<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Webber powerplay heaps pressure on Brawn</title> <atom:link href="http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/</link> <description>Formula 1 / F1</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Babur Majid</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-13004</link> <dc:creator>Babur Majid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:22:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-13004</guid> <description>James, error in your post. Webber did not get a stop and go penalty, it was a drive thru.Love the blog! keep up the good work!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, error in your post. Webber did not get a stop and go penalty, it was a drive thru.</p><p>Love the blog! keep up the good work!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ray</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12974</link> <dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:22:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12974</guid> <description>It&#039;s not that they are favouring Jenson over him that Barichello was complaining about at first I think. I don&#039;t believe they were either. It was purely the *terrible* strategic errors the team made during the course of the race. Fuel rig or no fuel rig, short fueled to get out in front of Massa at the first stop, and Rubens would have had a podium at least.So his complaints were somewhat justified.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that they are favouring Jenson over him that Barichello was complaining about at first I think. I don&#8217;t believe they were either. It was purely the *terrible* strategic errors the team made during the course of the race. Fuel rig or no fuel rig, short fueled to get out in front of Massa at the first stop, and Rubens would have had a podium at least.</p><p>So his complaints were somewhat justified.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rudy Pyatt</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12962</link> <dc:creator>Rudy Pyatt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12962</guid> <description>James, do the F1 regs prevent teams from having a crew for each car, each with it&#039;s own chief (as we call it here; strategist or race engineer would be the European term I guess) and fuel rig?  That&#039;s always been the case in every form of U.S. racing, whether on road courses or ovals. For example, Roger Penske owns the team, but Tim Cindric calls the strategy for Helio Castroneves, while Roger does the same for Ryan Briscoe. They&#039;re free to race each other, and can choose their strategies individually. Seems to me this would eliminate the &quot;they&#039;re favoring him over me&quot; controversies.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, do the F1 regs prevent teams from having a crew for each car, each with it&#8217;s own chief (as we call it here; strategist or race engineer would be the European term I guess) and fuel rig?  That&#8217;s always been the case in every form of U.S. racing, whether on road courses or ovals. For example, Roger Penske owns the team, but Tim Cindric calls the strategy for Helio Castroneves, while Roger does the same for Ryan Briscoe. They&#8217;re free to race each other, and can choose their strategies individually. Seems to me this would eliminate the &#8220;they&#8217;re favoring him over me&#8221; controversies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: john g</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12959</link> <dc:creator>john g</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:15:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12959</guid> <description>yawn barichello complains again. instead of looking towards the team, he needs to look at himself. anyway, didn&#039;t button have the same three stop strategy?very impressed by webber, thought his race was over after the drive through but credit to him, he was untouchable! and great to see another winner. it looks like he was maybe a little delicate at the start of the season - and is now a full match for the highly rated vettel. this year finally has some interest back, especially with mclaren and ferrari finally starting to look strong. without the puncture, hamilton could easily have been in with some decent points.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yawn barichello complains again. instead of looking towards the team, he needs to look at himself. anyway, didn&#8217;t button have the same three stop strategy?</p><p>very impressed by webber, thought his race was over after the drive through but credit to him, he was untouchable! and great to see another winner. it looks like he was maybe a little delicate at the start of the season &#8211; and is now a full match for the highly rated vettel. this year finally has some interest back, especially with mclaren and ferrari finally starting to look strong. without the puncture, hamilton could easily have been in with some decent points.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rpaco</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12957</link> <dc:creator>rpaco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:41:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12957</guid> <description>Just because you are paranoid it doesn&#039;t mean that they are not out to get you! As Rubens will verify.A very good lesson in how to handle the press from Ross afterwards, that will no doubt go into many training courses.Of course it is quite possible that Rubens is being sidelined whenever there is an opportunity to get Jensen ahead, that happens to penalise Rubens.It is a team sport and that is very probably the best solution for the team. Sorry Rubino but that&#039;s life, you still get paid to be the fall guy!Team rules should be officially allowed then we can see proper strategy with number two drivers placed to hold up the opposition.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you are paranoid it doesn&#8217;t mean that they are not out to get you! As Rubens will verify.</p><p>A very good lesson in how to handle the press from Ross afterwards, that will no doubt go into many training courses.</p><p>Of course it is quite possible that Rubens is being sidelined whenever there is an opportunity to get Jensen ahead, that happens to penalise Rubens.</p><p>It is a team sport and that is very probably the best solution for the team. Sorry Rubino but that&#8217;s life, you still get paid to be the fall guy!</p><p>Team rules should be officially allowed then we can see proper strategy with number two drivers placed to hold up the opposition.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: adrian</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12950</link> <dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:24:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12950</guid> <description>(1) &quot;I can understand him being unhappy that the team switched the order of the final pit stops, giving Jenson the chance to pass him, but Jenson was faster at that stage of the race.&quot; - James, is it actually the case that the order of Jenson and Rubens&#039; last pitstops was switched? I don&#039;t think this was reported on the BBC?(2) @ conspiracy theorists: apart from the huge unlikelihood that the fuel hose blunder was choreographed with all the risks of severe disciplinary action that this would entail (i) if you were going to do this, surely you&#039;d make sure that it the act lasted long enough to allow Jenson to pass Rubens (it did not ); and (ii) Jenson would likely much rather Rubens take points off Vettel at this stage for the purposes of the championship race, given the growing superiority of the Red Bull car - I&#039;m sure Jenson is perfectly secure that he can show Rubens the way in equal machinery.(3) If Brawn were trying to favour Jenson over Rubens, why did they not get Rubens to move over sooner when Jenson was stuck behind him before the last set of pitstops, having been lapping much quicker.(4) As Brawn says, Rubens just did not have the pace. He was miles off Webber&#039;s pace and his fastest lap (11th) was 0.4secs off Button&#039;s. Rubens only lost say 4 secs with the refuelling gaffe, but was caught up by Jenson despite Jenson having to work his way through the field, while Rubens was in clear air for the whole of the first stint. He may have got in front of Webber at the start, but that&#039;s about all he did of any note in the whole race.(5) If Rubens had any decency, he&#039;d just get his head down. He&#039;s upset that in what is very likely to be his last year of F1 he&#039;s got a title-winning car but is being battered by the pace of his teammate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1) &#8220;I can understand him being unhappy that the team switched the order of the final pit stops, giving Jenson the chance to pass him, but Jenson was faster at that stage of the race.&#8221; &#8211; James, is it actually the case that the order of Jenson and Rubens&#8217; last pitstops was switched? I don&#8217;t think this was reported on the BBC?</p><p>(2) @ conspiracy theorists: apart from the huge unlikelihood that the fuel hose blunder was choreographed with all the risks of severe disciplinary action that this would entail (i) if you were going to do this, surely you&#8217;d make sure that it the act lasted long enough to allow Jenson to pass Rubens (it did not ); and (ii) Jenson would likely much rather Rubens take points off Vettel at this stage for the purposes of the championship race, given the growing superiority of the Red Bull car &#8211; I&#8217;m sure Jenson is perfectly secure that he can show Rubens the way in equal machinery.</p><p>(3) If Brawn were trying to favour Jenson over Rubens, why did they not get Rubens to move over sooner when Jenson was stuck behind him before the last set of pitstops, having been lapping much quicker.</p><p>(4) As Brawn says, Rubens just did not have the pace. He was miles off Webber&#8217;s pace and his fastest lap (11th) was 0.4secs off Button&#8217;s. Rubens only lost say 4 secs with the refuelling gaffe, but was caught up by Jenson despite Jenson having to work his way through the field, while Rubens was in clear air for the whole of the first stint. He may have got in front of Webber at the start, but that&#8217;s about all he did of any note in the whole race.</p><p>(5) If Rubens had any decency, he&#8217;d just get his head down. He&#8217;s upset that in what is very likely to be his last year of F1 he&#8217;s got a title-winning car but is being battered by the pace of his teammate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chris</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12949</link> <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:10:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12949</guid> <description>my crystal ball says for the next three races:Brawn shouldn&#039;t sweat too much as they should do very well in hungary with the predominant  medium/slow corners and hotter temperatures. The start stop nature of the valencia circuit should level the playing field and both brawn and red bull should watch there backs for the KERS cars and the improved Mclaren.Red bull will murder everyone in spa, but hopefully the weather will mix it up.oh yeah, i like the site update. much more elegant.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my crystal ball says for the next three races:</p><p>Brawn shouldn&#8217;t sweat too much as they should do very well in hungary with the predominant  medium/slow corners and hotter temperatures. The start stop nature of the valencia circuit should level the playing field and both brawn and red bull should watch there backs for the KERS cars and the improved Mclaren.</p><p>Red bull will murder everyone in spa, but hopefully the weather will mix it up.</p><p>oh yeah, i like the site update. much more elegant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charles Kane</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12947</link> <dc:creator>Charles Kane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:43:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12947</guid> <description>I&#039;m not paranoid - the fuel rig could and most likely was just bad luck but please explain it to me why the team put the harder tyres a second time for Rubens in his 3rd stop while Jenson got the softer tyre for his last 10 laps. I have always thought that the harder tyre is much slower in the first few laps out of the pits. So to me it looked very much the team did not want Rubens to have any chance to defend his position against Jenson.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not paranoid &#8211; the fuel rig could and most likely was just bad luck but please explain it to me why the team put the harder tyres a second time for Rubens in his 3rd stop while Jenson got the softer tyre for his last 10 laps. I have always thought that the harder tyre is much slower in the first few laps out of the pits. So to me it looked very much the team did not want Rubens to have any chance to defend his position against Jenson.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stevie P</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12945</link> <dc:creator>Stevie P</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:40:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12945</guid> <description>Anyone else feel that Rubens wanted to switch to a 2-stopper (especially after realising that Webber was taking a drive-through penalty) and that&#039;s why he was (very!!) disgruntled at the end of the race?Wouldn&#039;t have helped though... Brawn struggled on their tyres (whichever set they used).Have Brawns in-season developments actually made their situation worse re: tyre-degradation?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else feel that Rubens wanted to switch to a 2-stopper (especially after realising that Webber was taking a drive-through penalty) and that&#8217;s why he was (very!!) disgruntled at the end of the race?</p><p>Wouldn&#8217;t have helped though&#8230; Brawn struggled on their tyres (whichever set they used).</p><p>Have Brawns in-season developments actually made their situation worse re: tyre-degradation?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jasper</title><link>http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2009/07/webber-powerplay-heaps-pressure-on-brawn/comment-page-1/#comment-12944</link> <dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:32:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/?p=2889#comment-12944</guid> <description>Hi James, what did you make of Alonso&#039;s race pace, while everyone was talking about McLaren&#039;s breakthrough, it seemed that Renault outdid them. Firstly Alonso was on course to set the fastest time in Q1 on Saturday before getting blocked by Glock &amp; then in the race he was consistently pumping in fast lap times, even with fuel. Do you think this means Renault are back in business or was this just a result of their car working well with the tyres on this occasion?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James, what did you make of Alonso&#8217;s race pace, while everyone was talking about McLaren&#8217;s breakthrough, it seemed that Renault outdid them. Firstly Alonso was on course to set the fastest time in Q1 on Saturday before getting blocked by Glock &amp; then in the race he was consistently pumping in fast lap times, even with fuel. Do you think this means Renault are back in business or was this just a result of their car working well with the tyres on this occasion?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/20 queries in 0.039 seconds using memcached

Served from: s15319199.onlinehome-server.info @ 2010-03-12 05:06:10 -->