Will the Prancing Horse rise?
Monza 2014
Italian Grand Prix
FIA says Bahrain GP is definitely on
News
Darren Heath
Posted By: James Allen  |  13 Apr 2012   |  1:12 am GMT  |  76 comments

The FIA has released a statement this morning, before the teams and Bernie Ecclestone have had their scheduled 12-30pm meeting, designed to stop speculation about the Bahrain Grand Prix taking place next week.

After a long silence over the subject of Bahrain, this statement puts the governing body shoulder to shoulder with the Bahraini authorities and states in the clearest terms that the race will go ahead next week. The timing is interesting for another reason; in that region Friday is a day when protests typically take place after prayers, so there will be close attention paid to the reaction on the ground in Bahrain today to this statement.

The message of the statement within F1 circles is clear: the FIA is in charge and there is no room for dissent from the teams. It will be interesting to see the reaction as the day unfolds.

The statement reads as follows:

“The FIA is the governing body of motor sport and therefore of Formula One. As such, it sets the season’s calendars following the proposal of the Commercial Rights Holder (CRH) in accordance with the local national authorities in all matters relating to safety.

Within that context, the FIA ensures that any event forming part of an FIA World Championship is organised in compliance with the FIA Statutes and the relevant Sporting and Technical Regulations, and that the safety of the public, officials, drivers and teams is secured at all times during an event.

The FIA must make rational decisions based on the information provided to us by the Bahraini authorities and by the Commercial Rights Holder. In addition we have endeavoured to assess the ongoing situation in Bahrain.

President Jean Todt led a fact-finding mission to the Kingdom in November 2011, meeting a large number of decision-makers and opinion formers, including elected Shia members of parliament, the president of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry, ambassadors from the European Union countries, the Crown Prince, the Interior Minister and many members of the business community.

All expressed their wish for the Grand Prix to go ahead in 2012, and since then, the FIA has kept in close touch with all these stakeholders. Away from the public eye, the FIA has received regular security briefings from the most senior diplomatic officials based in the Kingdom as well as from other independent experts.

The 2012 calendar, as presented by the CRH, was ratified by the World Motor Sport Council (WMSC) in September 2011. Since then no request from the F1 Commission or the CRH has been made to the WMSC to either postpone or cancel the Bahrain Grand Prix.

Based on the current information the FIA has at this stage, it is satisfied that all the proper security measures are in place for the running of a Formula One World Championship event in Bahrain.

Therefore, the FIA confirms that the 2012 Gulf Air F1 Grand Prix of Bahrain will go ahead as scheduled.”

The line about ensuring that “the safety of the public, officials, drivers and teams is secured at all times during an event” is interesting in that “at all times” clearly means travel to and from the circuit and overnight. Many F1 personnel will be in Bahrain from Monday morning for seven days. Also worth noting is that this line doesn’t mention the media.

There is expected to be a large turnout of media representatives at the race, although staff from Japanese and Finnish TV have already opted not to travel as have some individual journalists.

Reaction to the statement will follow as the day goes on and this post will be updated accordingly.

Featured News
MORE FROM JA ON F1...
Share This:
Posted by:
Category:
76 Comments
  1. Aimal Khan says:

    $$$$$ is king.

    1. joaquin says:

      and F1, FIA, FOTA+Red Bull, Ferrari,Etc. are his bitches.

      1. F1 fan says:

        Well, after all F1 is a business and not a political entity !

    2. Wayne says:

      Normally I would agree but i’m not sure in this case. F1 has along standing contract in place, there is no official advise against visitng the country in question.

      If F1 changes its plans it will be accused of supporting the opposition. If F1 goes ahead it will be accused of supporting the government.

      F1 is a sport (business)perhaps the most sensible course is for it not to get involved and follow thoruhg on its agreement in the absence of official advice to the contrary?

      Aditionally, I hope all of you who are derriding F1 despite the incredibly difficult position it finds itself in, are likewise writing to all of the companies who do billions of dollars worth of business in Bahrain every year. These businesses are(apparently by the unfair crieria you are applying to F1) supporting the government much more than F1 does. Their people too are at risk from the violence etc.

      To get this wound up about a sporting event in Bahrain when the Syrian government is killing thousands every day is a bit worrying. The Chinese too run one of the most oppresive regimes on the planet, and they are not adverse to killing their own people as we all know, if you want a more F1 linked example of opression.

    3. john doe says:

      Folks great point.

      If you hadn’t seen what is REALLY going on in Bahrain.

      Please watch

      http://www.presstv.ir/live/llnw/

      Do not listen to the BBC and the main stream media

    4. Anthony M. says:

      Everyone has to look within themselves and make a decision for themselves about the suffering of others, whether it be in Bahrain, the UK, the USA, China, or wherever on planet earth we have to take a stance/a side/a choice on the things that are going on. AS FOR ME AND MY HOUSE, IF THE BAHRAIN GRAND PRIX GOES AHEAD WHILE THE CURRENT SITUATIONS CONTINUE, I WILL NOT WATCH ANY MORE F1 RACE. I WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE FOLLOWING OF F1, I WILL DELETE ALL THINGS F1 FROM MY LIFE. BECAUSE I BELIEVE WE ALL CAN DO BETTER REGARDLESS OF HOW SMALL IT MAY SEEM. THIS WILL BE MY CHOICE/STANCE/SIDE. Also I will be sending out a response to as many of the companies that participate in F1 being there and to companies that do business there.

      1. Kevin Green says:

        Great stand if you can do it!! you will notice i have been one of the most outspoken about this event and how it should not go ahead BUT i love all things F1 other than certain key figures running the sport, AND to be honest i will still be watching it either way.

        If situations like this carry on then that would likely change P.s the race wont go ahead but the image that i warned

  2. Denise says:

    I’ve said this in a previous post to a different article on here, but I’m not shocked about this announcement. Where has all the news coverage of Bahrain been? Apart from a little bit on the BBC this week, there has been nothing like the coverage Bahrain this year that they got last year. My guess is that 95% of people think everything is hunky dory over there.
    Bet you there’ll be some coverage now that the race has been confirmed!
    I really hope the race goes off without a hitch, because I hate to think of the concequences.

    1. rgvkiwi says:

      I also agree, what sort of precedent does it set if the FIA / F1 back down to pressure from what is essentially a form of terrorism.

      It is well meaning to most of us (the west being mostly democratic) but one mans terrorism is anothers fight for rights.

      Almost all governments have a “we will not negotiate with terrorists” principle. Why should the FIA be any different?

      At this point it is all threats, scare mongering and inuuendo…..

      I can understand the personal safety issues but without any real form of threat being shown or taking place I feel it is a mistake to back down to this type of pressure. Sure an opprotunity to cause mayhem may take place, but that is the nature of terrorism and one F1 faces in many countries it travels too already.

      Reliance on the local authorities is required at every meeting in every country…

      Mark C.

    2. Michael says:

      No news is not always good news. There’s plenty of dissent in Bahrain, it’s just nowhere near as close to civil war as Syria, which is why it’s getting ignored.

      We’ve already had one man killed for protesting the race. That fact still stuns me. Whatever your reading of the situation in Bahrain, surely the government, in allowing that, should have blown any chance they had of hosting a Grand Prix?

      And there’s every chance there will be more protests and that there will be more armed militia on the streets. The risk of a second killing in the name of F1 seems unacceptably high.

      It’s ridiculous. We don’t need this. Any country in the world would love to host a race. Bahrain is in the middle of nowhere. Its security makes Sao Paulo look like Monaco. It was a really bad decision to go there and cancelling this event would have got us out of the contract, opening up a valuable slot in the calendar to somewhere people actually want to race at.

      1. Wayne says:

        Michael, I would want to know the precise, unabridged, clear and transparrent details of how and why this man died. Did he die due to the actions of an over-zealous authority force or did he die because he did something stupid or illegal?

        If a protestor attaked a policeman who was on duty at the British Grand Prix and tragically died due to an action he took, I do not think the institution should be blamed. The people who work for the government are just that, PEOPLE, and they too have a right to protect themselves.

      2. Michael says:

        Yes, well, a big part of the problem is the difficulty in getting reliable information out of the country. Eyewitness reports say he was not involved in the protest but was filming it when an unmarked car pulled up and opened fire. The opposition say it was the militia, who were operating alongside the police. There is no suggestion of provocation or illegal activity on the dead man’s behalf, unless you count journalism as illegal.

        Make no mistake, this is not a case of legitimate policing being blown out of proportion for political gain. Nor is it Western sensibilities being used to judge a situation we don’t understand. It’s the deliberate targeting of journalists by the state in order to control the flow of information out of the country. The fact that you haven’t seen much about Bahrain on the news suggests that it’s working.

        If foreign journalists had full, free access to report on the protests, we could get a truer picture of events and there wouldn’t be this cloud of suspicion over the regime. Ask yourself why the leadership wouldn’t want that. Look at what we do know about what’s going on in that country. Then make up your own mind. Is this a great place for a race?

  3. Lezza says:

    God forbid that that no-one is hurt, because if they are, the incident will blow the FIA apart.

    1. JohnBt says:

      After all the comments, just pray that no one will be hurt. It’s still immoral IMHO.

    2. Pete says:

      You mean: “God forbid that ANY-one is hurt, because if they are, the incident will blow the FIA apart” right? O_0

  4. Kevin Green says:

    Terrible decision, certain people could well be left regretting this, It’s shameful.

  5. John Francis says:

    Finally thats good. I need a ticket for this
    Are there any available? And from where can I find one

    1. If you feel it is safe enough, then you can get your ticket from the organisers here: http://www.unified.com.bh/

      If you end up going, I’d be curious to know how the spectator experience is by filing a review on GrandPrixAdvisor.com.

  6. Sebee says:

    Thank you FIA!

    Never thought I would say that.

    Let’s move on, nothing left to see here.

    1. Robert s says:

      agreed

    2. VV says:

      Apart from protests, people being thrown in jail and Abd al-Hadi al-Khwajah’s hunger strike, you mean?

      Yeah, nothing happening. Fun and games in Bahrain.

      1. Sebee says:

        You know what – no one has said this, but I will say it now, because I’ve seen too many comments like this.

        I don’t recall reading in my histroy books at school about any major outrage from the middle east region when the western world was fighting for it’s freedom and democracy. I also don’t see the middle east embrace values which are clearly logical and right and should be in place, let’s start with fair and equal treatment of women throughtout the middle east region for example.

        So spare me the drama about a few people being thrown in jail or one man being on a hunger strike. Millions died to win the the freedoms and laws we enjoy. How many times must I say this – this Bahrain struggle is not ours to fight. It’s not F1s to fight. It’s a shallow victory if you don’t win it yourself.

        What should the Bahraini history books write? Will they erect a giant statue of an McLaren F1 car and credit their democratic freedoms to F1 not staging a race? I can’t believe how off the scale of reality some views can be. And don’t think for a second that I’m not aware of the fact that my stone cold reality is not viewed in that light by some.

  7. Mojo says:

    At the and of the day, this is just about money, i.e. who has to pay the bill in case the race doesn’t take place. Bernie will always say “there will be a race”, otherwise he’d have to pay the TV stations, which he doesn’t like, despite him being one of UK’s richest men. The King of Bahrain doesn’t want to pay the bill again, so my guess is that we’ll go racing this year.

  8. MichaelG says:

    I wasn’t expecting this. Words fail, to be honest.

    I hope all goes well for the F1 teams, journalists, etc. Stay safe, James.

  9. Racyboy says:

    James,
    Just wondering if you and your team are being provided with security to and from airport-hotel-track etc?

      1. Ashwin says:

        James
        Are you afraid or nervous about visiting Bahrain despite knowing the obvious facts?

      2. Davexxx says:

        Good luck, James!

      3. Racyboy says:

        I’m amazed the BBC haven’t assured it’s employees safety and security considering you’re contractually obliged to attend.

        It’s a shame it’s come to this.

        F1 is supposed to be a fun, enjoyable experience…can’t see that being the case next weekend.
        I guess we’ll all just have to narrow our blinkers a little.

      4. Victor says:

        James, does it make any difference security-wise to travel as a BBC journalist, as opposed to being on your own business?

      5. Mintee says:

        You’ll be behind a WALL of security for sure.

        But you’ll be sure of an audience! This one will make headlines and every team and sponsor will be panicking that it will go very wrong indeed.

        As has been said, if there is trouble in the country it could look very bad indeed for F1 but I doubt it will get near the teams or the track.

      6. paul dossor says:

        you will not need security to travel around bahrain. roads are free and unfettered. it is a relief that the gp is back on as it will help the country as a whole. yes i have lived in bahrain for the past 15 years. the country needs the gp

      7. Martin says:

        Hi Paul,

        I’ve never been to the Middle East / Gulf region (I’ve flown over it from Australia a few times) and I make no claims to understanding the culture or the politics. I’m interested in your view that Bahrain needs the race. Why is that? Is it a status thing, or the attention brings a good vibe? Or is there a significant tourist and/or business benefit from it?

        Thanks,

        Martin

      8. Paul says:

        Hi Martin,

        Essentially it is a combination of all 3 and more. Simple put Bahrain is only 1.1 M people about the size of a small capital city. So from a status point it has been one way for a small island country to get recognition around the world in the past, present and future. 60% are Bahrainis. The government provides free education, almost free university, free medical heavily subsidised housing (180m2) $100 a month, cheap petrol, cheap electricity (free as certain people dont pay), pensions etc for low income Bahrainis. Almost a nanny state. They have an elected parliament in the lower house. Bahrain is not a Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco. with an upper house appointed by the King. The protest is that the Shia population want a greater say in running the country based on population and accountability within government for actions performed simply put. There are villages around Bahrain that are dominated by the Shia population and this is where the protests originate. Religious Imams in these villages have a great influence as well. Enough of the background

        Status symbol yes for the country as a whole as it is the Bahrain Grand Prix sponsored by Gulf Air. The Grand Prix makes up around 2 to 3 percent of the GDP and it has a flow on effect with tourism and business. So it is needed to insure that business is possible in Bahrain. If the GP had been cancelled then quite a few companies headquarter in Bahrain would probably have left. So any Bahrainis employed would lose their jobs. Expats leave and the houses remain unrented. no money coming in. out of 34 houses on our compound 14 are empty. At the height of the unrest from March through to maybe September 4 to 5 star hotels had around 15 to 20% occupancy. Saudis would not come across the causeway to spend money. The business environment was distinctly unfriendly. Alot of small business went under on both sides of the religion.

        so in a nutshell the GP is needed to stabilise the business environment so the country can go forward and sort out their domestic issues with reforms, rights abuses etc. Cancellation would have had a negative impact on business and probably a tougher impact on the protesters.

        On the protest side it could be seen as a Mexican stand off with the police maintaining a presence outside the villages and young protesters taunting them. the villages usually have debris across the road to stop police coming in easily and in some cases have open maze that leads any body coming into the village as a trap. These standoffs have lead to people being hurt on both sides.

        Who starts the confrontation is anybody’s guess but the violence is limited to villages and not popular ares such as shopping malls etc.

        Good vibe certainly as it is a sign that there may be a pickup in business. which is good for everybody.

        Overall it is a good thing for the country on the business front, human rights activists can state their case to world media, government reforms can be monitored, tourism gets a boost and as my 8 year old says the noisy cars are back.

        drop us an email if you want a quick tour of the island from an expat aussie.

        PS: If you take a taxi insure that the meter is on and dont haggle a price unless you want a guide for the whole day. From airport to manama around 4BD or 10 australian.

        Enjoy Bahrain I think you will be pleasantly surprised I hope.

    1. LD01 says:

      As much as I don’t think Bahrain should go ahead, I have no doubt that none of the teams, or F1 personnel are in any direct danger.

      This is about drivers giving soundbites about how wonderful Bahrain is and how they love the place, while shaking hands with the ruling regime, etc. They can’t (especially McLaren) go there and disrespect the rulers. They have to perform for them.

      That’s what they’re being paid well for. Expect lots of PR spin and photo-ops with morally good causes to be ramped up as soon as Bahrain is over as the drivers will need it to maintain their personal sponsorship deals.

  10. Toby says:

    Well that’s that then…Let’s just hope it all goes off without a hitch. I guess in 10 days we will know. Maybe, just maybe the sport can help the country move forward in some way.

  11. jpinx says:

    I suppose the media get dropped into the “public” category? Just what has FIA done, other than communicate with one side of the “problem”. I see no evidence of the FIA taking a balanced view.

    James – good luck – keep your head down after hours…

  12. Mark J says:

    I will be making a silent protest by not watching the event.

    I know people use examples of various countries in which F1 goes to that have questionable political and human rights records. But this race has been used by the authorities there as an advertisment to show that everything is alright, when clearly it isn’t. Obviously a lot of Bahrani money is linked to the sport and there are members of the country high up in the FIA. This would be the only reason why such a decision was made.

    Its one of those days why I wonder I follow such a sport, pay for tickets to see races and watch it on TV. I sinserley hope locals and people visiting the Grand Prix will be safe, and any protects respected.

    1. tom in adelaide says:

      I’ll be joining you. And I suspect we won’t be missing much.

      I don’t think there is anything wrong with watching this race, I certainly wouldn’t judge anyone who did, but I have been really turned off by all the B.S that the FIA and Bernie have spun. That and the complete lack of accountability the team managers have taken (by deferring 100% of the decision to the FIA).

      1. paul dossor says:

        stop watching the sport where fair worse human rights abuses occur then. singapore china malayasia are all goo d examples.

        i suggest you research all comments regarding bahrain instead of all the rhetoric expressed in twitter by both sides.

        if they had cancelled because of politics then the above gps should be canceled to.

        bythe way i live in bahrain

      2. Robert s says:

        good point, like Jackie Stewart said where would it stop. cancel the world cup and Olympics?

        when the violence in northern island happened, sporting event still went on.

        Like i mentioned in a previous post, the media are the ones blowing this out of proportion.

      3. Kevin Green says:

        poor evaluation there Robert the world cup and olympics are directly about the nations F1 is not its about a sporting business model moving about making and creating money through extortionate fee’s and advertising directly at the trackside!!

        Are DC and Humphrey going to be walking down the high Street’s in Bahrain as like in India etc??? i think not!!!

    2. Wu says:

      I hope you will be boycotting the one this weekend too. Poor Tibetans… they just want a say in China. And what about the other billion who do as well?

      UK had a bit of protesting, now arsonists are given heavier prison sentences than peadophiles and a woman with mental problems is also in prison. All the while our PM sells policy for donations to his party, takes money from the poor to give to the rich, yet insists we’re all in it together. If I was you I’d rather not watch the UK or Chinese GP than Bahraini.

    3. **Paul** says:

      I suggest you don’t watch this weekend either in that case. China has an appalling record with human rights and so forth.

      I firmly believe it’s not the job of a sports governing body to make judgements about a countries internal issues, unless there is a proven risk to the safety of the people attending the event. For them to do so sets a slightly worrying precedent in my opinion.

      1. Mark J says:

        Looks like yourself Paul, the other Paul and Wu did not read in full what I said in the comment originally. So I’ll say it again, go to the Bahrain F1 website and tell me the race isn’t been used as a political tool to promote unity in the country.

        If you went through every country the race goes to I am sure you could pick out one human rights incident. You will not get an argument from me there.

        But not in recent time has a race itself been used a real political tool. This is where my issue is. The FIA fined Turkey $5 million for such a move when they wheeled out the President of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus onto the podium a few years back. But obviously its fine by the FIA for Bahrain to use the race to show everything is fine again. Sadly from what I read outside of the F1 media it is not.

    4. Umar Ali Hayat says:

      Dont make sports political, Sports is sports it has nothing to do with politics, race or anything for that matter other than sports itself.
      And secondly you dont know the ground reality true picture of Bahrain, you only know what the media tells you, i really dont know the real picture and i dont believe the media to the extent they blow out. Because my friends who are in bahrain says the life there is normal and safe.
      Kindly be discrete in the information that you digest from the News. because they only show one side of the coin, well that is what makes there news exciting.

    5. LD01 says:

      I thought we’d have a USA ’05 scenario but with only the McLaren team racing.

  13. goferet says:

    I love how the FIA gets in there and takes charge like some kind of tough headmaster with statements like… ”There’s no room for dissent” — Classic!

    Anyway finally we get a decision regarding Bahrain and I believe the FIA have made the right call for the sport just couldn’t afford to cancel this event again for that would have meant we would have a abandoned $200 million facility sitting idle in the desert for all eternity which would have been a darn shame!

    And no, unlike some posters, I don’t believe this decision is all about money but instead loyalty for look there are so many countries around the world that want a race spot on the calendar nowadays (yes more countries than there’re weeks) so it would have been very easy for Bernie to drop Bahrain in favour of some other country which would have been charged even more.

    For sure, as our JA on F1 says, today after Friday prayers will be a defining moment but unlike other Arab countries that wanted democracy during the Arab spring, Bahrain & Saudi Arabia are the two were it’s citizens weren’t after regime change (for they love their Monarchies just like we do over here in the UK) but rather just wanted a more fair system in which the ruling minority shared the spoils with the rest of the country —> That’s all.

    Anyway glad this decision has been reached so we can now concentrate at taking care of business in China.

    P.s.

    I guess Mclaren must have breathed a major sigh of relief over this news for they were in danger of losing their business partners, no?

    1. James Allen says:

      They didn’t say there’s no room for dissent, that is my interpretation of it

      1. goferet says:

        @ James Allen

        They didn’t say there’s no room for dissent
        ————————————————-

        Oh excuse me, thanks for the clarification sir.

  14. Many the line “… that the safety of the public, officials, drivers and teams is secured at all times during an event” doesn’t mention the media in particular but it does refer to the public.

    I don’t see any reason why the media would have less consideration than the public, at large one would imagine.

  15. Craig in Manila says:

    So, now that it’s definitely on, will be interesting to see how many (if any) drivers/teams/media/whomever decide that, irrespective of the race going ahead, they will not be going either due to their personal security concerns or for reasons of their own personal morals/principles.

  16. Phil says:

    I have a bad feeling about this….

  17. franed says:

    I think that the FIA statement has proved my suspicion beyond any doubt, that all input on which they have based their decision came from those who have never stepped off the red carpet. (For some in the whole of their lives) The same people who have no qualms about using deadly force on their own population. Unfortunately the moderate Crown Prince and even the King are being tarred by the same brush that characterises the hard line police, troops and militia.
    In fact, mostly disguised to the the “West”, what is going on is basically a religious war
    Sunni vs Shia with outside reinforcement from Saudi and the UAE. It so happens that the well off rulers are of one sect and the mass and vast majority of less well of population of the other. Thus this is not a bit of local disquiet that can be smoothed over.

  18. Wu says:

    Indeed, thank you FIA. Enough of this storm in a teacup business and get cracking.

    Who knows, with DRS it might even be a good race!

  19. Adam Garretty says:

    Doesn’t seem right. Things don’t seem hunky dory over there from news reports I’ve read. Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja (52) is serving life imprisonment for anti-government protests. He is two months on hunger strike now and will probably soon die in jail. Amnesty International says there are 14 prominent opposition activists as prisoners of conscience and they are asking for the immediate relief.

    Dissent is stamped on quickly there. Just like the FIA it seems.

    Wrong decision.

    1. Adam Garretty says:

      I mean *release (not relief).

  20. Tom says:

    This just might end up making the actions of the teams and FIA during the 2005 US Grand Prix reasonable in comparison.

  21. Chris Chong says:

    We should start a donation drive to “Hire a 24/7 security detail for James Allen during the Bahrain GP” on Kickstarter or something.

  22. Dan says:

    I find the decision baffling. All of this talk about it being too expensive to cancel is nonsense considering the risks that are at stake. I love Formula One but at the end of the day it’s only one motor race, it’s not going to kill anyone if it’s not on. The goings on in Bahrain are actually a matter of life or death.

    The other discourse about F1 being able to ‘bring happiness to the people’ or something along those lines is also flawed. Bahrain never gets much attendance anyway, plus I doubt the ordinary people in Bahrain are going to feel any better about the struggle for freedom and democracy by watching 24 multi-millionaires driving around a track for 2 hours before heading back home to one of their many mansions elsewhere in the world.

  23. Nigel says:

    The FIA are clearly unfamiliar with the concept of ‘duty of care’.

    But of course, as Ecclestone says, “it’s all perfect”.

    Good luck, James & stay safe.

  24. btaylor says:

    Why should it not run ?

    Are we to give in to any little protest anybody fancies running ?

    Most of these protests and revolutions have ended up resulting in Anarchy and a far worse state for the people living there and an opportunity for Islamic fundaMentalists.

    The regime might not be perfect, but they are a million times better than the alternatives… wake up people.

  25. nick says:

    The FIA are purely focusing on safety and completely ignoring the ethical and political aspects, such as is it acceptable to implicitly support the regime by holding the grand prix? I’m not saying I know the answer to that, I just find it quite interesting that they’ve managed to sidestep that question completely. It’s a bit like if the English rugby team went off to tour South Africa in the 80s and said “Don’t worry, it’s fine because we think it should be safe”.

  26. ArJay says:

    F1 triumphs…
    Faith in Bahrain is restored…for now

  27. mark says:

    This is motorsport not human right. If you wish to state your opinion about the injustices of F1 being in Bahrain then might I respectfully suggest you start by looking first in your own back yard. You might be shocked/saddened to see what you find……..
    Here’s to a great battle on the track not off……that is why we all watch motorsport in the first place is it not.

    1. Robert s says:

      exactly

    2. Tom says:

      For my part, my objection is that the Bahrain government is clearly using the race in an attempt to show the country as stable once again. It is a blatantly political act that is supposed to be against FIA rules.

      After all, Turkey was heavily fined when it pulled a political stunt during the podium ceremony several years ago at their GP. The entire Bahrain GP this year is a political stunt.

  28. Erik says:

    A shameful display by all involved in this decision.

    I truly hope the common Bahraini people will one day have thier nation’s money spent on having thier human rights issues resolved, as opposed to on holding an elite sport for the benefit of the few ruling elite.

    And it’s hard to justify the sport to non-fans with decisions like this being made. I will not be watching this race.

  29. John T says:

    The thing i cant understand is this whole “don’t go and race in this country because of whats happening”.

    Very few people complained when F1 was going to South Africa, at the time of apartheid. If we applied the reasoning for not going to Bahrain, we would see a considerably reduced calendar.

    Brazil is another example of a country, which, down through the years, has been less than democratic. One case in particular, stands out in braziian history, the Carandiru massacre. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carandiru_massacre

    There are some “democratic” countries, who, if you applied the same rule for Bahrain, that shouldn’t be holding F1 races, I will leave it to you’s all to work out who they are, Google is at your fingertips.

  30. Lewis says:

    When I went to the Friday of the GP in 2007 they were searching people on the way in to the circuit even then. You can bet that nothing will happen at the circuit itself as the security will be immense.

  31. David Ryan says:

    Can’t say I’m surprised, but doesn’t mean I agree. When you have organisations like Human Rights Watch suggesting that F1 will be endorsing the regime’s actions by going, and yet it still decides to go, in my view you sacrifice any pretence of remaining apolitical. I see no real difference between this and continuing to race in South Africa during apartheid, long after other sports had pulled out. I can only hope this does not turn into something the FIA regrets seriously.

  32. Adelaide says:

    I don’t like this. It’s not right.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top Tags
SEARCH News
JA ON F1 In association with...
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Multi award winning Formula One photographer
Multi award winning Formula One photographer