A return to winning ways?
Marina Bay 2014
Singapore Grand Prix
Where will the next F1 stars come from?
News
Where will the next F1 stars come from?
Posted By:   |  22 Jan 2009   |  3:16 pm GMT  |  0 comments

How can our sport identify and nurture the best driving talents and bring them to F1? What is the best way to evaluate a young driver?

One of the eye catching lines Bernie Ecclestone came out with recently in an interview with my Financial Times colleague Christian Sylt was a dismissal of the revived Formula 2 series as merely something Max Mosley came up with when he was going through “a problem with his private life “ last summer. It was “all done for the wrong reasons,” he said.

While it is true that F2 was announced in the midst of the Mosley/News of the World situation, on closer inspection it is a serious project and it could turn out to be a threat to GP2, which is why Bernie was scathing. I spent some time recently with the man charged with running the series for the FIA, ex F1 driver Jonathan Palmer, and got a look at what he and the FIA think is the model for the future of motor sport.

Bringing a driver up to F1 level is very expensive; it costs £600,000 for a season of Formula 3 and an eye watering £1.3 million for a season of GP2. Admittedly the GP2 is a good show; the racing is exciting, the series supports all the European Grands Prix and has a strong TV package because it is sold with F1 to rights holders. So it’s high profile and gives the drivers 24 races a season. There is a lot of value there.

But in this climate young drivers will find it much harder to raise £1.3 from family, friends and sponsors because everyone is hurting for cash at the moment.

Featured News
MORE FROM JA ON F1...
Share This:
Posted by:
Tags:
No Comments
  1. rpaco says:

    Surely F2 should be the feeder for A1, the same principles apply same cars only the driver are different.
    So in F2 are the cars allocated by ballot at each race? Are they really the same or are the teams allowed to change suspension components, brakes, injectors. intakes? (Yeah Ok, know I should go away and read the rulebook, I will, I will)

    Even when club single make racing started all the same, the guys with more money had new tyres, shocks, and disposables every race so at all levels of motor racing its always the money that wins.

    Its always been about money to get anywhere you need bucket loads and then later skiploads.

    A budget cap on F1 would be a great leveler but we have lost the original intent. It used to be FOCA not FOTA “Constructors” being the operative word and the intent to construct the winning vehicle. The driver was in some cases a necessary evil.

    But then we shall never see Schumi in a McClaren or Lewis in Massa’s Ferrari. What percentage of the winning package is the driver? Could Schumi have won the same races in a Minardi? No! what about a BMW? Still no! what about in the McClaren? Yes why?

  2. Joe Davies says:

    F2 sounds like a great concept but the thing that is to F2′s disadvantage in its appeal is that it is not supporting the Grands Prix and so the F1 teams are not going to be watching the drivers automatically as they do with GP2, obviously. You said F2 will be on eurosport, do you know where we can catch GP2 this year? Are we going to be hearing you commentating anywhere at all in 2009 such as on GP2 or F2? Would be great to hear you – will miss your commentaries as I’m sure will a lot of people. Where are you going to be within the F1 media this year? – Joe

  3. Chris says:

    I think F2 is a brilliant idea and I think if it eventually follows the GP circuit around it will definitely succeed. The only drawback I can see is that if you take the teams out of the way, then a driver will loose the experience of being involved in car development the political aspects of driving within a team i.e. rivalry with your team mate and how to handle and establish yourself within a team. All of which I think is a major part of F1 and should be taught at the earliest possible chance. Drivers without this may not fulfil their potential. If you look at past drivers Prost, Senna, Mansell, Schumacher they were all political animals and played the game to get where they where.

  4. Adam says:

    Are we overlooking something here. Am I right in thinking that a feeder series not only develop the drivers but also gives the experiance to engineers and allow them to progress to F1.

    If we move to a standardised format in all feeder series surely this could lower the innovation in F1.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Top Tags
SEARCH News
JA ON F1 In association with...
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Download the chequered flag podcast today
Multi award winning Formula One photographer
Multi award winning Formula One photographer