Hot fun in Summertime
Budapest 2014
Hungarian Grand Prix
New cars from Lotus, Sauber and Renault break cover
News
New cars from Lotus, Sauber and Renault break cover
Posted By: James Allen  |  31 Jan 2011   |  5:59 pm GMT  |  93 comments

Today was a busy day of launches in Valencia, with three teams pulling the wraps off their cars.

Lotus was the first, launching the car via an online web magazine called Lotus Pages. Mid morning it was the turn of the now heavily Mexican influenced Sauber team and soon after that of Renault, with a car the team themselves are describing as super aggressive.

Tomorrow Red Bull, Toro Rosso, Williams and Mercedes will launch, taking the total of new cars in circulation up to eight. We will then see McLaren on Friday, Virgin next Monday and Force India at the Jerez test. At some point the HRT car will also appear.

All the teams are commenting that there has been very little time since the end of last season and next winter will be even shorter, with the final race in November 27 meaning that the Young Drivers’ test will be in December! There is already a certain weariness and the season hasn’t started yet. The sport will have to be careful to guard against burn out of staff.


Lotus
The new Lotus bears no resemblance to last year’s car, it has a much more aggressive profile, different livery and a Renault engine in the back.

Team principal Tony Fernandes put aside for a moment the wrangle with Lotus cars over the use of the Lotus name in F1, talking of the Team Lotus project being about “daring to dream”. That is certainly something the team’s charismatic technical boss is allowing himself to do in his launch rhetoric,

“When you look at this car, it looks like a front running car in every area,” said chief technical officer Mike Gascoyne. “We said very clearly that we want to start challenging the established teams and I think that is very achievable. But that line has to continue to go up so we’ll have to target being up there with Toro Rosso, Sauber and Force India and then by the end of the season targetting Williams and Renault.”

The team is aiming to score between 40 and 50 points and score a seventh or eighth place finish in the Constructors’ Championship.


Sauber
Sauber has had a good winter commercially and is hoping that the new found stability will allow the technical team to stretch their legs a little more. Technical director James Key identified the weaknesses in the way the team was using its formidable wing tunnel in Hinwil and this is the first Sauber car produced under his management. According to the team, “One of the overriding targets is to improve aerodynamic efficiency, low-speed cornering, mechanical grip and to gain more flexibility in suspension tuning.”

Peter Sauber observed that last year was, “The 41st year of our company history and one of the most difficult. But we managed to overcome these difficulties in the second half of the season. We implemented some well-considered structural changes. The appointment of James Key as Technical Director already bore fruit last season, and he is now in charge of development of the Sauber C30-Ferrari. At the same time, we have managed to secure our business foundation for the 2011 season. In these economically straitened times that is something we can be proud of too.”


Renault
The Renault team, now sponsored by Lotus Cars and no longer owned even in part by Renault is the most aggressive looking of the three new cars unveiled today. Under technical director James Allison, the design and aerodynamic departments have been pushing hard to close the gap to the leading three teams, Red Bull, Ferrari and McLaren,
“Words like ‘aggressive’ and ‘innovative’ are very much in vogue in Formula 1 at the moment, but where the R31 is concerned we feel those adjectives are appropriate,” said Allison. “It’s true to say that the car has been designed in an ambitious manner and a quick glance at the layout will confirm that its entire concept differs considerably, not just from last year’s car, but from any car this team has ever produced.”

Team principal Eric Boullier said, “In 2010 we achieved a very high rate of development and the car that finished the season was two seconds per lap quicker than the car we had at the first race. All the hard work over the last twelve months has been focussed on delivering a big improvement for 2011, and that means we should be more competitive than last year. Will we be stronger than our competitors? Hard to say, but based on the efforts of everybody here, I feel we deserve it.

“Our driver line-up is still a mixture of talent, experience and youth. Robert is clearly one of our strongest assets and we know we can rely on his speed, commitment and dedication for the long term. As for Vitaly, he showed us at the end of last year that he understands what we expect of him in 2011 and he was ready to commit to this. With a year’s experience behind him, he will be able to approach the new season with more confidence and is ready to help the team raise its game. We took the risk of investing in him last year and I’m sure we will see the benefit of that this year.”

Renault has hired two reserve drivers, Romain Grosjean and Bruno Senna, whose uncle Ayrton drove the original Lotus Renault cars in the mid 1980s in the black and gold colours of John Player Special and who the team will no doubt deploy in that capacity for promotional events, “Black and gold looked beautiful back in the 1980s, when my uncle was racing, and they look just as stunning on a current car, ” said Senna. “Also, to be able to wear the same colours that my uncle used for a few years in his career feels very special.”

Lead driver Robert Kubica was a little off-message at one stage, when asked whether it was an honour to drive for Lotus he said, “I think Lotus is our sponsor. At least from what I know it is a sponsor,” he said when asked if he dreamt to drive for Lotus. So I could also say it is my dream to drive for Total. I think it would be different if Lotus owned the team and were fully involved into the team.”

Meanwhile team owner Gerard Lopez has confirmed that his Genii Capital now owns 100% of the team and that Lotus cars has an option to buy shares in two years time.

Featured News
MORE FROM JA ON F1...
Share This:
Posted by:
Category:
93 Comments
  1. Andy H says:

    James,
    Glad you refered to the Renault and Lotus cars correctly.Spot on.

    1. DannyBahar says:

      What Lotus cars?
      You mean Team Lotus’ cars, of course.

      the only Lotus cars are produced by Group Lotus PLC

      Fernandes has the rights to “Team Lotus” name (even if he does), not to “Lotus” name. “Lotus” is a registered trademark. Guess by whom?

      1. Marcus says:

        You know, I didn’t really care about Team Lotus before, but all this big corporation bullying the racers around has made me care. Team Lotus have done the hard work of setting up an F1 team. The real Lotus F1 team is Lotus racing. They built a team, built cars, and race them. Paying the bills doesn’t make you a racer, or make you Lotus in F1. The fans will ultimately judge, but I don’t want a pig with lipstick on it.

    2. MattNZ says:

      Fully agree. There may be two teams arguing over the name ‘Lotus’ but only one team will have ‘Lotus’ F1 cars.

  2. JD says:

    Love the comment from Kubica. It would be nice of more drivers and managers in F1 were as forthright.

    1. Rich C says:

      Yes! Kubica nails it in one! Bang on!
      +2

    2. Andy C says:

      Me too. He’s a top guy. I bet that went down well :-)

    3. Cameron Isles says:

      ‘Respect’ — as Lewis would tweet to his peepz — is definitely in order for Kubica for that one.

    4. Ry says:

      That is very funny!!!

    5. AK says:

      Tyical poms (in this case, journalists)! Why call something by a French name when you can call it by a British name?

      Thankfully, Kubica was alive to it and put them in their place.

      1. brooza says:

        What are you on about?

      2. AK says:

        It’s obvious that a journalist has asked him something like “how does it feel to drive for Lotus?”.

        Now the only kind of journalist that would ask such thing when the car and team is actually a Renault is a pom (i.e. a Brit).

    6. Henry says:

      Somewhere in a meeting room Danny Bahar is banging his head against a wall…oh if only we could have seen his expression. :)

      Kubica may or may not have done this on purpose, but either way its a fantastic slip-up. Renault and Kubica together are going to be a strong team this year i feel – he will undoubtedly be able to put a car in race-winning positions if the car is anywhere near up to the job. So I look forward to seeing this ‘radical’ new renault driven in anger.

  3. Joe says:

    Iv heard rumours about exhausts at the front of the car.. Any inside info James?

    1. James D says:

      I’ve heard this as well. I heard it described as the most radical exhaust system in F1 ever… it blows on some sort of diffuser at the front of the car.

      I’d appreciate it if James could shed some light on this.

    2. AK says:

      Yes, it is true. Apparently the engineers have targeted a need for more downforce when the car is in reverse and going backwards…

    3. Kyle says:

      Seems it’s now confirmed that the Renault’s exhausts exit at the front under the sidepods!

      http://twitpic.com/3vf0o2

      Very interesting concept, and surely it will be completely unfeasable for rival teams to incorporate into their own cars should it prove to be a significant source of extra performance.

      Could prove to be the ace up the sleeve for Renault this season.

      1. Kyle says:

        To contradict my previous comment, upon further reading it turns out that incorporating such a system is not necessarily “completely unfeasable” as it would not necessitate modification of the monocoque.

        Regardless, introducing a “FEE” (Front Exit Exhaust) as it’s now being coined would presumably be more of a nightmare than the EBD was last season for those teams which didn’t start the season with it.

      2. Paul H says:

        Although it may not require changes to the chassis the components that would be surrounded by a change of exhaust – radiators, engine systems, electronics and lots of carbon fibre – would be extremely sensitive the heat. This may make it difficult or impossible for other teams to incorporate until later in the season at the earliest.

  4. devilsadvocate says:

    Thats some pretty heavy language coming from good ole Bob Kubica and from the powers to be at Genii, this a sign of trouble behind the scenes with Mr. Bahar and company? Did Genii finally pull the reins in on him and the whole Lotus takeover?
    Also worth noting the official F1 website almost seems to be extra careful in their language of the two launches making it clear that the two teams are Team Lotus running renault power train and Renault which they only briefly underline as being sponsored to some degree by Lotus car company. Is this perhaps because some out of court deal has been reached? Maybe Group decided their claim for pulling Fernandez’ card 4 years early wouldn’t hold up in court?
    It certainly speaks volumes that Genii is making it very clear they are the 100% owners, makes me think someone finally put their foot down and said “enough already!”

    1. young slinger says:

      Especially with the bad publicity between Group Lotus and Team Lotus – make P L E N T Y of distance!

  5. L says:

    Hmm, weird, on all the motorsport forums the Renault (or whatever it is called) is being seen as the tamest and most boring looking car from all the teams so far?

    What part of it is aggressive or innovating, maybe it can’t be seen on the pictures but only in real-life?

    1. Bart says:

      Renault seems to have the tightest package out there, an interesting floor, suspicious air inlets and – unlike other new cars – it sports a pull-rod suspension. No to mention exhausts hidden God knows where. Also, bar the messy area around the cockpit it looks absolutely stunning.

    2. Declan says:

      There is speculation that the exhaust could be coming out of the front-edge of the side pods, to help blow air along the underfloor.

    3. Jonathan Vogt says:

      It has pull-rod rear suspension. I suppose that’s something :P

  6. Olivier says:

    I hate to say this, but the new livery from Team Lotus looks hideous (especially the back end)! Very juvenile, like it has been designed by a 12 year old making “VROOOM” sounds all the way through the design process. :(

    Shame, because their black&gold competition winner looked so awesome! They could’ve just replaced the black&gold with green&yellow?! This way they would’ve kept their promise to execute the winner’s design AND have a jawdropping beautiful car with lots of historic references …

    1. Ian says:

      Agreed about the competition winner, real shame that.

  7. Greg says:

    They all look good, I’m intrigued with the cockpit sides of the Lotus, they seem lower than the others.

    I like the paint job on the Renault, Kubica’s words are interesting regarding the debate of the Lotus name.

    The Sauber looks like its got something up its sleeve with the bodywork around the air intake, can you throw some light on it James

  8. jmv says:

    so far every car looks like a wider evolution of last years red bull… all following Newey and trying to think along with him…

    how cool would it be if Newey presents tomorrow a radical low nose :-D

  9. jmv says:

    or maybe his ant-eater nose that never raced at mclaren

    1. David McVey says:

      The ant-eater nose did race at mclaren. The abortive mp4 18 was the first car to feature it but it never raced. However, it did feature the following year on the mp4 19 and was raced in a variety of versions right up until the MP4 23 in which Hamilton won the title.

  10. Paul P says:

    Three cars launched and no huge commercial deals on any:

    Team Lotus – Maxxis have gone, no new additions

    Renault – still no title, or any other ‘blue chip’ brands. How long ’til they need to borrow money and brand another bank?

    Sauber – all the Telmex and Cuervo hype, and ends up being a small presence, i.e. not huge money. And Mad Croc renewed a few days ago, but the brand is gone from the car

    Would be hard to imagine new money at Mercedes (all that MS hype led brands in by the handful, each no doubt now very disappointed), and Toro Rosso will probably be same as always.

    Pressure falls to Red Bull, who MUST surely launch a new oil company sponsor tomorrow. My money is on Petrobras…time will tell!

      1. Rich C says:

        Look how low in the car he is in that shot! Isn’t there a rule that you have to be able to see *over the steering wheel?

    1. devilsadvocate says:

      I find myself quite puzzled by your analysis of the Sauber… given that from almost any angle you can see multiple iterations of Carlos Slim’s brand (Telmex, TelCell, and Claro) and the same for Cuervo, not an anlge on the car from which you cant see the brand its almost too in your face for my liking, but heck, I hear Señor Slim is one of the richest people in the world so Im sure he gave them a pretty penny for all that exposure.

    2. Leo says:

      Renault’s Title sponsor is Lotus, hence all the fuss over the Lotus name in F1….

    3. Henry says:

      No huge commercial deals on any?!

      I think Peter Sauber might have something to say about that. Large enough to transform his team from being on the brink of bankruptcy to having three or four major sponsors and more in the pipeline is quite major.

  11. Rich C says:

    I like the way these ppl are throwing around the term “aggressive.”
    But I’d bet it just ain’t so.
    F1 designers are all playing *defense – they just don’t want to be the guy that tries something way out that fails.
    So they’ll all be just about the same again.
    They should learn to play *offense and just ‘go for it’!

  12. Paul H says:

    Good looking step up from Team Lotus on the initial views, although all the new teams are likely to have the most different cars from last years (unless HRT start with last years car). Interesting air box design, especially with the rule changes and Mercedes returning to a regular design on the digitally produced images so far shown. On one or two pictures the front wheel rims look to stand proud of the tyres which is odd.

    Neither Renault or Sauber appear to have changed much at all from last years contenders with evolution looking like the name of the game.Understandable for Sauber – ensure they have ironed out last years woes and then a decent development push once races return to Europe would seem a likely path. Hoped for a more interesting livery this year though.

    Renault at this point most likely playing it quiet, certainly expect a lot of change considering the rate of progress they made last year with regard to aero package. The revealed car is rather bland, I was expecting more with the talk of aggressive approach – must be all the hidden parts or maybe they just meant the oddly stunted looking nose. Hopefully by first race they’ll have added a few more interesting parts. Of note is how Lada is more prominent so far in the pictures. I wouldn’t have gone for the ruby slipper look on the race kit.

    One thing that has struck me is how all the cars revealed have different wheels. Normally don’t notice the alloys on the cars at all but this year seems to be one of the first thing that draws my eye. Surprised nobody has copied Ferrari’s cooling hoops this year.

    It’s so nice that the cars are here, testing starting and racing shortly and we can concentrate on that for next few weeks at least rather than what’s in a name?
    That which we call a Lotus,by any other name would smell as sweet as high octane race fuel.

    1. NamedMyKidAyrton says:

      Yup, the Sauber livery stinks. That’s no way to attract fans, viewers and/or sponsors.

      1. Chris Orr says:

        I agree.
        And it doesnt look like that have attracted that some serious big sponsors for this year, and I imagine Saubers real estate would be a bit cheaper then the big teams at the moment.

    2. Kyle says:

      Personally I’m quite excited by the first glimpses of the Sauber C30. Hopefully it will allow them to close the gap to the top teams and maybe even pull of a feat like Force India at Spa in 2009.

      With the exception of Renaults front blown exhaust system, the C30 appears to have the most aggressive design features of the cars which have been unveiled so far.

      The car is characterized by striking angularity at several locations and appears to have a very low profile – in particular the drivers seating position and surrounding area looks lower than it does on other cars.

      Most notably the sidepods, roll structure, turning veins and other auxiliary aero components are all very distinctive from those of rival teams whilst the rear of the car has perhaps seen the most significant changes.

      I just hope Sauber has a solid grasp of how to extract a high level of performance from an exhaust blown diffuser as they didn’t introduce one on last years car.

      Personally I’m also a fan of the livery. I hated last years livery but this year it just seems fitting as it accentuates the distinctiveness of the C30.

      More close up pictures and detail on the technical aspects of the car here: http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/sauber-c30-launch-detail-and-analysis/

      Just to ensure no confusion, this isn’t my blog, just one I stumbled across through James’s excellent twitter feed.

      1. Paul H says:

        Cheers for the link, actually changes my mind somewhat about the Sauber. Few interesting pics and comments show that they have added a few little touches that demonstrate some more creative approaches that weren’t evident in other pictures I’ve seen. Still think the livery looks like an after thought, but there are noticeable spaces on both car and team overalls for title sponsors to be placed – come on Corona, get involved!

        I shall also take the time to retract my comment about Renault not living up to all their talk of aggressive design and creating a boring car. Whilst I don’t think it looks good and think aggressive is the wrong word, they’ve certainly thought out of the box with the exhaust system. Really hope they can get it to work properly as could very well be this seasons new must have gadget.

  13. Some interesting quotes from Lopez on autosport.com where he asks Fernandez to stop using “heritage and passion” arguments and confess it’s all about TV money. Lopez also admits that Group Lotus is a mere sponsor for now; wonder what Tony will write on his twitter: he’s been talking about kings and new dynasties lately (referring to himself obviously – a very modest guy by all means), also ending every sentence with “Colin Chapman”. Maybe he should change his name to Chapman to make it more real?

    It’s unlikely 1Malaysia are going to mix with the established teams this year (despite PR talk); an odd 10 place here and there may be possible, otherwise it’ll be a bit of humiliation for Lotus name like in the early 1990s.

    Sauber are back to normal Sauber. Good to see that after BMW years, a very user-friendly team – no PR talk, just the desire to race. I hope they can have a decent year without too many engine failures or wing failures.

    1. David Ryan says:

      Have to say that after reading the article on Autosport, that strikes me as a rather unwise statement for Lopez to be making. His own team’s courtship of Group Lotus, after all, is almost entirely motivated by money just as any sponsorship deal is for a team. Further mud slinging in light of pending court proceedings is not a particularly wise strategy, as I’m sure his legal team would have advised him.

      1. The guy has a decent idea of what he’d doing – Lopez I mean.

        We also don’t know who courted who in this case, seems like Group Lotus are interested in technical products that companies owned by Lopez are developing. It’s a win-win situation for both parties.

        One positive thing that about Genii people is that they don’t bang their heads against the wall, roll their eyes, and scream about their overwhelming goodness on Twitter. They’re saying, “Look, Group Lotus chose to go with what was known as Renault F1 Team because they feel it’s the best way to spend their money and get a decent exposure; they prefer to go racing this way.” Thank God press releases from Enstone don’t evoke Chapman in every sentence.

        I suppose Chapman was in the right place at the right time when things were developing in every area of human knowledge; he picked up the vibe, hence his reputation for pushing the boundaries. He belongs to a certain era; he certainly had tons of genuine charisma, old style. It was a classic. I don’t think anyone can lay claim to that. Whether the new chapter for Lotus in F1 (in all shapes and sizes) can bring the famous name back to the limelight is a whole different story. We’ll see what happens.

        PS Where have the exhausts gone on the R31? Is it the ground-breaking effect?

      2. David Ryan says:

        I don’t dispute that Genii have done a good job up to this point – indeed, turning around Renault after Crashgate is one heck of an achievement. However, my point was more that criticising another team on the grounds of supposedly “chasing the money” when all modern F1 teams do precisely that is somewhat hypocritical. They did also make allusions to carrying the Lotus heritage when the deal was first announced at the end of last year, so the apparent backtrack from this position is both conflicting and also somewhat hypocritical. It’s a rather unwelcome continuation of the mudslinging that Lopez himself expressed frustration with (and on which I concur), hence why I find the statements so peculiar. The court case will resolve the issue of who has the rights to use the name in Formula One, and I would have thought they would observe usual practice and not comment further until the case is decided. For my part, I would say that Team Lotus is more a continuation of Chapman’s ideology than Group Lotus or Renault, but that is just me.

        The exhausts do seem to be exiting at the front of the sidepods for the purposes of enhancing the blown diffuser concept seen last year (see http://scarbsf1.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/renault-r31-front-exit-exhausts-fee-explained/). It’s certainly unconventional, but I’m not sure running the exhaust heat past your cooling system/fuel tank/KERS etc. is the wisest idea ever. I’m also not sure it’ll provide that much more downforce given that the intensity and directness of the airflow will be much reduced by the time it reaches the back of the car. I suppose it adds some originality to the grid though which is always welcome – I just hope for their sake it doesn’t come at the cost of engine reliability.

    2. Chris says:

      Everything TF says is pure hype and no substance

  14. D G Plews says:

    Oh dear, the Sauber livery looks even duller than the blank 2010 car! I was expecting more of a mexican red/white/green flavour.

    1. Landon says:

      I always thought the Sauber livery was rather striking last year- it always caught my eye.

      The only way to improve it in my opinion would be to make the black/grey areas bare/clearcoated carbon fibre.

    2. Koby fan says:

      Agree. I bit underwelming…Expected Sauber to have the biggest livery change & see more Telmex blue over the body work. Instead they’ve kept the corporate Sauber black/white/red. Rear wing is ripe for another sponsor before Bahrain…

  15. Chris Garwood says:

    I’m interested that the Team Lotus, appears (in other pictures as well) to have a Mercedes style air box (split in the middle) when there are supposed to be banned this year

    1. William McCone says:

      They aren’t banned, there are just tighter restrictions governing width etc. They are still allowed but I read the benefit was less with the new regulations.

  16. Baron Von Awesome says:

    The r31 sure has some interesting tricks up it’s sleeve, it’s one to watch, that’s for sure, could be this years Red Bull or Brawn.

  17. Declan says:

    Aside from the very public bickering on who owns the privilege of using the Lotus name in F1 – I have to say that both Tony Fernandes and Gerard Lopez have really impressed me with their respective approaches to racing.

    You don’t have to stretch very far back in time to recall the team owners whose only concern seemed to only be the glamour of F1 and the marketing veneer; forgetting that a racing team is fundamentally about designing and engineering a precision machine (Mr Branson – I hope you don’t fall in this group!)

    On face value, both Fernandes and Lopez have gone about running their teams in the right way. Fernandes has clearly given Mike Gascopyne free rein and equipped him with enough resources – not to mention hiring two drivers who are proven to be pretty quick. Lopez probably had the more difficult job of steering the rudderless Renault after “crashgate” and rebuilding the technical department from years of underinvestment by Flavio Briatore.

    I think both men have shown that they deserve to be in F1 on merit.

    1. Rafael Lopez says:

      Agreed.

    2. Chris Garwood says:

      Well said, I think that Team Lotus and following their twitter/facebook have brought a breath of fresh air to F1, and Lopez for getting the team through Crashgate without doing a BMW/Toyota/Honda

  18. Richard Bell says:

    So is the black and gold car a Renault sponsored by Lotus even though it has Lada on the side and Rover on the barge board? Bonkers.

    1. Chris says:

      Richard Bell aka Tony Fernandes

      If you took your time to look properly instead of spouting ill informed nonsense, you would see that it is a different Rover company sponsoring Lotus Renault GP.

      1. Richard Bell says:

        Chris aka Mr Serious

        I know, it was a joke.

        For what it’s worth, I am and always have been against Tony Fernandes team using the Lotus name.

  19. AP says:

    Hi James,

    As the new Sauber looks good from what I can see on the web, I was wondering if you know if they will run Ferrari KERS? If so Ferrari will have more feedback on KERS from Sauber and TR. Do you what Willams are going to run? I recall them and Brawn working on the fly wheel couple of years ago.
    Thanks again.

    1. Fergal says:

      Williams said a month or two back that they’re running battery KERS (cosworth’s I think) as the flywheel isn’t practical in the current regs. I think the reason was due to space – with large fuel tanks, you can put the batteries where you want but the flywheel is just a single big object, so you can’t fit it in.

  20. Knuckles says:

    James, great insight about weariness already setting in, and burn out. It appears to me that never ending resource restrictions and the equally never ending rising of stakes and lengthening of the season don’t go together well. It’s an interesting topic, and worth having an eye on.

    We remember how demands increased in football due to Champion’s League and whatnot. This went hand in hand with a huge increase of resources. The football teams changed from having 11 great players and a few not-so-greats to having a full squad of 21 top players available. At the same time the players learned to accept that it’s no problem not to play each match, and in fact not possible. The managers pick and choose from the whole squad according to needs and health.

  21. Robert McKay says:

    I quite like the look of the Sauber.

    Indeed looking at it I suddenly realised that the new “shape” of F1 cars (as we’ve had since 2009) now finally looks the business and the older ones just look weird.

    I think that always happens – I remember the 1998 cars being weird for a while after the wider 1997 ones and then at some point a few seasons down the line it reverses and what the sport used to be then looks weird.

    Guess it’s that auto-refresh of F1 doing it’s thing!

  22. StefMeister says:

    Sauber’s Adjustable Rear Wing in action::
    http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8889/c30wing.gif

    1. Rich C says:

      LOL
      I must have watched that piece about a dozen times, wondering what track it was, before I realized it was the same bit over and over and…

  23. Phil says:

    Does anyone know why Sauber are still carrying BMW colours of blue and white?

  24. Husker says:

    Loving the Team Lotus livery! First time we get CGI renders instead of pics as a form of presentation isn’t it?

    I was expecting the new Sauber to look more like the Ganassi cars Rolex Sports cars champions, light blue and white. Oh well, best luck to them!

    Where exactly is the exhausts in the Renault? Anyone???? Were they hiding them or are they actually beneath the car like the 80′s early 90′s car’s?

  25. jonas says:

    Brilliant response from Kubica. He must sometimes wonder what he has got himself into.

  26. Charles says:

    It would be nice if Sauber had put any effort at all into the appearance of their car.

  27. Seán Craddock says:

    Hang on, if Mercedes’ air intake is banned due to safety concerns, why r Team Lotus showing a similar design on their T128?

  28. Stephen says:

    James,

    Have Team Lotus announced there reserve driver?

  29. DannyBahar says:

    James, you quoted Kubica’s words without two sentences:

    So I could also say it is my dream to drive for Total. I think it would be different if Lotus owned the team and were fully involved into the team. It’s a good partner to have and they have high ambitions. It looks promising

    1. James, Danny Bahar is onto you!

    2. Rich C says:

      Sure, sure. Spin it, DannyB, spin it hard!
      See my remarks up there near the top?

      1. DannyBahar ;) says:

        What remarks?
        aaagh, those deep ones.

  30. Brian says:

    There is one thing that has really stood out in all of the launch photos – it’s those Pirelli tyres…they look really strange with their “straight” logo rather than one that curves with the shape of the tyre. They look awful – just not “right” somehow…I hope this is not their final design.

  31. Paul Kirk says:

    AP, I understand Williams are using electrical curse they developed themselves instead of the flywheel system, due to reduced bulk and more flexability in the placement of components, the f/w system being one bulky unit and the battary system comprising of separate smaller components.
    PK.

  32. Neil Ford says:

    James- What is the official name for Lotus Renault for 2011… or regardless of all of the miss directed support for group lotus, is this your own interpretation?

    1. James Allen says:

      Lotus Renault GP Team is the name they are entered under and if one of their drivers makes it into the top three that’s how I will introduce him

  33. Gord says:

    The Lotus, Renault and Sauber look pretty nice, I can’t wait for the new season.

    1. AK says:

      Must you put them in that order? Try Renault, Sauber and Lotus next time for better clarity.

  34. One more thought: the 1Malaysia aka Team Lotus F1 car carries no “Team Lotus” stickers… Instead it carries “1Malaysia” branding on the sides of the cockpit. Looks like they decided to play it safe just in case.

    I was going through some archive pictures and Lotus chassis used to carry “Team Lotus” name in the past.

    PS Tony once again says he’s good one and the innocent victim of Gerard’s outrageous bullying on his Twitter (followed by the manic “ha-ha-ha”). Wonder what Nigel Mansell would do if he had Twitter back in those days…

    Downloaded Team Lotus Notes – or whatever it’s called – out of curiosity: they have a good PR team, no doubt about it. Not sure if they’re still using Sine Qua Non’s services or assembled their own squad of “dream spin doctors”. It definitely sells, the whole thing smells a bit like the Rolling Stone magazine adapted to F1 with Tony impersonating the fat band manager and Mike doing the crazy (ageing) guitarist part (Cobain?); Jarno and Heikki act as Novoselic and Grohl. The masses are gonna love it.

    1. James Allen says:

      Like it, nice parallells!

    2. Kenny says:

      There’s a Team Lotus badge on the nose.

      1. There’s a familiar logo but no “Team Lotus” letters (as far as I can see). Last year “Lotus” was written all over the car.

      2. Kenny says:

        The nose badge has “Team Lotus” on it…there’s another one in the cockpit. Both are very small, though.

      3. David Ryan says:

        Group Lotus were acting as a sponsor as well as providing the licence for the “Lotus Racing” name, hence the higher profile last year which is comparable with the Lotus branding on the Renault this year. The Team Lotus badge and level of exposure for Fernandes’ team on the car this year, in contrast, is akin to that of McLaren or Williams, neither of which have their name plastered over the car yet are still recognisable. Teams only tend to go for overt references to their name if they’re struggling to get sponsors or – as with Ferrari this year – if certain sponsors have been hit with advertising restrictions.

  35. Ross says:

    Pleased to see the two reserve drivers for Renault Lotus getting another chance in F1. If I had to chose to be a reserve driver for any team it would be them. If Kubica has a season similar to last years he will be sitting in a top car next year. If Petrov has a similar season he will be gone, maybe even earlier.

    It’s not often someone is owed another chance in F1. However Romain Grosjean career almost went down the pan after being stuck in a dog of a car with no testing in the midst of the Piquet scandal playing second fiddle to Alonso. Allegedly it’s a different team now but in whatever form Renault is now they owe him another chance.

    1. Kyle says:

      +1

      Grosjean and Senna are two men I was sad to see kicked out of a seat in F1 as I think neither were given a reasonable chance to show their worth. Same for Chandhok.

  36. Alexx says:

    im curious if the exaust exiting from the side pod will be succeptible to damage, from a little wheel-banging?

    1. Kyle says:

      Here’s a great close up shot of it from earlier today to judge for yourself:

      http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/JLE0965.jpg

      Any damage caused by contact around that area of the car would likely reduce aero performance to some extent anyway so it’s probably not a major concern.

      Your post did get me thinking though, I wonder what measures Renault have taken with this system to ensure that foreign objects entering the exhaust pipes would not compromise the system, for example a considerable off track excursion through a gravel trap, chunks of rubber from the track and tyres over the duration of a race or even just an extreme quantity of water flowing into the pipe during a wet session/race.

      Of course, Renault is far too professional a team to overlook something as obvious as a wet track to break their car, but it would be hilarious if it were true.

      Most probably the major area of concern for Renault with this system in terms of reliability and performance will be the internals of the car, relating to the packaging, cooling and indeed the drivers themselves as having exhaust pipes that operate at 600+ degrees celcius either side of the driver could potentially be nigh on unbearable for the drivers over a race distance.

  37. Anssi says:

    Kubica said the truth about “Lotus”, nothing wrong with that.

    Thre is nothing wrong with that UNLESS someone else higher up in the team is trying to fool people by lying or by “being conservative about the truth”. That wouldn’t happen, right?

LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top Tags
SEARCH News
JA ON F1 In association with...
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Download the chequered flag podcast today
MTS
Industry-Leading Testing and Sensing Solutions
Multi award winning Formula One photographer
Multi award winning Formula One photographer