Will the Prancing Horse rise?
Monza 2014
Italian Grand Prix
Di Resta: “Give me a faster car and I’ll get a podium”
News
XPB_573473_1200px
Posted By: James Allen  |  22 Apr 2013   |  1:09 pm GMT  |  109 comments

Paul di Resta has sent out a message to his Force India team: “Give me a faster car and I’ll get a podium. The Scot drove an impressive race in Sunday’s Bahrain Grand Prix, leading at one point and spending much of the grand prix in the top three. However Di Resta was passed by the Lotus of Romain Grosjean, who was on fresher option tyres, in the closing stages and had to settle for fourth.

Despite just missing out on the first podium finish of his career, Di Resta told JA on F1 after the race that the team is working at it’s maximum, however they must keep pushing and find more resources if they are to keep fighting for big points.

Force India moved above McLaren to fifth in the constructors’ championship as a result of Di Resta’s fourth place. The team have been competitive all season and could have been higher in the standings had it not been for faulty wheel nuts which spoiled both drivers race.

A fantastic result in Bahrain Paul and you equalled your best result in Formula 1 but you were so close to a podium. What’s your emotion right now?

“At the end of the day, I’ve got to congratulate everybody in the team. I think our performance has been good. We’ll go away with positive notes from it. We got caught out by somebody [Grosjean] who didn’t qualify where they should have, had four new sets of tyres and did a three-stop strategy which would have been the fastest way for any car if you had the tyres. They had the tyre life to do it.

“But there were strengths in the grand prix which we picked up on. Maybe we could have been a bit more aggressive at times. But it was a solid job when you can take advantage of the misfortunes of what the Ferraris had but essentially beat McLaren on outright pace. It’s crucial for us to pick up those points against out competitors.”

Having had a debrief with the team, can you see anywhere in race that could have been different for you to get that podium?

“Maybe the last tyre choice but I would definitely have made the same choice again given the information we had. You can always say when you’re doing a two-stop that you’re compromised because slower cars got in front of us with their first pit stop, and when I came out from my first pit stop, I was stuck behind them for 12 laps losing time – but you just have to bite your teeth and get on with it. It was definitely the right strategy for us.

“Another day, we’d probably get a podium out of it but the thing we can say is if we had faster car, we would have been in a position in front of Raikkonen and we would have beat him. But you’re racing cars that are qualifying on pole and winning races. Given the misfortune that we had in Malaysia in the heat, we’ve got to take a great amount of positives from the first four races but not forget that the team needs to work hard to bring updates because if they want this podium they’re going to have to work for it probably more than we [the drivers] do at the moment.”

It was a great result for the team, moving them ahead of McLaren in the constructors’ championship, which must be a nice feeling after these first four flyaway races?

“It is and given that we lost a grand prix [Malaysia] that we were very strong at, it’s all there. But we know McLaren are going to bounce back. They’ve got a huge amount of resource, they don’t lie down. But we’ll keep pushing as much as we can. It’s going to be an enjoyable couple of weeks but we’ll arrive in Barcelona with a lot of work to do – and we need to repeat it. We’ll be praying that the sun is out and shining quite hard.”

Do you think you just got more out of the car this weekend or is performance track specific?

“I think this is where we would probably have been in Malaysia. We can tell the car is performing well when it’s hot. We can’t put our finger on it. We were strong in the race in China when it was cooler and not so quick in qualifying when it was a bit warmer. When you get the car in the right operating window, it makes a big difference and we’ve seen that through the fluctuation up and down the grid.

“We were a second off pole on Saturday but the car that qualified pole finished ninth. It’s good, it’s good racing but it’s difficult. There’s a lot of freedom and you can’t always predict where it’s going to be. I think everybody is getting on top of the tyres and understanding them but Pirelli are going to change them a bit so that will throw another question mark into the mix I think in Barcelona [for the Spanish Grand Prix on May 12].”

When you get on a plane home, what will be your overriding emotion?

“I’m not getting on a plane home soon, I’ve got to go to India first. But I’m obviously a lot happier. After the second stop, we were racing [Mark] Webber and at points, we were pulling away from the Webber-Hamilton battle. I think Grosjean just got clear of them through having new tyres. You’re going to be vulnerable to someone on a new set of medium tyres. If we had them, we would have fitted them and he probably wouldn’t have passed us.

“In terms of our stint pace compared to Raikkonen, would he have got past us with the same age tyres? Probably not because we had both done the same amount of laps at end of race [on the tyres] and we were doing the same pace.  But it was simple, he had fresher, softer tyres and when the car’s a bit lower and the temperature drops it falls into the window of that strategy.”

What are your emotions after finishing fourth?

“I think I’ve got to be happy with it. You always want to get on the podium but it will come soon enough. It will make us work a bit harder. It’s 12 points taken with both hands but looking at every session this weekend, our performance was 100% what we could have done, so to go away with all those boxes ticked, credit to all the boys who are working hard after two long weeks.”

Deputy team principal Bob Fernley said there was naturally a bit of disappointment on missing out on a podium – do you feel that as well?

“Yeah I do. The team want a podium. I said ‘give me a faster car and I’ll get a podium’. If they work harder in the design office and essentially get a bit more resource in there, there’s no reason why we can’t do that. As a team, we’re performing to our maximum capacity – it’s just about getting that little bit more to get you a bit more comfortable at end of races and get you in position in qualifying every week which gives you credits to do that.”

Has team got resources to do that?

“The team is punching above its weight at the moment. It’s a midfield team. You can’t say we are a team the same as McLaren. I’ve been part of this team and it’s grown but it takes years and years to keep comfortably doing it. I would say it will take a few more years to do it. But if we can get this car in the operating window, it’s strong. We’ll be doing what we can in the engineering office to do that weekend in and weekend out.”

You’ve bounced back after a disappointing end to last year. Did you feel like you had a point to prove?

“Not so much a point to prove but I think I had convinced myself that nothing was going right at the end of last year and nothing was going to go right. Anything that could have gone wrong went wrong. This season was a fresh start. And I think we’ve performed to what we could have. I don’t see any more that we could have done. We’ll keep doing it. In Melbourne, we had a strong race, in China we had a strong race. We were on for one in Malaysia before the problems and we had another good weekend in Bahrain.

“We just have to keep rolling on, that’s what I say to the boys. We’ve got some new bits coming for Barcelona which are quite exciting if they work. It could turn it around. But not all the other teams are sleeping so I’m not going to get myself carried away. I’ll go away and think about it for a couple of weeks and get training. It’s exciting going back to Europe, I can get the family back on board and let them come and enjoy it and have a bit more support from it.”

Do you think the pecking order will change with all the teams bringing update packages to Barcelona?

“I think the one that is probably going to be the big one is McLaren and where they are going to be and if their updates make a huge difference. But we’ve got bits on the car which haven’t worked properly so we’ll be trying to optimise them as well as bringing new stuff. I think these cars are so close to their potential that it’s so hard to find those small bits.

“It was probably us concentrating so hard in winter testing, particularly in the last test in Barcelona where we didn’t bring any new bits and focused on understanding what we had, that has made the difference. We left Barcelona with a good car and I think we can go back there with higher temperatures and the car should hopefully be in a bit more of a sweet spot.”

Featured News
MORE FROM JA ON F1...
Share This:
Posted by:
Category:
109 Comments
  1. Michael S says:

    I think about 16 other drivers could say the same thing…. a bit of an obvious statement…

    1. Accole says:

      Guy is plain arrogant.

      It wasnt until bahrain that he could finally match the car’s potential and now he talking big.

    2. Gudien says:

      It’s not just about the podium, Paul.

  2. Scuderia McLaren says:

    Get the podium and you’ll get a faster car.

    Sorry Paul but that is a cop out. Every driver wants a faster car, not everybody deserves it.

    1. Sossoliso says:

      Chicken and Egg?
      Yes please, make mine an Omelette.

      1. Sebee says:

        Deep thoughts…with Jack Handy.

        Give me water, and I won’t be thirsty.

        Give me money, and I won’t be poor.

  3. Accole says:

    give you faster car?? your teammate almost won a gp in brazil 2012 while you were nowhere.

    1 shouldn’t attempt 2 stoppers unless you are Kimi Raikkonen.

    1. Simmo says:

      Why not try a 2 stopper, he pulled it off for 4th…

      Also, not stealing Hulkenberg’s thunder here or anything – I think he did a great job and is a solid driver – but it was sort of to do with the weather conditions creating a tyre lottery in Brazil.

      1. James says:

        One of the chief engineers on the grid said to Martin Brundle, on his gridwalk for Sky, that they believed Nico should’ve been further forward on the grid than where he was. Turns out they werent far from wrong.

      2. Yak says:

        Partly yes, but it still takes skill to put a Force India up the front against one of the very best cars on the grid being driven by one of the best shifty-weather-condition drivers out there, followed later on by a battle with a guy who’s often called the fastest driver in F1 today.

        I hope Sauber can pick up there game soon, because all he can do for now is out-class his team mate… which doesn’t appear to be any great achievement anyway.

  4. Glennb says:

    Give 75% of the drivers a faster car and they’ll be on the podium too. Sheeeesh.

    1. Emanuel says:

      Only 3 can be on the podium. That equals roughly 14% of the drivers.

    2. I will says:

      Agree 100%.
      JB win can be example.

    3. karthick says:

      Jenson too complains. But he is not targeted. Poor guy he s getting torn apart by everyone. I feel Paul’s tone is just not media friendly. He always has the stubborn look, not as flamboyant as Jenson or a Lewis. Just like vettel getting hated for winning. Last year in the last fly away races he had issues with the car. Even FI management accepted it and they tried to help him out with his driving style.

  5. hippyneil says:

    “Give me a faster car and I’ll get a podium”. Well, duh.

    Good drive from him on Sunday, though.

  6. nns2703 says:

    Di Resta only moans and demand 4m others to improve. He could hv finished on podium if he had extracted 100% 4m the car.
    Adrian Sutil with 15-16 lap older tyre consistently lapping in mid to low 1’39 but what Di Resta was doing lapping .5 sec slower then him. If Sutil was in his position then he would hv finished P2 atleast.

    1. Quade says:

      Two things -
      one, Di Resta is a great guy; two, Di Resta finished 4th, Sutil finished 13th.

      1. Yak says:

        Didn’t Sutil suffer a puncture on the first lap or something? That’ll tend to affect your race negatively. As will having a Sauber inserted into the back of your car in China.

        To compare finishing results when one car suffers a problem and the other doesn’t, or to compare points at the moment, is a bit pointless. The two seem fairly evenly matched at the moment, with it kinda swinging back and forth between them depending on the weekend. But di Resta does tend to whine a fair bit. He seems to be a tad less whiney so far this year, but that’s not necessarily saying much.

        Maybe he’s a great guy when you’re not putting a mic in front of him and asking, “How do you think your race went?”, but we don’t really see those bits.

      2. Me says:

        “If Sutil was in his position then he would have finished P2 at least”

        I agree with this…

  7. Tim says:

    For a while during the race I thought the Brit, Paul Di Resta, was going to get on the podium.
    Unfortunately the Scot, Paul Di Resta, narrowly missed third place :-(c

    1. NF1 says:

      I’ll bet you also supported Andy Murray once or twice too….

  8. Elissa says:

    I was certainly one person in the UK who was happy to see Romain pass him. Di Resta comes across with such an ‘entitled’ persona it’s hilarious. He’s extremely quick to throw the boot in against anyone else and especially his team. Good driver but appalling attitude and must be pretty annoying getting constantly overlooked for the ‘big drives’…..maybe he should go away and consider why and improve his demeanour.

    1. Quade says:

      Can we have examples of this arrogance?
      It should be easy to google around and provide us links to things said or done by Di Resta.

  9. Geoff Norman says:

    Taking over from Coulthard as the best whinger on the grid.

    1. Lol says:

      Webber has that one by miles.

      1. 69bhp says:

        brilliant :)

  10. Rach says:

    Was disappointed in the lack of fight that Di Resta showed when battling with Grosjean?

    My question would be does he really want it? If I’m whitmarsh, brawn or Horner looking for a driver did he look like he had the hunger? My view is he doesn’t he reminds me of DC or Button both good drivers but not ruthless like a Vet Ham Alo Web could you imagine either of these drivers giving up a podium so easy?

    1. Laurence H says:

      My thoughts exactly.

  11. SimoneL says:

    DiResta has always struck me as a good driver, but not a great driver. Perfectly capable of a No 2 spot at Ferrari / RBR, but I can’t see him as a No 1 / equal driver at one of the big teams. Not taking anything away from his drive on Sunday, but his best results do seem to come from playing the strategy game.

    Really wish that the Merc / Ferrari engine issue hadn’t clouded Force India’s driver choice as based on his current performance, Bianchi at Force India could have been really interesting

  12. Peter Bakalor says:

    I think saying in effect “if only they would work harder” is not a great way to endear yourself to the team.

    1. Yak says:

      Alonso did it pretty much all last year. One minute he’d say they’re the best team and they’re working hard, but the next minute he’d say the car itself is rubbish. So what, they try really hard but they’re just a bit simple?

      That said, I didn’t read di Resta’s comment that way. I took it more as a, “If we just keep pushing like we are we can make that next step,” type thing. As opposed to say, “You guys suck, I’m carrying all the weight here!”

      1. Thomas says:

        Thats pretty unfair. Alonso is as loyal as they come, talking up Ferrari, Massa, team first mentality and la familia every time someone gets a mic in front of him.

  13. mhilgtx says:

    Well it looks like at least 4 want to bash Paul for his statements.

    I think Paul and Sutil have done a great job and Force India should be commended for their efforts this year. The team has struggled especially in China but he is right the drivers have been there.

    The US broadcast guys interviewed someone from FI and apparently they had plenty of updates including a software update to allow smother downshifting. Beat they wish they had that in Brazil, they would have probably won that race without the harsh downshifting washing out the rear of the car.

    James or anyone have you heard any rumors that Chevrolet-GM-Holden might get into F1 with the new motor? Since the new motor is very similar to the one they run in IndyCar and Chevy being dominant I just wonder why they don’t. It seems like a good fit for the Holden badge.

  14. KGBVD says:

    The photograph of Paul smiling really threw me off…

    1. Yak says:

      Very rarely do I actually laugh out loud at things on the internet, but this got me…

    2. C MILLOY says:

      Very good best comment here..

  15. Mon Pen says:

    Oh dear yes a bit of an obvious thing to say and I can’t imagine there isn’t a driver on the grid who hasn’t said something equally trite at some point. But the point he is rather clumsily making is that it was the car, not his driving ability, that let him down in the end few laps so in that way it is fair comment. Anyway surely we all hate seeing drivers win just because they have great cars, it was bad enough with Villeneuve in 97 winning in a car Ricardo Rosset could have won in, or a string of WDCs Schumacher took in similarly dominant cars, or that Kimi can only ever win in a dominant car that someone else has developed for him, to realise how dull F1 gets when wins are virtually predetermined.

    1. Timmay says:

      Villeneuve fully deserved his title – that was a strong season.

      Mansell, Button, Vettel 2011 – now those were hollow victories based solely on the car.

      1. KRB says:

        JV had a strong car, without doubt. But it’s not like he was an old hand in the team against a rookie teammate … Frentzen was new to the team, but in his 4th F1 season, while it was JV’s 2nd season.

        10-1 in poles, 7-1 in wins, almost double the points.

        1997 was one of the best ever seasons in F1.

      2. Daninator says:

        Totally agree with Timmay’s comment, not sure what Mon Pen is on about though…

        Although MAN, BUT, and VET are good driver’s and deserve to be champions IMO, but yes their car’s in those years were the class of the field.

      3. Me says:

        Who, apart from Keke Rosberg has won the world championship while not in the best car?

      4. James Allen says:

        Schumacher ’94 and ’95,

        Any other ideas anyone?

      5. Chris says:

        Prost in 86?

      6. Fernando Cruz says:

        Prost in 86, Senna in 91, Schumacher in 94 and 95, Alonso in 2005, Hamilton in 2008…

      7. Me says:

        @James

        “Schumacher ’94 and ’95,

        Any other ideas anyone?”

        You don’t think the Benetton was the best car at the time?

      8. James Allen says:

        No the Williams was

      9. Chris says:

        I do like Jenson, and think he’s a fantastically smooth driver, but I always wonder about his title. But if he hadn’t have won it, SV would have.

        Even so, you have to take advantage of the chance to win when you have it, I mean, who wins the title in a dog of a car?

      10. uhum says:

        All titles won by Fangio were won with a car a couple of seconds faster than the second best car. So clearly, all his titles are hollow and he is not a real champ.

        Also Senna won his championships with clearly the fastest car. So also hollow titles and a hollow driver.

        And this goes for at least 3/4 of all champions.

      11. Merlin says:

        Ultimately, you can really only measure a driver’s quality against his opposition when they are both in equal machinery, and you are forgetting that Fangio was tested against Sterling Moss as his teammate, who was considered one of the greatest of the era. Likewise, Senna fought against Prost at McLaren. Until ’88, Prost was widely considered to be the best driver and the finest tactician of his era, until he was beaten by Senna.

      12. Bart says:

        “Mansell, Button, Vettel 2011 – now those were hollow victories based solely on the car.”

        Don’t be ridiculous. Dominating a season doesn’t make a victory hollow. Otherwise you’d better start talking the same about Clark and Fangio.

    2. Merlin says:

      Your remark about Villeneuve is far off the mark. Based on your logic, Rosset would be a superior driver to Heinz-Harald Frentzen, a claim that I doubt anyone will seriously support.

    3. Kimi4WDC says:

      Where is Alonso, with cars DNFing with technical failures in front of him? :)

  16. Paddy says:

    I don’t think DIR is as good as he thinks he is. Nothing special.

    1. karthick says:

      That is what you think..

  17. Kartik says:

    FI Missed pairing Jules with DIresta. had it happened we can see him tweeting about the Problems he had after every session.

    1. Timmay says:

      LoL so true. Bianchi looks quite good so far

    2. Kimi4WDC says:

      More like Sutil & Bianchi, that would have been much better. Though you never know how Bianchi would have perform, but I hope he gets his chance next year in a capable car.

      ps. Not to take anything away from Bianchi, but Chilton is not some one you want to pace yourself on.

      1. Kartik says:

        I know that @kimi4WDC but the Performance is the one must be considered He was dragging the Marussia car to Back end of Mid field and until caterham upgraded their Floor he Owned both caterhams comfortably.
        But as you said Bianchi and Sutil will be very Good pair but it didn’t pan out in reality.

  18. magic carpet says:

    To win one must first visualize oneself winning and that’s what Paul is trying to do. Good luck Paul, but saying if you’d “had another set of fresh tyres you would have fitted them, and Romain wouldn’t have passed you” is nonsense. If you had fitted fresh tyres, you would have finished twentysomething seconds, behind the Lotus and not even have been near him. If if if!

  19. Mitchel says:

    Don’t know why, but Di Resta is massively unpopular compared to Hulkenberg, Sutil….and many others no doubt.

    As long as he doesn’t say ‘is it cos I is Scotch?’, he might be able to weather the storm!

    1. Me says:

      Scotch?…

      I don’t believe they like being called that…

      Try Scottish.

  20. jay dee says:

    Sorry but he has had three years to prove himself and he hasn’t done anything special. Perez managed to impress in a Sauber and Vetel even won for Torro Rosso. What has Di Resta done apart from complain at every race?

    1. Angelina says:

      +1000

  21. Lewis Greaves says:

    Agree with all the other comments, bit of an idiotic statement to make… Surely it’s obvious that if you have a faster car you wold be able to contend for podium positions on a regular basis!

  22. Paige says:

    Nico Hulkenberg didn’t need a faster car to take the lead from a McLaren in Brazil or to have real race-winning pace there. All he needed to do was have some patience and not sideswipe Lewis Hamilton going into the first corner.

    Shut up and drive, Paul.

    1. Thomas says:

      Yep. Paul has pretty much been average for the last three years, and will probably not change.

  23. Elie says:

    Dear James, please pass this on to our friendly Scotsman
    Great effort Paul but your wrong on a number of counts ;-
    1. You did have a faster car than Raikkonen – you qualified 7th whereas Kimi was 8th and finished two places ahead!.
    The force India was quicker in a straight line also
    2. Romain Grosjean had an impact in the race and you did not !- he made one extra stop and finished ahead of you- sure he had fresher Rubber but he lost 20+ sec getting them on. Also he came from 11th not 7th and had to fight more than you did.
    3. Kimi had one lap older tyres on the last stint Not newer and at the last stop Kimi was 2 seconds ahead so – So you couldn’t have caught him had you stopped on the same lap.
    4. Kimi pulled a gap of 7.9.- 8.5 seconds during the last stint . Then the last 10 laps Kimi pulled away again to over 10sec on the same rubber.

    So No you weren’t pulling faster times you were comprehensively beaten by the only driver on the same strategy, on the same tyres, in a car that qualified behind you and was technically slower at that circuit. You are good but you are no Iceman and you are already being matched by your new team mate at other circuits -head down arse up and keep chipping away it was a good effort but many others would like a “faster car” including those that beat you.

    1. Scuderia McLaren says:

      +1

    2. Jake says:

      And actually, Kimi started from grid 8 vs. Paul from grid 5 due to Webber’s and Hamilton’s penalties..

      1. Elie says:

        Thanks..thats right

  24. Clear View says:

    If Paul keeps up like this, I can see him in the Lotus next year when Kimi goes to Red Bull……. Would like to see him in a proper quick car, just to scratch an itch.!

  25. oak says:

    got to say the comments above me are ridiculous! i don’t believe any other driver would have finished higher then 4th in a force India on Sunday. also people complain when drivers are too “mediafied” then complain when they give an honest answer! give the guy a break, any article about di resta always turns into who can slag him off the most, rather then how well he drove in the race!

    1. Steve Zodiac says:

      +1

    2. Simmo says:

      +1. If Kimi says anything of the sort people praise him…

      1. Surya says:

        Kimmi speaks his mind. Paul speaks from frustration. KIMMI has finished in the points in 22 consecutive races. World champion can out drive a car around its problem and still be on the podium. Any of this is available with Paul
        ? Hence people adore Kimmi and frown on Paul.

      2. Kimi4WDC says:

        I don’t think the issue is what exactly is being said, more like how they say it and just a general perception of the driver. Yes, they might say same things. But same as when Vettel does his “I want to be cool” epic fail remarks, people can’t help but cringe.

        Obviously for some reason, plenty of people perceive Paul differently to what you think and you can’t justify it with “the others do it”.

      3. KRB says:

        Corrections, it’s 21 consecutive races in the points. Four from beating the record.

        http://www.statsf1.com/en/statistiques/pilote/point/consecutif.aspx

      4. Accole says:

        Kimi never blame his team even back in mclaren days when his car more likely to broke down than finish races.

    3. Elie says:

      Ridiculous is when you say something that isn’t true..and sorry what Paul said simply wasn’t true. No one doubted he drove a good race but lets be real & keep it in perspective. Which I think many of the above posters addressed.

  26. Chris says:

    “If they work harder in the design office”

    Yup, I’m sure they’re all just sat there playing on their Xboxes all day at the moment you ungrateful little wretch. Try actually outdriving your car like everyone else has to for once.

    He’s never getting beaten because of anything he does, it’s always someone/something elses fault. I can’t stand him.

    1. brendan says:

      yes your right he only turns up and drives,the engineers work really hard,he will have 3 weeks off now while they all working.
      he should praise the workers for giving him a car to finish 4th in.
      before qualifying paul would off bite your arm off to finish 4th.
      i think he is worried about sutil coming in to the team after a year off and being as fast or faster than him.

    2. Robert says:

      Agreed – that “if they work harder” comment really infuriated me, and frankly cost PDR massive points in my estimation. Spoilt child. We need to have Sutil not being taken out in races so that he can show the little child how to drive what is given to him, not moan about what he wants.

  27. Steve Zodiac says:

    If you read the article properly you will see that Paul is merely saying that the car is not yet quite fast enough to achieve that last little bit. I don’t know why everyone says he’s a moaner, he certainly takes the job seriously and he’s always polite and helpful and takes the time to speak to the reporters in detail about any part of F1.
    Nigel Mansell was the king of the moaners and he ended up a national hero(also took him quite a few years to finally start winning). Seems to me that Paul is kicking Sutil’s arse too.

    1. Me says:

      But Mansell was a good driver…

      “Seems to me that Paul is kicking Sutil’s arse too.”

      For the moment maybe, but don’t expect it to last…

  28. Anon says:

    He thinks he’s so great and he’s had 2 full seasons so far in F1, one with Sutil and one with Hulkenberg and he’s been beaten twice.

    1. Calmo says:

      and that brings me to the question, how many non-brits at that vicious prove or go home mid/low team competition level would have been given a 3rd chance.. I cant think of many names.

  29. Ral says:

    I was wondering why they didn’t put him on a more “normal” 3-stop. He was lying 2nd after only 6 laps. If they’d had genuine faith in their own car’s pace, surely a normal strategy would have made sure slower cars wouldn’t have gotten in his way in the pit stop sequences, for example?

    It had a bit of a Sauber-esque feel to it for me: so used to having to find alternative strategies to get a good result, that when they were there on pace last year, they struggled to accept that almost and hurt their own chances almost by sticking with alternative strategies.

    1. AdrianMorse says:

      Very good point. If Paul had pitted at the end of lap 11 or even 12, he would have come out in front of the Rosberg – Button group, as can be seen here:

      http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2013/04/22/2013-bahrain-grand-prix-lap-charts/

      He then could have done a three-stopper. He would have had to use one set of used tyres, but then so did most other drivers who started from the top 10. A missed chance for Force India.

  30. AndyFaeLarky says:

    He could have had a podium if Force India had changed to a 3 stop and covered off Vettel…

    1. Ade says:

      Read the article – lack of tyres prevented him from running a 3 stopper!

      1. Ral says:

        That’s what he’s suggesting, sure. But he didn’t use any more tyres than the other people who qualified at the front.

        He would have had to use a scrubbed set, at least once. So? Most people did. Unless he actually damaged the tyres beyond minor flat spots, there was no reason why that would have unduly disadvantaged him.

  31. Adnan says:

    Says a driver who has lost out to his team mate twice in two years. Last year was a comprehensive drubbing. Second most over rated driver on the grid…after a certain ex-world champion who moans when his team mate attacks him on the track.

    1. Scuderia McLaren says:

      Yep. Agree 100%. Add an Aussie with a Bull on his car that has raced two centuries and you have all 3 of the most overrated in F1.

  32. JohnBt says:

    A better driver will the one yanking the hell out of a car like Senna in the Toleman.

    1. Skan says:

      Can’t happen anymore in the Pirelli era, bud. Senna would have pitted 8 times in the Bahrain race. I hear that you need to be driving at a solid 80% pace the car would allow and wave anyone trying to pass to score some good results.

  33. Timmay says:

    Man – give this guy a REALLY fast car and he might even come 2nd in the world drivers championship.

    What a joke.

  34. Craig in Manila says:

    People say funny things.

    1. “Give me a faster car and I’ll get a podium” essentially implying that he is waiting for them to lift their game.

    2. “The team are performing to maximum capacity” which obviously means that the Team cannot perform any better.

    Anyways, one result does not maketh the man. My jury remains out on this guy.

  35. JB says:

    Congrats DiResta for getting a small breakthrough. Not everyone can be as good as Alonso, Hamilton, Raikkonen or Vettel.

    As one of the best of the rest, DiResta ain’t too bad!

  36. Steve W says:

    Give him the fastest car and he might even win. Maybe…

  37. Ryan Eckford says:

    Force India aren’t that far away. They have probably the fifth fastest car, leading a group including McLaren, and the lone Sauber of Hulkenberg.

    They are capable of getting onto the podium if Red Bull, Lotus, Ferrari and Mercedes drop the ball, or have some misfortune.

  38. JD says:

    Glad to see on this forum other people who aren’t taken in by the Di Resta hype!! I’ve never known such a mediocre driver get so much
    TV coverage. He’s never shown even a glimmer
    of being a truly great driver, and yet seems to think he should be in a top team!

    1. brendan says:

      yes your right,if he is so good why aint he buttons team mate now?
      force india is doing well its a good start to the season for them.
      not calling the guy but the way he comes across is not good.least button smiles and has a laugh to compensate for being a morning git.
      imagine them two in the same team ha.

  39. Anthony Young says:

    I agree there is too much arrogance in what he says. He should be pleased with fourth place and should thank the team for giving him such a good car.

    It is notable that he didn’t even mention Sutil, who was unlucky to pick up a puncture on lap 1 and after that was not only faster than di Resta but everybody else as well. You have to put that down to sour grapes I guess.

    And yet it may be characteristic that Paul while not as fast as Sutil is good at staying out of trouble and getting it home, whereas Sutil is more prone to getting into trouble. That still marks Paul out as just a good number two though.

  40. jay dee says:

    He is dull as dish water. Wouldn’t matter him being not a great driver if he had a personality but he never does or says anything interesting.

  41. JoeP says:

    I have a hard time like DiResta. Sure, he’s a great sportsman and 100x the driver I am, so I recognize his professional competency, but his personality rubs me the wrong way and I don’t find him to be sympathetic. Given that he doesn’t podium, let alone win, and I’m not inclined to cheer for him. I don’t wish him to fail, but get a personality, Paul!

  42. pally says:

    Hi James,

    If you did a thorough analysis vs Sutil you would have noticed that Sutil beat Di Resta convincingly in the head to head at Bahrain.

    Sutil had a damaged wing through no fault of his own so by Lap 2 was 80 seconds behind Di Resta.
    However by the last lap of the race Sutil had reduced that defeceit to 55 seconds on the same strategy. This is a whopping 25 seconds Sutil gained on Di Resta from lap 2 onwards despite having to deal with traffic also.

    1. James Allen says:

      I know, and he did a faster race that Vettel if you look at it that way as he was closer to him at the end than he was after his early stop.

      But this is a strategy report about the tactics that decided the race, not a ‘who did the best race’ report.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top Tags
SEARCH News
JA ON F1 In association with...
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Multi award winning Formula One photographer
Multi award winning Formula One photographer