F1 World Champion 2014
Lewis Hamilton
Vettel flawless as Red Bull get 1-2
News
Vettel flawless as Red Bull get 1-2
Posted By:   |  19 Apr 2009   |  9:59 am GMT  |  0 comments

Renault boss Flavio Briatore said this weekend that the current pecking order undermines F1’s credibility.

But today was a great race with great performances at the front from Sebastien Vettel and Mark Webber, who scored a Red Bull one two. Jenson Button and team mate Rubens Barrichello were struggling to get the wet tyres to work as well as Red Bull and managed third and fourth places.

Meanwhile the grandee teams whom Briatore believes should be at the front, Ferrari, McLaren and Renault had another difficult day. Ferrari got no points again for the third race, Renault turned P2 on the grid into P9 at the finish. McLaren fared a little better with fifth and six places.

Briatore’s credibility point was related to the diffuser situation but not only do Red Bull not have a double diffuser, today the rain was a great leveller and still the grandees didn’t take advantage.

It was Vettel’s second win, again in the wet just as it was last year in Monza. “Every lap there was a lot of aqua planing,” said Vettel. “We knew we were on a short strategy and had to push to get away from the pack. I had the best conditions because I had no car in front of me for most of the race. I’m extremely happy, the second time in wet I’ve won. The car was fantastic. We were struggling with reliability yesterday but the team fixed it and we got a 1-2 for Red Bull.”

Vettel took blame for an incident during the second safety car period when Sebastien Buemi collided with him behind the safety car, he had backed off because he thought Trulli’s slow moving car in front was Barrichello and didn’t realise that Buemi was behind him.

Mark Webber observed that when the wet tyres lose their edges they don’t cut through the water as well and that was a factor for many drivers.

Jenson Button was philosophical about not being able to match the Red Bull cars. “Everyone was struggling with aqua planing,” he said. “The last corner was a lake. It was a struggle with tyres shuddering, I couldn’t get temperature into the tyres. I don’t know why obviously our car works in a different way. I couldn’t challenge Red Bull, they were immensely quick.”

Meanwhile Lewis Hamilton, who has excelled in the wet in the past started very confidently, making a lot of moves and passes. But he got into a vicious spiral as his wet tyres wore down because he was on a one stop strategy and asked a lot of them. Lewis had a series of spins. Team mate Heikki Kovalainen got ahead of him towards the end of the race.

Button extended his championship lead and now must be looking at Vettel as his main rival apart from his own team mate. The big names are a long way behind, with only Hamilton getting any kind of score on the board with a sixth of the season already gone.

Featured News
MORE FROM JA ON F1...
Share This:
Posted by:
Category:
Tags:
No Comments
  1. martin tf says:

    Excellent race. would be good to see a battle over the next few between the Brawns and the Red Bulls.

  2. NumberTwo says:

    the thing that i like about Vettel the most is that the guy has some balls.

    he pitted and then passed button. A move he didn’t had to do, but he is pure racer, he saw he can do it and did it. He did same stuff in brazil 2008 when he passed hamilton and pushed lewis to 6th place, Vettel just looks like another “no compromise” driver.

    It was a brilliant race, by both RB’s, Webber passing button on the outside was nice to watch, a great race indeed.

  3. danf1 says:

    It’s all made Flavio look a little stupid really hasn’t it? The arguement that somehow Ferrari, McLaren and Renault have a right to be at the front is quite ridiculous anyway. There has to be the odd shift in power from time to time. We may be witnessing one now, or it may be a temporary blip, but every ‘grandee’ team started somewhere and every ‘grandee’ eventually slides down the order (Williams were a grandee, weren’t they?).

    Perhaps it is all due to the huge changes we have seen over the last few years. Ferrari seem to be unravelling after the Todt years, McLaren may be missing Dennis and his leadership and Renault have never shown real consistent winning in the way the other Grandee teams have anyway. They seem to go through cycles.

  4. koord says:

    How’s that for you Hamilton fans? He was as spinning as much as Massa last year in Silverstone, but obviously we want to be very quiet about it and blame it on the car or tyres… wait, Kovalainen didn’t spun once and classified better. Oh noes! Got to find a new excuse I guess.

    Meanwhile Vettel has always shined in wet conditions, no matter if it’s a good or bad car (Fuji 2007, Monza 2008…). Great job from him.

    Seems to me that without a good car Hamilton is pretty much nothing. Anyway, it doesn’t matter as we’ve got new guys at the top and this could bee one of the greatest seasons ever!

  5. Don says:

    Great race – even it it was another wet race – maybe Bernie will consider holding a race in Ireland… it’s always raining here lol!

    Well done Red Bull Racing and I’m delighted with Vettel’s result 2nd win – the new rain master I dare say?

    Although as a Ferrari fan since the 1980′s I’m in mourning for the demise as the Ferrari team – 3 races with no points – it’s a nightmare!!!!

    Briatore is been a sore loser saying the current pecking order undermines F1’s credibility. He should put his energy into upgrading the Renault’s!!!

    The BBC coverage is getting better – only had to switch over to the Radio 5 commentary twice during the race!

  6. Broer Sammy says:

    Briatore, the race cannot be win by talking. Prove it if your team is world champion team. Red Bull wins the race 1-2 without double or triple diffusers. Brave Vettel !!!!! – the future world champion.

  7. loki says:

    Flavio will probably now demand that Red Bull’s TV money be distributed among the other teams, on the basis that they all need to spend money to develop pull-rod suspension……..

  8. Peter Freeman says:

    I must admit that I am really enjoying Force Italy at the moment, I wonder how long it will last?

  9. Aaron James says:

    I dont know about you James but i reckon heads will roll soon, quite a few drivers are chronically underperforming.

    1) Piquet. Patience would be very thin.
    2) Nakajima. I reckon its cause of Toyota he is there, and if thats the case is he safe?
    3) Bourdais. Once again being given a hiding by a novice.

    If it was me that had to replace those 3, id pick

    1) Davidson to Renault. Alonso and Davidson a great combi.
    2) Sato to Williams or Toro Rosso. Would certainly keep Rosberg/Buemi honest.

    Any suggestions who else anyone? And why?

  10. MS says:

    Briatore just comes across so bitter. These first three races have been outstanding, he’s just ruing his lost opportunity. It’s also a bit rich calling Button a kerbstone when he employs Piquet.

  11. Steve says:

    It was a great race and it was really good to see the RBR 1-2 result…this season is so much more interesting with these new guys fighting each other for the podium. They all see to have better off road rapport with each other and seem more accessible when interviewed when contrasted with last seasons winning teams.

    It’d be good to Webber win his first GP, so hopefully we’ll see that happen this season.

    Leggard continues to add zero value to the mix and merely annoys the viewer with his unfortunate horse racing style of commentary (I thought Red Rum was going to beat Vettel over the line at the chequered flag), meaningless anecdotes and somewhat careless talking over his colleagues while they’re making a point. Jake Humphreys rocks as does the interactive red button after the race with all the extra interviews and after race breakdown with DC, Brundle and Gascoigne.

  12. Tom Cawley says:

    Briatore is coming across as a bit of a fool at the moment. He may have Alonso there, but they persist with these weird glory-grabbing strategies that make the team look ridiculous. And how he can harp on about Jenson and Reubens like he does and yet employ Piquet in his second car is beyond me. Again Nelson looked out of his depth, to say the least. Why is he still there? There must be a very good reason…

    Vettel was untouchable today, wasn’t he?

  13. Martin P says:

    Hi James, I find one of your twitter comments quite interesting:

    “I think the top teams have seen enough of Vettel now to know he’s the guy they need. How long can RBR hold onto him?”

    I know who you mean, but is it not feasible that Red Bull IS one of the top teams now, especially with a budget cap on the horizon? Or do you genuinely believe the current competitiveness of Brawn & Red Bull is just a transitional phase in Formula 1?

  14. rpaco says:

    Yes Lewis explained quite amiably and philosophically about his tyres only lasting a few laps and not at all in the way that Mike Gasgoigne implied.

    Shame about Sutil.

  15. David S says:

    James,
    Any news on the ‘fix’ for the Red Bulls driveshaft issues?
    There was talk yesterday of borrowing parts from Toro Rosso and potential legality issues.

    Has this been cleared up?

  16. Robert McKay says:

    Don’t know if Briatore’s grapes can get any sourer.

    Having teams like Red Bull, Brawn, Toyota etc. doing so well is good for the freshness of the sport. Obviously everyone loves a Mclaren-Ferrari battle but do we want that year-in, year-out?

    Anyway, the pattern of the season is that teams that should and could be scoring heavily are having very patchy weekends. Red Bull have had one or two in the dry, Toyota have had one or two, Williams have had three weak scores, BMW aren’t going well.

    Button has scored consistently heavily but has had a half-point score in Sepang to consider.

    So I think the “grandee” teams should thank their lucky start that some of the teams haven’t given them more of a mountain to climb in terms of points on the board – and it looks like Mclaren, at least, are beginning, steadily, to respond.

    I don’t think the championship has really shaken itself out and settled down yet into a clear battle between any two teams, and with the diffusers and KERS devices both still a bit raw very there’s a long way to go this year.

  17. F1 fan says:

    Will there ever be a simple straight race this season?

    Every race has had a safety car and/or wet condtitions. I would like to have seen a dry race, to see relative race pace. Lewis was lucky, with so many spins and off’s he was lucky not to go in the gravel. The newer circuits are better for drivers who make more mistakes, Fuji last year was a massive example of that. Vettel didn’t really make a mistake, when everyone else had at least one.

    James, whats is your opiinion on the Trulli/Kubica crash, what happened to Kubica?

  18. Tommy Karamin says:

    Lewis did not have the best of races…he’s a lot better than this performance in the wet! Ferrari are a mess right now! Vettel is a superstar in the wet but he has yet to really prove himself in dry conditions. Maybe Bahrain is his chance!

  19. Darren M says:

    Shame Sutil didn’t finish 6th today. Not only because it would have been Force India’s first points and a great day for the minnows, but it would have been hilarious to see Ferrari as the only the team without points! I know it’s wrong to take pleasure from other people’s misfortune, and I much prefer the post Schumi Ferrari, but I’ve always had a bit of a problem with them and it’s nice to see them struggling for a change.

    And as for Vettel- he’s arguably the best driver in F1 right now. I’ve rated him ever since he was running third for Toro Rosso when they were slow back at Fuji 2007 (when they were slow).

    I remember JA mentioned before the start of the season that the new regulations would sort of seperate the wheat from the chaff. That’s beginning to look like the case now. Piquet, Nakajima and Bourdais have looked out of place in F1 so far this season. I can see some of them being replaced before long.

  20. rpaco says:

    Lewis in the Red Bull would have beat Vettel !

  21. MS says:

    Vettel caught my eye ages ago and it was the race where he was in line for a podium then crashed under the safety car into his now team mate Webber. He’s such a good driver, he’s ballsy but doesn’t take unneccesary risks, but furthermore he’s such a nice guy. Not a glimmer of arrogance, he even seemed so apologetic to Buemi for the Swiss cliping the back of his car.

    Piquet I thought was unlucky last year, but now I’ve come to the conclusion he’s just useless. Get rid, and get rid quickly. Flavio has no right slagging off drivers or teams when he is wasting a car with him.

  22. Kris says:

    Disapointing race for Lewis today. Was good to see some life from Heiki, for once. Yes, Hamilton made some mistakes today, but take out what happened in the aftermath of Melbourne and that’s 4th (true position in Oz), 7th and 6th. Actually not a bad haul for what was – at least for the first two races – believed to be a stinker of a car. As a Mclaren fan, it shows how much of a shame it is that they messed up so badly in Australia as Lewis would actually still be within striking distance of the top which, when you consider the apparent disparity in performance of the cars, would be a marvellous achievement. I don’t think he can win the title but I think it would give his credibility as a driver a great boost to finish 4th or 5th in a season dominated by exceptional circumstances.

  23. knoxploration says:

    Briatore needs to stop whining and just get on with it, to be honest. In my mind he’s starting to paint himself as an exceptionally poor loser.

    Trying to have monies formerly promised to Brawn GP taken back, when all they’ve done is run a clearly legal car and beat teams that have missed the ball – that shows absolutely zero class whatsoever. If he keeps it up, I’ll be rooting for Renault to fail.

  24. tom johnson says:

    What are you on about, Koord?

    Don’t even begin to compare Hamilton’s spins with Massa’s at Silverstone. Hamilton finished well into the points for starters. More importantly Hamilton’s spins were caused by a fearless drive to make up places at all times.

    Hamilton doesn’t do cruise and collect, unlike Button he’s not a driver of fast cars, he’s a racing driver always looking for the gap. It’s what makes him so exciting and compelling to watch, without him boring processions here we come, he’s as fast as anyone out there he does more overtaking than anyone and he gets more abuse for so called personality flaws than anyone ever has but I detect a stiffening of resolve in his make up, why should he care what ‘fans’ who’ve never been within 20m of a garage think why should he worry about the daily tabloids obsessing about the PCDs he’s here to win championships not play poker with Fisi and co.

    Vettle is todays hero the rain master indeed let’s conveniently forget that he spun out in the rain of KL two weeks ago. Five GPs ago (China) Kubica was headed for the championship showdown remember, a bit of pressure and he’s not been the same since. Last year the genius Vettle crashed out in five of the first six races remember so before we start dismissing Hamilton’s achievements or, just as bad, damning them with faint praise let’s remember that no one has entered F1 with more pressure and greater demand from his team for success and he delivered on the money just two points from being a double world champ in his first two seasons.

    When I see Vettle face off that sustained pressure I’ll rank him alongside until then just congratulate Vettle for his superb drive/win don’t use it to bash the best that F1 currently has to offer.

  25. Attakorn S. says:

    Hey James,

    I loved your commentary for the ITV and am missing your voice! I still followed you here though..you provide lots of great insight so keep up the good work!

    I have a question regarding Alonso’s race….

    “Why would Renault pit Alonso so early in the beginning of the race? They said they thought the safety car would stay out for much longer, but if that is the case, how would he gain an advantage? He will still have to pit again later in the race right? Unless they think they can save fuel under the safety car and don’t have to refuel but isn’t that gambling abit too far for the 2nd place he had?

    Wouldn’t it be much better if he stayed out like Vettel and Webber and got a clear start and put the hammer down while the field is spreading and pit only when he needed? I reckon he would’ve been comfortably in the points!”

    Many thanks,
    Attakorn S.

  26. iceman says:

    Vettel was outstanding today, but he really needs to stop taking the blame for things that aren’t his fault. Right now I get the feeling he is too nice to win a championship!

  27. M__E says:

    Im not sure they were talking about Ross when they were saying he was one of the most ignorent men in F1….my god does Flav take the biscuit..in fact Im so horrified by that comment that your mind cannot comprehend it! – and I cant even think of the words to show my disgust at this “the current pecking order undermines F1’s credibility”
    THE IGNORANCE of it!!!!!!!!
    :mad:

  28. kenny says:

    I didn’t understand Renault’s strategy. It seems that if Alonso had been quickest off a standing start, he would not have been able to make much of a break because he would have had to pit for fuel so early. Were Renault just grandstanding?

    It was a real shame that Sutil went off- six points would have been like winning the championship for Force India.

  29. Darren M says:

    The difference is, when Hamilton has his messy race he still gets some useful points. Personally, I reckon Hamilton is racing well so far this season. He finished 4th in Australia (before the post race bother), 5th in Malaysia (which became 7th after the two lap countback rule, and had his points halved) and 6th today. With a bit of luck/ honesty, he could have gained 12 points already, which is more than most of the 2008 frontrunners have looked like getting.

  30. Boston F1 Fan says:

    “Lewis Hamilton, who has excelled in the wet in the past started very confidently, making a lot of moves and passes. But he got into a vicious spiral as his wet tyres wore down because he was on a one stop strategy and asked a lot of them.”

    Learn to read. Those wet tires, as they said in the race commentary, wear down very quickly in heavy rain. Hamilton used only two sets of tires during the race, not three.

    Lewis is also using new parts that Kovalainen isn’t using. He liked them in the dry; it’s possible that they don’t work as well during the wet.

    I should also note that last year in Silverstone they were driving the same car but Hamilton finished first and lapped most of the field while Kovalainen finished fifth.

  31. Phil says:

    Lewis may have spun a lot, but the 1 stop strategy really didn’t help with that.

    And let’s not forget, he passed Kimi 3 times – the spins were worth it for that piece of comedy gold alone!

  32. Peter says:

    He passed Kimi 3 times with KERS and new diffuser. Others passed Kimi, too…

  33. rpaco says:

    They said it was drive shaft seals, while the earlier commentary said it was gaiters. Anyway apparently it was a bad batch and using some from a different batch solved the problem.
    Thus batch traceability is very important.
    There are at least eight things that can go wrong with any injection moulding; (or about 15 if you are going to be really picky) I won’t bore you with them here, or the story of leaky roofs which may give away my identity. But it is good policy to have components from at least two batches in stock, in theory they are identical but in practice there can be variations in the performance of the material after moulding ie it not being flexible enough at the operating temperature range or humidity range. Then there are the effects of storage and transport, were they exposed to reduced air pressure or freezing in transit? Then there is ESC (envirnonmental stress cracking, which can frighten the living daylights out of any moulding designer) So after you have designed the perfect component there are many ways it can all go wrong. That’s why we have quality planning in the automotive industry, (APQP) it does not foresee everything but certainly helps avoid many possible calamities.

  34. James Allen says:

    They didn’t have much choice, he only had a few more laps of fuel left and he would have lost more by coming in after the race had started. Yes he was always going to stop at least one more time. The safety car stayed out long enough to hurt Alonso, but not to hurt Vettel and Webber who had more fuel.

  35. KNF says:

    A kerbstone (of the concrete kind, not JB) would literally be better than Nelsinho right now, is it a case of trying too hard (like Massa’s Sauber years?)

  36. M__E says:

    Agreed…Setanta anyone?.. :!:

  37. KNF says:

    LOL!!! I saw what you did there… :D

  38. Nik Black says:

    “Vettle is todays hero the rain master indeed let’s conveniently forget that he spun out in the rain of KL two weeks ago.”

    He was in inters and completely aquaplaned across the track (not on the wheels, the water was so deep he was sliding on the barge board).

    Vettels previous mistakes in the past in the wet and the few mistakes Lewis made yesterday are not real indications of their driving talent. Both of these guys are masters at getting the most out of a car in wet weather. Webber is also a great wet weather driver, despite his spin from 2nd on the grid in Silverstone last year. Never judge a driver from a single race or from an incident early in their careers – Lewis and Vettel have shown time and time again that they are the most skilled drivers on the grid (along with Alonso, who was absolutely fantastic for the second half of last year). The remainder of the drivers after these guys can collectively be referred to as ‘the rest’.

    Sans-penalties, Lewis would be in 4th place in the championship now – he is an extremely capable driver. The car would not even challenge in the midfield with a lesser driver. His consistency will allow him to finish the season in at least the top 4 with a car that is not in the top 10.

  39. Nik Black says:

    This is a point that Leggard seemed to miss during the commentary as well. The cars burn a lot less fuel under SC conditions. If Alonso had 9 laps of race fuel, then he would easily have had another 3-4 laps worth of fuel in the car when he did pit. Also, there was no parade lap, so thats worth another half lap of fuel. Pulling Alonso in seemed to be a strategic decision, to get his stop out of the way while it would cost the least amount of time as possible. The problem is that track position is worth so much more during a wet race – after 2 laps of racing Vettel was already 50 seconds ahead of the last placed Alonso!

    It was a tremendous blunder from Renault – a strategy more suited for a team that was running at the rear. Looking at the lap times, if Alonso completed 3-4 laps after the restart and then pitted, he would have come back out in 7-8th place. He could have then run a long second stint and been in an excellent position to claim good points as he would have remained out longer while the other cars made their first and second stops.

    On the other hand, Piquet somehow managed to not move from last place, even though he had a mildly capable car. Sutil showed what a capable driver is able to do in the wet with a not-so capable car. If Sutil was in the Renault and if Alonso wasn’t pulled in early, they could have easily walked away from China with 10+ points.

    Renault are in complete dissaray, as much as Ferrari are. They seriously need a better second driver and better race strategy. They are under-performing even though their car is a fair contender.

  40. Attakorn S. says:

    Thanks for your reply James. Sorry for asking again, I’m abit new to F1 :p

    I’m still not so sure why he would’ve lost more by coming in after the race had started? Surely, he would’ve got out in the middle of the pack instead of at the back of the pack right?

    Many thanks!

  41. Attakorn S. says:

    That’s exactly what I imagined! The only way that there could’ve been an advantage for a call like that is if Alonso was already at the back of the field right? Then, the advantage would be pitting without losing the 25 seconds or so needed to pit because he could’ve simply raced back and joined the end of the tail. But here, he was second! That’s what made me so confused….

    What made me even more confused is that Alonso and Renault said they thought the safety car was going to stay out much longer. I don’t really get how pitting Alonso would’ve gained him an advantage then! It should be the later you pit the better because you’d have more fuel for the restart and run longer.

    I think they had Singapore last year in their mind or something and forgotten to look at the monitors to see that he was already in 2nd place :D lol

LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top Tags
SEARCH News
JA ON F1 In association with...
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Multi award winning Formula One photographer
Multi award winning Formula One photographer