InnovationInnovationTata Communications
INNOVATION BRIEFING
All Articles in this section
Posted on August 20, 2012

There was an interesting story in yesterday’s Mail on Sunday about an innovative new use in the medical world for the F1 electronic control unit, the “brain” of an F1 car.

As a result of a chance conversation between a McLaren engineer and a paediatrician, Birmingham Children’s Hospital has been trialling the ECU in a children’s intensive care ward; the idea is that the F1-derived unit can measure all the key signs from the child, sense trends and detect developing problems earlier than the electronics previously used by the NHS.

The unit normally measures oil pressures, brake temperatures and the like.

Here, a lightly adapted version of the F1 ECU is being used to measure things like heart rate, oxygen levels and blood pressure in an ill child. And, inevitably, it is far more capable than the units currently used in hospitals; it can take a heart cardiogram 125 times a minute, instead of once an hour, for example.

This allows doctors to pick up signs of deterioration in a child’s condition much earlier and it detects subtle shifts, which the current system would not register. This is what F1 has arrived at through the desire to know as much as possible in real time about what is happening on the race car.


There are over 120 sensors on an F1 car, recording over 500 parameters which are transmitted live via telemetry, back to the pits and also to the teams’ factories in the UK and Europe. The ECU manages the data and the control systems and is a standardised unit used by all the F1 teams. In the four years since McLaren Electronic Systems started as ECU supplier, no car has retired from a race due to ECU failure, which gives a level of confidence for medical staff, no doubt.

The MoS spoke to Dr Heather Duncan, a consultant paediatrician at BCH, who described the trial as “a transformational breakthrough”; she is hoping to find more funding to continue the trial and encourage other childrens’ ICUs to trial the system.

“Formula 1 engineers do lots of real-time monitoring during races and look at performance and modelling to see when they should change tyres and have pit stops,” she said. “They’re predicting, essentially, which we don’t tend to do in healthcare.

“Although we can always see what is happening at the bedside, we can’t see trends over time. This software lets us do this – and it could improve a child’s chances of survival.

“At the moment it’s intuitive for a racing engineer but less so for clinicians. For example, breathing rate kept coming up as “revs per minute”. So there’s some tweaking to do.”

It’s easy to be cynical about stories like this, but the application of F1 technology to other areas of life is such an important bi-product of the drive for innovation, which makes F1 what it is.

As the team bosses fight each other over how to control costs and what F1 should be all about, they could do with taking account of stories like this one.


  1.   1. Posted By: Michael
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 9:25 am 

    Just love a story like this in helping the kids from F1 technologies. Good on ya all!!

    [Reply]

    Baart1980 Reply:

    Agree. This is really just beautifull

    [Reply]


  2.   2. Posted By: Mat
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 9:43 am 

    Awesome idea but the part that I find a little bit sad is the fact that something like this has been developed for a car but not for a human before! Surely a child’s health is more important than a racing car? Don’t get me wrong, I love F1 though.

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    I know what you mean, why are these great brains racing instead of saving lives? But cool when the innovation can carry across

    [Reply]

    rad_g Reply:

    Probably because NHS would have no funds to run this program.

    [Reply]

    Adam Reply:

    Would be great if junior F1 engineers could apprentice out for six months to a year on this kind of project. Both sides would benifit. F1 from the engineers horizons being broadened.

    Frankly I am amazed that no one has tried to adapt the F Duct to a road car to stall out the wake of the car at highway speed. Think of all the gas that could be saved in lower drag.

    [Reply]

    Phil R Reply:

    Road cars aren’t that compromised in terms of needing a downforce and drag benefit. You just shape the car to be low drag, with the detailing being making the tail lights being moulded in the wind tunnel etc.

    The one thing that could make sense is using the exhaust gasses to reduce drag rather than just pointing them out the back of the car.

    Honda used to rotate their engineers from their road car program into their race team for a period of months I believe. It really did work in terms of their philosophy of making their road cars better, but I believe it did the management in Brackley’s head in. As soon as an engineer got settled and had was just starting to get into the F1 program, they got flown back to Japan…

    Adam Reply:

    It would be far too dangerous in the wet. DRS isn’t allowed in the wet for instance.

    renato nysan Reply:

    The McLaren MP4-12 has an ‘airbrake’…

    Schmorbraten Reply:

    @ Adam
    An F1 car creates roughly three times its weight in downforce, is very twitchy on the limit and using an F-duct or DRS, apart from reducing drag, a) also reduces downforce (of which, in wet conditions, you need all you can get) and b) changes the understeer/oversteer balance significantly.

    An average road car creates lift instead of downforce (and hence isn’t relying on aerodynamics for grip or balance), isn’t twitchy on the limit and an F-duct would be tuned to just reduce drag.

    AndyK Reply:

    This is a fantastic story! whatever next?! They’ll be hiring the Mclaren pitcrew to help the surgeons deliver record breaking transplant times!!

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    Ferrari have done some work on making A&E inductions faster and more efficient, I believe

    Davexxx Reply:

    Prancing Horse logos on the wheelchairs…

    Elie Reply:

    Hope they arent the ones that worked on Lewis car earlier this year !

    michael grievson Reply:

    All down to money and investment. I’m a student nurse and I’m constantly amazed at the technology used.

    [Reply]

    Mee Reply:

    What would you stall? I think it’s a safe assumption to say that >95% of the cars on the road don’t have a drag-inducing rear or front wing.

    [Reply]

    Adam Reply:

    The whole car is effectively a very badly designed wing so you stall the wake coming off the rear of the car.

    CHXUNDA Reply:

    Interesting that breathing rate comes up as RPM.

    Medical research seems to have lagged behind many others doesn’t it? In 100 years the internet has been born, we have supersonic flight, high tech media is pervasive, mobile telephony has revolutionalized life yet medicine is yet to understand what causes cancer let alone getting a credible way to manage it. Maybe time for medics to step out their box

    [Reply]

    Snow Reply:

    CHXUNDA:

    You might want to read up a little about current cancer research.

    First, cancer is not one disease. It is many diseases, with multifactorial causation, much of which we DO understand, but that doesn’t imply that we can necessarily prevent it.

    Second, tremendous strides have been made in the treatment of the various types of cancer. The battle still wages, but we are vastly beyond most of the treatments from when I trained in the 90s. Many newer treatments are more targeted, leading to far less toxicity.

    Give a little credit to the thousands of researchers who have dedicated their lives to trying to prevent and the various forms of cancer, which now add up to the number one cause of death in industrialized nations. The human body is vastly more complicated and unpredictable than a mad-made machine.

    (For the record, I’m a clinician, not a researcher, but kudos to them for their hard work.)

    [Reply]

    KGBVD Reply:

    Inspired by this heart-warming story, the NHS just announced a $50M title sponsorship deal with McLaren!!! — wait, hang on…

    [Reply]


  3.   3. Posted By: genji gonzales
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 10:03 am 

    Is that anything to do with this?
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18982474

    [Reply]


  4.   4. Posted By: Cliff
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 10:14 am 

    As somonee whose sister-in-law nursse premature babies, I can tell you that she is “more than pleased” to hear of this trial. At a time when F1 often falls short by being so remote from its fans stories like this tells us what is really important. Well done to Mclaren for their efforts, its just a pitty that funding trials such as this may become an issue. What a shame!!

    [Reply]


  5.   5. Posted By: Tom
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 10:37 am 

    I might have known McLaren would be behind this – they seem to be way ahead when it comes to applied F1 technologies. Williams are quite active too, and there’s the occasional composite racing bike – but the other teams should pay more attention to your last paragraph!

    Plenty of scope for comedy here – a row of doctors sitting on a prat perch, or a hospital bed being wheeled in and a pit crew descending on the patient – feeding, cleaning and changing drips etc in 3 seconds.

    [Reply]

    Marco Reply:

    Actually Tom your joke about the pit crew isn’t far from the truth. Both McLaren and Ferrari, have in the past, used their pitstop skills in hospital theatres! If I recall correctly both teams worked with surgeons to optmise the theatre layout and the sequence of complex tasks to reduce the lenght of time operations took and consequently the ‘danger’ time a patient spent in theatre.

    [Reply]


  6.   6. Posted By: Kay
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 10:55 am 

    I wonder what does NASA use for things like this. Wouldn’t they have similar level of technology that’d be useful in ordinary lives?

    [Reply]

    Adam Reply:

    There will be new and better coming along now with new vehicles, but the majority of the shuttle technology was decades old!

    [Reply]

    Graham Reeds Reply:

    Where do you think the current size of cardiograms comes from? They were developed by (or for) NASA for the nascent space program (Gemini & Mercury).

    [Reply]

    KarenT Reply:

    NASA technology is used for all sorts of things in everyday life. If you want to know check out http://www.wtfNASA.com or http://io9.com/5934257/what-the-fck-has-nasa-done-for-you-lately-more-than-you-think.

    [Reply]

    Schmorbraten Reply:

    Anything going into space uses computers which are way behind standard issue consumer goods. It’s a) because of the lead times involved, b) because they want to make really, really damn sure it doesn’t fail by being designed too close to what’s possible at the time – a computer crash in space would waste huge amounts of money spent on the whole mission, and c) because they need to design it to be less sensible to radiation.

    [Reply]


  7.   7. Posted By: Seán Craddock
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 10:59 am 

    Wow! This is what the innovation section of the website is about, what an interesting story.

    I was in hospital a few weeks ago and was connected to a mobile heart monitor using telemetry to send the information to the cardiology department. I was very impressed, but I could see how the ECU could help massively.

    It took about 6 or 7 mins to set up the machine to get me a heart cardiogram; to get one 125 times a second is amazing and very important in an ICU

    [Reply]


  8.   8. Posted By: Tank
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 11:14 am 

    I’m surprised similar technology hasn’t been developed in biomedical engineering. That said, it is an exciting application – who said f1 tech needed to filter down only into ordinary cars?

    [Reply]

    Schmorbraten Reply:

    Sensors updating hundreds or thousands of times per minute or second are nothing new, but a device updating cardio readings x times per second doesn’t gain you anything if you don’t use that data. Analysing the data and using it to feed predictive algorithms seems to be the important contribution here.

    [Reply]


  9.   9. Posted By: Dan
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 11:24 am 

    I’d heard about this a while ago and thought it was a fantastic idea. There must be so much F1 technology that can be crossed into other fields. Mclaren should be incredibly proud that they can contribute like this. It is almost justifying their incredibly high expenses if they’re going to put the tech into hospitals, they desperately need it!

    Also, I love the fact that heart rate comes up as Revs per minute! Brilliant!

    [Reply]


  10.   10. Posted By: Andrew Carter
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 12:00 pm 

    A great story and makes perfect sense when you think about it.

    I’m not all that surprised that this has come about, the medical world does tend to put some surpriseng technologies to use. I remember reading several years ago that doctors were using a number of grpahics processors from a Playstation 2 for number crunching in medical research. It does make you wonder what other technologies could be applied in such a way.

    [Reply]

    KIt Reply:

    Which reminds me of restrictions on exports of an early generation Playstation because their CPU is apparently good enough to be adapted into missiles as guidance system.

    [Reply]


  11.   11. Posted By: Franco
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 12:17 pm 

    Great to hear F1 technology can be adopted and developed to help save lives.

    [Reply]


  12.   12. Posted By: Mack
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 12:19 pm 

    This is the type of issue that should get more media. It helps demonstrate that not all human activity associated with racing machinery is anti-social. There are many things that were/are developed for industry/production/space transport that manage to cross boundaries into very socially responsible areas. It is the networking of humans that bring about the crossing of boundaries. Lets promote and encourage more formal and informal networking of health and industry and university personnel with the highly talented people in F1.

    [Reply]


  13.   13. Posted By: Alastair Crisp
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 2:17 pm 

    It can’t of course actually take a cardiogram 125 times per second because then each one would be based on a (different) fraction of a heart beat.

    [Reply]

    Alastair Crisp Reply:

    But still a great idea.

    [Reply]

    BurgerF1 Reply:

    I believe it said 125 times/min. That would allow for virtually real-time and constant cardiogram monitoring for heartbeats that are <125 beats per minute (anything faster than that, and some beats would not be recorded). Not bad when subtle changes can lead to a more accurate diagnosis.

    Rather humourous that breathing rate came up as RPM!

    [Reply]

    Alastair Crisp Reply:

    Whoops, comment 7 said per second and I didn’t look back to the article.


  14.   14. Posted By: TitanRacer
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 2:29 pm 

    awesome. simply blown away!
    THIS is the feel good F1 story line of the year…

    [Reply]


  15.   15. Posted By: chaplinez
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 2:30 pm 

    It is good for the sport.

    [Reply]


  16.   16. Posted By: Tyler
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 2:59 pm 

    I love F1 and the technology crossover with the auto industry, but all that pales in comparison to whats being investigated here, very cool and kudos to you James for covering it.

    [Reply]


  17.   17. Posted By: peteinthewest
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 3:20 pm 

    I seem to remember a while ago that Ferrari and/or McLaren were involved with a hospitals A&E dept using their pit stop proceedures in the more expedient management of patients when surrounded by a large team of doctors and nurses

    [Reply]


  18.   18. Posted By: Amritraj
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 4:14 pm 

    Hi James,

    Great article. I had a clarification though. Why do you think people would get cynical about such technological applications emanting from F1?

    For an F1 fan, this is great news and just the beginning of contributions F1 can make to science and technology and for improving organisational performance and decision making.

    Regards.

    [Reply]


  19.   19. Posted By: Adelaide
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 6:22 pm 

    Racing is life…

    [Reply]


  20.   20. Posted By: veeru
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 6:32 pm 

    WOW. James, you are the real deal. Cants say enough thanks for this information

    [Reply]


  21.   21. Posted By: jpinx
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 6:37 pm 

    Brilliant stuff — thanks very much for the reportage James! Long may such cross-overs continue…..

    [Reply]


  22.   22. Posted By: verstappen
        Date: August 20th, 2012 @ 9:20 pm 

    What’s all the fuzz about road relevance, then? Everyday-life-relevance!

    [Reply]


  23.   23. Posted By: tom in adelaide
        Date: August 21st, 2012 @ 4:14 am 

    Competition fuels innovation. Great story, there’s no more worthy cause than helping children in need.

    [Reply]


  24.   24. Posted By: Elie
        Date: August 21st, 2012 @ 9:00 am 

    I can Just see Ron Dennis rubbing his hands together and announcing “Mclaren Medical Technologies”

    Fantastic story- hope we see more of these transferable uses for F1 Technology in future.
    Thanks James

    [Reply]


  25.   25. Posted By: monktonnik
        Date: August 21st, 2012 @ 9:41 am 

    This is exactly why I love the technology on F1, and it is why it is an excellent place to pioneer new technologies and innovations for road cars and other industries.

    If real time monitoring and modelling can help save lives then this is great news.

    Maybe Bernie ought to offer a yearly prize to the team who develops technology that is used outside F1

    [Reply]


  26.   26. Posted By: my tuppence
        Date: August 21st, 2012 @ 1:37 pm 

    BBC has already covered this a few weeks ago. Here’s the video:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18997318

    The software desperately needs updating!

    Then again, in laps and out laps might be used as an index for NHS efficiency!

    [Reply]


  27.   27. Posted By: Nil
        Date: August 21st, 2012 @ 3:49 pm 

    How do I get in touch with you? Here’s what I get on james@jamesallenonf1.com:

    : Quota exceeded.

    [Reply]

    Nil Reply:

    Hi James,

    I didn’t want to plug this comment in a story where it would be irrelevant but I couldn’t get in touch via email. I’d shared a story and some videos on self driving road cars on your site about a year ago. It was met with some disbelief and skepticism then. Since that time self driving cars have been legally allowed on the streets of Nevada, USA. Now we have a self driving Audi TTS on the race track. Take a look at this: http://singularityhub.com/2012/08/19/stanfords-self-driving-car-tears-it-up-on-racetrack-tops-120-mph/

    Self driving cars will slowly but increasingly be adopted throughout the world and will go a long way towards reducing pollution, traffic jams, road accidents and provide inexpensive mobility and
    accessibility to millions in developing countries. Here’s a video of Sebastian Thrun, the scientist behind the project: http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/12321

    Who knows, maybe one day the F1 safety car will be self driven. Please take a look at the links above. I’d love to hear your views and also of the F1 community on this.

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    Thanks, I’ll take a look

    [Reply]


  28.   28. Posted By: Sead Marusic
        Date: August 21st, 2012 @ 8:53 pm 

    Great news, and I really hope it will move on from initial talks…but what about a cost of it?
    I don’t think that F1 ECU is anywhere near affordable, even in terms of big hospital.
    On top pf the unit itself, there’s additional development/tweaking required…and unfortunately it does cost extra on top of already extremely expencive unit.
    I don’t see any hospital in my county (Croatia) as being capable to afford one.
    Let alone a hospital in some third world country.

    If F1 technology is to be transferred down, to real world, it has to have real world price….otherwise it won’t work.

    [Reply]


  29.   29. Posted By: Kris
        Date: August 21st, 2012 @ 9:05 pm 

    Hi James,
    Sky did a great piece with Brundle examining the ECU. What are your thoughts on Mclaren’s recent business ventures, namely the tie up with GSK, the road-car business (including the latest MSO project)? Within focused commentary on the sport, Mclaren seem to be behind Ferrari, Red Bull and Merc in terms of resources, yet they seem to be so innovative compared to their rivals. Watching the animations makes me realise how many opportunities they are creating – not just for their own brand, but also for those of their sponsors and drivers. Consider, for example, how much more recognisable and likeable Jenson and Lewis will be after this series of animations. I wonder to what extent the monetary value of those opportunities has been calculated for the drivers and what additional leverage it creates for the team in contract negotiations.

    I think this whole topic would make a really interesting topic for a summer or close-season article. I’m also really interested to know how Williams stock floatation affects day-to-day operations of the team. Are they still active with the fly-wheel KERS technology?

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    I think the use of applied technologies is one of their ace cards. They do it really well and you can see other teams coming later to the party.

    The GSK tie up is particularly innovative. Not heard much on it lately, but it’s a good idea

    [Reply]


  30.   30. Posted By: Peter Miles
        Date: August 22nd, 2012 @ 10:30 pm 

    I hate to put a dampener on what is a heart warming story but I own a garage and specialise in elctronics. I promise you any car built since about 2002, and in some cases far further back than that, has an ECU for the engine management, the ABS or many other functions more than capable of monitoring the vital signs of a human. We are slow compared to even a road engine running at up to 6,500 rpm!

    The clever part was seeing how the technology could be transferred, and if I’m cynical, publicised. That said, full marks for doing it!

    [Reply]


  31.   31. Posted By: PM
        Date: June 14th, 2013 @ 3:42 pm 

    That is true about ECU’s being in cars from way back. But, when people come up with newer ECU’s for example,
    the older ones don’t matter. This from someone who worked in electronics and did innovated work with amplifiers, gaming, nuclear testing and automotive. There’s still something to be said about the technology beyond figuring out that it can be transferred.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply







F1 broadcast progression
F1 broadcast progression
Insight
Behind the scenes look at how Formula 1 TV now operates team radio and other functions remotely
Tata's F1 connectivity wins major industry award
Tata's F1 connectivity wins major industry award
What can businesses learn from F1
What can businesses learn from F1
F1 broadcast: The Next generation
F1 broadcast: The Next generation
From car to factory in 0.25 seconds
How one F1 team moves its data three times faster than before
Innovation in F1 broadcast technology
Innovation in F1 broadcast technology
Featured Technical Story, April 2014
XPB.cc
The Singapore Grand Prix saw a significant development in the broadcast of Formula 1 with Formula 1 Management trialling a Proof of Concept for delivering video content to broadcasters. FOM’s... More...
LATEST VIDEO - What have F1 and Tata Communications learned from each other?
What have F1 and Tata Communications learned from each other?
Video from the official JA ON F1 Innovation channel on YouTube. Check here for all our latest videos.
Tata Communications New World Blog
Follow Tata Communication on twitter
Screen Shot 2012-06-29 at 18.53.51
Popular Tags in Innovations
Explore F1 Innovations