    [Meanwhile, in the garage prepping for Q1...]
    Newey: Hey Chris, we’ve got Bernie phoning in again, can I hang up?
    Horner: God, no! Patch him to my headset. Hey, Bernie, what’s up?
    BE: Time to throw in the squirrel, Horner.
    Horner: look, Bernie, do we really have to -
    BE: Throw the squirrel in Seb’s cowl, Horner. The one that chews the red wires.
    Horner: No Bernie, not the KERS wire again! Can’t we just throw the squirrel in the garage and use the peanut butter trick on Mark’s car-
    BE: The squirrel, Horner. For Seb, this time. No substitutions.
    Horner: [sighs] Oh, alright. Can we at least be allowed to use electrical tape to try to-
    BE: No, no touching the red wire after the squirrel is done with it! It’s about the _show_, Horner!
    Horner: [resigned] Right-o, then.
    Newey: [head in hands, shaking his head in disbelief]

    1. pratz says:

      +1 awesome

    2. alanf1 says:

      Hilarious, well done. We need it more often :)

    3. Brad Withyman says:

      …lol. played out perfectly. So when will the script be complete for casting? Or r u thinking of a mocumentory?

    4. Nedder says:

      Hahaha! Laughing my ass off…

  50. ACx says:

    Webber did not “beat” Vettel, Vettel had technical issues.

    Perhaps celebrate that for once Webber managed to beat every one else in their inferior cars. Too often he cant even get 2nd behind Vettel.

  51. D Vega says:

    If Ferrari would have built better cars in recent years then Massa would not have been beaten so soundly, and perhaps would have out scored Alonso over a year. Massa’s problem is not his speed over a lap, but his inability to extract the most out of a difficult car over the course of a race, which is an indictment on Ferrari as much as it is on Massa. If he goes to Mclaren next year, and Mclaren has a good car he will beat Button.

    1. hero_was_senna says:

      Meanwhile in dreamland…

  52. Marco says:

    James, are you able to stay neutral, when it is clear through the home page of yous site that Red Bull is a senior sponsor?

    It does not seem good policy to be helped by those than are being commented.

    Please give us your thoughts, I think this matter bothers many.

    Regards

    1. James Allen says:

      Red Bull is not a sponsor. The Red Bull page on the site is sponsored by Infiniti.

    2. Nedder says:

      Seriously? James’s credentials are impeccable. Shame on you!! ;)

  53. Grant says:

    RBR dominates even with KERS problems, that car is just on another level!!!!!

    1. Yago says:

      One for those who say Alonso does not admit it when he does not a good enough job…

  54. Ian James says:

    Just to also note that Mark weighs 75kg (very low for a man of 1.85m height) and Seb weighs 64kg (1.76m height).

    So, Mark has to accelerate, corner and brake an additional 11kg in mass on every lap of every GP.

    I just looked up most of the qualifying times for Seb and Mark over the past 3 years or so and it seems to me that, if they had been the same weight, Mark would have been on pole far more often than Seb. The times have always been very close but that 11kg additional mass in Webber’s car appears to have been a major factor in the results.

    It will be very sad not to have Mark starting in Melbourne next year. He’s been a terrific ambassador for the sport.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. SteveS says:

      It would be nice if F1 fans knew a little bit about F1. Every car + driver weighs exactly the same amount. Mark has to accelerate exactly the same weight out of every corner of every lap as does Seb and every other driver on the grid.

      1. Gazza says:

        That’s true but its also not as simple as that.

        The Hulk is having trouble getting the top drive he deserves because of his height/weight.

        Being lighter means you can put the 10kg ballast lower in the chassis giving a lower C of G which is always an advantage.

        With tenths counting in F1 these days it makes a difference.

      2. hero_was_senna says:

        To add to your comment, it’s a pity that F1 fans don’t realise that although the cars weigh exactly the same, that additional 11kgs of Webber sits in the worst possible place for a car’s balance, ie the driving seat.
        With Vettel, that 11kgs of ballast can be placed on the floor of the car to balance it more efficiently.

        Thats why Hulkenburg has been mentioned recently as too heavy for next years regs.

      3. the weight differential does play an important part though in setting up the ballast to max out the balance of the car. this is where vettel has much more latitude and webber is penalised by being heavier.

        i would also think that webber being considerable taller than vettel could cause some changes to the COG factor but by how much i wouldn’t know.

      4. Nedder says:

        Well said. There’s been a lot of blatant misunderstanding of the ‘minimum weight’ rules recently, fans of the sport should have got their heads around this one by now. An interesting solution to the ‘heavy driver’ problem that’s being whipped up at the moment… Can’t remember who said it or on which forum, but how about driver+seat=(say)85kg, car weighs the minimum weight minus 85kg. Would that be a level playing field?

    2. Martin says:

      Hi Ian,

      To clarify SteveS’ point, the regulations state that the minimum car weight including the driver without fuel is 642 kg. Next year the limit will be 690 kg.

      There are some comments that the Marussia and Caterham cars are not at the weight limit. Next year more cars+drivers are expected to be above the minimum.

      The lead cars will be at the weight limit, to the variation between drivers will be minimal. The car weight is adjusted based on driver weight at the time, so the cars are close to the weight limit.

      What isn’t the same is the centre of gravity. A lower centre of gravity aids performance on cars with aerodynamic downforce. Numbers on this are not readily available from teams in the same way as the 3 tenths per 10 kg of fuel. I’ve plugged some numbers and have come up with 0.1-0.3 seconds difference advantage for Vettel over Webber, but that is with several assumptions about the car characteristics and as to how it translates to lap time on the track.

      Cheers,
      Martin

  55. JustGuessing says:

    Did anyone else catch Alonso’s comment, roughly; in Q3 the Bulls just push the turbo and they’re away.

    My impression from the comment suggest he believes the Bulls have got something extra, perhaps the putative ‘traction control?’

    I’m just reporting, not stirring OK

    1. The Spanish Inquisitor says:

      No, it was a generic comment. No team name was giving.

  56. Sri says:

    I cannot understand why Alonso/Kimi qualify so low? If tires are an issue, cannot they change the driving style a bit to be like their team-mates (esp. Grosjean)? I know it is a bit difficult to change in the last few years of your driving career, but they must try something different. May be they are trying, but that is not working. How many years will they be giving Vettel pole position and they start 5 places behind trying to catch him in the race? If next year, their performance in quali is going to be like this, they can bid goodbye to WDC.

    1. Harshad says:

      Not sure about Alonso, but Kimi made 2 mistakes on his quick lap in Q3!!

      Kimi is just trying a little too hard to beat Grosjean in Q3, and is making mistakes.

      Till this weekend, since Hungary tyres were not really helping Kimi. However, this weekend he said he had that sorted out & all through weekend Kimi & GRO were quiet close to each other, but Kimi’s mistake in Q3 didn’t help.

      I think, going forward, we should see better performances from Kimi on Saturday.

    2. Stephen Taylor says:

      Maybe they will both end up like Prost. SACKED.

    3. Bryce says:

      Age, simple as that.

    4. Elie says:

      Why is it Kimi was 8 : 1 out qualifying Grosjean before the tyre change. Why is it despite this Kimi still finishes ahead on Sunday– how you set the car up for race day is what’s more important isn’t it

      1. Alexander Supertramp says:

        Grosjean is pretty quick over a lap and he needed more time to come to grips with the car than Kimi. I do believe however that Grosjean has thrived on the knowledge that Kimi is leaving and that Lotus will be his team next year. The way Grosjean has been handling the situation has impressed me. I also believe the likes of Kimi, Fernando and Lewis haven’t been performing at their very best because they have lost some strength to compete against Vettel for the big shiny prize. They are fighting for the smaller honours- 2nd in the WDC/WCC- and that’s not bringing out the very best out of them. Kimi’s recent quali performances were mainly his doing and not so much the set up. Sunday is race day and brings the racer out in Kimi. Loved his move in the chicane today!

  57. Sebee says:

    How could RBR allow Prodromou to be stolen by McLaren?!

    1. James Allen says:

      The question is – why would he want to leave RBR? Stability is everything, especially at that level

      1. SteveS says:

        Bags and bags of money, I would assume.

      2. Sebee says:

        RBR has the biggest bags! What just happened?!

        Stellaaaaa!!!! ….I mean McLareeeeeeeeeen!!!!

      3. CYeo says:

        Having the title as aerodynamics leader for McLaren F1 on your business card is also a pretty good bet.

      4. UAN says:

        Talking to Ted Kravitz yesterday, it seemed Horner implied, while neither confirming or denying, that Prodromou left, he wouldn’t be able to start for McLaren for at least a year (based on being in the middle of a contract).

        Prodromou worked at McLaren until 2006/7 (iirc) and perhaps going back with increased responsibilities, more money and perhaps a new challenge could all factor into it. Sometimes it could be as simple as some personal issues as well (not related to RB at all).

      5. Sebee says:

        Ego? Pride? Job Title? Thinking grass is greener on the other side? Wanting to get out of Newey’s shadow?

        Ahhhh…the secrets!

      6. Miha Bevc says:

        Opportunity to step out of Newey’s shadow and prove himself?

      7. Ronnie says:

        Maybe he wants to prove himself without Newey?

      8. Nedder says:

        Maybe he wants to get out of Newey’s shadow? Not being ‘The Man’ must get a bit wearing for a highly competitive person… Good luck to him, I shall be watching how his career progresses with great interest. Somebody has to be the next Newey, as Newey himself was once the new Patrick Head.

      9. Martin says:

        Isn’t Rob Marshall the head of aero at Red Bull, so this could be a promotion for him, one that otherwise might not be available?

  58. JC says:

    Grosjean and Hulk keep impressive pace… Massa again quicker than Alo, I think same happened at the later races last year … More concern for Ferrari… Anyways nobody really know how 2014 will be, and to have Two GREAT racing drivers may provide an edge that Maranello needs to be in the game.

    1. Alexander Supertramp says:

      Ferrari isn’t exactly showing Red Bull skill on the technical side of the equation. I don’t believe they can really trouble Red Bull next year. Fernando and Kimi could have a shot at the title next year, but that will be because of their own skills.

  59. Lewis says:

    Wow, even without KERS the Red Bull is the fastest car!

    Massa, Grosjean and Hulkenburg were all superb today, 2 of the 3 Lotus drivers next season.

  60. deancassady says:

    It is all so very interesting…
    the currents here, especially those under the surface, not to forget to mention the wind on the surface.
    I find the patterns fortifying the conspiracy theorizers position that KERS is somehow being used as a traction control method, without definitive evidence being left behind via the ECU.
    The fans disenfrachisement by the Vettel domination, and Red Bull’s need to consolidate their position without any chance of somehow having any ‘special treatment’ of Vettel’s set up, somehow identified.
    Of course people want to look for a silver bullet behind why the Vettel-Red Bull package is so dominant.
    It is bad for the show.
    I saw someone mention that both Kimi and Alonso have a spare set of unused tires; is this true? Sacrificing grid position for three more laps on the tires might be an optimizing solution, if the traffic issue is mitigated.
    Some of the poackages in front will be slower and very difficult to pass, i.e. Hulkenberg.
    I expect Grosjean to go for it, which is warning to the top three qualifiers.
    I am interested to see how Alonso will turn his off the line advantage at this circuit, where to go (to miss hitting slower cars)?

    What I’d like to see on the podium, Webber, Grosjean, Massa, rain of the unreigned number twos.

  61. Sarvar says:

    I sincerely wish Mark to make finally his 10th in Suzuka tomorrow.
    As for Seb he will clinch his 4th sooner or later so if he assists Mark directly or indirectly that would be his great farewell to his teammate.

    1. Ronnie says:

      Now why would Seb help someone who he perceives as having sabotaged him before? And why would Webber want or need help from Seb? I just hope that those two are grown ups now, and nothing silly happens. They should fight to earn their keeps. Victory tastes sweeter that way. How the two behaved at press conference today was certainly a positive sign.

  62. JB says:

    LOL! Just like last year’s Monaco GP, Webber had to depend on Schumacher’s penalty to inherit a pole position.
    This time, Vettel’s disadvantage gave Webber the pole. Nothing to be proud of. But I guess if Vettel gets pole again, some people may not like it.

    Lets see what Jedi moves can Alonso pull out at the start line. LOL…

  63. JB says:

    Is there a bet on how many places can Alonso move up after lap1?

  64. KRB says:

    Is Pic still racing for Marussia, or what? Again, he’s been penalised for running a red light in the pit lane after it was closed. He’s been given a drive-through that has to be served in the first 5 laps of the race.

    Good luck getting that 13th that way!!

  65. Yago says:

    Top performances of qualifying:
    1) Felipe Massa. If there is something similar to a perfect lap, he managed that today!
    2) Jenson Button. Astonishing peace through all sessions. This is his best track by far!
    3) Nico Hulkemberg. Fantastic qualifying! His second best just behind Monza. Indeed noticeably better than Corea, and that was already pretty good!

  66. Raymondo says:

    Anyways… Sure we are all looking forward to another scintillating battle between the best drivers in the world. Thanks James for keeping us posted on the latest in the F1 world. Also love reading all the comments from all the fans around the globe. We seem to be going in circles though with all the rants about who is the best driver and what team is bending the rules(or cheating) and all that. I think we all probably looking for one of those seasons where one of the drivers win the the title against all ods. Someone who didn’t even have the best package in the field. We have had that and there will be more, don’t you worry.

  67. any hint of a ‘staged event’ would never be accepted by webber. i would think that webber would rather park the car than accept a gift from vettel, and rightly so.

  68. K says:

    Funny how no one mentions that Webber’s new chassis is lighter than Vettel’s and then celebrate how he beat Vettel, without acknowledging the KERS of Vettel not working. In fact, people are celebrating like Webber won the championship, lol.

    Whatever makes the sour grapes sour-er, I guess.

    1. now that is an interesting comment K. please post your source vis-a-vis the chassis weights so that the veracity can considered.

      some days ago i read an article somewhere on newsnow that actually stated the exact opposite although as i couldn’t find the article i prefaced my post with that info. i look forward to reading your response.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top Tags
SEARCH News
JA ON F1 In association with...
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Multi award winning Formula One photographer
Multi award winning Formula One photographer