F1 World Champion 2014
Lewis Hamilton
Analysing a few pointers and trends from First F1 test of 2013
News
XPB.cc
Posted By: James Allen  |  09 Feb 2013   |  8:48 pm GMT  |  116 comments

The first F1 test of the 2013 season at Jerez provided little in the way of concrete pointers for the season that lies ahead; we do not know who is favourite for pole in Melbourne yet. But one would not expect to at this stage, as it was only the first test and the cars will change a lot before the season proper starts again with Melbourne qualifying on March 16.

Many of the cars started the week looking like 2012 models, but the wind tunnel models will look quite different already.

However, it is possible to read some trends and some signs from the testing done so far; to look at the kind of car some of the teams are dealing with, to look at early indications of how they are using the tyres and at some trends on single lap and longer run pace. So here are some pointers, with the thoughts of JA on F1′s technical adviser Prof Mark Gillan.

The first thing to say is that it is clearly going to be very close this year at the front and also between midfield teams, so we should have a really exciting championship and points will be hard to get for the midfielders.

It will come down to development, as always, but with no rule changes the gains the teams can make are constantly diminishing in size, so it could come down to tiny margins later in the year.


Red Bull

The new Red Bull looks a step forward from the car that ended the 2012 season fighting for wins with McLaren. Aerodynamically it is efficient, as Adrian Newey’s cars always are. It’s not done any eye catching times yet; this is classic Red Bull, they don’t show their hand.

As has been the trend in recent years, the Red Bull is the second slowest car on the straights: Vettel was clocked at 291km/h in the speed trap, compared to 305km/h for Force India and Lotus.

Last year their double DDRS system increased their straight line speed without sacrificing downforce in the corners towards the end of the season, but without it (and without being able to use DRS anything like as much under 2013 rules) they are back down the list.

This doesn’t matter if you are the quickest car and start from pole. But if you are in a battle, being 10-15km/h slower than your rivals could prove your Achilles Heel in a race.

The Red Bull’s longer runs on the Red Bull look consistent and fast, so they are on target. But they have lost something due to new rules on aeroelasticity on the front wings (i.e. flex wings) and one of the key areas engineers will be studying from the test data is how much performance has been lost there.


Ferrari

The Ferrari set the fastest time of the four day test in Jerez, with Felipe Massa dipping into the 1m 17s on Day 3. The new Ferrari is a good step forward from last year’s car and clearly is not riddled with problems, as last year’s was on its debut. This meant that Ferrari was able to crack on with testing development parts from as early as Day 2. They ran different exhausts, floor, diffuser and front wing in Jerez and many new things are no doubt planned for the Barcelona tests.

The Ferrari is using a DRS booster system using a Fluidic Switch, which channels air flow above a certain speed to increase the drag reduction system. It’s a difficult thing to get working right on a race track, but could be a useful gain if they nail it. Most of the top teams will probably evolve one as the year goes on.

It looks like this innovation could be the first “must-have” technology gizmo of the 2013 season.

The goal for Ferrari was to start the season with a car that is at or close to the pace of the front runner, as that will provide a platform for Fernando Alonso’s relentless consistency to mount a title campaign.


McLaren

McLaren maybe just shaded Round 1 – this first test – but it’s debatable.

Jenson Button’s lap in the 1m 18s on hard tyres on a dirty track on Day 1 was an eye opener. The McLaren hasn’t done anything eye catching since, but it got all their competitors wondering. At this stage the car looks better on the hard tyre than the soft, but there is a lot of new parts and set up changes to come so that may not be a pattern for the season. If you take a one second delta for the hard to the soft tyre, then this equals the Massa’s time on Day 3 when allowing for the tyre difference, but Button did the time on a dirty track on Day 1, whereas the track was clearly faster when Massa did his time. So it’s close, but the McLaren looks fast.


Lotus
The Lotus was arguably the most consistent car across the 2012 season and this year’s model looks like a nice improvement. They will be there or thereabouts, which is good news for Kimi Raikkonen fans.

James Allison’s technical team approaches things in a sensible, pragmatic way if new ideas aren’t working out. The feedback so far has been good and the car looked fast on the single lap runs on the soft tyre. Qualifying was a weakness of the 2012 car, so this is an area they have to get right this year if they are to better their 2012 results.


Mercedes
The Mercedes had reliability setbacks on the first two days, but they also didn’t look as strong as the front running Red Bull, Lotus, McLaren and Ferrari in the two high mileage days. The car is definitely losing its tyres on the longer runs, so they still have a lot to do, but Hamilton is making all the right noises and it’s really down to development from here.


Sauber
Sauber is always a dark horse, they were impressive last year in terms of capability to manage the tyre. They are on a similar budget level to Lotus, but have always done a good job. They aren’t far away and look to be ahead of Mercedes at this early stage.

Gutierrez caught the eye with some fast, consistent longer runs at the end of the week. It’s easy to go well in testing; for him the mental pressure of stepping up to having to deliver on a race weekend will be the challenge, it’s a big step up that some drivers don’t manage and we will watch that with interest.

What are the teams trying to achieve in a test?

F1 Teams are very regimented, they run 4 fuel levels: 20kg, 60kg, 80kg and 140kg. Most of the running you see at tests is done in 60-80kg loads. The only time they will do 140kg full tank runs is when they do a race simulation. The only time they will do less than 20kg, is when they simulate qualifying prior to the race simulation run.

Serious teams don’t run less than 20kg, which is a six-lap run. They have to be careful because the tyres don’t last more than a couple of timed laps.

Temperatures this week were 15 degrees, which isn’t too bad for winter testing, but it’s still not representative of the race weekend running which is usually 30 degrees plus and this is always one of the unknowns coming away from winter testing.

Featured News
MORE FROM JA ON F1...
Share This:
Posted by:
Category:
116 Comments
  1. tim says:

    What are the changes to the DRS rules mentioned?

    1. James Allen says:

      In quali and practice can only be used in prescribed zones

      1. And it is very good … finally they made a logical decision!

      2. Nesto says:

        It should have always been like this from the beginning, not sure why they allowed full use of it in quali when its primary reason was for overtaking during the race. I don’t like DRS and I’m an Alonso fan and it was implemented as a knee-jerk reaction to the 2010 finale.

        If they just had just allowed it in DRS zones during quali, I think RBR’s quali dominance would have been much different these past few years.

      3. Lee says:

        Wasn’t DRS announced before the finale?

      4. If it truly is an overtaking aid then why use it at all in quali? Surely quali should be about the basic speed of the car and DRS should only be a factor when attempting to overtake a slower car.

      5. shortsighted says:

        It always makes me wonder why when only Mercedes had the DDRS, it was allowed to be used anywhere on the circuit during qualifying, thus giving Mercedes the maximum benefit. Now that everyone has a DDRS, it is changed.

        Instead of a paid driver system, sometimes one has a paid benefit system. The FIA Technical Director has too much power to decide on his own.

    2. . says:

      Basically, the rule changes (just like the ones of the last 3 years) are about making the RBR go slower so the so called legendary teams could have a chance beating from a “drinks company”.

      F1 is such a great “sport”.

      1. floydhead says:

        Got to wonder why you’re reading and F1 blog then.

  2. Sikhumbuzo says:

    Hello James

    Do you perhaps have the total kilometers covered by each team for us please?

    ST

    1. Bayan says:

      Multiplying track length by laps done would give a good estimate of the distance covered.

  3. Salt says:

    Excellent piece. Have been following the live text feeds on dear old Aunty Beeb’s website and was also rather impressed by what looks like another excellent package from Lotus. Hoping they can manage to move this one forward, which is where they have stalled in last two seasons.

  4. Andy says:

    James, how far on average last year was the ferrari off the red bull mclaren pace? And what would have too be there net gain have too be on par or a tenth or two behind come Australia? It does seem too me they’ve managed too close up, what do you think?

  5. Michael says:

    Next test will again give us more of an indicator as Barcelona is the acid test of a car

  6. F1 for life says:

    Thanks James and Prof Mark Gillan, another good insight on the cars. Do you think Barcelona will give a clearer picture as various development parts for the 1st GP will be trialled out?

  7. Mitchel says:

    Thanks James,

    I always learn something a little unexpected from your articles. Wouldn’t have thought they’d be be so regimented with the fuel loads- no obvious sandbagging?

  8. F1 for life says:

    James, do you believe that the cars that we saw at this test will change slightly in the Barcelona test?

  9. richard piers says:

    Your analysis looks spot on. Too early to call.

  10. good summary there, but would like it to have included toro rosso as they have made substantial changes since last year and the car appeared to look quite impressive.

  11. Mocho_Pikuain says:

    James when you say “F1 Teams are very regimented, they run 4 fuel levels: 20kg, 60kg, 80kg and 140kg.” You mean there is a rule that only allows to load those exact amount of fuel loads or that they just simply perefer this loads for simplicity?

    1. James Allen says:

      No rule tgats whet has be one established practice

      1. Mocho_Pikuain says:

        Ok, thanks for the answer!

      2. Glennb says:

        Beautifully put James :)

  12. This has to be one of the go-to sites for technical analysis ahead of this season. So nice to get away from all the F1 political rubbish too!

    1. Miha Bevc says:

      Where have you been for the past 4 seasons? Anyway, welcome!

    2. coefficientf1 says:

      This place is also good for F1 technical insight:

      http://www.f1technical.net

  13. PJ says:

    Interesting report as always James. Thanks.

    Also, thank you for advertising Darren Heath’s exhibit today in London. I was able to go along, view his pictures, buy a copy of his book and even speak to the man himself. He’s a top bloke and his F1 pictures second to none.

    1. AlexD says:

      Lorenzo Bellanca?

  14. JCA says:

    James, with the problems with the condition of the tarmac that makes the tyre data less useful, do you think they would/should move the test next year?

    Also, would the Abu Dhabi track not be good for testing, late round of the previous season and used for YDT and warm temperatures , or is it too far from the U.K. bases?

  15. Tornillo Amarillo says:

    Oh.

    I realize that the article dedicates:
    to Red Bull 5 paragraphs,
    to Ferrari 4,
    to McLaren, Lotus, and Sauber, 2,

    and to Mercedes just 1 paragraph…

    Does this possibly show unconsciously the picking order at this early stage?

    1. Joel says:

      Any info on Force India? – they looked consistent, atleast compared to sametime last year.

    2. Miha Bevc says:

      it’s more like the order of the 2012 season

  16. Laurence H says:

    I think the races this year are going to look ugly. The McLarens, Mercedes and Saubers, all grey cars… yuck. Red Bull and Toro Rosso. Even Ferrari have added black to their livery to look like Marussia.

    1. Timmay says:

      That matters a lot.

    2. JohnBt says:

      I disagree. McLaren’s silver is closer to a matted chrome effect, Mercedes silver seems much brighter than McLaren and Sauber’s dark grey feels more like batman. More important point, racing will be closer this year.

    3. Bru72 says:

      I believe Ferrari have coloured the lower edge of the car black to make aerodynamic details much less visible. Look at all of the photo’s of the Ferrari and the bottom of the car blends into the tarmac. A simple but effective way to slow down other teams copying.

      1. coefficientf1 says:

        Yes, they’re hiding the Signal hole for their Passive Drag Reduction system in the “black” area under the monocoque. It was barely noticeable early in the Jerez test, just a little slot but later in the test they fitted another version that was bigger and easier to notice. Reminds me of a catfish!!

        http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=14597&start=495

      2. Bru72 says:

        well spotted

  17. Andy R says:

    Hello James,

    Any comment on Sergio Perez and his attitude, adaptability and speed in the Mclaren? Do you think Mclaren have a fast car, a reliable season but lack the qualifying and race pace genius of Lewis this year?

    Jenson is an excellent driver, but needs a car 0.5 secs clear of the next best car or changing conditions for atleast half a season to win the championship.

    Thoughts?

    Thanks and good blogging during the test1.

    1. Bayan says:

      Not sure about button needing a car to be 0.5 sec better than the next car. Just seems like he has a smaller operating window. Reminds a bit of Prost where if the car is to his liking in any given weekend, he seems to be unbeatable.

      1. Scott D says:

        Agreed. Jenson on his day is more than a match for anyone on the grid, as was Prost (who could outdrive the likes of Senna)

      2. Mocho_Pikuain says:

        Prost is a Legend with 4 titles and Jenson won thanks to the double diffuser.
        If F1 were a religion, comparing Button with Prost would be something near blasfem…

      3. Scott D says:

        yes Mocho_Pikuain…and Michael Schumacher won most of his titles thanks to his superior Ferrari, etc, etc…

  18. Martin says:

    Hi James and Mark,

    A few questions come to mind.

    1. We can see the inlet for the Ferrari fluid switch behind the air box inlet, but was there any evidence it was used when Massa set his best time? Was there any notable step in top speed that could be speculated on?

    2. Is the Mercedes rear tyre wear still the problem?

    3. Is there any reason when comparing say Button’s and Massa’s best times that they couldn’t be on significantly different fuel levels?

    4. As has been asked by others, how about the slower teams, e.g. has Marussia caught up at all?

    1. Mexx says:

      Per my understanding, there is a valve that opens above a certain airspeed. Massa wouldn’t have any direct control over whether to operate this or not, unless of course Ferrari have provided the driver with some way to override the switch in case things are not working as they should.

      1. James Clayton says:

        They wouldn’t be allowed to. That would be considered an active system.

      2. coefficientf1 says:

        There is no valve either as that would be considered a moveable aerodynamic device. The drag reduction device is actually more akin to a passive F-Duct. The signal hole accepts airflow and thereafter the flow moves through the system. The system is designed in such a way that below a certain air pressure the flow is guided along a benign path. However when that certain pressure is met/exceeded the airflow attaches to another path within the system which is fed to the rear wing (beam wing in my opinion but hard to say for sure) to stall it. The problem with such a devise is the design of the fluidic switch would have to vary from track to track as the desired air pressure at which the flow switches from one path to the other is unique to each circuit. Therefore gear ratios will need to be selected to achieve the required acceleration in order to activate the fluidic switch at the correct moment. This would be set in practice but come raceday and there is a massive change in ambient air pressure or windspeed the switch could become dangerously unpredictable. Imagine airpressure suddenly increasing enought to activate the switch whilst the car was in yaw at high speed. Goodnight Vienna!! As such I have my doubts that we will see these devices used in anger, not for a while yet at least.

      3. Martin says:

        That isn’t quite what I meant. So firstly was the duct there all the time? Secondly was there anything that indicated that it was being used?

        Ferrari could have set the switch to 320 km/h so that it never activated and it just allowed Ferrari to assess the negatives of the system such as increased drag. Being testing rather than a race weekend there’s nothing preventing Ferrari from being able to turn it off if it isn’t working.

        The other side of the story could be that Ferrari have got the system to work properly, unlike Lotus or Mercedes at this point even though those teams have had up to five months to assess data from testing while Ferrari possibly got it right first time.

      4. RodgerT says:

        The duct was there all of last year. So I don’t think that is the intake for their fluidic switch.

      5. Mike84 says:

        It doesn’t even matter if it’s not ‘active’, there cannot be any movable aerodynamic element even if it’s only moved by air.

        But you can use air itself to deflect other air, I think that’s what they mean by “fluid switch”. So at some speed the flow is deflected in such a way that it passes into a duct, and at other speeds it’s deflected away from the duct. i.e. the angle is a function of the speed.

        is that how it works?

      6. RodgerT says:

        There is an intake and two outlets, one of the outlets is larger than the other.

        At low speeds the large outlet is big enough for all of the air to pass through. At higher speeds not all of the air can get out through the larger opening creating a bottle neck of high pressure air which will start trying to find another way out which will be through the smaller outlet which directs the air up to the rear wing in order to stall it.

        The trick is to find the right speed for the device to start working. If its too low it will be working in high speed corners where you don’t want it to, and if it’s too high it won’t start working until you’re too far down the straight for it to do you any good.

      7. I have to say that jaonF1 is such a good site that the comments rock, thanks for those explanations

  19. tank says:

    that Sauber deserves some big sponsors on that sexy bodywork.

    great article, as always. #spoiltf1fans

  20. Double says:

    Thank you very much James. Very interesting article.

    Will be a second one refering to midfield and back of the grid teams as well ?

  21. Alberto Martínez says:

    Great article. Really surprised with the procedures regarding fuel levels

    In the article is said that “The Ferrari is using a DRS booster system using a Fluidic Switch, which channels air flow above a certain speed to increase the drag reduction system”

    I think this is what is called a passive DDRS system and as far as I know Lotus and Mercedes have tested it at Jerez. I didn´t know Ferrari have also tested it. If true, does it work in a different way to the Lotus/Mercedes one?

    Thanks

    1. Interesting that you have raised Ferrari as a team looking to use fluidic switches to boost DRS James. No evidence on their car at Jerez to suggest the type of DRD (Drag Reduction Device) we have seen Lotus, Mercedes, Red Bull and Sauber test in the past (See the article I posted on my site yesterday about DRD)
      The 2013 regulations have stopped the usage of DDRS with Rear Wing activation and so the teams must now pursue passive versions if they are to get further gains in drag reduction this season.

      Ferrari did use a new nose during the 4th day of testing which clearly featured a hole under the nose – https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/13135_10200515294943404_1728536599_n.jpg

      (the change of surface angles show it’s not a trick of light after much internal debate)

      I wait to see if this forms a much larger system at work (in the form of passive drag reduction) but I’d initially just see it as a form of additional cooling (Massa complained of this throughout his time in the F138) and/or component/KERS cooling tied in with their nose height being even higher than last year the boundary layer buildup will increase and so adding a duct here will reduce this (Something that other teams have been doing for quite some time, including Ferrari with the F2012)

  22. whiteflag says:

    “They are on a similar budget level to Lotus”

    Wow. If Sauber really have budget around quarter billion dolars like Lotus or McLaren, biggest than Mercedes and Williams it is big suprise.

    1. gotardo says:

      He probably meant Caterman.

    2. JCA says:

      You think Lotus has a budget of 250 000 000? They are outspent by at least RBR, Ferrari and McLaren, probably Mercedes as well. They are owned by venture capitalists, not a big corporation or car manufacturer, and still need to sell that big red space on the side that reads Genii, their own name.

      1. SKiPPY says:

        What Lotus does have though is a brand, and it’s name is Kimi Raikkonen. If Kimi has another great season, I can see Lotus recieving some more funding to close the gap.

  23. Ryan Eckford says:

    James, what were the differences between each compound? I heard the hard was quicker than the medium.

    1. James Allen says:

      Roughly 0.5s between compounds is our information

      1. Tornillo Amarillo says:

        So if hard tyres are faster than mediums, and Felipe Massa got 1min 17.879secs in softs, arguably:

        Sebastian Vettel 1min 18.565secs corresponds to 1:18,
        and Lewis Hamilton 1min 18.905secs corresponds to 1:17:9 ??

        Arguably Mercedes is not a slow car?

        I am confused.

      2. Quade says:

        Brother, your math is way off.

      3. raikkes says:

        1min18.905-500ths is 1min18.400 so lewis has stil got some time to make up mate lol

  24. Hank says:

    James,
    Your thoughts on Sahara Force India. They seem to have done decent mileage with good lap times. Are they potentially a dark horse for this year?

    1. coefficientf1 says:

      no.

  25. madmax says:

    Thanks James and Mark, especially with the fuel load info as never heard that before.

  26. nusratolla says:

    Firstly, It was sad to hear about Kimi Breakup.

    Secondly, Massa’s 1,17 lap was phenomenal which shows the potential of the car over a single lap and long runs too look quick enough to threaten.

    Redbull as always and as mentioned are good in concealing thing till the first race and yes, very interesting observation made in terms of its straight line speed deficit and I am sure they’ll find a solution for it, maybe like Mclaren you will see an entirely new car in Australia.

    Mclaren look solid and quick, but since Lewis’ departure the driver deficit looms over it.

    Mercedes they are racking up miles, they have the joint-fastest driver (along with Kimi) in their stable, now its time to deliver atleast a third fastest car on the grid, if they can manage to do that then I think Lewis can deliver race wins on a consistent basis.

    Lotus, they have been consistent, posting fastest times are not too much to read into for they were some way off Massa’s 1,17. But, what was interesting to note was they spent a lot of time in the garage, which could mean that the innovators are upto something again and were analysing and fine-tuning whatever breakthrough innovation they have under their E21. And like Mercedes all Lotus needs to focus is on giving Kimi atleast a third fastest car on the grid and like Lewis he will do the rest, which he did so rather remarkably last year. It would be easier for Lotus to give Kimi the third fastest car on the grid than for Mercedes to give Lewis the third fastest car on the grid.

    Well, lets see what Melbourne has in store for us :)

    1. Dave C says:

      Whats in store for us is another Vettel Alonso title battle! Redbull wont sort out there top speed deficiencies because they haven’t been able to sort it since 2009, also Lewis and Kimi are on a similar level and that level is lower than Vettel and Alonso, beating Rosberg would be a success but even that won’t be easy.

      1. nusratholla says:

        I think Hamilton will be a revelation this year. I assume him to be in more individualistic mettle.

        Well, the usual suspects are expected to fight it out for the title which are Vettel and Alonso (as you rightly stated) but what would make it interesting is the pace their individual teammates are able to extract out their respective cars, by all means Massa did overshadow Alonso on pure pace since Japan with Brazil being the his best performance since his near fatal accident. If, Massa continues this trend it would be interesting to see just how the internal dynamics of the Ferrari react, which by going by plausibility it would be more Alonso favored, but Massa has beaten his faster teammates in the past and by no means both Michael and Kimi were no pushovers…. He has the ability as proven in the past to beat his teammate without upsetting the internal dynamics of the team, but Alonso is another specimen and we all know just how he reacts to a faster teammate…. just ask Hamilton and Mclaren.

        Would love to see the individual teammates step up their respective games and give us a four-way title showdown, rather than playing bridesmaids to their respective teammates…. four way duels are better than two ways duel don’t you think?

      2. Mingojo says:

        But Massa has been slower than Alonso in the last 3 years and the last two races of 2012 are not enough evidence to say Massa will be quicker than Fernando this season.

  27. “this is classic Red Bull, they don’t show their hand.”

    Everyone has been saying this.

    But no one has shown their hand.

    So it that classic everyone?

    Why make a smirk-y deal about RB not showing their hand if no one else has done (now or before)

    1. Craig says:

      I agree other teams won’t have shown their hand either, but Red Bull are notorious for sandbagging to the extreme. Right up until Q3 on Saturday.

    2. AuraF1 says:

      I think the point is, as with tests for the past few years, red bull do no headline grabbing times and never attempt all out quali style laps until the final testing day or so.

      It’s almost as if they refuse to push the car – reliability wise they do – but speed testing they just seem to keep it low- key.

      Ferrari, with a poor car, have gone for glory runs when the Italian media starts baying for blood. Mclaren seem bizarrely open about their cars strengths and weaknesses.

      1. AuraF1 says:

        Just to confirm I was talking about Ferrari last year – not this year in regards to an off the pace car.

  28. Steven says:

    IS the suspension geometry on the Merc THAT bad? Or is the tire wear a result of a lack of rear downforce allowing the rear to move around?

    1. Michael Powell says:

      Lewis has been tweeting about getting his aero guys to increase downforce, so you might be right.

  29. goferet says:

    Red Bull

    Apparently the Red Bull of Vettel did set the fastest times on the hards during the Jerez test so they may not have set the quickest time overall but this is usually an indicator of raw pace.

    But one has to wonder if reliability won’t bite the Red Bulls later on in the season, I mean nothing is this plain sailing.

    Ferrari

    The Ferrari looks strong too but taking into account Rory Byrne’s quotes during the launch it seems Ferrari won’t be throwing the kitchen sink at the 2013 season for it seems the 2014 one is their target so I don’t expect a lot of developments coming from the team especially if Alonso isn’t leading the standings.

    Mclaren

    For sure, the Mclaren of Jenson looked quick on day one but I still stand by my assessment that teams that show their hand early especially on the first day usually are trying to cover up the fact, they aren’t too strong as shown by previous seasons and with the Mclarens of late, till they cross the finish line, reliability issues are always at the back of one’s mind.

    Lotus

    The Lotus maybe an improvement qualifying wise from the 2012 car as shown by Kimi’s thumbs up, but if it’s still kinder to it’s tyres then Lotus achilles heel will still be the weather in that if we have cooler track conditions then this maybe be bad news for their tyres.

    Mercedes

    As for Mercedes, could it be that they were losing their tyres faster be attributed to the fact that they did the most laps of anybody?

    Anyway as Lewis said, down force is what they’re lacking at the moment so they’re bound not to be as fast as the others but hey, the car is a big step from last year and all it needs during this winter testing is Lewis technical input to get them to the top.

    Williams

    Seeing as this season will be very tight then drivers’ skills will really shine especially in qualifying.

    So irrespective of what 2013 car Williams put out, I expect Maldonado to carry this team on his shoulders

    1. RodgerT says:

      The ability of the Lotus to heat its tires should be as pronounced as it was last year due to the change in construction, and compounds. This might help Button in the McLaren as well.

      The number of laps that Mercedes did was not among the highest totals for the week, and what was being specifically referred to in the article was how fast their tires seemed to go off over the course of a series of consecutive laps.

      1. RodgerT says:

        That first line should read “not as pronounced” as the the new tires are supposed to be more consistent in that characteristic.

  30. goferet says:

    My prediction for the fastest cars at the start of the 2013 season is:

    1. Lotus
    2. Ferrari
    3. Red Bull
    4. Mclaren
    5. Mercedes
    6. Sauber
    7. Williams
    8. Torro Rosso
    9. Force India
    10. Catheham
    11. Marussia

    1. Glennb says:

      Please define *fast* friend.

      1. goferet says:

        @ Glennb

        Well in this instance, my definition of fast would be that car that’s quickest over one lap.

        Not sure if you understand what I mean.

      2. Kay says:

        “Fast” can be in a straight line from 0-60 (or whichever speed), or as you say over one lap. Still, given that different circuits have different characteristics, the same car cannot be fast around all sorts of circuits. For instance RBR would be slow on Monza due to long straights which exposes its weaknesses, and Ferrari / McLaren would most probably be faster than them. Put the cars on Turkey or Australia, RBR would probably be the fastest.

  31. Elie says:

    Thanks for a great review Jerez and hopefully we get more in Barcelona.

    The more I see the Lotus the more I appreciate what a great looking aggressive package it is. I realise the Torro Rosso is another Red Bull backed team but I like the look of the new car too and hope we could get more analysis on it and a few of the mid field teams later on.

    Something that has slipped my mind -will it only be Melbourne before we see each driver in his own car ?- wouldn’t it be interesting to see both drivers in both cars on the last few days of testing. It would be terrific benchmarking prior race 1.

    1. Diabolo says:

      i completly agree with you concerning this stupid rule whiwh is to run only one car during the winter tests. Most of all it coud be better for the teams to have their 2 drivers on the track to manage different test programs before the 1st GP

    2. Yak says:

      It would also be more far expensive to test two cars. Isn’t there supposed to be cost cutting going on in F1?

      The other thing is, regarding seeing each driver in “his own car”… a team doesn’t necessarily even have two distinct cars. They have the bits to put together two (well, more really) cars, and after each weekend they’re pulled apart, parts cleaned up/fixed/replaced/whatever, and two cars are built for the next race weekend. The two cars won’t necessarily have the same parts as the previous race weekend. Even the monocoque a driver is sitting in might not be the same one he was in the previous weekend.

  32. JohnBt says:

    This will be a very good year judging from testing time sheets. But as usual we’ll have to wait for Australia and Malaysia for a more accurate result and further development race by race. The vanity panel sure make the cars look so much better and pleasing to the eyes.

    Lewis Hamilton will be the highlight for me though. Kimi will also be in contention for WDC I hope.

    My only fear is Red Bull’s sandbagging then run away with both championships. I sure hope not, like “oh no not again!”

    1. AuraF1 says:

      I think red bull sandbagging is just their SOP though. Sadly for the rest of the teams – the rb9 is a faster version of the end of year rb8 which was a very winning car.

      I’m obviously hoping that the change in DRS rules eliminates some of vettels quali advantage so he can’t just bag pole all year and keep out of trouble. Nothing against Seb – but frankly I’ve seen that year and I’d like one with a bit more drama!

      1. Yak says:

        Of course in 2012 when it came to race one, McLaren 1-2′d quali, and on race pace probably really should have taken 1-2 there too. It was a few races before Red Bull really showed any pace with Vettel at Bahrain.

        So even if they are sandbagging a bit, doesn’t mean when they really go for it that they’ll find themselves out front. The RB9 might be a step forward, but McLaren, Ferrari and Lotus at least all seem pretty chuffed at the moment too.

      2. Doobs says:

        RB have been slowed a bit by the various albeit minor aero rule changes and not being able to use DRS all lap, so even if their car is a development of their 2012 car, it need not actually be any faster.

  33. Anne says:

    I love that comment about Ferrari´s fluidic switch as the new must have for others. It means that Newey is going to figure out a way to improve it for the second half of the season. And Vettel is going to win the WDC again

    :)

  34. Diabolo says:

    i think it’s impossible to see which car will be faster than an other. It’s could be only a feeling and according to me :

    1- Mc Laren (Button)
    2- Lotus
    3- RedBull (Vettel)
    4- Ferrari
    5- Mercedes
    6- Toro Rosso / Williams
    7- Sauber / Force India
    8- Caterham
    9- Marussia

  35. Paul Hallett says:

    I can’t agree that the teams are that regimented, they’d have set fuel loads, I just can’t; there is so little point not telling a cars fuel load if we already know it’s going to be one of 4 or 5 loads. The simple truth is, no one knows what loads people had. Some teams didn’t even go for a headline time. The only analysis that has come out of this test is that there is no analysis to be done. This was more about testing the car works out of the box, and the real testing starts on the 19th in earnest, now all of the teams know, possibly bar Marussia, that they have a workable design. Unlike in previous years when Mclaren and Ferrari knew straight away, that they had dogs.

  36. sandyf1 says:

    I have not seen ferrari trying a passive DDRS yet. Lotus tried the merc’s version and Merc the lotus version. None of the other teams have tried one in this test.

    1. Yak says:

      Would you really see it as such anyway though? If it’s a hidden fluid switch that triggers stalling of the air over the rear wing or whatever, you’re not necessarily going to know any team are using it unless maybe one run they’re doing 300 down the straight and the next time they go out they’re suddenly able to clock 320. Or perhaps if a car becomes randomly unstable at the rear, while they’re still sorting the system out. But even those are not guaranteed to be a passive DRS system at work. Lotus obviously have the air intakes there in place like on the 2012 car, but whether they’ve actually been running the system, who knows…?

      Aside from perhaps other things being prioritised, one reason I can think teams would be not testing it at Jerez is that it’s not really a representative circuit. So maybe they’re saving it for Catalunya, where they’ll be able to test it on a track more relevant to what they’ll actually be racing on.

  37. Peres Mircea says:

    The Mclaren is the fasttest car. On a dirty track and on hrd tyres it should be quicker by half a second than the Ferrari ( 1 second difference between hard-soft, and 0.5 seconds the dirty track)

  38. Peres Mircea says:

    @ James Allen

    Why Mclaren had no parts in Jerez this week?
    I read an article about Sam Michael saying that they will have new parts only at the last two days of testing in Barcelona. I know that all the teams will bring the latest package for Melbourne, but until than all the teams test some new parts either in Jerez, or at the second test in Barcelona.
    So, why Mclaren so slow in bringing new parts?
    If you know something please post here, I’m a loyal fan of this site :) Thanks

  39. James Leaver says:

    Thanks for the great analysis recently!

  40. Wanja says:

    What I don’t understand is that the Mercs are still eating tires four years in a row. What’s wrong with their R&D?

  41. MB73 says:

    James, maybe you can unriddle this…

    Why is everybody so hyped about this ‘amazing’ laptime of Felipe Massa (or anyone else’s), if….

    - last years best testingtime at Jerez was 0.2 sec quicker (Nico Rosberg)
    - with an average 0.15 sec development gain each race during last season, cars should already have been 2-3 seconds faster, even without the work done in the winter, due to the stability in regulations.

    I think times are fairly slow…Is this the new tire, or what am I missing..??

    Thanks

    1. Mocho_Pikuain says:

      Nico Rosberg set that time with the 2011 car, second fastest time was Grosjean’s 1:18:419.

      1. MB73 says:

        Ok thanks, mist that one.

        But it really doesn’t make a lot of difference to the point I was making..

  42. Gareth says:

    What about the back end teams, How are they getting on James? Or will this be for another article?

  43. Methusalem says:

    Which team has more advantages/disadvantages? Sergio Perez sharing his Sauber secrets with McLaren, or Lewis Hamiltion taking with him some McLaren secrets to Mercedes?

    1. Kay says:

      RBR / Newey, without the need to know other teams’ secrets. He has his own!

  44. Quade says:

    Sauber has bucked the 2013 technical trend for high noses and deep undercuts to channel air to the diffuser.
    Their approach is a low nose and an overcut on the air inlets to channel air to the diffuser area.It is an approach that has produced what is easily the most beautiful 2013 car.
    It would be interesting to see how their philosophy does against the rest of the field.

  45. Bullish says:

    It would be great to get your analysis of the Torro Rosso. They looked to have strong performance through testing and have made significant progress on last year.

    It is a shame they haven’t reversed the red and the blue on the design of the car to differentiate themselves from the Red Bulls.

    Thanks

  46. shah says:

    Am I dreaming here? Everyone seems to to basing their predictions on the Jerez fastest times.

    Same thing every year, RedBull sandbag the blow everyone away then everyone plays catch up.

    RedBull again unless Mclaren have a good car like 2007 and 2008.

    1. Kay says:

      .. or 2012?

      McLaren started out very strong early in the 2012 season before shooting themselves in the feet as the season goes on.

  47. michael says:

    James, can you expand at all on your tweet about the McLaren/Cosworth rumours? Multiple sources etc.

    Is there an element of truth there, or was it quashed entirely by McLaren as fanciful speculation.

  48. SKiPPY says:

    If you look up Sauber’s new nosecone, it resmble the concave curve similar to HRT’s nose cone last year, and we all know how that ended.

    1. Kay says:

      Same thoughts here. Even the livery is similar to HRT!

      Not sure why they think they’d gain anything out of HRT…….. o_O

      Just hope Pete Sauber didn’t leave his team in the wrong hands……. :(

LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top Tags
SEARCH News
JA ON F1 In association with...
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Multi award winning Formula One photographer
Multi award winning Formula One photographer