<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Massa fastest again on Day 2 in Valencia</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/</link> <description>Formula 1 / F1</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: john NZ</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-49069</link> <dc:creator>john NZ</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:20:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-49069</guid> <description>yes all pitot-static instruments measure air pressure and display results calculated from pressure. Pitot tubes are all forward facing, placing one in the ground effect would be of limited use, as it still is only measuring relative air speed, you would need to know all your lift co-efficients to calculate a useful downforce value. If you are thinking a pitot tube pointed straight down, (i.e. a hole in the surface) then you are correct that would measure the ambient pressure under the car, so you would get a good indication of downforce, or at least a good indication of the pressure differential between top and bottom. (these are refered to as Static Holes).
J</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes all pitot-static instruments measure air pressure and display results calculated from pressure. Pitot tubes are all forward facing, placing one in the ground effect would be of limited use, as it still is only measuring relative air speed, you would need to know all your lift co-efficients to calculate a useful downforce value. If you are thinking a pitot tube pointed straight down, (i.e. a hole in the surface) then you are correct that would measure the ambient pressure under the car, so you would get a good indication of downforce, or at least a good indication of the pressure differential between top and bottom. (these are refered to as Static Holes).<br
/> J</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: F1ART</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48833</link> <dc:creator>F1ART</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:23:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48833</guid> <description>Who is commentating on fox?sorry can&#039;t stay around here too long go to &quot;Push on!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is commentating on fox?</p><p>sorry can&#8217;t stay around here too long go to &#8220;Push on!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Kirk</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48770</link> <dc:creator>Paul Kirk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:28:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48770</guid> <description>Good point re pitot tubes not measureing anything, John, I should have known that!!!! But re your &quot;air speed&quot; comment----what if I was checking to see if I had a possitive or negitive or how much negitive pressure under my racing car to check the amount of ground efect my air dam and skirts were creating? (Pitot tube through the floor). The measureing device would be recording presures as oposed to air speed, wouldn&#039;t they?
PK.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point re pitot tubes not measureing anything, John, I should have known that!!!! But re your &#8220;air speed&#8221; comment&#8212;-what if I was checking to see if I had a possitive or negitive or how much negitive pressure under my racing car to check the amount of ground efect my air dam and skirts were creating? (Pitot tube through the floor). The measureing device would be recording presures as oposed to air speed, wouldn&#8217;t they?<br
/> PK.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spark</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48667</link> <dc:creator>Spark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:22:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48667</guid> <description>Martin, actually you added some valuable information to my original thoughts. I only thought about the influence it had on the laptimes given the extra fuel and stress on the tires, but it can definitely influence the race strategie.If you are stuck behind another car up untill now it wouldn&#039;t make sense to pit earlier as you would have to refuel as well so the laptimes would drop. Now you are immediately on the pace and could gain an advantage by pitting earlier.I think we could be in for a treat looking at various strategy possibilities.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, actually you added some valuable information to my original thoughts. I only thought about the influence it had on the laptimes given the extra fuel and stress on the tires, but it can definitely influence the race strategie.</p><p>If you are stuck behind another car up untill now it wouldn&#8217;t make sense to pit earlier as you would have to refuel as well so the laptimes would drop. Now you are immediately on the pace and could gain an advantage by pitting earlier.</p><p>I think we could be in for a treat looking at various strategy possibilities.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paige</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48633</link> <dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:59:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48633</guid> <description>According to some reports on the internet, Hamilton did one long run yesterday and turned consistently in the low 1:12s, which is apparently territory no one else matched on longer runs.Ross Brawn also singled out Ferrari and Lewis as the &quot;quick&quot; ones yesterday.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to some reports on the internet, Hamilton did one long run yesterday and turned consistently in the low 1:12s, which is apparently territory no one else matched on longer runs.</p><p>Ross Brawn also singled out Ferrari and Lewis as the &#8220;quick&#8221; ones yesterday.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paige</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48630</link> <dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:57:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48630</guid> <description>Oh, simmer down.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, simmer down.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nathan</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48626</link> <dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:54:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48626</guid> <description>I think Lewis has proved he can look after a set of tyres from his one stoppers he did last year.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Lewis has proved he can look after a set of tyres from his one stoppers he did last year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nathan</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48625</link> <dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:51:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48625</guid> <description>I dont think that mclaren car is a dog at all this year. looks very very promising based on the amount of laps they are running to get those times. (assuming higher fuel than ferrari) I cant wait to see a low fuel load glory run. then we&#039;ll see how stong the macca is!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think that mclaren car is a dog at all this year. looks very very promising based on the amount of laps they are running to get those times. (assuming higher fuel than ferrari) I cant wait to see a low fuel load glory run. then we&#8217;ll see how stong the macca is!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jamie Merrifield</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48596</link> <dc:creator>Jamie Merrifield</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48596</guid> <description>Maybe Kubica will be able to eat this year then!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Kubica will be able to eat this year then!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Mee</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/02/massa-fastest-again-on-day-2-in-valencia/comment-page-1/#comment-48581</link> <dc:creator>Richard Mee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:26:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=5073#comment-48581</guid> <description>I&#039;m no aero dynamist... but I can&#039;t help thinking that the various winglets on the front wing of the McLaren add up to a fairly substantial combined flat front area which must increase drag a lot - the equivalent of pushing a log around the track.  Can anyone offer any insight on whether simple is best?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no aero dynamist&#8230; but I can&#8217;t help thinking that the various winglets on the front wing of the McLaren add up to a fairly substantial combined flat front area which must increase drag a lot &#8211; the equivalent of pushing a log around the track.  Can anyone offer any insight on whether simple is best?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.jamesallenonf1.com @ 2012-02-12 21:44:55 by W3 Total Cache -->
