Posted on June 25, 2010
F1 prediction: Win 2 top grandstand tickets for British GP | James Allen on F1 – The official James Allen website on F1

I’m delighted to be able to offer two top of the range grandstand seats for the British Grand Prix on 11 July, courtesy of my sponsor FX Pro, the Forex trading company which sponsors Virgin Racing.

You could be trackside at Silverstone in two weeks time (Darren Heath)


All you have to do to enter is leave a comment and predict what the margin will be in qualifying at Valencia between the two Virgin drivers and in whose favour. The times in F1 are measured to 1/1000ths of a second. So for example if you think Timo Glock will be faster, you might answer “Glock by 0.123 secs”. Please do remember the three digits after the decimal point.

To give you a guide, in Turkey Glock was faster than DI Grassi by 1.245 secs. In Montreal the gap was down to 0.734s again in Glock’s favour.

In the event that no-one gets the correct answer, the person getting the closest to the time will be the winner. If two people get the same correct answer, the one who posted first wins. If one of the drivers fails to set a time, the person who predicts that wins.

Obviously, as with the Fans Forum, only people who are able to physically get to the event should answer. If you are in Canberra with no chance of getting a flight, please don’t enter and spoil it for everyone else. Or enter for fun, but declare that you do not wish to claim the prize.

Entries must be in by 12-00hrs UK time on Saturday 26 June.

We will send the tickets and information pack out early next week.

The full JA on F1 Silverstone package courtesy of FX Pro

· Premium grandstand tickets to Saturday and Sunday’s events

· Large TV screens so you don’t miss one second of action

· Packed lunch with Virgin Racing cool bag

· A tour of the Virgin Racing garage, F1 Paddock and autographed team merchandise

· Kangaroo TV set

· Official F1 Programme

· Virgin Racing ticket lanyard with map, time table and Virgin Racing info

· Virgin Racing gift bag

Good Luck!

F1 prediction: Win 2 top grandstand tickets for British GP
872 Responses

  1.   1. Posted By: Craig Woollard
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 2:54 pm 

    Glock by 0.488 seconds

    [Reply]

    Aaron Reply:

    oh that’s weird.. I said exactly the same, and it was before any comments were showing..

    [Reply]

    Craig Woollard Reply:

    It’ll be random then when Glock beats Di Grassi by exactly 0.488 seconds then ;P

    [Reply]

    Aaron Reply:

    Haha here’s hoping!

    Though what happens if it is 0.488, I presume there can only be one winner..

    James Allen Reply:

    Only one entry per person, remember

    [Reply]

    William Reed Reply:

    glock by 0.346

    [Reply]

    Nathan Smith Reply:

    Glock By 0.334

    [Reply]

    John Videlo Reply:

    Glock by 1.001 seconds

    [Reply]

    Paul Walker Reply:

    Glock faster by 0.658

    [Reply]

    John O'Hare Reply:

    I think it will be Glock by 0.625 seconds

    [Reply]

    Ruth Stockdale Reply:

    I think it will be Glock by 0.298 seconds

    [Reply]

    bunnytanjuatco Reply:

    timo glock by o.797 sec

    [Reply]

    Barrie Reply:

    Glock by 0.402

    [Reply]

    Gordon Evans Reply:

    Glock by 1.122 sec.

    [Reply]


  2.   2. Posted By: Joe
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:00 pm 

    Timo Glock will be faster by .856 seconds.

    [Reply]


  3.   3. Posted By: Thomas Foote
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:04 pm 

    Glock by 0.846 secs

    [Reply]


  4.   4. Posted By: Stephen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:06 pm 

    Glock by 0.464

    [Reply]


  5.   5. Posted By: Andy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:13 pm 

    Glock by 0.625

    [Reply]


  6.   6. Posted By: Jil
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:13 pm 

    Glock by 0.473 s

    [Reply]


  7.   7. Posted By: Aaron
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:14 pm 

    Glock by 0.488 secs.

    [Reply]


  8.   8. Posted By: Paul Wilson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:16 pm 

    Glock by 0.812

    [Reply]


  9.   9. Posted By: Jake
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:17 pm 

    Glock by 0.611 seconds.

    [Reply]


  10.   10. Posted By: George
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:17 pm 

    It’s going to be 0.500 in Glock’s favour.

    [Reply]


  11.   11. Posted By: Lee Keery
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:18 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.455 secs

    [Reply]


  12.   12. Posted By: Dave
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:19 pm 

    Glock by 0.867 secs

    [Reply]


  13.   13. Posted By: Imran Patel
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:21 pm 

    .909 seconds

    [Reply]


  14.   14. Posted By: James Palmer
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:21 pm 

    0.533 Seconds

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    To whom?

    [Reply]

    James Palmer Reply:

    Sorry, Glock.

    [Reply]

    Blondie Su Reply:

    I love F1
    Glock by 0.933

    [Reply]


  15.   15. Posted By: Matt S
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:21 pm 

    Glock by 0.364

    [Reply]


  16.   16. Posted By: Imran Patel
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:22 pm 

    Glock by 0.909 secs

    [Reply]


  17.   17. Posted By: Leonardo
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:22 pm 

    Glock will be ahead of Di Grassi by .913s.

    [Reply]


  18.   18. Posted By: Nicci
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:22 pm 

    I think the gap will be 0.844 in Glock’s favour.

    [Reply]


  19.   19. Posted By: Goldfinger
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:24 pm 

    Glock by 0.223

    [Reply]


  20.   20. Posted By: Jason Cole
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:25 pm 

    0.2950 seconds

    [Reply]


  21.   21. Posted By: Jenny
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:26 pm 

    I predict Glock fastest by 1.302 secs.

    [Reply]


  22.   22. Posted By: Tom
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:26 pm 

    Glock by 0.123 secs

    [Reply]


  23.   23. Posted By: Neil Harper
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:26 pm 

    Glock by 0.846 secs

    [Reply]


  24.   24. Posted By: Mickey
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:27 pm 

    Glock by 0.486 secs

    [Reply]


  25.   25. Posted By: Goldfinger
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:27 pm 

    I meant 1.223 seconds! Too late to change?? Sorry.

    [Reply]


  26.   26. Posted By: Rob A
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:28 pm 

    Glock by 0.345 sec

    [Reply]


  27.   27. Posted By: Neil Cornthwaite
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:29 pm 

    I think that Glock will be faster by 0.824 seconds

    [Reply]


  28.   28. Posted By: Andrew Cameron
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:29 pm 

    Glock by 0.812 secs

    [Reply]


  29.   29. Posted By: Renzo Pigati
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:30 pm 

    Glock by 0.192 secs

    Best regards

    [Reply]


  30.   30. Posted By: thestretch
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:31 pm 

    i think glock will be 0.568s faster than di grassi

    [Reply]


  31.   31. Posted By: Danny Teasdale
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:31 pm 

    Glock by 0.723 – Good luck to all!

    [Reply]


  32.   32. Posted By: ColinZeal
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:31 pm 

    Glock by 0.698

    [Reply]


  33.   33. Posted By: paddy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:32 pm 

    glock by .561 but i live in canada so its just for fun

    [Reply]


  34.   34. Posted By: Alex Lawton
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.843 secs.

    [Reply]


  35.   35. Posted By: dulait
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:35 pm 

    Glock by 0.354 secs

    [Reply]


  36.   36. Posted By: Phil Snell
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:35 pm 

    Glock to be faster by 0.825

    BTW, Great competition and website!!

    [Reply]


  37.   37. Posted By: mark turner
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:37 pm 

    gap: 0.518

    [Reply]


  38.   38. Posted By: Liam
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:37 pm 

    I reckon it’ll be in Glock’s favour – 0.532 secs

    [Reply]


  39.   39. Posted By: Ben Miller
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:38 pm 

    Glock by 0.350 seconds

    [Reply]


  40.   40. Posted By: Irish con
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:38 pm 

    .777 glock faster

    [Reply]


  41.   41. Posted By: Silverelisedave
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:39 pm 

    I rekon its gonna be Glock quicker again by 0.820

    Thanks! :)

    [Reply]


  42.   42. Posted By: Gareth Nicholas
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:39 pm 

    Glock to beat Di Grassi by 0.278

    [Reply]


  43.   43. Posted By: Matthew Scrivin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:39 pm 

    Glock by 0.623s

    [Reply]


  44.   44. Posted By: Stephen Pattenden
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:40 pm 

    Glock by 0.868 secs

    [Reply]


  45.   45. Posted By: James Rossi
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:40 pm 

    Glock by 1.021s

    [Reply]


  46.   46. Posted By: Adam Taylor
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:40 pm 

    Glock by 0.423 secs – fun entry

    [Reply]


  47.   47. Posted By: Benjamin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:42 pm 

    Timo Glock by 1.125 seconds. I do not wish to claim the prize.

    [Reply]


  48.   48. Posted By: yer
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:42 pm 

    glock by 0.821

    [Reply]


  49.   49. Posted By: David Green
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:42 pm 

    Got to be Glock, and by 0.899 seconds

    [Reply]


  50.   50. Posted By: Ian
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:43 pm 

    Glock by 1.325secs

    [Reply]


  51.   51. Posted By: Samantha Cawley
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:43 pm 

    Glock by 1.132 seconds

    [Reply]


  52.   52. Posted By: Rob
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:44 pm 

    Glock by 0.884 seconds

    [Reply]


  53.   53. Posted By: NA
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:44 pm 

    Glock by .946

    Just entering for fun, cannot claim prize.

    [Reply]


  54.   54. Posted By: Mike Daniels
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:45 pm 

    Glock by 0.524

    [Reply]


  55.   55. Posted By: Frederik
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:46 pm 

    Glock by 1.076 sec

    [Reply]


  56.   56. Posted By: Jon P
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:47 pm 

    Glock by 0.234 secs

    [Reply]


  57.   57. Posted By: Daniel Mawby
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:47 pm 

    Glock by 0.678 secs

    [Reply]


  58.   58. Posted By: Mike Flemington
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:48 pm 

    Glock by 1.165 seconds

    [Reply]


  59.   59. Posted By: PaulL
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:48 pm 

    Glock 0.249

    [Reply]


  60.   60. Posted By: david
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:49 pm 

    Glock by 0.756 secs

    [Reply]


  61.   61. Posted By: Alan Goodfellow
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:49 pm 

    I’ll go for Glock by 0.758 seconds :)

    Thank you for giving us all this opportunity, James!

    [Reply]


  62.   62. Posted By: Erik C
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:49 pm 

    No claim, Glock by .823

    [Reply]


  63.   63. Posted By: Chris
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:50 pm 

    I reckon Glock by 1.235s.
    I have a question which I was hoping you might be able to help with, I’m going to Monza this year and was hoping to hire a Kangaroo TV but it isn’t available, do you know of any other way to follow the race from the track?

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    Buy a UHF scanner for £100 or so and scan through until you find some English commentary. You’ll find some team radio frequencies too

    [Reply]


  64.   64. Posted By: Tom S
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:50 pm 

    OK, let’s go for 0.555

    Last year’s Silverstone was my first ever GP, atmosphere was incredible.

    [Reply]

    Tom S Reply:

    (Glock!)

    [Reply]


  65.   65. Posted By: richie675
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:51 pm 

    In favour of Glock – 0.450

    [Reply]


  66.   66. Posted By: Padeepa
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:52 pm 

    Great prize. I say:
    Glock by 0.255 sec

    [Reply]


  67.   67. Posted By: Andy Brown
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:52 pm 

    Glock by 0.982 seconds

    [Reply]


  68.   68. Posted By: Mario Ramos
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:52 pm 

    “Glock by 0.555 secs”

    [Reply]


  69.   69. Posted By: El Shish
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:53 pm 

    Glock to be 0.650 faster than Di Grassi

    [Reply]


  70.   70. Posted By: Matthew Worden
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:54 pm 

    Glock by 0.827 secs

    [Reply]


  71.   71. Posted By: Shane Govern
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.549 secs

    [Reply]


  72.   72. Posted By: Alex O'Donnell
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:56 pm 

    The gap between the Virgin cars will be 0.584 secs in favour of T.Glock (spinning like a clock)

    [Reply]


  73.   73. Posted By: andrew_donny
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:57 pm 

    I feel compelled to comment as a regular but non-contributing reader for the past two seasons, particularly as this such a great prize.

    Here goes:

    Glock by 0.560 seconds.

    [Reply]


  74.   74. Posted By: Nick Hatton
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:58 pm 

    Glock by 0.812 secs

    [Reply]


  75.   75. Posted By: John Ross Harvey
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:58 pm 

    Timo Glock by 0.954s now, I do not have a psssport so I could say playing merely to see how close, however if I won I would immediately get a passport to partake in the event. My last live grand prix attended was the British Gp in 1996 where Jacques won and I wore my country flag proudly. Damon most at track remember was towed for the fans after the race, and both Ferraris went out.
    Best of luck to all.

    [Reply]


  76.   76. Posted By: Richard Dreyer
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 3:59 pm 

    I think Glock will be 0.846 seconds ahead.

    [Reply]


  77.   77. Posted By: Craig
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:00 pm 

    I predict 0.727 in favour of Glock.

    Thanks for the really cool fan initiatives lately. See you at the FOTA fans forum. I can’t wait.

    [Reply]


  78.   78. Posted By: Obster
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:02 pm 

    Glock by.330

    [Reply]


  79.   79. Posted By: Adam Callaghan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:03 pm 

    Glock by 0.316s

    [Reply]


  80.   80. Posted By: David
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:04 pm 

    Glock by 0.972

    [Reply]


  81.   81. Posted By: jbstans
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:04 pm 

    I’m going to have a stab at 0.639sec

    [Reply]

    jbstans Reply:

    To Glock

    [Reply]


  82.   82. Posted By: Paul Lewis
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:07 pm 

    Glock by 0.694 seconds

    [Reply]


  83.   83. Posted By: Neal Maarwood
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:07 pm 

    Glock by 0.947

    [Reply]


  84.   84. Posted By: Phil Bishop
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:08 pm 

    Glock by 0.428

    James this is another awesome initiative. Thanks a million and to FX Pro too.

    Cheers,

    Phil

    [Reply]


  85.   85. Posted By: Chris Bannister
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:09 pm 

    Glock by 0.736s

    [Reply]


  86.   86. Posted By: Neil Jenney
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:10 pm 

    Glock by 0.811 secs

    [Reply]


  87.   87. Posted By: Neil Williams
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:11 pm 

    Glock by 0.554 seconds

    [Reply]


  88.   88. Posted By: graham best
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:12 pm 

    Glock by 0.85 i reckon

    [Reply]


  89.   89. Posted By: Stephen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:12 pm 

    Glock by 0.642

    [Reply]


  90.   90. Posted By: Richo
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:13 pm 

    Glock by 1.435

    [Reply]


  91.   91. Posted By: Dominic Barker
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:13 pm 

    Glock 0.562 secs

    [Reply]


  92.   92. Posted By: Deeren Patel
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:14 pm 

    Glock by 0.654 secs.

    [Reply]


  93.   93. Posted By: Peter Jones
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:14 pm 

    Glock by 0.479

    [Reply]


  94.   94. Posted By: Andy C
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:15 pm 

    Glock by 0.428

    [Reply]


  95.   95. Posted By: Rob
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:16 pm 

    Timo by 0.945

    [Reply]


  96.   96. Posted By: malcolm.strachan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:17 pm 

    In Canada, so don’t count me in:

    Glock by 0.893 seconds.

    :)

    [Reply]


  97.   97. Posted By: Seymour Quilter
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:18 pm 

    Ok James
    in answer to your competition question:

    Glock ahead by 0.367

    fingers crossed!

    [Reply]


  98.   98. Posted By: Robert Fellows
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:18 pm 

    Glock By 0.237 Seconds

    [Reply]


  99.   99. Posted By: Roonmastor
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:20 pm 

    Great competition and pretty hard to predict. I’ll go with Glock by 1.187 seconds.

    [Reply]


  100.   100. Posted By: Steve Payne
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:20 pm 

    Glock 1.632s

    [Reply]

    Steve Payne Reply:

    Just to confirm Glock faster by 1.632 sec

    [Reply]


  101.   101. Posted By: F1ART
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:21 pm 

    Glock faster than DI Grassi by 0.575.

    See you in London next week James, many thanks for the invitation.

    [Reply]


  102.   102. Posted By: keith long
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:22 pm 

    Glock by 1.378

    [Reply]


  103.   103. Posted By: Ben G
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:23 pm 

    Glock by 0.514 seconds

    [Reply]


  104.   104. Posted By: Alex
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:23 pm 

    Glock by 0.956

    [Reply]


  105.   105. Posted By: Tyke Lockett
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:24 pm 

    “Glock by 0.095 secs”

    [Reply]


  106.   106. Posted By: Wayne HArding
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:24 pm 

    Glock by 0.346

    [Reply]


  107.   107. Posted By: JamesF1
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:24 pm 

    Glock by 0.656 seconds

    [Reply]


  108.   108. Posted By: Mario
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:26 pm 

    Timo by 0.965

    [Reply]


  109.   109. Posted By: Marco
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:26 pm 

    Glock by 0.853. Great Website James lots of insight for the dedicated fan. Thanks

    [Reply]


  110.   110. Posted By: Andrew
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:27 pm 

    Fantastic competition James, I can’t claim the prize but I’ll have a go…

    Glock by 1.135s.

    [Reply]


  111.   111. Posted By: Ian Lockett
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:27 pm 

    “Glock by 0.111 seconds”

    [Reply]


  112.   112. Posted By: Alastair Archbold
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:27 pm 

    Glock by 0.314 seconds.

    [Reply]


  113.   113. Posted By: Gareth Ludlow
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:28 pm 

    Glock by 1.362s

    [Reply]


  114.   114. Posted By: Kristian Robinson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:28 pm 

    Glock by 0.043 seconds

    [Reply]


  115.   115. Posted By: Ben G
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:29 pm 

    Lovely idea, thanks.
    Here goes;
    Glock by .578

    [Reply]


  116.   116. Posted By: Craig
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:29 pm 

    I think Timo Glock will be faster by 0.214s

    [Reply]


  117.   117. Posted By: Jamie
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:31 pm 

    Glock by 0.523secs

    [Reply]


  118.   118. Posted By: Ed Utteridge
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:31 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.954

    [Reply]


  119.   119. Posted By: Sam Hussaini
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:34 pm 

    I think Glock will be ahead by 0.620 seconds

    [Reply]


  120.   120. Posted By: Graeme
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:35 pm 

    Glock by 0.563

    [Reply]


  121.   121. Posted By: pat
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:35 pm 

    Superb competition!

    glock ahead by 0.534

    good luck everyone.

    [Reply]


  122.   122. Posted By: Nick Ablitt
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:36 pm 

    Glock by 0.543 secs

    [Reply]


  123.   123. Posted By: Lewis Henson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:36 pm 

    Glock by 0.699 secs

    [Reply]


  124.   124. Posted By: James W
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:36 pm 

    Glock by 0.356

    Out of interest, should one of the drivers not be able to post a time, what would happen then?

    [Reply]


  125.   125. Posted By: Giles
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:38 pm 

    0.824 Glock quicker

    [Reply]


  126.   126. Posted By: Helen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:39 pm 

    Glock will be faster than Di Grassi by .151s

    [Reply]


  127.   127. Posted By: Mark Anderson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:40 pm 

    Glock by 0.418 secs

    [Reply]


  128.   128. Posted By: citizenross
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:41 pm 

    Glock by 1.038

    [Reply]


  129.   129. Posted By: Richard Craig
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:42 pm 

    Another tough day for Virgin, especially Timo today. Really illustrates that in some respects, the in-season testing ban hinders as much as it helps. Whilst the “arms race” to resource and fund test teams (benefitting the rich teams) is eliminated, the new teams are forced to make painfully slow advances in their development due to the lack of track time (and the track time they DO get is under the full glare of the world’s media). I think some limited in-season testing should be permitted, to give the smaller teams more chance to develop their cars, give the test and reserve drivers more track time and perhaps reduce the rule bending which sees teams stretch the spirit of the rules permitting demonstration/media days.
    Glock by 0.874

    [Reply]


  130.   130. Posted By: Steven
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:43 pm 

    I reckon it’ll be 0.726 in Glock’s favour.

    [Reply]


  131.   131. Posted By: Jamie Sliwa
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:44 pm 

    Glock by 0.996

    Great prize, many thanks for the opportunity James!

    [Reply]


  132.   132. Posted By: Jonathan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:45 pm 

    Why not?! Glock by 0.351 secs.

    [Reply]


  133.   133. Posted By: Matt M
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:46 pm 

    Glock by 0.868

    [Reply]


  134.   134. Posted By: will clark
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:47 pm 

    Glock 0.623

    Good luck guys

    [Reply]


  135.   135. Posted By: jordan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:48 pm 

    Glock will be 1.4 seconds ahead of Di Grassi.

    [Reply]


  136.   136. Posted By: Steve JR
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:49 pm 

    Glock will beat Di Grassi by 1.121 seconds

    [Reply]


  137.   137. Posted By: William Wallace
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:50 pm 

    Glock by 0.545 seconds.

    [Reply]


  138.   138. Posted By: Andy W
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:51 pm 

    Glock by 0.874 seconds

    [Reply]


  139.   139. Posted By: Si
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:54 pm 

    Glock by 0.466 secs

    [Reply]


  140.   140. Posted By: Fuller
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.643s

    [Reply]


  141.   141. Posted By: Baart
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:56 pm 

    James, what about situation, when one or two of the drivers will be DNF ?

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    If you think that will happen make that your guess

    [Reply]

    Dave R Reply:

    Glock does not set a time!

    [Reply]


  142.   142. Posted By: ishtiaq
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:56 pm 

    Glock will be faster by 0.8500 seconds

    [Reply]


  143.   143. Posted By: Ollie Woods
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 4:59 pm 

    Glock by 0.891

    [Reply]


  144.   144. Posted By: George Kinghorn
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:01 pm 

    Glock by 0.597 secs

    [Reply]


  145.   145. Posted By: Chantal Hillarby
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:01 pm 

    Glock by 0.765

    [Reply]


  146.   146. Posted By: Howard Hughes
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:02 pm 

    Glock, by 0.537

    [Reply]


  147.   147. Posted By: Bill Nuttall
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:03 pm 

    Glock by 0.947

    [Reply]


  148.   148. Posted By: Andy Fov
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:04 pm 

    Glock’s supremacy over DiGrassi to be 0.575 seconds.

    *fingers crossed*

    [Reply]


  149.   149. Posted By: F1 Kitteh
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:06 pm 

    Glock by 0.997 secs

    [Reply]


  150.   150. Posted By: Phil
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:07 pm 

    Glock by 0.536s

    [Reply]


  151.   151. Posted By: Jeff
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:09 pm 

    Glock by 0.429 seconds

    [Reply]


  152.   152. Posted By: Tom Corrigan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:10 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.314 of a second

    [Reply]


  153.   153. Posted By: Graham
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:10 pm 

    Glock by 0.821 secs

    [Reply]


  154.   154. Posted By: Jose Carlos Silva
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:10 pm 

    Glock by 0.324 secs

    [Reply]


  155.   155. Posted By: Paul
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:11 pm 

    My prediction is:
    Timo Glock by 0.565 seconds

    [Reply]


  156.   156. Posted By: Deepan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:12 pm 

    Glock by 0.825 secs

    [Reply]


  157.   157. Posted By: Andy dryden
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:12 pm 

    Glock by 1.647

    [Reply]


  158.   158. Posted By: GeoffEdwards
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:13 pm 

    “Di Grassi by 0.033 secs”

    [Reply]


  159.   159. Posted By: Andy C
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:13 pm 

    Glock by 0.643 seconds.

    Thanks for the competition James!

    [Reply]

    Andy C Reply:

    James,
    please note that I just noticed someone else called andy c has also posted. I assume you can see from email addresses? I’m sure I only posted on this one.

    Thanks, enjoy the forum next week.

    [Reply]


  160.   160. Posted By: Matt
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:14 pm 

    I think the gap will be 0.952

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    Who faster?

    [Reply]

    Matt Reply:

    That would help wouldnt it – Glock!

    [Reply]


  161.   161. Posted By: Stephen Dann
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:15 pm 

    Nice prize

    Glock by 1.038 secs

    [Reply]


  162.   162. Posted By: Baart
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:15 pm 

    Glock by 0,612

    [Reply]


  163.   163. Posted By: Moog
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:16 pm 

    Glock 0.243

    [Reply]


  164.   164. Posted By: ronmon
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:16 pm 

    I can’t make it, but I’ll guess anyway.

    Glock by .854

    [Reply]


  165.   165. Posted By: Akan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:17 pm 

    Your site just exploded into awesome territory, been here from the start, nice to see it grow like this.

    Glock by 0.666 :D

    And for 10 tickets, I predict this one will get the most comments of all your submissions, haha.

    [Reply]

    Baart Reply:

    that`s right ! I was here, when this www was born :)

    [Reply]


  166.   166. Posted By: Russell Cook
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:18 pm 

    Glock by 0.836 secs

    [Reply]


  167.   167. Posted By: Alex
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:19 pm 

    Glock by 0.666 secs >:)

    [Reply]


  168.   168. Posted By: Kyle
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:21 pm 

    Glock by 0.853 seconds

    [Reply]

    Kyle Reply:

    A search of the comments shows that I’ve been beaten to that figure. So cancel the above.

    My new entry is 0.852 (still to Glock)!

    [Reply]


  169.   169. Posted By: Mightyquin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:21 pm 

    Glock by 0.572 secs

    [Reply]


  170.   170. Posted By: Phil Waddell
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:22 pm 

    Glock by 0.777 seconds

    [Reply]


  171.   171. Posted By: Hanzo
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:23 pm 

    Best prize an F1 fan can get, nice job James!

    Glock by 0.853 is my guess.

    [Reply]


  172.   172. Posted By: Stephen Williams
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:23 pm 

    Glock by 1.172 secs

    [Reply]


  173.   173. Posted By: Brogan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:23 pm 

    Presumably we just enter by commenting here?

    If so, can I have Glock by 0.687 ?

    Fingers crossed :D

    [Reply]


  174.   174. Posted By: Matt Hammond
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:24 pm 

    Glock by 0.912

    [Reply]


  175.   175. Posted By: Andrew Tilbury
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:25 pm 

    Nice competition!

    My guess would be Glock by 0.698 seconds

    [Reply]


  176.   176. Posted By: Harry Gilbert
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:28 pm 

    Glock by .554

    [Reply]


  177.   177. Posted By: SiY
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:29 pm 

    Glock by 0.426 secs

    [Reply]


  178.   178. Posted By: Natalie
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:29 pm 

    Glock, by 0.854s

    [Reply]


  179.   179. Posted By: Lee Gilbert
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:30 pm 

    Glock by 0.203

    [Reply]


  180.   180. Posted By: Keith
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:30 pm 

    A chance too good to miss so I am going to say;

    Timo Glock by 1.546 secs over Di Grassi.

    Great Blog by the way, James.

    [Reply]


  181.   181. Posted By: Nick
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:31 pm 

    I think Glock will be ahead by 0.316s

    [Reply]


  182.   182. Posted By: Chris
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:32 pm 

    Glock by 0.372 secs

    [Reply]


  183.   183. Posted By: Phil Waddell
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.777 seconds.

    [Reply]


  184.   184. Posted By: Mark
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.539 seconds!

    [Reply]


  185.   185. Posted By: Andrew
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:34 pm 

    I’m going to go with .547 in Timo’s favour.

    [Reply]


  186.   186. Posted By: John
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:34 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.342 seconds :)

    Nice oompetition James, thanks.

    [Reply]


  187.   187. Posted By: Andrew
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:36 pm 

    I predict Timo Glock by 0.243seconds.

    [Reply]


  188.   188. Posted By: David White
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:36 pm 

    Well, quite obviously Glock is going to outqualify Di Grassi by 0.589 seconds in Valencia.

    [Reply]


  189.   189. Posted By: john f
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:38 pm 

    0.844

    [Reply]


  190.   190. Posted By: Peter West
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:39 pm 

    Ok, I’ll have a crack at this: 0.596s in Glock’s favour.

    [Reply]


  191.   191. Posted By: Dave
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:39 pm 

    Glock by 0.768 seconds!

    (great prize btw James!)

    [Reply]


  192.   192. Posted By: Ian
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:40 pm 

    Two Virgins – who comes first, and how quickly?

    Timo Glock by 0.762 secs

    [Reply]


  193.   193. Posted By: Rob Pickering
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:40 pm 

    Glock by 0.983 secs

    [Reply]


  194.   194. Posted By: Ketchup
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:41 pm 

    I think Glock will be faster by .857 seconds

    [Reply]


  195.   195. Posted By: Tim Sculthorpe
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:41 pm 

    Hmm…. Glock ahead by 0.676 sounds about right to me.

    [Reply]


  196.   196. Posted By: james murphy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:42 pm 

    i think glock will be 1.375 seconds ahead of di grassi.

    [Reply]


  197.   197. Posted By: Smiley
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:43 pm 

    Glock by 0.521 secs

    [Reply]


  198.   198. Posted By: Nika Wattinen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:44 pm 

    I think that Glock will be faster by 0.489s

    [Reply]


  199.   199. Posted By: Paul
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:45 pm 

    Glock to be faster by 0.648 seconds.

    [Reply]


  200.   200. Posted By: Luiz Felipe Sviech Pontarolo
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:46 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.123 secs.
    I’am in Brazil.

    [Reply]


  201.   201. Posted By: Richard Simpson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:47 pm 

    My educated guess is: 0.431

    Good luck everyone!

    [Reply]


  202.   202. Posted By: seisteve
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:47 pm 

    Glock by 1.345 secs

    (with apologies to Di Grassi :-)

    [Reply]


  203.   203. Posted By: Matthew Menary
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:50 pm 

    Glock by 0.877

    [Reply]


  204.   204. Posted By: Andy Smith
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:53 pm 

    Glock by 0.812 secs.

    Cant wait to see the new teams mixing it up when they catch up.

    [Reply]


  205.   205. Posted By: Stephen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.893 secs

    [Reply]


  206.   206. Posted By: Martin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:57 pm 

    0.684

    [Reply]

    Martin Reply:

    To Glock

    [Reply]


  207.   207. Posted By: Danny H
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:58 pm 

    Great prize, I’m going with the form book, don’t let me down Timo.

    Glock by 0.687s

    [Reply]


  208.   208. Posted By: Bojan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 5:59 pm 

    I am going for Glock to be 0.771 seconds faster

    [Reply]


  209.   209. Posted By: Antony Best
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:00 pm 

    What an awesome competition, I’m going to say Glock by 0.826 seconds.

    Cheers for the competition James and FX Pro!

    [Reply]


  210.   210. Posted By: Terry Shepherd
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:01 pm 

    My prediction: Glock by 0.325 secs. See you there.

    [Reply]


  211.   211. Posted By: Tim
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:02 pm 

    I’m going to take the first punt and say Glock by 0.412 seconds

    [Reply]


  212.   212. Posted By: Graham Thwaite
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:03 pm 

    Glock by 0.578 secs

    [Reply]


  213.   213. Posted By: f1aroo
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:03 pm 

    Where do we go to enter. Surely you don’t want us to enter our times in Comments. If we are not able to attend, might we donate the prize to a known poor soul in England that is an F1 fanatic but can’t afford to subsidize CVC and Bernie.

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    Your email address comes through to me, so I can contact the winner. You may donate the tickets to someone who is able to attend

    [Reply]


  214.   214. Posted By: Garry J. Berry
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:05 pm 

    Competition > Glock by 0.905 secs.

    [Reply]


  215.   215. Posted By: Nazdakka
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:06 pm 

    Glock by 0.931s.

    [Reply]


  216.   216. Posted By: Carlos
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:07 pm 

    Glock Faster by 0.534 seconds

    [Reply]


  217.   217. Posted By: Gary C-G
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:07 pm 

    I’m an ex-pat living in Canada, may I enter and donate the prize to someone in England of my choosing if I win? Thanks

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    Yes.

    [Reply]


  218.   218. Posted By: Shane
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:08 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.523 seconds !

    [Reply]


  219.   219. Posted By: sam james
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:08 pm 

    Glock to beat Di Grassi by 0.342 of a second!

    [Reply]


  220.   220. Posted By: Iman Javanmardi
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:09 pm 

    Glock by 0.828 secs

    [Reply]


  221.   221. Posted By: Peter Sainsbury
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:11 pm 

    Glock by 0.781 secs

    [Reply]


  222.   222. Posted By: David Plews
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:14 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.111secs

    [Reply]


  223.   223. Posted By: Adam G
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:15 pm 

    Glock ahead by 0.438 seconds.

    P.S. James you have the best F1 site by far!

    [Reply]


  224.   224. Posted By: Suzanne Crane
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:15 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.334 secs

    [Reply]


  225.   225. Posted By: Charlie
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:17 pm 

    I think Glock will beat di Grassi by 0.708 seconds.

    I’m keeping my fingers crossed!

    [Reply]


  226.   226. Posted By: Richard Warren
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:18 pm 

    Glock by 0.987s.

    [Reply]


  227.   227. Posted By: Tom Haythornthwaite
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:21 pm 

    Glock by 0.987 sec. I will not be able to claim the prize.

    [Reply]


  228.   228. Posted By: Adrian Harris
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:22 pm 

    Glock by 0.801 seconds

    [Reply]


  229.   229. Posted By: Scott
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:23 pm 

    Glock by 0.844

    Extra text here.

    [Reply]


  230.   230. Posted By: Luke A
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:24 pm 

    I assume we can only have 1 guess each?

    I will sat:

    Glock fastest by 0.832

    [Reply]


  231.   231. Posted By: Richard hill
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:27 pm 

    Glock ahead by 0.223 secs

    [Reply]


  232.   232. Posted By: Jon
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:27 pm 

    Glock by 0.947

    [Reply]


  233.   233. Posted By: zoe
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:28 pm 

    glock by 0.523

    [Reply]


  234.   234. Posted By: Dan Binns
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:28 pm 

    Glock by 0.463 seconds

    [Reply]


  235.   235. Posted By: Kenny Carwash
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:29 pm 

    Nice competition idea! I’ll go with Glock fastest by 0.577 seconds.

    [Reply]


  236.   236. Posted By: F1Punter
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:29 pm 

    Glock by 0.642

    [Reply]


  237.   237. Posted By: Carl 21
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:31 pm 

    Glock by 0.847 seconds.

    [Reply]


  238.   238. Posted By: FuriousA83
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:31 pm 

    Glock by 0.529

    [Reply]


  239.   239. Posted By: James B
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:32 pm 

    Glock by 0.824

    [Reply]


  240.   240. Posted By: Stephen Farrall
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:32 pm 

    Glock by 0.855

    [Reply]


  241.   241. Posted By: Paul
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:35 pm 

    Glock by 0.543

    [Reply]


  242.   242. Posted By: Steve Arnott
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:38 pm 

    Glock by 0.847 seconds

    Good luck everyone!

    [Reply]


  243.   243. Posted By: Nige
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:39 pm 

    Glock quicker by .491

    [Reply]


  244.   244. Posted By: zoe
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:39 pm 

    glock by 0.352

    [Reply]


  245.   245. Posted By: Davey
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:40 pm 

    Glock by 0.182 secs :)

    [Reply]


  246.   246. Posted By: David Ledger
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:41 pm 

    Glock ahead by 0.638sec

    [Reply]


  247.   247. Posted By: James
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:41 pm 

    Glock by 0.453 seconds

    [Reply]


  248.   248. Posted By: Steven
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:43 pm 

    0.699 in glock favour

    [Reply]


  249.   249. Posted By: krad
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:44 pm 

    Glock by 0.312 Seconds

    [Reply]


  250.   250. Posted By: Pr0phet
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:46 pm 

    Glock by 0.836

    [Reply]


  251.   251. Posted By: debora marsh
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:47 pm 

    Glock by 0.216 Seconds

    [Reply]


  252.   252. Posted By: Steven
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:49 pm 

    glock by 0.699

    [Reply]


  253.   253. Posted By: Rus_h
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:51 pm 

    Glock to beat Di Grassi by 0.889

    [Reply]


  254.   254. Posted By: RichG
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:52 pm 

    Glock by 0.652

    [Reply]


  255.   255. Posted By: Pushkar
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:52 pm 

    Glock by 0.611

    [Reply]


  256.   256. Posted By: Richard Daw
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:53 pm 

    Glock by 0.523

    [Reply]


  257.   257. Posted By: Karl Chandler
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:53 pm 

    I predict:

    Glock by 0.437 secs

    Nice one James

    [Reply]


  258.   258. Posted By: Matt F
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.568 secs

    [Reply]


  259.   259. Posted By: ginnerchris
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.854 seconds

    [Reply]

    ginnerchris Reply:

    I notice that this time was taken earlier, but didn’t appear because comments hadn’t been moderated at the time.
    Can i change to Glock by 0.858?

    Thanks
    Chris

    [Reply]


  260.   260. Posted By: Paul
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.469s

    [Reply]


  261.   261. Posted By: Joss
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:56 pm 

    Glock by 0.478

    [Reply]


  262.   262. Posted By: Luke Horsfield
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:56 pm 

    Glock by 0.310 secs

    [Reply]


  263.   263. Posted By: Dank
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:57 pm 

    Glock by 0.632s

    [Reply]


  264.   264. Posted By: alex
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 6:58 pm 

    glock by .723

    [Reply]


  265.   265. Posted By: Guru F1
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:01 pm 

    Hi James,
    Thanks to you and Fx Pro for the opportunity! My prediction-
    >>Timo Glock will be faster by 0.886 seconds than Di Grassi

    Guru

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    No-one going for Di Grassi

    [Reply]


  266.   266. Posted By: Susan Cook
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:01 pm 

    Glock by 0.025 secs

    [Reply]


  267.   267. Posted By: Dizzy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:02 pm 

    Glock by 0.243 secs

    [Reply]


  268.   268. Posted By: vitor ferreira
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:02 pm 

    glock by 1,100 secs

    [Reply]


  269.   269. Posted By: Tom Page
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:05 pm 

    Glock by “1.657 seconds”

    [Reply]


  270.   270. Posted By: John Cooke
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:07 pm 

    Glock by 0.857s

    [Reply]


  271.   271. Posted By: Grabyrdy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:07 pm 

    Glock by 0.987

    [Reply]


  272.   272. Posted By: angie leason
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:09 pm 

    Glock by 0.129 of a second!

    [Reply]


  273.   273. Posted By: Mike Murphy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:09 pm 

    Glock will be ahead by 0.25sec.
    Entering for fun,not able to travel

    [Reply]


  274.   274. Posted By: Igino
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:11 pm 

    Glock by .581

    Won’t be able to make it from California :(

    [Reply]


  275.   275. Posted By: William McCone
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:11 pm 

    Glock ahead by 0.264

    Good luck everyone!

    [Reply]


  276.   276. Posted By: Matthew Walsh
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:12 pm 

    Glock by 0.655 secs

    [Reply]


  277.   277. Posted By: marcus
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:13 pm 

    0.562s
    i think will be the difference between the two.

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    In whose favour?

    [Reply]

    marcus Reply:

    In Timo’s favour.

    [Reply]

    marcus Reply:

    Actually, I see someone has already taken that time, so I’ll go with 0.567s in Timo’s favour.


  278.   278. Posted By: richard thompson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:16 pm 

    Glock ahead by 1.038 seconds..

    [Reply]


  279.   279. Posted By: senna
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:17 pm 

    glock 0.543 faster than di grassi.

    [Reply]


  280.   280. Posted By: Chaitanya
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:18 pm 

    Glock by 0.678

    For fun, no prize, but would like to know if i was close.

    [Reply]


  281.   281. Posted By: swayze
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:20 pm 

    glock by 0.983

    [Reply]


  282.   282. Posted By: wn
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:21 pm 

    Glock by 1.254 secs

    [Reply]


  283.   283. Posted By: Jonathan Dye
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:23 pm 

    Glock by 0.953

    [Reply]


  284.   284. Posted By: Alchemy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:24 pm 

    Glock by 0.342 secs

    [Reply]


  285.   285. Posted By: Dave P
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:24 pm 

    Glock ahead by 0.795 I am so hoping I am right!

    [Reply]


  286.   286. Posted By: Richard M
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:25 pm 

    Glock by 0.528 secs

    [Reply]


  287.   287. Posted By: Ben Brown
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:28 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.087

    [Reply]

    adrian setterfield Reply:

    Looks like you’re the lucky winner!

    [Reply]

    Ben Brown Reply:

    I think I just missed it. Never win anything!!

    :-)

    [Reply]


  288.   288. Posted By: Andy Bird
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:30 pm 

    Glock by 0.207

    [Reply]


  289.   289. Posted By: ilias
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:30 pm 

    glock 0.645

    [Reply]


  290.   290. Posted By: John
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:33 pm 

    I would say the gap will be .643 of a second.

    [Reply]


  291.   291. Posted By: Dave Graham
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:34 pm 

    Glock by 0.973 secs

    [Reply]


  292.   292. Posted By: Flintster
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:35 pm 

    Glock 1.436

    James, I recieved confirmation today for attending the forum on Thursday. Superb news and cannot wait let me tell you. Will see you there then….

    [Reply]


  293.   293. Posted By: Jim Serafin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:38 pm 

    In response to the contest, Glock by 0.645

    [Reply]


  294.   294. Posted By: David Martin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:39 pm 

    Great competition!

    Glock by 0.813 seconds

    [Reply]


  295.   295. Posted By: Simon F
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:46 pm 

    Glock by 0.921

    [Reply]


  296.   296. Posted By: tejas
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:49 pm 

    glock ahead (as usual) by 0.974s

    [Reply]


  297.   297. Posted By: Alex Milne
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:51 pm 

    Glock by 0.967 secs

    [Reply]


  298.   298. Posted By: Jon B
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:51 pm 

    I’m going for

    Glock by 0.837 secs

    Good luck to me!

    [Reply]


  299.   299. Posted By: Paul Gawne
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:54 pm 

    Glock by 0.982

    [Reply]


  300.   300. Posted By: Jeanette
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:54 pm 

    Glock by 0,754

    [Reply]


  301.   301. Posted By: Andrew Parente
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:55 pm 

    Glock by .645

    [Reply]


  302.   302. Posted By: Jonathan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 7:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.614 seconds

    [Reply]


  303.   303. Posted By: Matt Batt
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:01 pm 

    I think it will be:

    0.375 in Glocks favour

    [Reply]


  304.   304. Posted By: Dhruv Mehta
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:03 pm 

    Glock with 0.643 sec margin.

    [Reply]


  305.   305. Posted By: SAVAS SASMAZ
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:04 pm 

    Timo Glock by 0.360 secs

    [Reply]


  306.   306. Posted By: Elaine
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:04 pm 

    Di Grassi faster by 0.097

    [Reply]


  307.   307. Posted By: MarkleSchuMarker
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:04 pm 

    Glock 0.553

    [Reply]


  308.   308. Posted By: john f
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:05 pm 

    0.844 glock ahead of di grassi

    [Reply]


  309.   309. Posted By: Dan Warner
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:06 pm 

    Glock by 0.624

    [Reply]


  310.   310. Posted By: Jon Wilde
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:13 pm 

    Glock by 0.459 secs

    [Reply]


  311.   311. Posted By: Siddharth Javeri
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:14 pm 

    Glock by 0.598 seconds

    [Reply]


  312.   312. Posted By: Daisy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:14 pm 

    Glock by 1.256 secs

    [Reply]


  313.   313. Posted By: FLEX
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:17 pm 

    Glock by 0.876

    [Reply]


  314.   314. Posted By: Alastair MacGregor
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:18 pm 

    Glock by 0.825s :)

    [Reply]


  315.   315. Posted By: Grzegorz
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:19 pm 

    Glock by 0.623 secs

    [Reply]


  316.   316. Posted By: Mick
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:19 pm 

    Glock by 0.837

    [Reply]


  317.   317. Posted By: Mal Karen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:20 pm 

    Glock by 0.869

    [Reply]


  318.   318. Posted By: Julia
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:21 pm 

    Glock by 0.767

    [Reply]


  319.   319. Posted By: Attakorn Saiyasombat
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:22 pm 

    I predict Glock to have the upper hand with 1.200 seconds margin.

    I opt out of the British GP prize.

    [Reply]


  320.   320. Posted By: balint
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:24 pm 

    Glock by 0.980

    [Reply]


  321.   321. Posted By: Pmj
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:26 pm 

    Glock by 0.647 secs

    [Reply]


  322.   322. Posted By: Sebee
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:27 pm 

    Glock by 0.123

    I take your advice!

    [Reply]

    Sebee Reply:

    I have to up it to 0.124 for Glock since someone beat me to it at 0.123.

    [Reply]


  323.   323. Posted By: David Melvin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:27 pm 

    Glock by 0.467 seconds

    [Reply]


  324.   324. Posted By: Darren
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:28 pm 

    Haha looks like no one has much faith in Di Grassi…

    Glock by 0.846

    [Reply]


  325.   325. Posted By: Mercy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:28 pm 

    Glock by 0.712

    Poor Di Grassi (keep trying you’ll get him one day!)

    [Reply]


  326.   326. Posted By: El Pilluli
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:29 pm 

    Glock by 1.100 secs

    [Reply]


  327.   327. Posted By: Matthew F
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:30 pm 

    Glock by 0.564

    [Reply]


  328.   328. Posted By: Alex
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:30 pm 

    Glock by 0.892

    [Reply]


  329.   329. Posted By: Ben Cosgrove
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:30 pm 

    Glock by 0.823

    [Reply]


  330.   330. Posted By: Tom L.
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:31 pm 

    Glock by 0.693

    [Reply]


  331.   331. Posted By: gremlin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:32 pm 

    Glock by 0.983 sec

    [Reply]


  332.   332. Posted By: Dan Jackson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.635 seconds

    [Reply]


  333.   333. Posted By: John Hanhardt
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:36 pm 

    Glock by 1.173

    [Reply]


  334.   334. Posted By: John Hanhardt
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:38 pm 

    Glock by 1.173 seconds

    [Reply]


  335.   335. Posted By: Carl Perks
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:38 pm 

    Glock by 0.651

    [Reply]


  336.   336. Posted By: Michael Roberts
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:40 pm 

    Glock by 0.452 sec

    [Reply]


  337.   337. Posted By: VV
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:40 pm 

    Glock, by 0.839.

    [Reply]


  338.   338. Posted By: Chimppingpong
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:44 pm 

    Glock by 0.796

    [Reply]


  339.   339. Posted By: KidrA
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:44 pm 

    Glock by 0.534 secs

    [Reply]

    KidrA Reply:

    I saw 1 person already with the same predictions like me. Should I change it?

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    If they went first, yes

    [Reply]

    KidrA Reply:

    As I don’t have time to read all these 700 something posts, I go for the safe option and di Grassi by 0.088


  340.   340. Posted By: Ben
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:47 pm 

    Glock by 0.526

    [Reply]


  341.   341. Posted By: Julie W
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:47 pm 

    di Grassi by 1.050 seconds

    [Reply]


  342.   342. Posted By: Paul Morgan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:48 pm 

    Glock by .876

    [Reply]


  343.   343. Posted By: Lethal M
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:48 pm 

    Glock by 0.942

    [Reply]


  344.   344. Posted By: Domhnall Morrissey
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:49 pm 

    Glock by 0.375 seconds

    [Reply]


  345.   345. Posted By: Leonard Owen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:51 pm 

    De Grassi by 0.325

    [Reply]


  346.   346. Posted By: Ryan Bayliss
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:54 pm 

    Glock by 0.437

    [Reply]


  347.   347. Posted By: Mike Dawson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.738

    [Reply]


  348.   348. Posted By: Joni Redpath
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.725

    [Reply]


  349.   349. Posted By: iain
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:55 pm 

    Glock by 0.457

    [Reply]


  350.   350. Posted By: Martin Smith
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:55 pm 

    Glock by 1.054 secs

    [Reply]


  351.   351. Posted By: Josh Rowley
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:56 pm 

    Glock by 0.639

    [Reply]


  352.   352. Posted By: Nick H
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:56 pm 

    Glock by 0.635 seconds

    [Reply]


  353.   353. Posted By: Joyce Cerasoli
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:57 pm 

    Grassi by 0.139

    [Reply]


  354.   354. Posted By: John Appleyard
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:58 pm 

    Glock by 0.301

    [Reply]


  355.   355. Posted By: dstaisey
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 8:59 pm 

    Glock by 1.564

    [Reply]


  356.   356. Posted By: Daniel Chalmers
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:00 pm 

    Di Grassi to be faster than Glock by 0.014 seconds.

    [Reply]


  357.   357. Posted By: Will
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:01 pm 

    Glock by 0.743 seconds.

    [Reply]


  358.   358. Posted By: Matt W
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:02 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.600

    [Reply]


  359.   359. Posted By: Ian T
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:03 pm 

    Glock by 0.328 secs

    [Reply]


  360.   360. Posted By: Jefferson Gomes
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:05 pm 

    Glock by 0.737 s

    [Reply]


  361.   361. Posted By: Priscila Belavenute
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:05 pm 

    Glock by 0.473s

    [Reply]


  362.   362. Posted By: Richard
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:06 pm 

    Glock by 1.027

    If I win I will be giving my tickets away as I will already be there marshalling!

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    Good for you. There would be no racing without you guys

    [Reply]


  363.   363. Posted By: Ashley Uglow
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:08 pm 

    Di Grassi fastest by 0.005

    [Reply]


  364.   364. Posted By: Julianne Cerasoli
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:08 pm 

    Glock by 0.614 secs

    Great competition! Your blog is the best

    [Reply]


  365.   365. Posted By: Bruce McLaren
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:10 pm 

    Glock by 0.675 seconds

    [Reply]


  366.   366. Posted By: Luke
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:11 pm 

    glock by 0.354

    [Reply]


  367.   367. Posted By: Richard Goodey
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:11 pm 

    Glock by 0.578sec

    [Reply]


  368.   368. Posted By: chloe
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:12 pm 

    Glock by 0.835

    [Reply]


  369.   369. Posted By: Leon
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:13 pm 

    0.545

    [Reply]


  370.   370. Posted By: Lee Flowers
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:14 pm 

    Glock by 0.782

    [Reply]


  371.   371. Posted By: Luke
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:15 pm 

    0.385

    [Reply]


  372.   372. Posted By: Carole
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:16 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.912

    [Reply]


  373.   373. Posted By: David Cornish
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:17 pm 

    Glock by 0.482 seconds

    [Reply]


  374.   374. Posted By: sarah rowley
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:24 pm 

    glock faster by 0.827

    [Reply]


  375.   375. Posted By: nda
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:26 pm 

    Glock by 0.308

    [Reply]


  376.   376. Posted By: Malcolm46
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:28 pm 

    Glock by 0.746

    Thanks James!

    [Reply]


  377.   377. Posted By: MonkeyPeachy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:29 pm 

    Glock by 0.954

    [Reply]


  378.   378. Posted By: pete
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:31 pm 

    di grassi by 0.300 seconds

    [Reply]


  379.   379. Posted By: James Keeling
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.898

    [Reply]


  380.   380. Posted By: Matt
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:34 pm 

    Glock by 0.514s

    [Reply]


  381.   381. Posted By: Kirsty
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:35 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.176

    [Reply]


  382.   382. Posted By: Nick Peppas
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:36 pm 

    Glock by 0.654

    [Reply]


  383.   383. Posted By: Keilly
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:36 pm 

    Glock by 0.854

    [Reply]


  384.   384. Posted By: Sunny Grewal
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:37 pm 

    Glock by 1.067 seconds

    [Reply]


  385.   385. Posted By: Christian
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:37 pm 

    Glock by 0.711 sec

    [Reply]


  386.   386. Posted By: Rachel
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:38 pm 

    Glock by 0.656

    [Reply]


  387.   387. Posted By: Simon Burnell
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:38 pm 

    De Grassi by.999 assuming glock will fail to set a lap

    [Reply]


  388.   388. Posted By: JulioC
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:40 pm 

    Glock by 0.314

    [Reply]


  389.   389. Posted By: momo
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:40 pm 

    di grassi by 0.167

    [Reply]


  390.   390. Posted By: David
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:41 pm 

    Glock by 0.673 seconds

    [Reply]


  391.   391. Posted By: Jay Nava
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:42 pm 

    Glock by 0.237s

    [Reply]


  392.   392. Posted By: Biggles209
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:43 pm 

    Glock by 0.697 secs

    [Reply]


  393.   393. Posted By: Trevor Matthams
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:44 pm 

    Glock by .084

    [Reply]


  394.   394. Posted By: James sangster
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:44 pm 

    Glock by 0.212

    [Reply]


  395.   395. Posted By: Bill Mapel
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:45 pm 

    Timo Glock by .123 seconds

    [Reply]


  396.   396. Posted By: hanzo
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:48 pm 

    I’m changing it, by 0.090 for Di Grassi.

    [Reply]

    Sebee Reply:

    Dude!!!

    [Reply]


  397.   397. Posted By: James
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:48 pm 

    Glock by 0.301

    [Reply]


  398.   398. Posted By: Simon Wilson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:49 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.623 seconds

    [Reply]


  399.   399. Posted By: Pete Chadwick
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:51 pm 

    Glock by 0.570

    [Reply]


  400.   400. Posted By: Greg
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:51 pm 

    Glock by 0.623 seconds

    [Reply]


  401.   401. Posted By: Harv
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:52 pm 

    Glock by 0.634

    [Reply]


  402.   402. Posted By: Abby Othman
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:52 pm 

    GLOCK 0.353 SECONDS

    [Reply]


  403.   403. Posted By: Hoondog
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:53 pm 

    Glock by 0.524

    [Reply]


  404.   404. Posted By: Enigma
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:55 pm 

    di Grassi by 2.321 seconds

    [Reply]


  405.   405. Posted By: kimster46
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:56 pm 

    Timo Glock fastest by 0.267 seconds

    [Reply]


  406.   406. Posted By: C.Houghton
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:56 pm 

    Glock by 0.678 seconds

    [Reply]


  407.   407. Posted By: Alex Dylikowski
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:58 pm 

    Glock by 0.310

    [Reply]


  408.   408. Posted By: Rob Gallagher
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 9:59 pm 

    Glock by 0.367

    [Reply]


  409.   409. Posted By: Jeremy Appleyard
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:00 pm 

    Di Grassi DNF.

    [Reply]

    Jeremy Appleyard Reply:

    Just to clarify, by this I mean Di Grassi does not set a time.

    [Reply]


  410.   410. Posted By: Emma
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:01 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.121

    [Reply]


  411.   411. Posted By: Richard Bridge
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:01 pm 

    Glock by 0.419

    [Reply]


  412.   412. Posted By: AndyF
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:02 pm 

    di Grassi by 0.187 sec

    [Reply]


  413.   413. Posted By: Tracy Milne
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:02 pm 

    Glock by 1.185 sec

    [Reply]


  414.   414. Posted By: Alastair Hume
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:03 pm 

    Glock by 0.196

    [Reply]


  415.   415. Posted By: Tigga
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:03 pm 

    Glock to not record a time.

    [Reply]


  416.   416. Posted By: Gaz
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:06 pm 

    Glock by 0.246

    [Reply]


  417.   417. Posted By: Andy Owen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:07 pm 

    Glock by 0.243

    [Reply]


  418.   418. Posted By: Tim
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:09 pm 

    TG by .0126

    [Reply]


  419.   419. Posted By: Darren C
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:09 pm 

    de grassi – 0.0178

    [Reply]


  420.   420. Posted By: Alex
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:10 pm 

    Timo Glock, by 0.665 seconds.

    [Reply]


  421.   421. Posted By: Phil
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:12 pm 

    Glock by 0.211 s

    [Reply]


  422.   422. Posted By: Pawel
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:12 pm 

    Glock by 0,314sec

    [Reply]


  423.   423. Posted By: Sammy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:13 pm 

    Glock by 0.321

    [Reply]


  424.   424. Posted By: james mcnulty
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:13 pm 

    Glock by 0.601

    [Reply]


  425.   425. Posted By: steve kay
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:13 pm 

    di grassi by 0.010

    [Reply]


  426.   426. Posted By: Mike
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:14 pm 

    Glock beats di Grassi by 0.238seconds

    [Reply]


  427.   427. Posted By: Simon Morris
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:15 pm 

    Glock by 0.897

    [Reply]


  428.   428. Posted By: Brian
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:15 pm 

    Glock by 0.321

    [Reply]


  429.   429. Posted By: Ibrahim Patel
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:15 pm 

    Grassi to win by 0.047

    [Reply]

    jbstans Reply:

    Congrats… I think!

    [Reply]

    Ibrahim Patel Reply:

    I hope so…cant believe so many backed a german this weekend :P

    [Reply]


  430.   430. Posted By: Ben Thorpe
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:17 pm 

    Glock by 0.492 seconds

    [Reply]


  431.   431. Posted By: Edward Mackenzie
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:17 pm 

    Glock by 0.529

    [Reply]

    Edward Mackenzie Reply:

    actualy someone already has that time, Glock by 0.549

    [Reply]

    Edward Mackenzie Reply:

    ahh someone has that too, change to Glock by 0.535

    [Reply]


  432.   432. Posted By: MSPatel
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:17 pm 

    Glock by 0.846 seconds.

    [Reply]


  433.   433. Posted By: jack shahine
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:18 pm 

    Timo Glock by 0.405 secs

    [Reply]


  434.   434. Posted By: Alex B
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:19 pm 

    Glock by 0.570

    [Reply]


  435.   435. Posted By: Sheraz Rashid
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:20 pm 

    Glock by 0.895 seconds

    [Reply]


  436.   436. Posted By: Andrew MacAulay
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:21 pm 

    Glock by 0.754

    [Reply]


  437.   437. Posted By: michael grievson
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:21 pm 

    Timo glock 1.123 seconds

    [Reply]


  438.   438. Posted By: Chris Hallam
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:22 pm 

    Glock by 0.513 secs.

    [Reply]


  439.   439. Posted By: malcolm.strachan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:22 pm 

    Hahaha… 9 people chose Di Grassi, and about 325 chose Glock, as of posting this. :-) Poor Di Grassi! Even though I chose Glock above, I hope Di Grassi gets it!

    [Reply]


  440.   440. Posted By: Renko
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:23 pm 

    Glock by 0.643 sec

    [Reply]


  441.   441. Posted By: Ben Hallam
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:23 pm 

    De Grassi by 0.009 secs

    [Reply]


  442.   442. Posted By: Robert Plews
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:24 pm 

    Di.Grassi by 0.034 Sec

    [Reply]


  443.   443. Posted By: Chris Hallam
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:25 pm 

    Glock by 0.513 secs

    [Reply]


  444.   444. Posted By: William Riley
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:25 pm 

    Glock by 1.372

    [Reply]


  445.   445. Posted By: Hamish
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:26 pm 

    DI Grassi by 0.001.

    [Reply]


  446.   446. Posted By: Jamie Vidamour
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:26 pm 

    Glock by 1.137

    [Reply]


  447.   447. Posted By: D G Plews
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:27 pm 

    Glock by 1.222 sec.
    Surely Glock’s experience will count at this tough street track?

    [Reply]


  448.   448. Posted By: Julian
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:27 pm 

    Glock by 0.789

    [Reply]


  449.   449. Posted By: Simon
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:27 pm 

    Glock by .917

    [Reply]


  450.   450. Posted By: Rich P
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:28 pm 

    Glock by 0.782

    [Reply]


  451.   451. Posted By: amran
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:29 pm 

    glock by 0.628

    [Reply]


  452.   452. Posted By: george debenham
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:30 pm 

    De Grassi by 0.o87

    [Reply]


  453.   453. Posted By: Phil Ismay
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:31 pm 

    Glock by .755

    [Reply]


  454.   454. Posted By: Rob Milligan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:31 pm 

    Glock by 0.312

    [Reply]


  455.   455. Posted By: Nik James
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:31 pm 

    Glock ahead by 0.821

    [Reply]


  456.   456. Posted By: Jon jelly
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.967! Go timo!!!

    [Reply]


  457.   457. Posted By: Phil
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.3125 seconds

    [Reply]


  458.   458. Posted By: MikeS
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:34 pm 

    Lets give Di Grassi some support.

    Di Grassi by .12 of a second

    [Reply]


  459.   459. Posted By: Nik James
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:34 pm 

    Just seen someone has my first guess already so Glock by 0.822

    [Reply]


  460.   460. Posted By: Stuart Brown
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:35 pm 

    Glock by 0.497

    [Reply]


  461.   461. Posted By: CHRIS MORRISSEY
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:36 pm 

    Glock by 0.501 seconds.

    [Reply]


  462.   462. Posted By: Femi Akinz
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:36 pm 

    Glock by 0.734 secs

    [Reply]


  463.   463. Posted By: Donna Holmes
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:38 pm 

    Glock by 0.697

    [Reply]


  464.   464. Posted By: Milton
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:38 pm 

    Glock by 0.332

    [Reply]


  465.   465. Posted By: Gareth W
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:39 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.718 seconds

    [Reply]


  466.   466. Posted By: Edward Mackenzie
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:39 pm 

    Glock by 0.549

    [Reply]


  467.   467. Posted By: Christian
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:40 pm 

    Glock by 1.047

    [Reply]


  468.   468. Posted By: Matt
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:40 pm 

    I’ve just noticed that somebody placed the same time as I did, but earlier on. What happens in the event of more than one person having the winning time?

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    The earlier one wins

    [Reply]


  469.   469. Posted By: Roger
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:42 pm 

    Glock by 0.782s !!

    [Reply]


  470.   470. Posted By: debbie ryan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:43 pm 

    Glock by 0.624

    [Reply]


  471.   471. Posted By: James Griffiths
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:43 pm 

    Glock by 0.712

    [Reply]


  472.   472. Posted By: craig ryan
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:44 pm 

    Glock by 0.276

    [Reply]


  473.   473. Posted By: CJ
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:46 pm 

    Di grassi by 0.137

    [Reply]


  474.   474. Posted By: Ross Clabburn
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:48 pm 

    Glock by 0.043

    [Reply]


  475.   475. Posted By: Tracy
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:50 pm 

    Glock by 0.610 seconds

    [Reply]


  476.   476. Posted By: Alex B
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:51 pm 

    Glock ahead by 0.636

    [Reply]


  477.   477. Posted By: Jon Fitzgibbons
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:52 pm 

    Glock by 0.402 seconds

    [Reply]


  478.   478. Posted By: Sean T
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:52 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.178

    [Reply]


  479.   479. Posted By: Elliott Paul
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:54 pm 

    Glock by 0.874 secs

    [Reply]


  480.   480. Posted By: Rishab Nithyanand
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:54 pm 

    Glock by .667 sec

    [Reply]


  481.   481. Posted By: Adam Allen
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:57 pm 

    Glock by 0.669

    Cheers

    [Reply]


  482.   482. Posted By: Manorhowze
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:58 pm 

    Great competition. I want to say Di Grassi as I have only seen one person go for him so far but I am going to have to say,

    Glock by 0.598

    [Reply]


  483.   483. Posted By: Jake
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 10:59 pm 

    Di Grassi by 1.453 seconds

    [Reply]


  484.   484. Posted By: WC
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:00 pm 

    De Grass by 0.012

    [Reply]


  485.   485. Posted By: Maciek
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:01 pm 

    Glock by 0.128

    [Reply]


  486.   486. Posted By: Kevin Whittlesey
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:01 pm 

    Glock by 0.777 secs

    [Reply]


  487.   487. Posted By: Nick
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:02 pm 

    Glock by 2.710. Just for fun from Russia.

    [Reply]


  488.   488. Posted By: Alex O'Brien
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:02 pm 

    Glock by 0.387

    [Reply]


  489.   489. Posted By: Tim Horton
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:03 pm 

    Glock by 0.438

    [Reply]


  490.   490. Posted By: Kevin Whittlesey
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:04 pm 

    Glock by 0.778 secs

    [Reply]


  491.   491. Posted By: Jonathan Martin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:04 pm 

    De Grassi by 0.151

    [Reply]


  492.   492. Posted By: Troldrik
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:05 pm 

    Glock by 0.343 seconds

    [Reply]


  493.   493. Posted By: Anil
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:09 pm 

    Awesome idea James! I was planning on going to Silverstone this year but unfortunately had the money I had saved up stolen in a burglary whilst at Uni. Hopefully, with a bit of luck, I might be able to go now!

    I’m going to say Glock to outqualify Lucas by 0.601 seconds.

    [Reply]


  494.   494. Posted By: Jason C
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:09 pm 

    Glock by 0.684

    [Reply]


  495.   495. Posted By: Liam S
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:10 pm 

    Glock by 0.444 seconds

    I do not wish to claim the prize, unable to make B-GP as in Australia.

    [Reply]


  496.   496. Posted By: JimmiC
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:11 pm 

    I cannot get to Silverstone for that weekend, so I would like to be removed from the draw.

    But, just for fun, I think Di Grassi to finally overturn his team-mate but by the skin of his teeth – 0.005 secs

    [Reply]


  497.   497. Posted By: andrea
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:12 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.125

    [Reply]


  498.   498. Posted By: Rajdeep
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:12 pm 

    Glock by 1.074 seconds

    [Reply]


  499.   499. Posted By: Matt Devenish
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:13 pm 

    Glock by 1.345 seconds

    Good luck everyone :D

    [Reply]


  500.   500. Posted By: Lamer
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:14 pm 

    di Grassi by 1.5 seconds

    [Reply]


  501.   501. Posted By: mark mark
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:15 pm 

    Glock by 1.048

    [Reply]


  502.   502. Posted By: Josh
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:16 pm 

    Glock by 1.144s

    [Reply]


  503.   503. Posted By: John Snow
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:17 pm 

    Glock 0.371 seconds faster than di grassi

    great competiton, cheers James!

    [Reply]


  504.   504. Posted By: Patrick McLaughlin
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:17 pm 

    Timo Glock by 1.250sec

    [Reply]


  505.   505. Posted By: Paul Morris
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:18 pm 

    Glock by 0.911

    [Reply]


  506.   506. Posted By: Edward
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:19 pm 

    Glock by 0.534

    [Reply]


  507.   507. Posted By: Ace of Spades
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:20 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.667 seconds

    [Reply]


  508.   508. Posted By: robimart
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:21 pm 

    Identical times for both (0.000 gap)

    [Reply]


  509.   509. Posted By: Inder Mittal
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:21 pm 

    Glock by 1.255

    [Reply]


  510.   510. Posted By: Suzanne
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:25 pm 

    Just a question on the rules of this competition:

    What if say Glock makes Q2 and di Grassi doesn’t, and Glock goes slower in Q2 than he did in Q1? Which time counts?

    What if (however unlikely), both Virgins get through to Q2 – which session counts?

    Didn’t mean to be a party pooper, but it’s such a lovely prize you might end up having arguments if stuff like this, however logical, isn’t clarified :)

    For what it’s worth: Glock by 0.888, and I opt out of the prize :)

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    It’s the margin between them in Q1. If one of them doesn’t set a time then whoever predicts that wins. If two people get the right answer it’s the one who submitted a prediction first

    [Reply]


  511.   511. Posted By: George S
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:27 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.007

    [Reply]


  512.   512. Posted By: Realyn
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:29 pm 

    Glock by 1,028

    [Reply]


  513.   513. Posted By: Chris evans
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:30 pm 

    Di grassi by 0.132

    [Reply]


  514.   514. Posted By: Richard Fernandes
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.611

    [Reply]


  515.   515. Posted By: Liam
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.326

    [Reply]


  516.   516. Posted By: David
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:34 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.213s

    [Reply]


  517.   517. Posted By: Damo
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:35 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.237

    [Reply]


  518.   518. Posted By: charles fox
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:37 pm 

    Charles Fox

    Glock ahead by 0.893

    [Reply]


  519.   519. Posted By: Alex Nikiforov
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:38 pm 

    Timo Glock by 0.761

    [Reply]


  520.   520. Posted By: Chris George
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:39 pm 

    Glock by 0.899

    [Reply]


  521.   521. Posted By: Simon G
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:39 pm 

    Glock by 0.558 secs

    [Reply]


  522.   522. Posted By: Burt Reynolds
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:40 pm 

    Glock by 0.524 secs

    [Reply]


  523.   523. Posted By: Ben Cooper
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:41 pm 

    too many comments to check submitted answers already but i think it’ll be Glock ahead by 0.888 seconds!

    [Reply]


  524.   524. Posted By: Matthew Dodds
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:43 pm 

    0.393 to Glock

    [Reply]


  525.   525. Posted By: Harvey Yates
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:45 pm 

    Di Grassi: 0.103

    Let us hope he’s not reading this as he might not bother turning up.

    [Reply]


  526.   526. Posted By: Anand
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:47 pm 

    Glock by 0.655 secs.

    [Reply]


  527.   527. Posted By: alberto
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:49 pm 

    Glock by 0.539″

    [Reply]


  528.   528. Posted By: david z
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:50 pm 

    Di Grassi, why not! by 0.200

    [Reply]


  529.   529. Posted By: Nick F
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:51 pm 

    Glock by 0.800

    [Reply]


  530.   530. Posted By: Jake Miyairi
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:57 pm 

    Timo Glock by 0.826 secs!

    [Reply]


  531.   531. Posted By: Harvey Yates
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:57 pm 

    From practice today:

    Glock: 1.43.811
    Di Grassi: 1.43.854
    Therefore Glock is +0.027 ahead

    [Reply]


  532.   532. Posted By: Jonathan P
        Date: June 25th, 2010 @ 11:58 pm 

    Glock by 0.613

    [Reply]


  533.   533. Posted By: mofs
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:02 am 

    Glock by 0.853

    Mike

    [Reply]


  534.   534. Posted By: Vinesh
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:03 am 

    Glock by 0.477

    [Reply]


  535.   535. Posted By: Ben H
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:07 am 

    Glock by 0.431 secs.
    Do not wish to win the prize.

    [Reply]


  536.   536. Posted By: Sam M
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:10 am 

    Glock by 0.424

    [Reply]


  537.   537. Posted By: sw6569
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:18 am 

    0.783, glock in front

    [Reply]


  538.   538. Posted By: Keith
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:20 am 

    Glock by 0.671

    [Reply]


  539.   539. Posted By: MikeW
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:21 am 

    Sorry forgot to say *who* – Glock ahead by 0.380

    [Reply]


  540.   540. Posted By: sam w
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:24 am 

    Glock by 0.800

    [Reply]


  541.   541. Posted By: Grant Lee B
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:30 am 

    Timo by 1.111

    [Reply]


  542.   542. Posted By: w bonthuyzen
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:31 am 

    Glock by 0.512 seconds

    [Reply]


  543.   543. Posted By: Fausto Cunha
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:33 am 

    Glock by 0.831

    [Reply]


  544.   544. Posted By: shane
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:35 am 

    Glock will be quicker by 0.059

    [Reply]


  545.   545. Posted By: madjon88
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:35 am 

    Glock by 0.235

    [Reply]


  546.   546. Posted By: Stephen Bewers
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:36 am 

    Glock by 0.927

    [Reply]


  547.   547. Posted By: Steph
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:38 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.233

    [Reply]


  548.   548. Posted By: Paul Wiredu
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:42 am 

    Glock by 0.516

    [Reply]


  549.   549. Posted By: Aleksi S
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:43 am 

    DiGrassi by 0.028

    [Reply]


  550.   550. Posted By: Rachel
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:45 am 

    Glock by 1.001
    Opting out of prize (this’ll be the one time I actually win something…)

    [Reply]


  551.   551. Posted By: Langer
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:49 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.075

    [Reply]


  552.   552. Posted By: Gwion Daniel
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:50 am 

    Glock by 0.788 seconds

    [Reply]


  553.   553. Posted By: Paul Miller
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:52 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.045 sec

    [Reply]


  554.   554. Posted By: Matthew Barr
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:54 am 

    Glock by 0.198

    [Reply]


  555.   555. Posted By: Vince
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:57 am 

    Glock by 0.704

    [Reply]


  556.   556. Posted By: Rick
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:59 am 

    Glock by 0.612!

    [Reply]


  557.   557. Posted By: Ben
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:04 am 

    Glock by .645

    [Reply]


  558.   558. Posted By: Ben
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:04 am 

    oops, already taken, change to .646

    [Reply]


  559.   559. Posted By: Ben
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:04 am 

    Timo Glock by .646

    [Reply]


  560.   560. Posted By: Sam
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:05 am 

    Glock by 0.859sec

    [Reply]


  561.   561. Posted By: A Tsang
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:05 am 

    Glock by 1.030

    [Reply]


  562.   562. Posted By: Brace
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:07 am 

    I don’t have a chance to fly there but I’ll put my guess in. :)

    Glock crashes out and Di Grassi finishes quali in front of Heiki but behind Trulli. :)

    [Reply]


  563.   563. Posted By: RickeeBoy
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:12 am 

    Glock by .873 – In Auckland so can’t possibly win – Poo !!!!

    [Reply]


  564.   564. Posted By: kevin
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:18 am 

    glock by 0.525

    [Reply]


  565.   565. Posted By: agusn
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:22 am 

    Glock by 1.234 seconds.
    For donation!

    [Reply]


  566.   566. Posted By: Rich
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:22 am 

    Glock by 0.588

    [Reply]


  567.   567. Posted By: Matt Parsons
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:29 am 

    Glock by 0.951

    [Reply]


  568.   568. Posted By: Paul Edwards
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:33 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.927

    [Reply]


  569.   569. Posted By: ahmed
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:48 am 

    glock by 0.735 seconds

    [Reply]


  570.   570. Posted By: Matthew Squires
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:48 am 

    Glock by 0.369

    [Reply]


  571.   571. Posted By: Edward Mackenzie
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:50 am 

    Glock by 0.535

    [Reply]


  572.   572. Posted By: Hussein Lokhandwala
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 2:01 am 

    Glock by 0.617s

    [Reply]


  573.   573. Posted By: Stuey
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 2:09 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.355

    [Reply]


  574.   574. Posted By: john
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 2:15 am 

    Glock by .863

    [Reply]


  575.   575. Posted By: Bradley Sargeant
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 2:42 am 

    Glock by 0.648

    [Reply]


  576.   576. Posted By: Prakhar M.
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 2:54 am 

    Glock by 0.967

    [Reply]


  577.   577. Posted By: billy maddison
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 3:06 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.019

    [Reply]


  578.   578. Posted By: Dillan
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 3:29 am 

    Glock by 0.218

    [Reply]


  579.   579. Posted By: Vic
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 3:41 am 

    Glock by 0.225

    [Reply]


  580.   580. Posted By: Paul H-E
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 3:44 am 

    Glock by 1.012

    [Reply]


  581.   581. Posted By: srking
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 4:02 am 

    Great idea for a competition!

    Has to be Glock, by +0.272s…

    [Reply]


  582.   582. Posted By: Niallo
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 4:32 am 

    Glock by 0.247

    And if I had not been beaten to it I would go for DiGrassi DNF. Why? Because realistically the odds are they will probably be within at most 2 seconds of each other. That’s a 1/2000 chance of getting the number right. The odds of a DNF are much much shorter, DNFs in quali are not that uncommon (Alonso in Monaco for example!) But alas I’ve been beaten to the post so my answer is as above.

    [Reply]


  583.   583. Posted By: Leigh O'Gorman
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 4:33 am 

    Not going to look through the hundreds of comments thus far, so here goes.

    I think Glock will be faster by 0.638 of a second

    [Reply]


  584.   584. Posted By: ciprian tzzz
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 4:58 am 

    Glock by 0.163

    [Reply]


  585.   585. Posted By: AndrewM
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 4:59 am 

    Am in Melbourne, so just for fun:

    Glock by 0.653s

    [Reply]


  586.   586. Posted By: Kakashi
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:07 am 

    GLock ahead by 0.900 sec

    [Reply]


  587.   587. Posted By: Stephen Singh
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:17 am 

    Glock will be 0.153 quicker :)

    [Reply]


  588.   588. Posted By: Adrian
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:22 am 

    Glock by 0.421secs.

    [Reply]


  589.   589. Posted By: Steve Waller
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:26 am 

    Glock by 0.566

    [Reply]


  590.   590. Posted By: Frenchie
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:28 am 

    I live in Sydney so that just for fun unfortunately.

    Glock by 0.971 secs

    [Reply]


  591.   591. Posted By: Paul C
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:30 am 

    di Gassi by .001

    Well why not?

    No prize for me, Silverstone is a long way from NZ.

    [Reply]


  592.   592. Posted By: Aimee
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:34 am 

    Glock by 0.349

    [Reply]


  593.   593. Posted By: Chris Almond
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:39 am 

    Glock by 0.699

    [Reply]


  594.   594. Posted By: Tim
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:49 am 

    glock by 0.119

    [Reply]


  595.   595. Posted By: James B
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 5:58 am 

    Glock by 0.330

    [Reply]


  596.   596. Posted By: Maciej
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:07 am 

    Glock by 0.666

    [Reply]


  597.   597. Posted By: Ashok
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:09 am 

    Glock by 2.000 seconds………. I do not wish to claim the prize.

    [Reply]


  598.   598. Posted By: Wayne HArding
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:12 am 

    Hey James, lets have your prediction for fun!

    [Reply]


  599.   599. Posted By: Aw
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:23 am 

    glock by 0.813

    [Reply]


  600.   600. Posted By: Stuart Whitman
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:23 am 

    That should say Glock by 0.967

    [Reply]


  601.   601. Posted By: Julian Rinaldi
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:24 am 

    Glock by 0.776

    [Reply]


  602.   602. Posted By: Vivek
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:29 am 

    Glock by 1.568s

    [Reply]


  603.   603. Posted By: Dave
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:40 am 

    Glock by 0.437

    [Reply]


  604.   604. Posted By: Vignesh
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:49 am 

    Glock by 0.872

    [Reply]


  605.   605. Posted By: Stuart Temple
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:50 am 

    I’ll go for 0.381

    [Reply]

    Stuart Temple Reply:

    0.381 to glock.

    [Reply]


  606.   606. Posted By: Seb
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:53 am 

    Glock by 0.621

    [Reply]


  607.   607. Posted By: Raz Al Haddad
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:55 am 

    ok.. i’m flying back to london this week, hopefully it’ll be worth it :-)

    i’m saying 0.768

    [Reply]


  608.   608. Posted By: Mike
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:56 am 

    Glock by 0.345

    [Reply]


  609.   609. Posted By: Rich
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 6:59 am 

    Glock by 0.219

    [Reply]

    neal Reply:

    gglock by .7234

    [Reply]


  610.   610. Posted By: Allan D
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:03 am 

    Glock by 0.391

    [Reply]


  611.   611. Posted By: Hamish Williams
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:04 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.750

    [Reply]


  612.   612. Posted By: Jarek
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:05 am 

    Glock by 0.764 secs

    [Reply]


  613.   613. Posted By: martin
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:08 am 

    glock by 0.038 seconds

    [Reply]


  614.   614. Posted By: Eamonn Mc Cauley
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:10 am 

    Glock. 3.500 sec

    [Reply]


  615.   615. Posted By: Steve
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:21 am 

    Glock by 0.013

    [Reply]


  616.   616. Posted By: Jon
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:24 am 

    Glock by 0.888

    [Reply]


  617.   617. Posted By: Matt
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:25 am 

    Glock by 0.758

    [Reply]


  618.   618. Posted By: Paul Elliott
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:35 am 

    Glock by 0.780

    [Reply]


  619.   619. Posted By: Shane Govern
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:37 am 

    Glock by 0.438 secs

    [Reply]


  620.   620. Posted By: Tom Hitchings
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:51 am 

    Glock by 0.766 seconds

    [Reply]


  621.   621. Posted By: 1d
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 7:52 am 

    Glock by 0.068

    [Reply]


  622.   622. Posted By: Tim Wright
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:00 am 

    Glock by 0.660 seconds. However, I’m in Melbourne and therefore just doing it for fun! Maybe I can get a runners up t-shirt or something!

    [Reply]


  623.   623. Posted By: Scott
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:00 am 

    Glock ahead by 1.013 seconds.

    [Reply]


  624.   624. Posted By: Gowan
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:08 am 

    hmm,, Glock by 0.128

    [Reply]


  625.   625. Posted By: Carrick
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:09 am 

    Glock by 0.851

    [Reply]


  626.   626. Posted By: raffamuffin
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:10 am 

    0.777 in glocks favour :)

    [Reply]


  627.   627. Posted By: pete
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:12 am 

    just to annoy the missues, 0.077 in glocks favour!

    [Reply]


  628.   628. Posted By: James
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:16 am 

    Glock by 0.865

    [Reply]


  629.   629. Posted By: Catherine
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:17 am 

    Glock by 0.751

    [Reply]


  630.   630. Posted By: Lev Piautzer
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:19 am 

    Glock by 0.932 secs

    i wish myself good luck! :D

    [Reply]


  631.   631. Posted By: Denis
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:24 am 

    Just for fun (do not wish to claim the prize):

    Di Grassi by 0.115

    [Reply]


  632.   632. Posted By: Dave
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:26 am 

    Glock by 0.538

    [Reply]


  633.   633. Posted By: Steve Earle
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:27 am 

    I’ll go for Di Grassi to be quicker by 0.123s

    [Reply]


  634.   634. Posted By: Gorale
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:27 am 

    let it be T.Glock 0.634.

    [Reply]


  635.   635. Posted By: Andrew
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:29 am 

    Glock by 0.188

    [Reply]


  636.   636. Posted By: Russ
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:35 am 

    Glock by 0.048

    [Reply]


  637.   637. Posted By: Tim Furber
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:35 am 

    Glock 0.935

    [Reply]


  638.   638. Posted By: jago
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:35 am 

    Glock by 0.968 secs. Thanks.

    [Reply]


  639.   639. Posted By: Gemma Martin
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:38 am 

    In Glock’s Favour – 0.525
    (cor it took a while to check nobody else had it, what a response!

    [Reply]


  640.   640. Posted By: Han
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:39 am 

    0.678 To glock

    [Reply]


  641.   641. Posted By: wayne
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:40 am 

    Glock by 0.618

    [Reply]


  642.   642. Posted By: Kieran
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:40 am 

    Glock by 0.229

    Come on Di Grassi, speed up man!

    [Reply]


  643.   643. Posted By: Iain
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:42 am 

    di Grassi by 0.100 secs

    [Reply]


  644.   644. Posted By: David
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:46 am 

    Glock by 0.643

    [Reply]


  645.   645. Posted By: Dave
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:49 am 

    Glock by 0.624

    [Reply]


  646.   646. Posted By: Dave
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:50 am 

    Glock by 0.626

    [Reply]


  647.   647. Posted By: Sam Bashton
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:52 am 

    Glock by 2.01 seconds

    [Reply]


  648.   648. Posted By: Roger Hoyes
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:53 am 

    Di Grassi by by 0.024

    [Reply]


  649.   649. Posted By: Ronnie Cowie
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:54 am 

    Glock by 0.368

    [Reply]


  650.   650. Posted By: Kelly
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:54 am 

    Glock by 0.223

    [Reply]


  651.   651. Posted By: AndrewJ
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:55 am 

    Glock by 0.363 Seconds

    [Reply]


  652.   652. Posted By: Henri
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:57 am 

    Gock faster by 0.591

    [Reply]


  653.   653. Posted By: Neil Slaughter
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:58 am 

    Timo Glock ahead by 0.632 seconds

    [Reply]


  654.   654. Posted By: Jakub
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 8:59 am 

    Glock by 0.301

    [Reply]


  655.   655. Posted By: Johan
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:00 am 

    Glock by 0.481

    [Reply]


  656.   656. Posted By: KPolubok
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:03 am 

    Glock by 0.551

    [Reply]


  657.   657. Posted By: Gemma
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:06 am 

    Glock 0.525

    [Reply]


  658.   658. Posted By: Jonathan Kelk
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:07 am 

    Cool, I’ll be in England that weekend!!

    I’m expecting everyone else to go for Glock, so I’ll go for Lucas to beat Timo by 0.256 seconds. By the way has anyone predicted both cars not setting a lap yet? Not sure I’d want to go in their garage after predicting that though, lol.

    [Reply]


  659.   659. Posted By: bowen
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:09 am 

    Glock by 0.395

    [Reply]


  660.   660. Posted By: Mike S
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:11 am 

    Glock by 0.844

    [Reply]


  661.   661. Posted By: Jim Kelly
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:16 am 

    Glock by 0.526 secs

    [Reply]


  662.   662. Posted By: Robert Jennings
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:19 am 

    Glock by 0.432 secs.

    [Reply]


  663.   663. Posted By: Parthi
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:20 am 

    Glock by 0.747

    [Reply]


  664.   664. Posted By: RMartin
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:20 am 

    DiGrassi by 0.200

    [Reply]


  665.   665. Posted By: Airborne Williams Cap
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:22 am 

    Glock by …. oh, I don’t know… 0.934.

    [Reply]


  666.   666. Posted By: SmAShY
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:25 am 

    Glock by 0.738

    [Reply]


  667.   667. Posted By: mvi
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:26 am 

    Just for fun, Di Grassi by 0.013

    [Reply]


  668.   668. Posted By: bg
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:27 am 

    Lucas Di Grassi by 0.719

    [Reply]


  669.   669. Posted By: Oliver Langford
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:29 am 

    I am saying Glock by 1.433

    [Reply]


  670.   670. Posted By: Vannman
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:30 am 

    Glock by 0.888 sec

    [Reply]


  671.   671. Posted By: dan
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:31 am 

    glock by 0.533

    [Reply]


  672.   672. Posted By: TomH
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:32 am 

    Glock by 0.198 sec

    [Reply]


  673.   673. Posted By: Michael Kitchen
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:33 am 

    Glock by 1.203

    [Reply]


  674.   674. Posted By: AJ A
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:34 am 

    glock by 0.667

    [Reply]


  675.   675. Posted By: koper
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:34 am 

    Glock by 0.139

    [Reply]


  676.   676. Posted By: Russell Harper
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:35 am 

    Glock will be faster by 0.681
    cheers

    [Reply]


  677.   677. Posted By: SmAShY
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:36 am 

    Can I please change my prediction to Glock by 0.741 as I noticed someone else had my previous one, thanks

    [Reply]


  678.   678. Posted By: David
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:40 am 

    Glock by 0.853

    [Reply]


  679.   679. Posted By: Pavel Vedrov
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:41 am 

    Glock by 0.386 sec

    [Reply]


  680.   680. Posted By: David
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:42 am 

    Err, scratch that last one, two people have guessed it already! Glock by 0.851 then!

    [Reply]


  681.   681. Posted By: tom
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:45 am 

    glock by 0.315

    [Reply]


  682.   682. Posted By: Charlotte c
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:46 am 

    Di grassi by 0.230.

    [Reply]


  683.   683. Posted By: Barny
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:47 am 

    Timo by 0.828

    [Reply]


  684.   684. Posted By: jamie norman
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:48 am 

    0.127

    [Reply]


  685.   685. Posted By: Cogalot
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:49 am 

    Glock by 0.332 seconds

    [Reply]


  686.   686. Posted By: sean k
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:50 am 

    glock by 0.432
    more comps. like this please very cool idea……………

    [Reply]


  687.   687. Posted By: Steve W
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:52 am 

    Glock by 0.195 secs

    [Reply]


  688.   688. Posted By: Stuart Cameron
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:52 am 

    Glock by 1.011

    [Reply]


  689.   689. Posted By: Andy
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:53 am 

    Glock by 0.286

    [Reply]


  690.   690. Posted By: Stephen W
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:54 am 

    Glock by 0.443 secs

    [Reply]


  691.   691. Posted By: Terry
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:54 am 

    Glock by 0.759

    [Reply]


  692.   692. Posted By: Steve Busler
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 9:58 am 

    Glock by 0.465 secs

    [Reply]


  693.   693. Posted By: chris scott
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:01 am 

    Glocks car will have a problem and he wont set a time

    [Reply]


  694.   694. Posted By: John
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:03 am 

    Glock by 0.583

    [Reply]


  695.   695. Posted By: Joe F
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:05 am 

    Glock by 0.602

    [Reply]


  696.   696. Posted By: Rich Green
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:07 am 

    Timo Glock by +0.741

    [Reply]


  697.   697. Posted By: jay dodah
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:07 am 

    Glock will be in front by 1.272

    [Reply]


  698.   698. Posted By: Yasin
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:11 am 

    glock by 0.067s

    [Reply]


  699.   699. Posted By: mikki
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:13 am 

    di grassi 0.324

    [Reply]


  700.   700. Posted By: Jakub
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:14 am 

    Glock by 0.667

    [Reply]


  701.   701. Posted By: Mark
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:16 am 

    Glock by 0.385 seconds.

    [Reply]


  702.   702. Posted By: art
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:16 am 

    Glock by 0.545

    [Reply]


  703.   703. Posted By: Clare
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:17 am 

    Glock by 1.333

    [Reply]


  704.   704. Posted By: Rene
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:19 am 

    Glock by 0.336

    [Reply]


  705.   705. Posted By: Dom
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:23 am 

    Glock by 0.972 sec

    [Reply]


  706.   706. Posted By: Paul
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:24 am 

    I don’t want to claim the prize, but to enter for fun. Glock by 0.471s

    [Reply]


  707.   707. Posted By: MJL
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:30 am 

    I will go for Glock by 0.107 seconds

    [Reply]


  708.   708. Posted By: jan grzegorczyk
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:32 am 

    0.913 in favour of glock.

    [Reply]


  709.   709. Posted By: Richard
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:33 am 

    Glock by 0.213 secs

    [Reply]


  710.   710. Posted By: Jim Brunton
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:40 am 

    DI Grassi by 0.163s

    [Reply]


  711.   711. Posted By: Mike
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:41 am 

    0.643

    [Reply]


  712.   712. Posted By: Mike
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:42 am 

    Glock by 0.643

    [Reply]


  713.   713. Posted By: Tom Green
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:51 am 

    Glock by 0.621

    [Reply]


  714.   714. Posted By: Steve Whatling
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:51 am 

    Glock by 0.688 sec

    [Reply]


  715.   715. Posted By: Mark Sheppard
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:53 am 

    Glock by 0.327

    [Reply]


  716.   716. Posted By: Stephen Cartwright
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:54 am 

    Glock by 0.112 seconds

    [Reply]


  717.   717. Posted By: Andrew Jarman
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:55 am 

    Glock to win by 0.954

    [Reply]


  718.   718. Posted By: Tups
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:57 am 

    Glock by 1.176

    [Reply]


  719.   719. Posted By: Miriam N
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:57 am 

    Glock by .392s

    [Reply]


  720.   720. Posted By: Dan
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 10:59 am 

    Glock by 0.377s

    [Reply]


  721.   721. Posted By: Ria
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:00 am 

    Di grassi by 1.000

    [Reply]


  722.   722. Posted By: Andrew Jarman
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:02 am 

    just noticed someone already has 0.954 so I’m changing to Glock by 0.917 if that’s ok.
    Thankyou

    [Reply]


  723.   723. Posted By: Stevie
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:04 am 

    Glock by 0.993 seconds

    [Reply]


  724.   724. Posted By: George
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:05 am 

    Glock by 0.799

    [Reply]


  725.   725. Posted By: Marty
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:05 am 

    Glock by .507

    [Reply]


  726.   726. Posted By: YasF1
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:06 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.021s – worth a shot.

    [Reply]


  727.   727. Posted By: Suzi
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:07 am 

    DI Grassi by 0.030 seconds

    [Reply]


  728.   728. Posted By: DJC
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:08 am 

    Glock by 0.410s

    [Reply]


  729.   729. Posted By: Simo
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:08 am 

    Glock by 0.521

    [Reply]


  730.   730. Posted By: Rob
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:09 am 

    I think Di Grassi by 0.131

    [Reply]


  731.   731. Posted By: nigel
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:10 am 

    glock quicker by .406

    [Reply]


  732.   732. Posted By: Terry M
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:11 am 

    di Grassi by 0.851

    [Reply]


  733.   733. Posted By: Nick Oddy
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:12 am 

    Glock by 0.319

    [Reply]


  734.   734. Posted By: Miss H
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:14 am 

    Glock by 0.003

    [Reply]


  735.   735. Posted By: Rob Thomson
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:16 am 

    Di Grassi faster by 0.999 seconds.

    [Reply]


  736.   736. Posted By: Steve
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:16 am 

    Glock by 0.997 seconds

    [Reply]


  737.   737. Posted By: Claire Bird
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:17 am 

    Di Grassi by 0.273

    [Reply]


  738.   738. Posted By: Andrew Halliday
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:17 am 

    Glock 0.927

    [Reply]


  739.   739. Posted By: A-Job
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:23 am 

    I’m thinking it’s gonna be Glock by 0.436

    [Reply]


  740.   740. Posted By: Sunshine on Leith
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:24 am 

    Glock by 0.706 secs

    [Reply]


  741.   741. Posted By: Ben Bowie
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:24 am 

    Glock by .014

    [Reply]


  742.   742. Posted By: bel
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:25 am 

    Luca Di Grassi by 0.81

    [Reply]


  743.   743. Posted By: Dean Cowie
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:28 am 

    Glock by .829

    [Reply]


  744.   744. Posted By: Andras F.
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:28 am 

    Glock by 0.730

    [Reply]


  745.   745. Posted By: Joakim
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:28 am 

    Glock by 0.499s.

    [Reply]


  746.   746. Posted By: Liam Cowie
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:29 am 

    Glock by 0.688

    [Reply]


  747.   747. Posted By: Dan Clegg
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:30 am 

    Glock by 0.374 secs

    [Reply]


  748.   748. Posted By: Debs
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:30 am 

    Glock by 0.530

    [Reply]


  749.   749. Posted By: Andy G
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:32 am 

    Glock by 0.689

    [Reply]


  750.   750. Posted By: Joel Morrison
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:33 am 

    Glock by 0.563

    I’m in Melbourne, I don’t wish to claim the prize.

    [Reply]


  751.   751. Posted By: gezmond
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:33 am 

    glock by 0.735

    [Reply]

    gezmond Reply:

    amend to 0.733 please

    [Reply]


  752.   752. Posted By: Steve Grant
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:34 am 

    Glock by 0.432 secs from DiGrassi.

    [Reply]


  753.   753. Posted By: F1 Novice
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:35 am 

    Glock by .372

    [Reply]


  754.   754. Posted By: Louise Brown-Grant
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:35 am 

    DiGrassi will not post a time in Qualifying.

    [Reply]


  755.   755. Posted By: Kris G.
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:37 am 

    Glock by 0.489 secs

    [Reply]


  756.   756. Posted By: Mark Greenwood
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:39 am 

    Glock by 1.546 seconds

    [Reply]

    Mark Greenwood Reply:

    okay, so I didn’t check that 1.546 hadn’t already been suggested!, so I’ll change mine to…

    Glock by 1.547 seconds

    Thanks for a great site James!

    [Reply]


  757.   757. Posted By: Liam
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:41 am 

    Glock by 0.327

    [Reply]


  758.   758. Posted By: CJ the 2cnd, probably...
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:42 am 

    Glock by 0.937

    [Reply]


  759.   759. Posted By: Seba
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:42 am 

    Glock by .407 sec

    [Reply]


  760.   760. Posted By: Dawn Harper
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:43 am 

    Glock by 0.359
    thanks
    fingers crossed

    [Reply]


  761.   761. Posted By: Ron
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:43 am 

    Glock by 0.406

    [Reply]


  762.   762. Posted By: Stuart
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:43 am 

    Glock by 0.391 secs

    [Reply]


  763.   763. Posted By: Rasuwan
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:45 am 

    Glock by .395 sec

    [Reply]


  764.   764. Posted By: Feb
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:46 am 

    Glock by 1.119

    [Reply]


  765.   765. Posted By: Zayan
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:47 am 

    Glock by 0.239 seconds

    [Reply]


  766.   766. Posted By: Magda potocka
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:48 am 

    Di grassi by 0.500

    [Reply]


  767.   767. Posted By: Nick Williams
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:49 am 

    They seem to be a bit closer at this track. I think Glock ahead of Di Grassi by 0.235 secs

    [Reply]


  768.   768. Posted By: F1 Novice
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:51 am 

    .372 has been used so

    Glock by .373

    [Reply]


  769.   769. Posted By: grant
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:52 am 

    Glock by 0.918

    [Reply]


  770.   770. Posted By: Scott Elkington
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:52 am 

    glock by 0.754

    [Reply]


  771.   771. Posted By: Matt
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:52 am 

    Due to my original time having been posted first by somebody else, I can’t win with that guess. Therefore, I will change my guess so that I stand a chance.

    Glock by 0.511s

    [Reply]


  772.   772. Posted By: Charlie B
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:54 am 

    Glock by 1.172

    [Reply]


  773.   773. Posted By: nicola elkington-horridge
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:55 am 

    glock by 0.222

    [Reply]


  774.   774. Posted By: paul
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:56 am 

    glock by 0.679 seconds

    [Reply]


  775.   775. Posted By: david horridge
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:57 am 

    glock by 0.354

    [Reply]


  776.   776. Posted By: Marcin
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:57 am 

    Glock by 0.578

    [Reply]

    Marcin Reply:

    have to change it to 0.579 as there was already a few with 0.578

    [Reply]


  777.   777. Posted By: Ashley
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:58 am 

    Glock by 0.201 secs

    [Reply]


  778.   778. Posted By: logboy
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:59 am 

    glock by 0.039 seconds

    [Reply]


  779.   779. Posted By: UrsusAltair
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 11:59 am 

    You could have given us plane tickets too :) j/k

    Only for fun: Glock by 0.448s

    [Reply]


  780.   780. Posted By: Stu
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:00 pm 

    Glock by 0.685secs

    [Reply]


  781.   781. Posted By: Julia Williams
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:03 pm 

    0.615

    [Reply]


  782.   782. Posted By: Julia Williams
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:04 pm 

    In Glock’s favour.

    [Reply]


  783.   783. Posted By: David
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:04 pm 

    Glock by 0.511 seconds

    [Reply]


  784.   784. Posted By: Murray Naish
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:05 pm 

    Glock by 0.721!

    [Reply]


  785.   785. Posted By: Neil van Kalles
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:06 pm 

    0.236 in Glock’s favour.

    [Reply]


  786.   786. Posted By: Christoforos Theodoratos
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:13 pm 

    Glock by 0.856 secs

    [Reply]


  787.   787. Posted By: R.B.
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:16 pm 

    Timo faster by 1.104 sec

    [Reply]


  788.   788. Posted By: Andrew
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:19 pm 

    I think Glock will fail to set a time James.

    [Reply]


  789.   789. Posted By: Iain M
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:24 pm 

    Glock by .333

    [Reply]


  790.   790. Posted By: Gamal Kaba
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:26 pm 

    Glock faster by 0.235

    [Reply]


  791.   791. Posted By: Doug Jefferson
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:30 pm 

    Glock by 0.348

    [Reply]


  792.   792. Posted By: Jason Jackson
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:33 pm 

    Glock by 0.324

    [Reply]


  793.   793. Posted By: Neil Kenward
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:41 pm 

    Di Grassi by 0.214 seconds

    [Reply]


  794.   794. Posted By: Hugh
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:45 pm 

    Glock by 1.123

    Thanks for the opportunity

    [Reply]


  795.   795. Posted By: Dils
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:52 pm 

    Glock by 0.610

    [Reply]


  796.   796. Posted By: Nikola '89
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:53 pm 

    Glock by 1.116

    [Reply]


  797.   797. Posted By: Stephen Farrall
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:54 pm 

    glock by 0.786

    [Reply]


  798.   798. Posted By: Steven Shafer
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:58 pm 

    Glock by 0.731

    [Reply]


  799.   799. Posted By: Shane
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 12:59 pm 

    Glock by 0.453 seconds

    [Reply]


  800.   800. Posted By: Mags
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:00 pm 

    Glock by .587

    [Reply]


  801.   801. Posted By: Pranav
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:00 pm 

    Glock by .221 seconds

    [Reply]


  802.   802. Posted By: Peter Jones
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:25 pm 

    Wow, well done to Di Grassi, and good luck to the 1% of people here who chose him to beat Glock :-)

    [Reply]


  803.   803. Posted By: Feb
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:27 pm 

    wow, digrassi did it! :)
    haven’t seen anyone commenting in favor of him but congrats if there is any :)

    [Reply]


  804.   804. Posted By: Baart
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:38 pm 

    Once again F1 shows how unpredictible it is ! Di Grassi in front of Glock. Amazing

    [Reply]


  805.   805. Posted By: Harvey Yates
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 1:47 pm 

    So did you know something, James?

    Cracking idea. Made Q1 interesting.

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    A hunch. Unbeaten runs are there to be broken.

    [Reply]

    Langer Reply:

    Looks like I was very Close.. but close enough? Here’s hoping.

    [Reply]

    Andy C Reply:

    James, who won the tickets? You had a chance to check yet

    not very often my wife outpredicts me, but I fell for timo to beat Lucas!

    [Reply]


  806.   806. Posted By: Dudley
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 2:11 pm 

    Well don’t all you guys who said Glock look silly :)

    [Reply]


  807.   807. Posted By: DC
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 2:16 pm 

    Well what a time for Di Grassi to out perform Glock!

    [Reply]


  808.   808. Posted By: Paul Miller
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 2:52 pm 

    Ahh I think I finished second….Gutted!

    [Reply]


  809.   809. Posted By: Baart
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 3:29 pm 

    Im very disapointed. Everytime i try to tip it fail.

    [Reply]


  810.   810. Posted By: Hamish
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 4:30 pm 

    My punt on di grassi by 0.001 seems less ridiculous now than it did last night. Amazing to see the two Williams in the top ten on identical times.

    21. di Grassi Virgin-Cosworth 1:42.086
    22. Glock Virgin-Cosworth 1:42.140

    If my maths is right official gap of 0.054.

    My gap 0.053 so I allowed myself a glimmer of hope of winning. Didn’t last long with at least one quickly better (I skimmed going back so don’t trust my results…

    727 # Suzi
    June 26th, 2010 @ 11:07 am

    DI Grassi by 0.030 seconds

    Suzi’s gap of 0.024 really close target set so even better luck to any person going closer.

    Here’s hoping for an entertaining race tomorrow and Silverstone. Enjoy your day out.

    [Reply]

    James Allen Reply:

    First check through suggests the closest was #429 Ibrahim Patel with 0.047, so he was only 7/1000ths of a second off. We had loads of entries within a few hundredths. And you though F1 was close.

    Will check and post soon

    [Reply]


  811.   811. Posted By: Jota
        Date: June 26th, 2010 @ 4:58 pm 

    — (for your eyes only :)

    Great fun this contest, James!
    Please, repeat it in the future!

    Do you want me to set up a web page so that people could log their guesses and then the winner be automatically computed??

    I will do it for free… but I will be very happy if you buy me a beer and give a invitation to a GP… ;)

    [Reply]


  812.   812. Posted By: Cyprus-Toon
        Date: June 29th, 2010 @ 1:18 pm 

    Oh & Alonso is such a saint when he’s driving, he’s as bad as Webber for complaing about other drivers but when it’s their fault, they’ve never done anything wrong!!! Funny but if it had been the other way around, Ferrari would have gotten away with no drive-thru pentaly because they get away with alot more than other teams do & if you say they don’t, then you’re as blind as a bat!!

    [Reply]


  813.   813. Posted By: Aileen Bodiwala
        Date: August 5th, 2010 @ 12:13 pm 

    There should be no pressure from the fans in this competition for Michael to risk his life while driving. The media gave him enough coverage to unstable his mental activities. He is Human not a puppet. Do not raise him up and throw him down whenever you feel like. He is passionate and there, only for his fans. There are no speed limits on the road to Excellence.

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply





COUNTDOWN TO NEXT RACE
Strategy Report
Innovation and Technology brought to you by TATA Communications
Senna DVD
Download the Chequered Flag Podcast here
MTS
Darren Heath
Sport Right Now